Skip to main content
Log in

Intranasal fentanyl versus placebo for pain in children during catheterization for voiding cystourethrography

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Pediatric Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Voiding cystourethrogram (VCUG) is a common procedure at pediatric tertiary care centres that can be painful as it involves a urinary catheter. Currently there are no widely utilized protocols for non-topical medications to decrease pain that children feel during catheterization.

Objective

To determine if intranasal (IN) fentanyl is effective at decreasing pain that children feel during catheterization of VCUG when compared with sterile water.

Materials and methods

We performed a double-blind randomized controlled trial, using IN fentanyl (2 μg/kg) compared to placebo (sterile water,) in children 4–8 years of age scheduled for elective VCUG in one urban pediatric tertiary center.

Results

Using the Face Pain Score-Revised, children receiving IN fentanyl scored 2.58 (1.93–3.25 95% CI) while those receiving sterile water scored 2.86 (2.20–3.51 95% CI) showing no statistically significant difference. There were no adverse events.

Conclusions

Although we were unable to show a statistically significant difference between our study and control groups, we believe that this may be due to technique (positioning, delivery device) and timing of administration of IN fentanyl as well as multi-factorial causes of distress during VCUG. Future studies investigating alternative delivery techniques of IN fentanyl for analgesia during VCUG may yield more promising results.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Shaw KN, Gorelick M, McGowan KL et al (1998) Prevalence of urinary tract infection in febrile young children in the emergency department. Pediatrics 102:e16

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Sargent MA (2000) What is the normal prevalence of vesicoureteral reflux? Pediatr Radiol 30:587–593

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. American Academy of Pediatrics (1999) Practice parameter: the diagnosis, treatment, and evaluation of the initial urinary tract infection in febrile infants and young children. Pediatrics 103:843–852

    Google Scholar 

  4. Merritt KA, Ornstein PA, Spicker B (1994) Children’s memory for a salient medical procedure: implications for testimony. Pediatrics 94:17–23

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Galinkin J, Fazi L, Cuy R et al (2000) Use of intranasal fentanyl in children undergoing myringotomy and tube placement during halothane and sevoflurane anesthesia. Anesthesiology 93:1378–1383

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Borland M, Jacobs I, Geelhoed G (2002) Intranasal fentanyl reduces acute pain in children in the emergency department: a safety and efficacy study. Emerg Med 14:275–280

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Manjushree R, Lahiri A, Ghosh BR et al (2002) Intranasal fentanyl provides adequate postoperative analgesia in pediatric patients. Can J Anaesth 49:190–193

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Streibel HW, Koenigs D, Kramer J (1992) Postoperative pain management by intranasal demand-adapted fentanyl titration. Anesthesiology 77:281–285

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Toussaint S, Maidl J, Schwagmeier R et al (2000) Patient-controlled intranasal analgesia: effective alternative to intravenous PCA for postoperative pain relief. Can J Anaesth 47:299–302

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kennedy RM, Luhmann JD (1999) The “ouchless emergency department”. Getting closer: advances in decreasing distress during painful procedures in the emergency department. Pediatr Clin North Am 46:1215–1247

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Golianu B, Krane EJ, Galloway KS et al (2000) Pediatric acute pain management. Pediatr Clin North Am 47:559–587

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Hicks C, von Baeyer C, Spafford P et al (2001) The Face Pain Scale—Revised: toward a common metric in pediatric pain measurement. Pain 93:173–183

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Zier JL, Drake GJ, McCormick PC et al (2007) Case-series of nurse-administered nitrous oxide for urinary catheterization in children. Anesth Analg 104:876–879

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Zier JL, Kvam KA, Kurachek SC et al (2007) Sedation with nitrous oxide compared with no sedation during catheterization for urologic imaging in children. Pediatr Radiol 37:678–684

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Bozkurt P, Kilic N, Kaya G et al (1996) The effects of intranasal midazolam on urodynamic studies in children. Br J Urol 78:282–286

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Elder JS, Longenecker R (1995) Premedication with oral midazolam for voiding cystourethrography in children: safety and efficacy. AJR 164:1229–1232

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Stokland E, Andréasson S, Jacobsson B et al (2003) Sedation with midazolam for voiding cystourethrography in children: a randomised double-blind study. Pediatr Radiol 33:247–249

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Akil I, Ozkol M, Ikizoglu OY et al (2005) Premedication during micturating cystourethrogram to achieve sedation and anxiolysis. Pediatr Nephrol 20:1106–1110

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Merguerian PA, Corbett ST, Cravero J (2006) Voiding ability using propofol sedation in children undergoing voiding cystourethrograms: a retrospective analysis. J Urol 176:299–302

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Kogan A, Katz J, Efrat R et al (2002) Premedication with midazolam in young children: a comparison of four routes of administration. Paediatr Anaesth 12:685–689

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Streibel HW, Pommerening J, Rieger A (1993) Intranasal fentanyl titration for postoperative pain management in an unselected population. Anaesthesia 48:753–757

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Berde C, Wolfe J (2003) Pain, anxiety, distress and suffering: interrelated, but not interchangeable. J Pediatr 142:361–363

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Stashinko E, Goldberger J (1998) Test or trauma? The voiding cystourethrogram experience of young children. Issues Compr Pediatr Nurs 21:85–96

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Beyer JE (1984) The oucher: a user’s manual and technical report. The Hospital Play Equipment Company, Evanston

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ran D. Goldman.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chung, S., Lim, R. & Goldman, R.D. Intranasal fentanyl versus placebo for pain in children during catheterization for voiding cystourethrography. Pediatr Radiol 40, 1236–1240 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-009-1521-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-009-1521-1

Keywords

Navigation