Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Finger proximal interphalangeal joint gap arthroplasty

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
European Journal of Plastic Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

The proximal interphalangeal (PIP) joint plays an important role in both grasp and pinch. In terms of mobility and stability, an intact PIP joint plays an important role in isolated finger function as well as the function of the entire hand. Currently, there are only a few surgical management protocols: arthrodesis, arthroplasty without joint replacement and arthroplasty with prosthetic replacement. This study aims to evaluate the gap arthroplasty technique as an alternative method for PIP joint reconstruction and to identify its advantages and disadvantages.

Methods

This interventional prospective study was conducted in a university hospital setting. We performed PIP joint gap arthroplasty using a dynamic traction device system after resection of the ankylotic area. The assessed outcome parameters were pain relief and range of motion (ROM) at 6 months, post-operatively.

Results

The results showed a complete pain relief, excellent passive ROM (in mean 65°) and a good active ROM (in mean 41°). This allows the patient to move the four ulnar fingers together without interruption from the injured finger. Overall patient satisfaction was very good.

Conclusions

Gap arthroplasty is an easy and effective technique for the PIP joint, and it does not require expensive materials as do artificial joint procedures. However, further studies are needed to conduct a long-term functional evaluation.

Level of Evidence: Level IV, therapeutic study.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Van Nuffel M, Degreef I, Willems S, et al. (2014) Proximal interphalangeal joint replacement: resurfacing pyrocarbon versus silicone arthroplasty. Acta Orthop Belg 80:190–195

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Takigawa S, Meletiou S, Cooney WP, et al. (2004) Resurfacing arthroplasty versus silicone arthroplasty for proximal interphalangeal joint osteoarthritis. J Hand Surg 29(5):785–795

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bickel KD (2007) The dorsal approach to silicone implant arthroplasty of the proximal interphalangeal joint. J Hand Surg 32(6):909–913

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Marco R (2014) Proximal interphalangeal joint arthroplasty: implants and surgical approaches. Curr Orthop Pract 25(5):415–419

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Luther C, Germann G, Sauerbier M (2010) Proximal interphalangeal joint replacement with surface replacement arthroplasty (SR–PIP): functional results and complications. Hand 5:233–240

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Squitieri L, Chung KC (2008) A systematic review of outcomes and complications of vascularized toe joint transfer, silicone arthroplasty, and pyroCarbon arthroplasty for post-traumatic joint reconstruction of the finger. Plast Reconstr Surg 121:1697–1707

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Chan K, Ayeni O, McKnight L, et al. (2013) Pyrocarbon versus silicone proximal interphalangeal joint arthroplasty: a systematic review. Plast Reconst Surg 131–1:114–124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Bales JG, Wall LB, Stern PJ (2014) Long-term results of Swanson silicone arthroplasty for proximal interphalangeal joint osteoarthritis. J Hand Surg 39(3):455–461

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Tarabadkar N, Iorio ML, Jerry I, Huang JI (2015) JBJS reviews, 2015 May; 3 (5): e1. http://dx.doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.RVW.N.00063

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to express their appreciation to Dr. Mohamed Elsayed Abdelhameed, the hand physiotherapist who helped us a lot in this work. The authors would also like to thank Dr. Mohammed H. El Fahar for his peer-to-peer review of this paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mohamed Elsaid Abdelshaheed.

Ethics declarations

Ethical standards

The study has been approved by the hospital’s Research Ethics Committee and has been performed in accordance with the ethical standards as laid down in the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Conflict of interest

Mohamed Elsaid Abdelshaheed, Ahmed Abdel-Galil Khalil, Reda Abdallah Younis, Ahmed Mohamed Bahaa El-Din Moustafa, and Samy Ahmed Mahmoud Shehabeldin declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Patient consent

Informed consent was obtained from all the patients before their inclusion in this study.

Funding

None.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Abdelshaheed, M.E., Khalil, A.AG., Younis, R.A. et al. Finger proximal interphalangeal joint gap arthroplasty. Eur J Plast Surg 40, 117–122 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00238-016-1243-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00238-016-1243-1

Keywords

Navigation