Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Brain surface motion imaging to predict adhesions between meningiomas and the brain surface

  • Diagnostic Neuroradiology
  • Published:
Neuroradiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

“Brain surface motion imaging” (BSMI) is the subtraction of pulse-gated, 3D, heavily T2-weighted image of two different phases of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) pulsation, which enables the assessment of the dynamics of brain surface pulsatile motion. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of this imaging method for providing presurgical information about adhesions between meningiomas and the brain surface.

Methods

Eighteen cases with surgically resected meningioma in whom BSMI was presurgically obtained were studied. BSMI consisted of two sets of pulse-gated, 3D, heavily T2-weighted, fast spin echo scans. Images of the systolic phase and the diastolic phase were obtained, and subtraction was performed with 3D motion correction. We analyzed the presence of band-like texture surrounding the tumor and judged the degree of motion discrepancy as “total,” “partial,” or “none.” The correlation between BSMI and surgical findings was evaluated. For cases with partial adhesions, agreements in the locations of the adhesions were also evaluated.

Results

On presurgical BSMI, no motion discrepancy was seen in eight cases, partial in six cases, and total in four cases. These presurgical predictions about adhesions and surgical findings agreed in 13 cases (72.2%). The locations of adhesions agreed in five of six cases with partial adhesions.

Conclusion

In the current study, BSMI could predict brain and meningioma adhesions correctly in 72.2% of cases, and adhesion location could also be predicted. This imaging method appears to provide presurgical information about brain/meningioma adhesions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Sindou MP, Alaywan M (1998) Most intracranial meningiomas are not cleavable tumors: anatomic-surgical evidence and angiographic predictibility. Neurosurgery 42:476–480

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Salpietro FM, Alafaci C, Lucerna S, Iacopino DG, Todaro C, Tomasello F (1994) Peritumoral edema in meningiomas: microsurgical observations of different brain tumor interfaces related to computed tomography. Neurosurgery 35:638–641, discussion 641–632

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Ildan F, Tuna M, Gocer AP et al (1999) Correlation of the relationships of brain–tumor interfaces, magnetic resonance imaging, and angiographic findings to predict cleavage of meningiomas. J Neurosurg 91:384–390

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Nakasu S, Nakasu Y, Matsumura K, Matsuda M, Handa J (1990) Interface between the meningioma and the brain on magnetic resonance imaging. Surg Neurol 33:105–116

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Spagnoli MV, Goldberg HI, Grossman RI et al (1986) Intracranial meningiomas: high-field MR imaging. Radiology 161:369–375

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Takeguchi T, Miki H, Shimizu T et al (2003) Prediction of tumor–brain adhesion in intracranial meningiomas by MR imaging and DSA. Magn Reson Med Sci 2:171–179

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Takeguchi T, Miki H, Shimizu T et al (2003) Evaluation of the tumor–brain interface of intracranial meningiomas on MR imaging including FLAIR images. Magn Reson Med Sci 2:165–169

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Suzuki Y, Sugimoto T, Shibuya M, Sugita K, Patel SJ (1994) Meningiomas: correlation between MRI characteristics and operative findings including consistency. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 129:39–46

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Alvernia JE, Sindou MP (2004) Preoperative neuroimaging findings as a predictor of the surgical plane of cleavage: prospective study of 100 consecutive cases of intracranial meningioma. J Neurosurg 100:422–430

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kalkanis SN, Carroll RS, Zhang J, Zamani AA, Black PM (1996) Correlation of vascular endothelial growth factor messenger RNA expression with peritumoral vasogenic cerebral edema in meningiomas. J Neurosurg 85:1095–1101

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Inamura T, Nishio S, Takeshita I, Fujiwara S, Fukui M (1992) Peritumoral brain edema in meningiomas—influence of vascular supply on its development. Neurosurgery 31:179–185

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Tamiya T, Ono Y, Matsumoto K, Ohmoto T (2001) Peritumoral brain edema in intracranial meningiomas: effects of radiological and histological factors. Neurosurgery 49:1046–1051, discussion 1051–1042

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Salpietro FM, Alafaci C, Tomasello F (2000) Meningioma cleavage. J Neurosurg 93:159–160

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Miyazaki M, Ichinose N, Sugiura S, Kassai Y, Kanazawa H, Machida Y (1998) A novel MR angiography technique: SPEED acquisition using half-Fourier RARE. J Magn Reson Imaging 8:505–507

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest statement

We declare that we have no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Toshiaki Taoka.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Taoka, T., Yamada, S., Yamatani, Y. et al. Brain surface motion imaging to predict adhesions between meningiomas and the brain surface. Neuroradiology 52, 1003–1010 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00234-010-0671-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00234-010-0671-z

Keywords

Navigation