Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Site of Coronary Sinus Drainage Does Not Significantly Affect Coronary Flow Reserve in Patients Long Term After Fontan Operation

  • Published:
Pediatric Cardiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study was designed to investigate the impact of postoperative coronary sinus drainage pressure on coronary flow reserve (CFR) assessed by Doppler guidewire in patients long term after Fontan operation. Twenty-nine patients (median age, 17.4 years female, 11) at a median of 10.6 years after Fontan operation were examined with intracoronary Doppler guidewire during cardiac catheterization. Fourteen patients had coronary sinus (CS) drainage to the systemic venous atrium and 15 patients had CS drainage to the pulmonary venous atrium after Fontan operation. Median CS drainage pressure was significantly higher in systemic venous CS drainage compared to pulmonary venous CS drainage (11 vs 5 mmHg, p < 0.0001). Median CFR values for the right and left coronary artery did not differ significantly with respect to CS drainage. There was a positive correlation between coronary flow reserve and pulmonary arteriolar resistance (p < 0.05) in multivariate regression analysis. The site of coronary drainage into the systemic atrium or the pulmonary venous atrium did not significantly affect CFR. Our data do not support a surgical strategy of elective redirection of coronary sinus blood to a low-pressure compartment but support an early staged approach. The positive correlation between CFR and pulmonary resistance demands further evaluation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Akagi T, Benson LN, Gilday DL, et al. (1993) Influence of ventricular morphology on diastolic filling performance in double-inlet ventricle after the Fontan procedure. J Am Coll Cardiol 22:1948–1952

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Antony I, Nitenberg A, Foult JM, Aptecar E (1993) Coronary vasodilator reserve in untreated and treated hypertensive patients with and without left ventricular hypertrophy. J Am Coll Cardiol 22:514–520

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Ardehali A, Ports TA (1990) Myocardial oxygen supply and demand. Chest 98:699–705

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Bellamy RF, Lowensohn HS, Ehrlich W, Baer RW (1980) Effect of coronary sinus occlusion on coronary pressure-flow relations. Am J Physiol 239:H57–H64

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Cheung YF, Penny DJ, Redington AN (2000) Serial assessment of left ventricular diastolic function after Fontan procedure. Heart 83:420–424

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. de Leval MR, Kilner P, Gewillig M, Bull C (1988) Total cavopulmonary connection: a logical alternative to atriopulmonary connection for complex Fontan operations. Experimental studies and early clinical experience. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 96:682–695

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Doucette JW, Corl PD, Payne HM, et al. (1992) Validation of a Doppler guide wire for intravascular measurement of coronary artery flow velocity. Circulation 85:1899–1911

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Eicken A, Fratz S, Gutfried C, et al. (2003) Hearts late after Fontan operation have normal mass, normal volume and reduced systolic function: a magnetic resonance imaging study. J Am Coll Cardiol 42:1061–1065

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Eicken A, Genz T, Kuhn A, Hauser M, Hess J (2004) Impaired left ventricular function after arterial switch operation: exclusion of significant coronary stenosis with an intravascular Doppler guidewire. Pediatr Cardiol 25:62–64

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Fontan F, Baudet E (1971) Surgical repair of tricuspid atresia. Thorax 26:240–248

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Fontan F, Kirklin JW, Fernandez G, et al. (1990) Outcome after a “perfect” Fontan operation. Circulation 81:1520–1536

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Gould KL, Lipscomb K, Hamilton GW (1974) Physiologic basis for assessing critical coronary stenosis. Instantaneous flow response and regional distribution during coronary hyperemia as measures of coronary flow reserve. Am J Cardiol 33:87–94

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Gregg DE (1938) The immediate effects of occlusion of the coronarveins on coronary blood flow in the coronary arteries. Am J Physiol 124:435–443

    Google Scholar 

  14. Hamaoka K, Onouchi Z, Kamiya Y, Sakata K (1998) Evaluation of coronary flow velocity dynamics and flow reserve in patients with Kawasaki disease by means of a Doppler guide wire. J Am Coll Cardiol 31:833–840

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Hauser M, Bengel FM, Kuhn A, et al. (2003) Myocardial perfusion and coronary flow Reserve Assessed by positron emission tomography in patients after Fontan-like operations. Pediatr Cardiol 28:28

    Google Scholar 

  16. Hess J (2001) Long-term problems after cavopulmonary anastomosis: diagnosis and management. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 49:98–100

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Hoffman JI (1984) Maximal coronary flow and the concept of coronary vascular reserve. Circulation 70:153–159

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Ilbawi MN, Idriss FS, Muster AJ, et al. (1986) Effects of elevated coronary sinus pressure on left ventricular function after the Fontan operation. An experimental and clinical correlation. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 92:231–237

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Kern MJ, Bach RG, Mechem CJ, et al. (1996) Variations in normal coronary vasodilatory reserve stratified by artery, gender, heart transplantation and coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 28:1154–1160

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Kirklin JK, Blackstone EH, Kirklin JW, Pacifico AD, Bargeron LM Jr, (1986) The Fontan operation. Ventricular hypertrophy, age, and date of operation as risk factors. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 92:1049–1064

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Klautz RJ, van Rijk-Zwikker GL, Steendijk P, et al. (1997) Acute elevation of coronary venous pressure does not affect left ventricular contractility in the normal and stressed swine heart: implications for the Fontan operation. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 114:560–567

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Kouatli AA, Garcia JA, Zellers TM, Weinstein EM? Mahony L (1997) Enalapril does not enhance exercise capacity in patients after Fontan procedure. Circulation 96:1507–1512

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Malcic I, Sauer U, Stern H, et al. (1992) The influence of pulmonary artery banding on outcome after the Fontan operation. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 104:743–747

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. McGinn AL, White CW, Wilson RF (1990) Interstudy variability of coronary flow reserve. Influence of heart rate, arterial pressure, and ventricular preload. Circulation 81:1319–1330

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Miura T, Hiramatsu T, Forbess JM, Mayer JE Jr. (1995) Effects of elevated coronary sinus pressure on coronary blood flow and left ventricular function. Implications after the Fontan operation. Circulation P2:II298–II303

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Mosher P RJJ, McFate PA, Shaw RF (1964) Control of coronary blood flow by an autoregulatory mechanism. Circ Res 14:250–259

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Oskarsson G, Pesonen E, Mimkhammar P, Sandstrom S, Jogi P (2002) Normal coronary flow reserve after arterial switch operation for transposition of the great arteries: an intracoronary Doppler guidewire study. Circulation 106:1696–1702

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Pantely GA, Bristow JD, Ladley HD, Anselone CG (1988) Effect of coronary sinus occlusion on coronary flow, resistance, and zero flow pressure during maximum vasodilatation in swine. Cardiovasc Res 22:79–86

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Rossen JD, Winniford MD (1993) Effect of increases in heart rate and arterial pressure on coronary flow reserve in humans. J Am Coll Cardiol 21:343–348

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Scharf SM, Bromberger-Barnea B, Permutt S (1971) Distribution of coronary venous flow. J Appl Physiol 30:657–662

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Strauer BE (1990) The significance of coronary reserve in clinical heart disease. J Am Coll Cordial 75:775–783

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Ward KE, Fisher DJ, Michael L (1988) Elevated coronary sinus pressure does not alter myocardial blood flow or left ventricular contractile function in mature sheep. Implications after the Fontan operation. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 15:511–515

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Wilson RF, White CW (1986) Intracoronary papaverine: an ideal coronary vasodilator for studies of the coronary circulation in conscious humans, Circulation 75:444–451

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

This work was supported by grant “Maximilian-Forschungspreis” from Herzkind e.V., Germany

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. Eicken.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Eicken, A., Sebening, W., Genz, T. et al. Site of Coronary Sinus Drainage Does Not Significantly Affect Coronary Flow Reserve in Patients Long Term After Fontan Operation. Pediatr Cardiol 27, 102–109 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00246-005-1036-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00246-005-1036-y

Keywords

Navigation