Skip to main content
Log in

Experimental studies on heat transfer and friction factor characteristics of CuO/water nanofluid under laminar flow in a helically dimpled tube

  • Original
  • Published:
Heat and Mass Transfer Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

An experimental investigation on the convective heat transfer and friction factor characteristics in the plain and dimpled tube under laminar flow with constant heat flux is carried out with distilled water and CuO/water nanofluids. For this, CuO nanoparticles with an average size of 15.3 nm were synthesized by sol–gel method. The nanoparticles are then dispersed in distilled water to form stable suspension of CuO/water nanofluid containing 0.1, 0.2 and 0.3% volume concentration of nanoparticles. It is found that the experimental Nusselt numbers for 0.1, 0.2 and 0.3% volume concentration of CuO nanoparticles are about 6, 9.9 and 12.6%, respectively higher than those obtained with distilled water in plain tube. However, the experimental Nusselt numbers for 0.1, 0.2 and 0.3% volume concentration of CuO nanoparticles are about 3.4, 6.8 and 12%, respectively higher than those obtained with distilled water in dimpled tube. The friction factor of CuO/water nanofluid is also increased due to the inclusion of nanoparticles and found to increase with nanoparticle volume concentration. The experimental results show that there exists a difference in the enhancement levels of Nusselt numbers obtained with nanofluids in plain tube and dimpled tube. Hence it is proposed that the mechanism of heat transfer enhancement obtained with nanofluids is due to particle migration from the core of fluid flow to tube wall.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

A :

Cross sectional area of test section, m

c p :

Specific heat, J/kgK

d :

Tube diameter, m

f :

Friction factor

h :

Heat transfer coefficient, W/m2 K

I :

Current, A

k :

Thermal conductivity, W/m K

L :

Length of the test section, m

\( \dot{m} \) :

Mass flow rate, kg/s

Nu :

Nusselt number

P :

Perimeter, m

p:

Pitch, mm

Δp :

Pressure drop, Pa

Pr :

Prandtl number

q ′′ :

Actual heat flux, W/m2

Q t :

Total heat, W

Q loss :

Heat loss, W

Re :

Reynolds number

T f :

Fluid temperature, K

T w :

Wall temperature, K

v :

Velocity, m/s

V :

Voltage, V

x:

Axial distance, m

\( \phi \) :

Volume concentration

ρ :

Density, kg/m3

μ :

Viscosity, kg/ms

in :

inlet

nf :

nanofluid

out :

outlet

s :

solid phase

References

  1. Ahuja AS (1975) Augmentation of heat transport in laminar flow of polystyrene suspension: experiments and results. J Appl Phys 46:3408–3416

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Choi SUS (1995) Developments and applications of non-Newtonian flows. ASME FED 66:99–105

    Google Scholar 

  3. Wen D, Lin G, Vafaei S, Zhang K (2009) Review of nanofluids for heat transfer applications. Particuology 7(2):141–150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Kakac S, Pramuanjaroenkij A (2009) Review of convective heat transfer enhancement with nanofluids. Int J Heat Mass Transfer 52:3187–3196

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Godson L, Raja B, Mohan Lal D, Wongwise S (2010) Enhancement of heat transfer using nanofluids-An overview. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 14:629–641

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Pak BC, Cho Y (1998) Hydrodynamic and heat transfer study of dispersed fluids with submicron metallic oxide particle. Exp Heat Transfer 11:151–170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Xuan Y, Li Q (2003) Investigation on convective heat transfer and flow features of nanofluids. J Heat Transfer 125:151–155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Wen D, Ding Y (2004) Experimental investigation into convective heat transfer of nanofluid at the entrance region under laminar flow conditions. Int J Heat Mass Transfer 47:5181–5188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Ding Y, Alias H, Wen D, Williams RA (2006) Heat transfer of aqueous suspensions of carbon nanotubes (CNT nanofluids). Int J Heat Mass Transfer 49:240–250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Yang Y, Zhang ZG, Grulke EA, Anderson WB, Wu G (2005) Heat transfer properties of nanoparticle-in-fluid dispersions (nanofluids) in laminar flow. Int J Heat Mass Transfer 48:1107–1116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. He Y, Jin Y, Chen H, Ding Y, Cang D, Lu H (2007) Heat transfer and flow behavior of aqueous suspensions of TiO2 nanoparticles (nanofluids) flowing upward through a vertical pipe. Int J Heat Mass Transfer 50:2272–2281

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Chen HS, Yang W, He YR, Ding YL, Zhang LL, Tan CQ (2008) Heat transfer and flow behaviour of aqueous suspensions of titanate nanotubes (nanofluids). Powder Technol 183:63–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Duangthongsuk W, Wongwises S (2008) Heat transfer enhancement and pressure drop characteristics of TiO2–water nanofluid in a double-tube counter flow heat exchanger. Int J Heat Mass Transfer 52:2059–2067

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Duangthongsuk W, Wongwises S (2008) Effect of thermophysical properties models on the predicting of the convective heat transfer coefficient for low concentration nanofluids. Int Commun Heat Mass Transfer 35:1320–1326

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Anoop KB, Sundararajan T, Das SK (2009) Effect of particle size on the convective heat transfer in nanofluid in the developing region. Int J Heat Mass Transfer 52:2189–2195

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Heris SZ, Esfahany MN, Etemad SG (2007) Experimental investigation of convective heat transfer of Al2O3/water nanofluid in circular tube. Int J Heat Mass Transfer 28:203–210

    Google Scholar 

  17. Hwang KS, Jang SP, Choi SUS (2009) Flow and convective heat transfer characteristics of water-based Al2O3 nanofluids in fully developed laminar flow regime. Int J Heat Mass Transfer 52:193–199

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Sharma KV, Syam Sundar L, Sarma PK (2009) Estimation of heat transfer coefficient and friction factor in the transition flow with low volume concentration of Al2O3 nanofluid flowing in a circular tube and with twisted tape insert. Int Commun Heat Mass Transfer 36:503–507

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Yu W, France DM, Smith DS, Singh D, Timofeeva EV, Routbort JL (2009) Heat transfer to a silicon carbide/water nanofluid. Int J Heat Mass Transfer 2:3606–3612

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Sommers AD, Yerkes KL (2010) Experimental investigation into the convective heat transfer and system-level effects of Al2O3-propanol nanofluids. J Nanopart Res 12:1003–1014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Fotukian SM, Nasr Esfahany M (2010) Experimental study of turbulent convective heat transfer and pressure drop of dilute CuO/water nanofluid inside a circular tube. Int Commun Heat Mass Transfer 37:214–219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Fotukian SM, Nasr Esfahany M (2010) Experimental investigation of turbulent convective heat transfer of dilute γ-Al2O3/water nanofluid inside a circular tube. Int J Heat Fluid Flow 31:606–612

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Williams W, Buongiorno J, Hu LW (2008) Experimental investigation of turbulent convective heat transfer and pressure loss of alumina/water and zirconia/water nanoparticle colloids (nanofluids) in horizontal tubes. J Heat Transfer 130:042412-1-7

    Google Scholar 

  24. Rea U, McKrell T, Hu LW, Buongiorno J (2009) Laminar convective heat transfer and viscous pressure loss of alumina–water and zirconia–water nanofluids. Int J Heat Mass Transfer 52:2042–2048

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Buongiorno J (2006) Convective transport in nanofluids. J Heat Transfer 128:240–250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Suresh S, Chandrasekar M, Chandra Sekhar S (2011) Experimental studies on heat transfer and friction factor characteristics of CuO/water nanofluid under turbulent flow in a helically dimpled tube. Exp Therm Fluid Sci 35:542–549

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Lee JH, Hwang KS, Jang SP, Lee BH, Kim JH, Choi SUS, Choi CJ (2008) Effective viscosities and thermal conductivities of aqueous nanofluids containing low volume concentrations of Al2O3 nanoparticles. Int J Heat Mass Transfer 51:2651–2656

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Vicente PG, Garcia A, Viedma A (2002) Heat transfer and pressure drop for low Reynolds turbulent flow in helically dimpled tubes. Int J Heat Mass Transfer 45:543–553

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Chen J, Steinhagen HM, Duffy GG (2001) Heat transfer enhancement in dimpled tubes. Appl Therm Eng 21:535–547

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Coleman HW, Steele WG (1989) Experimental and uncertainty analysis for engineers. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  31. Xuan Y, Roetzel W (2000) Conceptions for heat transfer correlation of nanofluids. Int J Heat Mass Transfer 43:3701–3707

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  32. Shah RK (1975) Thermal entry length solutions for the circular tube and parallel plates. In: Proceedings of 3rd national heat mass transfer conference, Indian Institute of Technology, Bombay, Paper no. HMT-11-75

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. Suresh.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Suresh, S., Chandrasekar, M. & Selvakumar, P. Experimental studies on heat transfer and friction factor characteristics of CuO/water nanofluid under laminar flow in a helically dimpled tube. Heat Mass Transfer 48, 683–694 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00231-011-0917-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00231-011-0917-2

Keywords

Navigation