Abstract
The competitive formation of the methylene and methylene ether bridges in the urea–formaldehyde reaction in alkaline solution was investigated by using 13C NMR and quantum chemistry calculations. Despite that the classical theory states that the condensations of methylolureas only form methylene ether bridges at alkaline pH, the competing formation of methylene bridges was observed in this study. The NMR spectra show that the methylene ether bridges are exclusively formed under conditions of 80 and 90 °C with F/U = 2/1. At 80 °C with F/U = 1/1, the linear methylene bridge (–NH–CH2–NH–) began to compete with ether bridges, but it was minor. At 90 °C with F/U = 1/1, the methylene bridges were found to be much more competitive. The theoretically calculated energy barriers for the formation of different types of methylene ether bridges are lower than those for methylene bridges by 12–26 kJ/mol. The steric hindrance was proposed to be another important effect that suppresses the condensations between di- and tri-methylolureas to form the branched methylene bridges [–(HOCH2)N–CH2–NH– or –(HOCH2)N–CH2–N(CH2OH)–]. However, the reaction between a free amino group –NH2 and a methylol group –CH2OH was proposed to encounter no steric hindrance. Hence, once the higher temperature and lower F/U ratio were guaranteed, the competitive formation of linear methylene bridges was observed.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Beachem MT (1963) Urea–formaldehyde condensation products. J Org Chem 28:1876
Christjanson P, Pehk T, Siimer K (2006a) Hydroxymethylation and polycondensation reactions in urea–formaldehyde resin synthesis. J Appl Polym Sci 100:1673–1680
Christjanson P, Pehk T, Siimer K (2006b) Structure formation in urea–formaldehyde resin synthesis. Proc Est Acad Sci Chem 55:212–225
Chuang I, Maciel GE (1994) NMR study of the stabilities of urea–formaldehyde resin components toward hydrolytic treatments. J Appl Polym Sci 52:1637–1651
Cossi M, Barone V, Mennucci B (1998) Ab initio study of ionic solutions by a polarizable continuum dielectric model. Chem Phys Lett 286:253–260
De Jong JI, De Jonge J (1952a) The reaction of urea with formaldehyde. J Recl Trav Chim 71:643–660
De Jong JI, De Jonge J (1952b) The formation and decomposition of dimethylolurea. J Recl Trav Chim 71:661–667
De Jong JI, De Jonge J (1952c) The reaction between urea and formaldehyde in concentrated solutions. J Recl Trav Chim 71:890–898
De Jong JI, De Jonge J (1952d) Kinetics of the reaction between mono-methylolurea and methylene diurea. J Recl Trav Chim 72:207–212
De Jong JI, De Jonge J (1953) Kinetics of the formation of methylene linkages in solutions of urea and formaldehyde. J Recl Trav Chim 72:139–156
Despres A, Pizzi A, Pasch H, Kandelbauer A (2007) Comparative 13C-NMR and matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight analyses of species variation and structure maintenance during melamine–urea–formaldehyde resin preparation. J Appl Polym Sci 106:1106–1128
Du G, Lei H, Pizzi A, Pasch H (2008) Synthesis–structure–performance relationship of cocondensed phenol–urea–formaldehyde resins by MALDI-ToF and 13C NMR. J Appl Polym Sci 110:1182–1194
Dunky M (1998) Urea–formaldehyde (UF) adhesive resin for wood. Int J Adhes Adhes 18:95–107
Dunky M (2004) Adhesives based on formaldehyde condensation resins. Macromol Symp 217:417–429
Frisch MJ (2003) Revision A. 01. Gaussian, Inc., Wallingford
Head-Gordon M, Pople JA, Frisch MJ (1988) MP2 energy evaluation by direct methods. Chem Phys Lett 153:503–506
Hehre WJ, Ditchfield R, Pople JA (1972) Self-consistent molecular orbital methods. 12. Further extensions of Gaussian-type basis sets for use in molecular-orbital studies of organic-molecules. J Chem Phys 56:2257
Jada S (1998) The structure of urea–formaldehyde resins. J Appl Polym Sci 35:1573–1592
Kadowaki H (1936) New compounds of urea–formaldehyde condensation products. Bull Chem Soc Jpn 11:248
Kibrik EJ, Steinhof O, Scherr G, Thiel WR, Hasse H (2012) 13C-NMR, 13C–13C gCOSY, and ESI-MS characterization of ether-bridged condensation products in N,N0-dimethylurea–formaldehyde systems. J Appl Polym Sci 128:3957
Kibrik EJ, Steinhof O, Scherr G, Thiel WR, Hasse H (2013) Proof of ether-bridged condensation products in UF resins by 2D NMR spectroscopy. J Polym Res 20:79
Kibrik EJ, Steinhof O, Scherr G, Thiel WR, Hasse H (2014) On-line NMR spectroscopic reaction kinetic study of urea–formaldehyde resin synthesis. Ind Eng Chem Res 53:12602–12613
Kim MG (1999) Examination of selected synthesis parameters for typical wood adhesive-type urea–formaldehyde resins by 13C NMR Spectroscopy. I. J Polym Sci Part A Polym Chem 37:1007
Kim MG (2000) Examination of selected synthesis parameters for typical wood adhesive-type urea–formaldehyde resins by 13C NMR spectroscopy. II. J Appl Polym Sci 75:1243–1254
Kim MG (2001) Examination of selected synthesis parameters for typical wood adhesive-type urea–formaldehyde resins by 13C NMR spectroscopy. III. J Appl Polym Sci 80:2800–2814
Miertus S, Tomasi J (1982) Approximate evaluations of the electrostatic free energy and internal energy changes in solution processes. J Chem Phys 65:239–245
Miertus S, Scrocco E, Tomasi J (1981) Electrostatic interaction of a solute with a continuum. A direct utilization of AB initio molecular potentials for the prevision of solvent effects. J Chem Phys 55:117–129
Minopoulou E, Dessipri E, Chryssikos GD, Gionis V, Paipetis A, Panayiotou C (2003) Use of NIR for structural characterization of urea–formaldehyde resins. Int J Adhes Adhes 23:473–484
Nair BR, Francis DJ (1983) Kinetics and mechanism of urea–formaldehyde reaction. Polymer 24:626–630
No BY, Kim MG (2004) Syntheses and properties of low-level melamine-modified urea–melamine–formaldehyde resins. J Appl Polym Sci 93:2559–2569
Park B, Kim YS, Singh AP, Lim KP (2003) Reactivity, chemical structure, and molecular mobility of urea–formaldehyde adhesives synthesized under different conditions using FTIR and solid-state 13C CP/MAS NMR spectroscopy. J Appl Polym Sci 88:2677–2687
Philbrook A, Blakea CJ, Dunlopb N, Easton CJ, Keniry MA, Simpson JS (2005) Demonstration of co-polymerization in melamine–urea–formaldehyde reactions using 15N NMR correlation spectroscopy. Polymer 46:2153–2156
Siimer K, Pehk T, Christjanson P (1999) Study of the structural changes in urea–formaldehyde condensates during synthesis. Macromol Symp 148:149–156
Soulard C, Kamoun C, Pizzi A (1999) Uron and uron–urea–formaldehyde resins. J Appl Polym Sci 72:277–289
Steinhof O, Kibrik EJ, Scherr G, Hasse H (2014) Quantitative and qualitative 1H, 13C, and 15N NMR spectroscopic investigation of the urea–formaldehyde resin synthesis. Magn Reson Chem 52:138
Tomita B, Hatono S (1978) Urea–formaldehyde resins. III. Constitutional characterization by 13C Fourier transform NMR spectroscopy. J Polym Sci 16:2509–2525
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by the programs of National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) (Nos. 31360159 and 51273163). We are thankful to Dr. Bo Li of Kunming Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Science for 13C NMR determinations.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Li, T., Guo, X., Liang, J. et al. Competitive formation of the methylene and methylene ether bridges in the urea–formaldehyde reaction in alkaline solution: a combined experimental and theoretical study. Wood Sci Technol 49, 475–493 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00226-015-0711-2
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00226-015-0711-2