Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Frequency and timing of emergency department visits and hospital admissions in stented patients following common stone procedures

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Urolithiasis Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Emergency department (ED) visits and hospital admissions (HA) following urologic procedures are a concern for payors, providers, and patients. We seek to quantify ED visits and HA after urologic stone procedures. This is a retrospective cohort study using claims data from the IBM MarketScan Commercial and Medicare Supplement database. Adults with a urologic stone diagnosis and no history of stone procedure in prior 12 months who underwent stone procedures with ureteral stent codes between 2012 and 2017 were included. All-cause vs genitourinary (GU)-related ED visits and HA were evaluated during 30, 60, 90, and 120-day periods following the index urologic stone procedure. 88,047 patients were included in the analytic cohort. For inpatients, rate of all-cause vs GU-related ED visits was 10% vs 9% at 30 days and 19% vs 15% at 120 days. For outpatients, rate of all-cause vs GU-related ED visits was 9% vs 8% at 30 days and 15% vs 12% at 120 days. A similar trend was found when examining HA. Younger patients (18–44 years old) had higher rates of all-cause ED visits following inpatient index stone procedure (13% vs 10% at 30 days, p ≤ 0.0001). Twenty percent of patients have an ED visit or HA up to 120 days after having a stone procedure with most returning with GU-related complaint. Younger patients had the greatest burden among the study cohort. Further studies need to determine causation of these unplanned visits to guide appropriate intervention.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Scales CD, Smith AC, Hanley JM, Saigal CS (2012) Prevalence of kidney stones in the United States. Eur Urol 62(1):160–165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2012.03.052

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Matlaga BR, Fwu C-W, Powers TE, et al. 2018. Urologic Diseases in America. 333.

  3. Pearle MS, Goldfarb DS, Assimos DG et al (2014) Medical management of kidney stones: AUA guideline. J Urol 192(2):316–324. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2014.05.006

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Tiselius H-G (2016) Metabolic risk-evaluation and prevention of recurrence in stone disease: does it make sense? Urolithiasis 44(1):91–100. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00240-015-0840-y

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Antonelli JA, Maalouf NM, Pearle MS, Lotan Y (2014) Use of the national health and nutrition examination survey to calculate the impact of obesity and diabetes on cost and prevalence of urolithiasis in 2030. Eur Urol 66(4):724–729. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2014.06.036

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Scales CD, Saigal CS, Hanley JM, Dick AW, Setodji CM, Litwin MS (2014) The impact of unplanned postprocedure visits in the management of patients with urinary stones. Surgery 155(5):769–775. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2013.12.013

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Hiller Spencer C, Daignault-Newton S, Pimentel H et al (2021) Ureteral stent placement following ureteroscopy increases emergency department visits in a statewide surgical collaborative. J Urol. https://doi.org/10.1097/JU.0000000000001653

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Johnston AW, Jiang R, Alkazemi MH et al (2019) Nationwide readmission rates following percutaneous nephrolithotomy: Does age matter? J Endourol 33(9):704–711. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2019.0239

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, MacKenzie CR (1987) A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis 40(5):373–383. https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9681(87)90171-8

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kwok CS, Martinez SC, Pancholy S et al (2018) Effect of comorbidity on unplanned readmissions after percutaneous coronary intervention (from the nationwide readmission database). Sci Rep 8(1):11156. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-29303-y

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. McFerrin C, Raza SJ, May A, Davaro F, Siddiqui S, Hamilton Z (2019) Charlson comorbidity score is associated with readmission to the index operative hospital after radical cystectomy and correlates with 90-day mortality risk. Int Urol Nephrol 51(10):1755–1762. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-019-02247-6

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Voskuijl T, Hageman M, Ring D (2014) Higher Charlson comorbidity index scores are associated with readmission after orthopaedic surgery. Clin Orthop 472(5):1638–1644. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-013-3394-8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Lin Y, Yang C, Chu H et al (2019) Association between the Charlson Comorbidity Index and the risk of 30-day unplanned readmission in patients receiving maintenance dialysis. BMC Nephrol 20(1):363. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12882-019-1538-0

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Leibovici D, Cooper A, Lindner A et al (2005) Ureteral stents: Morbidity and impact on quality of life. Isr Med Assoc J 7(8):491–494

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Al-Marhoon MS, Shareef O, Venkiteswaran KP (2012) Complications and outcomes of JJ stenting of the ureter in urological practice: A single-centre experience. Arab J Urol 10(4):372–377. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aju.2012.08.004

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Khanna A, Fedrigon D, Monga M, Gao T, Schold J, Abouassaly R (2020) Postoperative emergency department visits after urinary stone surgery: variation based on surgical modality. J Endourol 34(1):93–98. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2019.0399

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. McAbee KE, Pearlman AM, Deebel NA, Rasper AM, Terlecki RP (2020) Unplanned in-global clinic visits, emergency department encounters and hospital readmissions following urological prosthetic surgery: data for quality improvement. Urol Pract 7(2):132–137. https://doi.org/10.1097/UPJ.0000000000000079

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Peard L, Goodwin J, Hensley P, Dugan A, Bylund J, Harris AM (2019) Examining and understanding value: the impact of preoperative characteristics, intraoperative variables, and postoperative complications on cost of robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. J Endourol 33(7):541–548. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2019.0066

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Du K, Wang RS, Vetter J, Paradis AG, Figenshau RS, Venkatesh R, Desai AC (2018) Unplanned 30-day encounters after ureterorenoscopy for urolithiasis. J Endourol 32(12):1100–1107. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2018.0177

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. van Walraven C, Jennings A, Taljaard M et al (2011) Incidence of potentially avoidable urgent readmissions and their relation to all-cause urgent readmissions. CMAJ Can Med Assoc J J Assoc Medicale Can 183(14):E1067-1072. https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.110400

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. van Walraven C, Bennett C, Jennings A, Austin PC, Forster AJ (2011) Proportion of hospital readmissions deemed avoidable: a systematic review. CMAJ Can Med Assoc J J Assoc Medicale Can 183(7):E391-402. https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.101860

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Flannigan RK, Gotto GT, Donnelly B, Carlson KV (2014) Standardized follow-up program may reduce emergency room and urgent care visits for patients undergoing radical prostatectomy. Can Urol Assoc J 8(7–8):E505–E509. https://doi.org/10.5489/cuaj.1655

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Lindenauer PK, Lagu T, Rothberg MB et al (2013) Income inequality and 30 day outcomes after acute myocardial infarction, heart failure, and pneumonia: retrospective cohort study. BMJ 346:521

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Cole A, Telang J, for the Michigan Urological Surgery Improvement Collaborative et al (2020) Infection-related hospitalization following ureteroscopic stone treatment: results from a surgical collaborative. BMC Urol 20(1):176. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12894-020-00720-4

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rohail Rashid Kazi.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interests

Becton–Dickinson provided the MarketScan database that was analyzed and used in this study.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 38 KB)

Supplementary file2 (DOCX 12 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rashid Kazi, R., Jung, M., Kelly, T. et al. Frequency and timing of emergency department visits and hospital admissions in stented patients following common stone procedures. Urolithiasis 50, 381–387 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00240-022-01313-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00240-022-01313-6

Keywords

Navigation