Skip to main content
Log in

Implementation of Methodology for Quality Improvement in Pediatric Cardiac Catheterization: A Multi-center Initiative by the Congenital Cardiac Catheterization Project on Outcomes—Quality Improvement (C3PO-QI)

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Pediatric Cardiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The Congenital Cardiac Catheterization Project on Outcomes (C3PO) launched in 2007 as a multi-center collaborative to establish standardized and comparable metrics for pediatric cardiac catheterization procedures. The limitations of larger registries at the time led to the development of the next phase in 2013, C3PO-Quality Improvement (C3PO-QI), focusing on instituting QI initiatives within the field. The objective of this manuscript is to provide a detailed overview of C3PO-QI and report data on case characteristics and outcome metrics being explored. C3PO-QI was designed to cultivate institutional collaboration during implementation of its initiatives. A database and website were developed to support data entry and on-demand reporting. The registry prospectively captures pediatric cardiac catheterization data among 15 hospitals. The present study includes case demographic data (n) and quality metric reporting by case type, age, and radiation dose variables. This dataset includes 13,135 cases entered into the database between 1/1/2014 and 12/31/2015. Interventional cases make up the highest percentage by case mix distribution (48 %), and patients <1 years make up the highest percentage by age distribution (26 %). The ratio of diagnostic and interventional procedures performed changes by age group. Application of QI metric shows all procedure types surpassing metric goals. Large volume data collection, such as in C3PO-QI, allows for meaningful interpretation of data. C3PO-QI is uniquely poised to deliver fast-paced changes in the field. Although the project initiatives are specific to pediatric cardiac catheterization, the implementation of the project and utilization of real-time reporting is generalizable to other specialties and multi-center collaboratives.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bentham JR, Thomson JD (2015) Current state of interventional cardiology in congenital heart disease. Arch Dis Child 100:787–792. doi:10.1136/archdischild-2014-30605

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Jayaram N, Beekman RH, Benson L, Holzer R, Jenkins K, Kennedy KF et al (2015) Adjusting for risk associated with pediatric and congenital cardiac catheterization: a report from the NCDR IMPACT registry. Circulation 132:1863–1870. doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.114.014694

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Chaudhry-waterman N, Coombsa S, Porras D, Holzer R et al (2014) Developing tools to measure quality in congenital catheterization and interventions: the congenital cardiac catheterization project on outcomes (C3PO). Methodist DeBakey Cardiovasc J 10:63–67

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Bergersen L, Gauvreau K, Marshall A, Kreutzer J, Beekman R, Hirsch R et al (2011) Procedure-type risk categories for pediatric and congenital cardiac catheterization. Circ Cardiovasc Interv 4:188–194. doi:10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.110.959262

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Bergersen L, Marshall A, Gauvreau K, Beekman R, Hirsch R, Foerster S et al (2010) Adverse event rates in congenital cardiac catheterization: a multi-center experience. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 75:389–400. doi:10.1002/ccd.22266

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Bergersen L, Gauvreau K, Foerster SR, Marshall AC, McElhinney DB, Beekman RH et al (2011) Catheterization for congenital heart disease adjustment for risk method (CHARM). JACC Cardiovasc Interv 4:1037–1046. doi:10.1016/j.jcin.2011.05.021

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Vincent RN, Moore J, Beekman RH, Benson L, Bergersen L, Holzer R et al (2016) Procedural characteristics and adverse events in diagnostic and interventional catheterisations in paediatric and adult CHD: initial report from the IMPACT Registry. Cardiol Young 26:70–78. doi:10.1017/S1047951114002637

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Nykanen DG, Forbes TJ, Du W, Divekar AA, Reeves JH, Hagler DJ et al (2016) CRISP: catheterization RISK score for pediatrics: a report from the congenital cardiac interventional study consortium (CCISC). Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 87:302–309. doi:10.1002/ccd.26300

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Ghelani SJ, Glatz AC, David S, Leahy R, Hirsch R, Armsby LB et al (2014) Radiation dose benchmarks during cardiac catheterization for congenital heart disease in the United States. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 7:1060–1069. doi:10.1016/j.jcin.2014.04.013

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Institute for Healthcare Improvement (2003) The breakthrough series: IHI’s collaborative model for achieving breakthrough improvement. IHI Innovation Series white paper. http://www.ihi.org/resources/pages/ihiwhitepapers/thebreakthroughseriesihiscollaborativemodelforachievingbreakthroughimprovement.aspx. Accessed 7 March 2016

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to recognize the study coordinators and personnel that have made this project possible: Martin Bocks, MD, Cynthia Cardwell, Joanne Chisolm, Ron Grifka, MD, Rashi Gupta, Andrea Kennedy, Diane Kickbush, Tom Lloyd, MD, Karen Minsterman, Cyndi Murphy, Sharon Thomaston, and Suzanne Welch.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lisa Bergersen.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cevallos, P.C., Rose, M.J., Armsby, L.B. et al. Implementation of Methodology for Quality Improvement in Pediatric Cardiac Catheterization: A Multi-center Initiative by the Congenital Cardiac Catheterization Project on Outcomes—Quality Improvement (C3PO-QI). Pediatr Cardiol 37, 1436–1445 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00246-016-1454-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00246-016-1454-z

Keywords

Navigation