Abstract
To verify the conventional concept of “developmental stenosis of the cervical spinal canal”, we performed a morphological analysis of the relations of the cervical spinal canal, dural tube and spinal cord in normal individuals. The sagittal diameter, area and circularity of the three structures, and the dispersion of each parameter, were examined on axial sections of CT myelograms of 36 normal subjects. The spinal canal was narrowest at C4, followed by C5, while the spinal cord was largest at C4/5. The area and circularity of the cervical spinal cord were not significantly correlated with any parameter of the spinal canal nor with the sagittal diameter and area of the dural tube at any level examined, and the spinal cord showed less individual variation than the bony canal. Compression of the spinal cord might be expected whenever the sagittal diameter of the spinal canal is below the lower limit of normal, that is about 12 mm on plain radiographs. Thus, we concluded that the concept of “developmental stenosis of the cervical spinal canal” was reasonable and acceptable.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Landgren E (1937) The importance of the sagittal diameter of the spinal canal in the cervical region. Nervenarzt 10: 240–248
Wolf BS, Khilnani M, Malis L (1956) The sagittal diameter of the bony cervical spinal canal and its significance in cervical spondylosis. J Mt Sinai Hosp 23:283–292
Payne EE, Spillane JD (1957) The cervical spine: an anatomico-pathological study of 70 specimens (using a special technique) with particular reference to the problem of cervical spondylosis. Brain 80:571–596
Hinck VC, Sachdev NS (1966) Developmental stenosis of the cervical spinal canal. Brain 89:27–36
Di Chiro G, Schellinger D (1976) Computed tomography of spinal cord after lumbar intrathecal introduction of metrizamide (computer-assisted myelography). Radiology 120:101–104
Thijssen HOM, Keyser A, Horstink MWM, Meijer E (1979) Morphology of the cervical spinal cord on computed myelography. Neuroradiology 18:57–62
Yu YL, du Boulay GH, Stevens JM, Kendall BE (1985) Morphology and measurements of the cervical spinal cord in computer-assisted myelography. Neuroradiology 27:399–402
Yu YL, Stevens JM, Kendall B, du Boulay GH (1983) Cord shape and measurements in cervical spondylotic myelopathy and radiculopathy. AJNR 4:839–842
Fujiwara K, Yonenobu K, Ebara S, Yamashita K, Ono K (1989) The prognosis of surgery for cervical compression myelopathy: an analysis of the factors involved. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 71: 393–398
Ishida Y, Suzuki K, Ohmori K (1988) Dynamics of the spinal cord: an analysis of functional myelography by CT scan. Neuroradiology 30:538–544
Dvorak J, Froehlich D, Penning L, Baumgartner H, Panjabi M (1988) Functional radiographic diagnosis of the cervical spine: flexion/extension. Spine 13: 748–755
Adams CBT, Logue V (1971) Studies in cervical spondylotic myelopathy. I. Movement of the cervical roots, dura and cord, and their relations to the course of the extrathecal roots. Brain 94:557–568
Breig A, Turnbull I, Hassler O (1966) Effects of mechanical stresses on the spinal cord in cervical spondylosis: a study on fresh cadaver material. J Neurosurg 25:45–56
Suzuki M, Shimamura T (1994) Morphological study of the axial view of the cervical spinal cord by MR images (Japanese). J Jpn Orthop Assoc 68:1–13
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Inoue, H., Ohmori, K., Takatsu, T. et al. Morphological analysis of the cervical spinal canal, dural tube and spinal cord in normal individuals using CT myelography. Neuroradiology 38, 148–151 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00604802
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00604802