Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Pisiform excision is an effective and safe treatment for ulnar-sided wrist pain related to the pisotriquetral joint

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
European Journal of Plastic Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Pisotriquetral disorders can cause chronic ulnar-sided wrist pain. When conservative treatment is insufficient, pisiform excision can be a solution. There are reports found in the literature describing variable effects of this procedure in small, descriptive case series.

Methods

This study included 175 patients who underwent pisiform excision performed in various specialized private hand clinics between 2011 and 2015. Patients were analyzed using standardized outcome measurements.

Results

Functionality was improved significantly 3 months postoperative, with a decrease in pain (n = 86) (P < 0.05), mean improvement of 13 degrees in wrist flexion/extension (n = 72) (P < 0.001), and 18% increase in strength (n = 75) (P < 0.001). Twelve months postoperatively, the wrist function (PRWHE-DLV) improved from a mean of 64 to 25 (n = 62) (P < 0.001).

Conclusions

The results support pisiform excision as an effective and safe treatment. Significant pain relief can be expected with improvement in wrist function. Unfortunately, a high amount of data was missing. The authors believe that the data presented in the study represents an underestimation of the results.

Level of evidence: Level III, therapeutic study.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Beckers A, Koebke J (1998) Mechanical strain at the pisotriquetral joint. Clin Anat. 11(5):320–326

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Carroll RE, Coyle MP (1985) Dysfunction of the pisotriquetral joint: treatment by excision of the pisiform. J Hand Surg Am. 10(5):703–707

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Kofman KE, Schuurman AH, Mulder MC et al (2016) The pisotriquetral joint: osteoarthritis and enthesopathy. J Hand Microsurg. 06(01):18–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Yamaguchi S, Viegas SF, Patterson RM (1998) Anatomic study of the pisotriquetral joint: ligament anatomy and cartilagenous change. J Hand Surg Am 23(4):600–606

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Belliappa PP, Burke FD (1992) Excision of the pisiform in piso-triquetral osteoarthritis. J Hand Surg British Eur Vol. 17(2):133–136

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Blum AG, Zabel J, Batch T, Barbara K, Zhu X, Dautel G (2006) Pathologic conditions of the hypothenar eminence: evaluation with multidetector CT and MR imaging. RadioGraphics 26:1021–1044. https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.264055114

  7. Moraux A, Lefebvre G, Pansini V, Aucourt J, Vandenbussche L, Demondion X, Cotten A (2014) Pisotriquetral joint disorders: an under-recognized cause of ulnar side wrist pain. Skeletal Radiol. 43(6):761–773

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Palmieri TJ (1982) Pisifform area pain treatment by pisiform excision. J Hand Surg Am. 7(5):477–480

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Geissler WB (2001) Carpal fractures in athletes. / Fractures carpiennes chez le sportif. Clin Sport Med. 20(1):167–188

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Van Eijzeren J, Karthaus RP (2014) The effect of pisiform excision on wrist function. J Hand Surg Am. 39(7):1258–1263

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Campion H, Goad A, Rayan G, Porembski M (2014) Pisiform excision for pisotriquetral instability and arthritis. J Hand Surg Am 39(7):1251–1257.e1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Lam KS, Woodbridge S, Burke FD (2003) Wrist function after excision of the pisiform. J Hand Surg Am. 28(1):69–72

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Lautenbach M, Eisenschenk A, Langner I, Arntz U, Millrose M (2013) Comparison of clinical results after pisiformectomy in patients with rheumatic versus posttraumatic osteoarthritis. Orthopedics. 36(10):e1239–e1243

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Trail IA, Linscheid RL (1992) Pisiformectomy in young patients. J Hand Surg Am. 17(3):346–348

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Coll AM, Ameen JRM, Mead D (2004) Postoperative pain assessment tools in day surgery: literature review. J Adv Nurs. 46(2):124–133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Hamilton GF, McDonald C, Chenier TC (1992) Measurement of grip strength: validity and reliability of the sphygmomanometer and jamar grip dynamometer. J Orthop Sport Phys Ther. 16(5):215–219

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Brink SM, Voskamp EG, Houpt P, Emmelot CH (2009) Psychometric properties of the Patient Rated Wrist/Hand Evaluation-Dutch Language Version (PRWH/E-DLV). J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 34(4):556–557

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. MacDermid JC, Tottenham V (2004) Responsiveness of the disability of the arm, shoulder, and hand (DASH) and patient-rated wrist/hand evaluation (PRWHE) in evaluating change after hand therapy. J Hand Ther. 17(1):18–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Akl EA, Carrasco-Labra A, Brignardello-Petersen R, Neumann I, Johnston BC, Sun X, Briel M, Busse JW, Ebrahim S, Granados CE, Iorio A, Irfan A, Martínez García L, Mustafa RA, Ramírez-Morera A, Selva A, Solà I, Sanabria AJ, Tikkinen KA, Vandvik PO, Vernooij RW, Zazueta OE, Zhou Q, Guyatt GH, Alonso-Coello P (2015) Reporting, handling and assessing the risk of bias associated with missing participant data in systematic reviews: a methodological survey. BMJ Open. 5(9):e009368

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Powney M, Williamson P, Kirkham J, Kolamunnage-Dona R (2014) A review of the handling of missing longitudinal outcome data in clinical trials. Trials. 15(1):237

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Hand-Wrist Study Group2, Hand-Wriststudygroup@gmail.com: R Feitz, A Fink, TM Moojen, H Slijper, HL de Boer, J Debeij, N de Haas, G Vermeulen, X Smit, S Souer, E Walbeehm

Statistical analysis: M Brusse-Keizer

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to M. V. van Burink or O. T. Zöphel.

Ethics declarations

Patient consent

Patients provided a written consent for the use of their data.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

The Medical Ethical Review Committee Twente (Post Office Box 50000, 7500 KA Enschede, The Netherlands; email: metc@mst.nl) approved this study (reference: K16-21) and the data collection was compliant with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

van Burink, M.V., Al Shaer, S., van Rossen, J. et al. Pisiform excision is an effective and safe treatment for ulnar-sided wrist pain related to the pisotriquetral joint. Eur J Plast Surg 43, 175–180 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00238-019-01587-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00238-019-01587-x

Keywords

Navigation