Abstract
The advanced use of complex tools is considered a primary characteristic of human evolution and technological advancement. However, questions remain regarding whether humans possess unique underlying brain networks that support advanced tool-using abilities. Specifically, previous studies have demonstrated the presence of a structurally and functionally unique region in the left anterior supramarginal gyrus (aSMG), that is consistently active during tool use action observation. This region has been proposed as a primary hub for integrating semantic and technical information to form action plans with tools. However, it is still largely unknown how tool use motor learning affects left aSMG activation or connectivity with other brain regions. To address this, participants with little experience using chopsticks observed an experimenter using chopsticks to perform a novel task while undergoing two functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) scans. Between the scans, participants underwent four weeks of behavioral training where they learned to use chopsticks and achieve proficiency in the observed task. Results demonstrated a significant change in effective connectivity between the left aSMG and the left anterior intraparietal sulcus (aIPS), a region involved in object affordances and planning grasping actions. These findings suggest that during unfamiliar tool use, the left aSMG integrates semantic and technical information to communicate with regions involved with grasp selection, such as the aIPS. This communication then allows appropriate grasps to be planned based on the physical properties of the objects involved and their potential interactions.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
The datasets generated during and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
References
Aflalo T, Zhang CY, Rosario ER, Pouratian N, Orban GA, Andersen RA (2020) A shared neural substrate for action verbs and observed actions in human posterior parietal cortex. Sci Adv. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abb3984
Anguera JA, Reuter-Lorenz PA, Willingham DT, Seidler RD (2010) Contributions of spatial working memory to visuomotor learning. J Cogn Neurosci 22:1917–1930. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn.2009.21351
Ardesch DJ, Scholtens LH, Li L, Preuss TM, Rilling JK, van den Heuvel MP (2019) Evolutionary expansion of connectivity between multimodal association areas in the human brain compared with chimpanzees. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 116:7101–7106. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1818512116
Bellebaum C, Tettamanti M, Marchetta E, Della Rosa P, Rizzo G, Daum I, Cappa SF (2013) Neural representations of unfamiliar objects are modulated by sensorimotor experience. Cortex 49:1110–1125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2012.03.023
Binder JR, Desai RH (2011) The neurobiology of semantic memory. Trends Cogn Sci 15:527–536. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2011.10.001
Binkofski F, Buxbaum LJ (2013) Two action systems in the human brain. Brain Lang 127:222–229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2012.07.007
Boronat CB, Buxbaum LJ, Coslett HB, Tang K, Saffran EM, Kimberg DY, Detre JA (2005) Distinctions between manipulation and function knowledge of objects: evidence from functional magnetic resonance imaging. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res 23:361–373. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2004.11.001
Bosch TJ, Hanna T, Fercho KA, Baugh LA (2018) Behavioral performance and visual strategies during skill acquisition using a novel tool use motor learning task. Sci Rep 8:13755. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-32001-4
Boynton GM, Engel SA, Glover GH, Heeger DJ (1996) Linear systems analysis of functional magnetic resonance imaging in human V1. J Neurosci 16:4207–4221
Caruana F, Avanzini P, Mai R, Pelliccia V, LoRusso G, Rizzolatti G, Orban GA (2017) Decomposing tool-action observation: a stereo-EEG study. Cereb Cortex 27:4229–4243. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhx124
Caspers S, Geyer S, Schleicher A, Mohlberg H, Amunts K, Zilles K (2006) The human inferior parietal cortex: cytoarchitectonic parcellation and interindividual variability. Neuroimage 33:430–448. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.06.054
Caspers S, Eickhoff SB, Geyer S, Scheperjans F, Mohlberg H, Zilles K, Amunts K (2008) The human inferior parietal lobule in stereotaxic space. Brain Struct Funct 212:481–495. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00429-008-0195-z
Caspers S, Eickhoff SB, Rick T et al (2011) Probabilistic fibre tract analysis of cytoarchitectonically defined human inferior parietal lobule areas reveals similarities to macaques. Neuroimage 58:362–380. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.06.027
Cross ES, Cohen NR, Hamilton AF, Ramsey R, Wolford G, Grafton ST (2012) Physical experience leads to enhanced object perception in parietal cortex: insights from knot tying. Neuropsychologia 50:3207–3217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2012.09.028
Dale AM (1999) Optimal experimental design for event-related fMRI. Hum Brain Mapp 8:109–114
Datta A, Bansal V, Diaz J, Patel J, Reato D, Bikson M (2009) Gyri-precise head model of transcranial direct current stimulation: improved spatial focality using a ring electrode versus conventional rectangular pad. Brain Stimul 2:201–207, 207 e201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brs.2009.03.005
Economo C, Koskinas GN, Triarhou LC (2008) Atlas of cytoarchitectonics of the adult human cerebral cortex. Karger, Basil, New York
Eickhoff SB, Stephan KE, Mohlberg H, Grefkes C, Fink GR, Amunts K, Zilles K (2005) A new SPM toolbox for combining probabilistic cytoarchitectonic maps and functional imaging data. Neuroimage 25:1325–1335. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.12.034
Fagg AH, Arbib MA (1998) Modeling parietal-premotor interactions in primate control of grasping. Neural Netw 11:1277–1303. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0893-6080(98)00047-1
Ferrari PF, Rozzi S, Fogassi L (2005) Mirror neurons responding to observation of actions made with tools in monkey ventral premotor cortex. J Cogn Neurosci 17:212–226. https://doi.org/10.1162/0898929053124910
Forman SD, Cohen JD, Fitzgerald M, Eddy WF, Mintun MA, Noll DC (1995) Improved assessment of significant activation in functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI): use of a cluster-size threshold. Magn Reson Med 33:636–647. https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.1910330508
Garcea FE, Mahon BZ (2014) Parcellation of left parietal tool representations by functional connectivity. Neuropsychologia 60:131–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2014.05.018
Garcea FE, Greene C, Grafton ST, Buxbaum LJ (2020) Structural Disconnection of the Tool Use Network after Left Hemisphere Stroke Predicts Limb Apraxia Severity. Cereb Cortex Commun 1:tgaa035. https://doi.org/10.1093/texcom/tgaa035
Goldenberg G, Spatt J (2009) The neural basis of tool use. Brain 132:1645–1655. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awp080
Johnson-Frey SH (2004) The neural bases of complex tool use in humans. Trends Cogn Sci 8:71–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2003.12.002
Johnson-Frey SH, Newman-Norlund R, Grafton ST (2005) A distributed left hemisphere network active during planning of everyday tool use skills. Cereb Cortex 15:681–695. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhh169
Kellenbach ML, Brett M, Patterson K (2003) Actions speak louder than functions: the importance of manipulability and action in tool representation. J Cogn Neurosci 15:30–46. https://doi.org/10.1162/089892903321107800
Lacadie CM, Fulbright RK, Rajeevan N, Constable RT, Papademetris X (2008) More accurate Talairach coordinates for neuroimaging using non-linear registration. Neuroimage 42:717–725. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.04.240
Lancaster JL, Rainey LH, Summerlin JL et al (1997) Automated labeling of the human brain: a preliminary report on the development and evaluation of a forward-transform method. Hum Brain Mapp 5:238–242. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0193(1997)5:4%3c238::AID-HBM6%3e3.0.CO;2-4
Lanzilotto M, Ferroni CG, Livi A et al (2019) Anterior intraparietal area: a Hub in the observed manipulative action network. Cereb Cortex 29:1816–1833. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhz011
Mahon BZ, Milleville SC, Negri GA, Rumiati RI, Caramazza A, Martin A (2007) Action-related properties shape object representations in the ventral stream. Neuron 55:507–520. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2007.07.011
Mangalam M, Fragaszy DM, Wagman JB et al (2022) On the psychological origins of tool use. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 134:104521. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2022.104521
Mantini D, Corbetta M, Romani GL, Orban GA, Vanduffel W (2013) Evolutionarily novel functional networks in the human brain? J Neurosci 33:3259–3275. https://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.4392-12.2013
McDowell T, Holmes NP, Sunderland A, Schurmann M (2018) TMS over the supramarginal gyrus delays selection of appropriate grasp orientation during reaching and grasping tools for use. Cortex 103:117–129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2018.03.002
Murata A, Gallese V, Luppino G, Kaseda M, Sakata H (2000) Selectivity for the shape, size, and orientation of objects for grasping in neurons of monkey parietal area AIP. J Neurophysiol 83:2580–2601. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.2000.83.5.2580
Oldfield RC (1971) The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia 9:97–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/0028-3932(71)90067-4
Orban GA (2016) Functional definitions of parietal areas in human and non-human primates. Proc Biol Sci. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2016.0118
Orban GA, Caruana F (2014) The neural basis of human tool use. Front Psychol 5:310. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00310
Orban GA, Ferri S, Platonov A (2019) The role of putative human anterior intraparietal sulcus area in observed manipulative action discrimination. Brain Behav 9:e01226. https://doi.org/10.1002/brb3.1226
Orban GA, Lanzilotto M, Bonini L (2021) From Observed action identity to social affordances. Trends Cogn Sci 25:493–505. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2021.02.012
Osiurak F (2013) Apraxia of tool use is not a matter of affordances. Front Human Neurosci. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2013.00890
Osiurak F (2014) What neuropsychology tells us about human tool use? The four constraints theory (4CT): mechanics, space, time, and effort. Neuropsychol Rev 24:88–115. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11065-014-9260-y
Osiurak F, Reynaud E (2020) The elephant in the China shop: when technical reasoning meets cumulative technological culture. Behav Brain Sci 43:e183. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X20000291
Osiurak F, Jarry C, Le Gall D (2010) Grasping the affordances, understanding the reasoning: toward a dialectical theory of human tool use. Psychol Rev 117:517–540. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019004
Pandya DN, Seltzer B (1982) Intrinsic connections and architectonics of posterior parietal cortex in the rhesus monkey. J Comp Neurol 204:196–210. https://doi.org/10.1002/cne.902040208
Peeters R, Simone L, Nelissen K, Fabbri-Destro M, Vanduffel W, Rizzolatti G, Orban GA (2009) The representation of tool use in humans and monkeys: common and uniquely human features. J Neurosci 29:11523–11539. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2040-09.2009
Peeters RR, Rizzolatti G, Orban GA (2013) Functional properties of the left parietal tool use region. Neuroimage 78:83–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.04.023
Rallis A, Fercho KA, Bosch TJ, Baugh LA (2018) Getting a handle on virtual tools: an examination of the neuronal activity associated with virtual tool use. Neuropsychologia 109:208–221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2017.12.023
Ralph MA, Jefferies E, Patterson K, Rogers TT (2017) The neural and computational bases of semantic cognition. Nat Rev Neurosci 18:42–55. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn.2016.150
Ramayya AG, Glasser MF, Rilling JK (2010) A DTI investigation of neural substrates supporting tool use. Cereb Cortex 20:507–516. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhp141
Reynaud E, Lesourd M, Navarro J, Osiurak F (2016) On the neurocognitive origins of human tool use: a critical review of neuroimaging data. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 64:421–437. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2016.03.009
Roebroeck A, Formisano E, Goebel R (2005) Mapping directed influence over the brain using Granger causality and fMRI. Neuroimage 25:230–242. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.11.017
Ruther NN, Tettamanti M, Cappa SF, Bellebaum C (2014) Observed manipulation enhances left fronto-parietal activations in the processing of unfamiliar tools. PLoS One 9:e99401. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0099401
Sakata H, Taira M, Murata A, Mine S (1995) Neural mechanisms of visual guidance of hand action in the parietal cortex of the monkey. Cereb Cortex 5:429–438. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/5.5.429
Slotnick SD (2017) Resting-state fMRI data reflects default network activity rather than null data: a defense of commonly employed methods to correct for multiple comparisons. Cogn Neurosci 8:141–143. https://doi.org/10.1080/17588928.2016.1273892
Smith SM, Miller KL, Salimi-Khorshidi G et al (2011) Network modelling methods for FMRI. Neuroimage 54:875–891. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.08.063
Taira M, Mine S, Georgopoulos AP, Murata A, Sakata H (1990) Parietal cortex neurons of the monkey related to the visual guidance of hand movement. Exp Brain Res 83:29–36. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00232190
Tunik E, Frey SH, Grafton ST (2005) Virtual lesions of the anterior intraparietal area disrupt goal-dependent on-line adjustments of grasp. Nat Neurosci 8:505–511. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn1430
Tunik E, Lo OY, Adamovich SV (2008) Transcranial magnetic stimulation to the frontal operculum and supramarginal gyrus disrupts planning of outcome-based hand-object interactions. J Neurosci 28:14422–14427. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4734-08.2008
Umiltà MA, Escola L, Intskirveli I et al (2008) When pliers become fingers in the monkey motor system. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 105:2209–2213. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0705985105
Valyear KF, Culham JC (2010) Observing learned object-specific functional grasps preferentially activates the ventral stream. J Cogn Neurosci 22:970–984. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn.2009.21256
Woo CW, Krishnan A, Wager TD (2014) Cluster-extent based thresholding in fMRI analyses: pitfalls and recommendations. Neuroimage 91:412–419. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.12.058
Yoo K, Sohn WS, Jeong Y (2013) Tool-use practice induces changes in intrinsic functional connectivity of parietal areas. Front Hum Neurosci 7:49. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2013.00049
Acknowledgements
Partially funded by a Center for Brain and Behavior Student Research Grant to TJB.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
All authors contributed to the study. All authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no financial or non-financial interests that are directly or indirectly related to the work submitted for publication.
Additional information
Communicated by Bill J Yates.
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Bosch, T.J., Fercho, K.A., Hanna, R. et al. Left anterior supramarginal gyrus activity during tool use action observation after extensive tool use training. Exp Brain Res 241, 1959–1971 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-023-06646-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-023-06646-1