Abstract
Spatial priming allows memory for target locations to be evaluated, whereby when a target appears in the same location across trials, participants become more efficient at locating it and consequently their search times decrease. Previously, we reported priming effects when the location of a target was repeated with respect to the participant’s body but not when it was repeated relative to their eye position; therefore, suggesting that body-centred information is available after a delay of at least a few seconds (Ball et al. in Exp Brain Res 204:585–594, 2010). However, we were unable to rule out the possibility that stable allocentric cues within the room may have contributed to the priming effects that we observed. In this current study, we introduced a condition where despite participants moving to a new location between trials, their position relative to the target was maintained. This movement disrupted any potential room-based cues about the target location. While we replicated our previous finding of priming when the location of the target was repeated relative to the viewer when no movement was required, we also found robust priming effects when participants moved to a new location in between trials. Thus, we provide clear evidence that in our spatial priming task, the location of the target was being coded in a body-centred reference frame and that this information is available after a delay.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aglioti S, DeSouza JFX, Goodale MA (1995) Size-contrast illusions deceive the eye but not the hand. Curr Biol 5:679–685
Ball K, Smith D, Ellison A, Schenk T (2009) Both egocentric and allocentric cues support spatial priming in visual search. Neuropsychologia 47:1585–1591
Ball K, Smith D, Ellison A, Schenk T (2010) A body-centred frame of reference drives spatial priming in visual search. Exp Brain Res 204:585–594
Burgess N, Spiers HJ, Paleologou E (2004) Orientational manoeuvres in the dark: dissociating allocentric and egocentric influences on spatial memory. Cognition 94:149–166
Carlson NR (2001) The physiology of behaviour. Allyn & Bacon, Massachusetts
Christou CG, Buelthoff HH (1999) View dependence in scene recognition after active learning. Mem Cogn 27:996–1007
Cohen N, Cross ES, Tunik E, Grafton ST, Culham JC (2009) Ventral and dorsal stream contributions to the online control of immediate and delayed grasping: a TMS approach. Neuropsychologia 47:1553–1562
Dabbs JM, Chang EL, Strong RA, Milun R (1998) Spatial ability, navigation strategy, and geographic knowledge among men and women. Evol Hum Behav 19:89–98
Diwadkar VA, McNamara TP (1997) Viewpoint dependence in scene recognition. Psychol Sci 8:302–307
Finlay CA, Motes MA, Kozhevnikov M (2007) Updating representations of learned scenes. Psychol Res 71:265–276
Geyer T, Müller HJ, Krummenacher J (2007) Cross-trial priming of element positions in visual pop-out search is dependent on stimulus arrangement. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 33:788–797
Goodale MA, Jakobson LS, Keillor JM (1994) Differences in the visual control of pantomimed and natural grasping movements. Neuropsychologia 32:1159–1178
Haffenden AM, Goodale MA (1998) The effect of pictorial illusion on prehension and perception. J Cogn Neurosci 10:122–136
Himmelbach M, Karnath HO (2005) Dorsal and ventral stream interactions: contributions from optic ataxia. J Cogn Neurosci 17:632–640
Huang L, Holcombe AO, Pashler H (2004) Repetition priming in visual search: episodic retrieval, not feature priming. Mem Cogn 32:12–20
Kim B, Lee S, Lee J (2007) Gender differences in spatial navigation. Proc World Acad Sci Eng Technol 25:297–300
Koshino H, Boese GA, Ferraro FR (2000) The relationship between cognitive ability and positive and negative priming in identity and spatial priming tasks. J Gen Psychol 127:372–382
Kristjansson A, Vuilleumier P, Malhotra P, Husain M, Driver J (2005) Priming of colour and position during visual search in unilateral spatial neglect. J Cogn Neurosci 17:859–873
Lawton CA (2001) Gender and regional differences in spatial referents used in direction giving. Sex Roles 44:321–337
Maljkovic V, Nakayama K (1994) Priming of pop-out: I. Role of features. Mem Cogn 22:657–672
Maljkovic V, Nakayama K (1996) Priming of pop-out: II. The role of position. Percept Psychophys 58:977–991
Milner AD, Goodale MA (1993) Visual pathways to perception and action. In: Hicks TP, Molotchnikoff S, Ono T (eds) Progress in brain research, vol 95. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 317–337
Milner AD, Goodale MA (1995) The visual brain in action. Oxford University Press Inc, Oxford
Milner AD, Goodale MA (2006) The visual brain in action. Oxford University Press Inc, Oxford
Milner AD, Dijkerman HC, Pisella L, McIntosh RD, Tilikete C, Vighetto A, Rossetti Y (2001) Grasping the past: delay can improve visuomotor performance. Curr Biol 11:1896–1901
Mou W, McNamara TP, Valiquette CM, Rump B (2004) Allocentric and egocentric updating of spatial memories. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 30:142–157
Mou W, Xiao C, McNamara TP (2008) Reference directions and reference objects in spatial memory of a briefly viewed layout. Cognition 108:136–154
Riemann BL, Lephart SM (2002) The sensorimotor system, part I: The physiologic basis of functional joint stability. J Athl Training 37:71–79
Rossit S, Szymanek L, Butler S, Harvey M (2010) Memory-guided saccade processing in visual form agnosia (patient D.F.). Exp Brain Res 200:109–116
Schenk T (2006) An allo-centric rather than perceptual deficit in patient D.F. Nat Neurosci 9:1369–1370
Schenk T (2010) Visuomotor robustness is based on integration not segregation. Vis Res 50:2627–2632
Schenk T, McIntosh RD (2010) Do we have independent visual streams for perception and action? Cogn Neurosci 1:52–61
Shelton AL, McNamara TP (2004) Orientation and perspective dependence in route and survey learning. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 30:158–170
Shore DI, Klein RM (2001) On the manifestations of memory in visual search. Spat Vis 14:59–75
Vishton PM, Rea JG, Cutting JE, Nunez LN (1999) Comparing effects of the horizontal-vertical illusion on grip scaling and judgment: relative versus absolute, not perception versus action. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 25:1659–1672
Westwood DA, Goodale MA (2003) Perceptual illusion and the real-time control of action. Spat Vis 16:243–254
Westwood DA, Heath M, Roy EA (2001) The accuracy of reaching movements in brief delay conditions. Can J Exp Psychol 55:304–310
Westwood DA, Heath M, Roy EA (2003) No evidence for accurate visuomotor memory: systematic and variable error in memory guided reaching. J Motor Behav 35:127–133
Witt JK, Ashe J, Willingham DT (2008) An egocentric frame of reference in implicit motor sequence learning. Psychol Res 72:542–552
Zaehle T, Jordan K, Wustenberg T, Baudewig J, Dechent P, Mast FW (2007) The neural basis of the egocentric and allocentric spatial frame of reference. Brain Res 1137:92–103
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ball, K., Lane, A., Ellison, A. et al. Spatial priming in visual search: memory for body-centred information. Exp Brain Res 212, 477–485 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-011-2754-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-011-2754-4