Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Mutagenicity, Genotoxicity, and Estrogenic Activity of River Porewaters

  • Published:
Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We investigated mutagenicity, genotoxicity, and estrogenic activity in the porewaters of two river basins in southern Italy that had different features. Three samples from each site were collected in different seasons from 7 sites for a total of 21 samples. Mutagenicity was measured with the Ames test with and without metabolic activation (S9) using Salmonella typhimurium TA98 and TA100 strains. Genotoxicity was measured with two tests: one involved a chromophore that detected DNA damage in Escherichia coli PQ37 (SOS chromotest), and the other measured micronuclei formation in the root cells of Vicia faba. Estrogenic activity was measured with a yeast-based estrogen receptor assay and an MCF-7 cell-based, estrogen-sensitive proliferation assay. We also applied chemical analyses to detect alkylphenols, pesticides, natural and synthetic hormones, and heavy metals. The porewaters of both river sediments showed mutagenic/genotoxic activity on V. faba test and Ames test, the latter both with and without S9 liver fraction. The SOS chromotest without metabolic activation was not sufficiently sensitive to detect genotoxicity of the porewaters, but the SOS DNA repair system in E. coli PQ37 was activated in the presence of S9 mix. Good correlations were found between mutagenicity/genotoxicity and the concentration of cadmium and between estrogenic activity and the presence of copper. This study assessed the chemical concentrations of some bioavailable pollutants in porewater and detected the overall effects of multiple pollutants that contributed to mutagenicity, genotoxicity, and estrogenic activity of these two basin porewaters, thus increasing our understanding of the environmental consequences of polluted aquatic ecosystems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bartoli G, Papa S, Sagnella E, Fioretto A (2012) Heavy metal content in sediments along the Calore River: relationships with physical–chemical characteristics. J Environ Manag 95:S9–S14

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Béraud E, Cotelle S, Leroy P, Férard JF (2007) Genotoxic effects and induction of phytochelatins in the presence of cadmium in Vicia faba roots. Mutat Res 633:112–116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brossa L, Marsè RM, Borrull F, Pucurull E (2005) Occurrence of twenty-six endocrine-disrupting compounds in environmental water samples from Catalonia, Spain. Environ Toxicol Chem 24:261–267

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Buchinger S, Heininger P, Schlüsener Reifferscheid G, Claus E (2013) Estrogenic effects along the river Saale. Environ Toxicol Chem 32(3):526–534

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cargouët M, Perdiz D, Mouatassim-Souali A, Tanisier-Karolak S, Levi Y (2004) Assessment of river contamination by estrogenic compounds in Paris area (France). Sci Total Environ 324:55–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chefetza B, Bilkis YI, Polubesova T (2004) Sorption–desorption behavior of triazine and phenylurea herbicides in Kishon river sediments. Water Res 38:4383–4394

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen G, White PA (2004) The mutagenic hazards of aquatic sediments: a review. Mutat Res 567:151–225

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • De Souza D, da Silva MRC, Machado SAS (2006) The employ of multiple voltammetric pulses for the study of the adsorption of bipyridilium pesticides in river sediment. Electroanalysis 18:2305–2313

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duong CN, Schlenk D, Chang NI, Kim SD (2009) The effect of particle size on the bioavailability of estrogenic chemicals from sediments. Chemosphere 76:395–401

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ehlers GAC, Loibner AP (2006) Linking organic pollutant (bio)availability with geosorbent properties and biomimetic methodology: a review of geosorbent characterisation and (bio)availability prediction. Environ Pollut 141:494–512

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Floehr T, Xiao H, Scholz-Starke B, Wu L, Hou J, Yin D et al (2013) Solution by dilution?—a review on the pollution status of the Yangtze River. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. doi:10.1007/s11356-013-1666-1

  • García-Reyero N, Grau E, Castillo M, Lopez De Alda MJ, Barceló D et al (2001) Monitoring of endocrine disruptors in surface waters by the yeast recombinant assay. Environ Toxicol Chem 20:1152–1158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Higley E, Grund S, Jones PD, Schulze T, Seiler TB, Lübcke-von Varel U et al (2012) Endocrine disrupting, mutagenic, and teratogenic effects of upper Danube River sediments using effect-directed analysis. Environ Toxicol Chem 31:1053–1062

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Isidori M, Lavorgna M, Nardelli A, Parrella A (2004) Integrated environmental assessment of Volturno River in South Italy. Sci Total Environ 327(1–3):123–134

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kwon JH, Lee HK, Kwon JW, Kim K, Park E, Kang MH et al (2008) Mutagenic activity of river water from a river near textile industrial complex in Korea. Environ Monit Assess 142:289–296

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lah B, Vidic T, Glasencnik E, Cepeljnik T, Gorjanc G, Marinsek-Logar R (2008) Genotoxicity evaluation of water soil leachates by Ames test, comet assay, and preliminary Tradescantia micronucleus assay. Environ Monit Assess 139:107–118

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lu X, Chen C, Zhang S, Hou Z, Yang J (2013) Concentration levels and ecological risks of persistent organic pollutants in the surface sediments of Tianjin Coastal Area. China Sci World J. doi:10.1155/2013/417435

    Google Scholar 

  • Ma TH, Xu Z, Xu C, McConnell H, Rabago EV, Arreola GA et al (1995) The improved Allium/Vicia root tip assay for clastogenicity of environmental pollutants. Mutat Res 334:185–195

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Manier N, Deram A, Le Curieux F, Marzin D (2009) Comparison between new wild plant Trifolium repents and Vicia faba on their sensitivity in detecting the genotoxic potential of heavy metal solutions and heavy metal-contaminated soils. Water Air Soil Pollut 202:343–352

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Maron DM, Ames BN (1983) Revised methods for the Salmonella mutagenicity test. Mutat Res 113:173–215

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Martin MB, Reiter R, Pham T, Avellanet YR, Camara J, Lahm M et al (2003) Estrogenic-like activity of metals in Mcf-7 breast cancer cells. Endocrinology 144(6):2425–2436

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Minissi S, Lombi E (1997) Heavy metal content and mutagenic activity, evaluated by Vicia faba micronucleus test, of Tiber river sediments. Mutat Res 393:17–21

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Monarca S, Feretti D, Zani C, Rizzoni M, Casarella S, Gustavino B (2005) Genotoxicity of drinking water disinfectants in plant bioassays. Environ Mol Mutagen 46:96–103

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Navarro A, Endo S, Gocht T, Barth JAC, La Corte S, Barceló D et al (2009) Sorption of alkylphenols on Ebro River sediments: comparing isotherms with field observations in river water and sediments. Environ Pollut 157:698–703

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Parrella A, Isidori M, Lavorgna M, Dell’aquila A (2003) Stato di qualità ambientale del fiume Volturno integrato da indagini di tossicità e genotossicità. Ann Ig 15:147–157

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Peck M, Gibson RW, Kortenkamp A, Hill EM (2004) Sediments are major sinks of steroidal estrogens in two United Kingdom rivers. Environ Toxicol Chem 23:945–952

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Peng SH, Wang WX, Li X, Yen YF (2004) Metal partitioning in river sediments measured by sequential extraction and biomimetic approaches. Chemosphere 57:839–851

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Petrovic M, Solè M, Lopez de Alda MJ, Barceló D (2002) Endocrine disruptors in sewage treatment plants, receiving river waters, and sediments: integration of chemical analysis and biological effects on feral carp. Environ Toxicol Chem 21(10):2146–2156

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Quillardet P, Hofnung M (1993) The SOS chromotest: a review. Mutat Res 297:235–279

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Routledge EJ, Sumpter JP (1996) Estrogenic activity of surfactants and some of their degradation products assessed using a recombinant yeast screen. Environ Toxicol Chem 15(3):241–248

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ruiz MJ, Marzin D (1997) Genotoxicity of six pesticides by Salmonella mutagenicity test and SOS chromotest. Mutat Res 390(3):245–255

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sanderson H, Price BB, Dyer SD, De Carvalho AJ, Robaugh D, Waite SW et al (2006) Occurrence and hazard screening of alkyl sulfates and alkyl ethoxysulfates in river sediments. Sci Total Environ 367:312–323

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schmitt C, Balaam J, Leonards P, Brix R, Streck G, Tuikka A et al (2010) Characterizing field sediments from three European river basins with special emphasis on endocrine effects—a recommendation for Potamopyrgus antipodarum as test organism. Chemosphere 80:13–19

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schuh MC, Casey FXM, Hakk H, DeSutter TM, Richards KG, Khan E et al (2011) Effects of field-manure applications on stratified 17β-estradiol concentrations. J Hazard Mater 192:748–752

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Smital T, Terzić S, Lončar J, Senta I, Žaja R, Popović M et al (2013) Prioritisation of organic contaminants in a river basin using chemical analyses and bioassays. Environ Sci Pollut Res 20:1384–1395

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Song YF, Gong P, Wilke BM, Zhang W, Song XY, Sun TH et al (2007) Genotoxicity assessment of soils from wastewater irrigation areas and bioremediation sites using the Vicia faba root tip micronucleus assay. J Environ Monit 9:182–186

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Soto AM, Sonnenschein C, Chung KL, Fernandez MF, Olea N, Serrano FO (1995) The E-screen assay as a tool to identify estrogens: an update on estrogenic environmental pollutants. Environ Health Perspect 103(Suppl 7):113–122

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sumpter JP (2005) Endocrine disrupters in the aquatic environment: an overview. Acta Hydrochim Hydrobiol 33:9–16

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas KV, Balaam J, Hurst M, Nedyalkova Z, Mekenyan O (2004) Potency and characterization of estrogen-receptor agonists in United Kingdom estuarine sediments. Environ Toxicol Chem 23:471–479

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Toan PV, Sebesvari Z, Bläsing M, Rosendahl I, Renaud FG (2013) Pesticide management and their residues in sediments and surface and drinking water in the Mekong Delta, Vietnam. Sci Total Environ 452–453:28–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Toxicity Data Analysis and Database Software (Toxcalc™), (version 5.0) (1996). Tidepool Scientific Software and Michael A Ives, Mckinleyville, CA, USA

  • United States Environmental Protection Agency (1996) Method 3510 C. Separatory funnel liquid-liquid extraction. Revision 3. USEPA, Washington, DC

  • United States Environmental Protection Agency (2007) Method 6020 A, Revision 1. Inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry. Revision 1. USEPA, Washington, DC

  • United States Environmental Protection Agency (2007) Method 8270 D, Revision 4. Semivolatile organic compounds by gas chromatography/mass spectrometry (GC/MS). USEPA, Washington, DC

  • Vargas VMF, Migliavacca SB, Melo AC, Horn RC, Guidobono RR, Sá Ferreira IC et al (2001) Genotoxicity assessment in aquatic environments under the influence of heavy metals and organic contaminants. Mutat Res 490:141–158

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Viganò L, Benfenati E, van Cauwenberge A, Eidem JK, Erratico C, Goksøyr A et al (2008) Estrogenicity profile and estrogenic compounds determined in river sediments by chemical analysis, ELISA and yeast assays. Chemosphere 73:1078–1089

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wetzel MA, Wahrendorf DS, von der Ohe PC (2013) Sediment pollution in the Elbe estuary and its potential toxicity at different trophic levels. Sci Total Environ 449:199–207

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • White PA (2002) The genotoxicity of priority polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in complex mixtures. Mutat Res 515:85–98

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Xiao XY, McCalley DV, McEvoy J (2001) Analysis of estrogens in river water and effluents using solid-phase extraction and gas chromatography-negative chemical ionization mass spectrometry of the pentafluorobenzoyl derivatives. J Chromatogr A 923:195–204

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yang Z, Liu M, Xu S, Hou L, Ou D, Liu H et al (2006) HCHs and DDTs in sediment-dwelling animals from the Yangtze Estuary, China. Chemosphere 62:381–389

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yu J, Dong HW, Shi LT, Jiang HL, Yu JW, Zhao QW et al (2013) Re-Examination of the genotoxic activity of water taken from the Songhua River in P. R. China. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 65(1):78–88

  • Zhao Z, Zhang L, Wu J, Fan C, Shang J (2010) Assessment of the potential mutagenicity of organochlorine pesticides (OCPs) in contaminated sediments from Taihu Lake, China. Mutat Res 696:62–68

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhong Y, Feng SL, Luo Y, Zhang ZM, Kong ZM (2001) Evaluating the genotoxicity of surface water of Yangzhong city using the Vicia Faba micronucleus test and the comet assay. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 67:217–224

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge the work of Veronica Piccioli and Giovanni Mastroianni in assisting with the chemical analyses.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Dipartimento di Scienze e Tecnologie Ambientali, Biologiche e Farmaceutiche, Seconda Università degli Studi di Napoli, Via Vivaldi, 43, 81100, Caserta, Italy

    Alfredo Parrella, Margherita Lavorgna, Emma Criscuolo & Marina Isidori

Authors
  1. Alfredo Parrella
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Margherita Lavorgna
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Emma Criscuolo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Marina Isidori
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marina Isidori.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Parrella, A., Lavorgna, M., Criscuolo, E. et al. Mutagenicity, Genotoxicity, and Estrogenic Activity of River Porewaters. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 65, 407–420 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00244-013-9928-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00244-013-9928-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation