Abstract
We study the equilibrium temperature distribution in a model for strongly magnetized plasmas in dimensions two and three. Provided the magnetic field is sufficiently structured (integrable in the sense that it is fibered by co-dimension one invariant tori, on most of which the field lines ergodically wander) and the effective thermal diffusivity transverse to the tori is small, it is proved that the temperature distribution is well approximated by a function that only varies across the invariant surfaces. The same result holds for “nearly integrable” magnetic fields up to a “critical” size. In this case, a volume of non-integrability is defined in terms of the temperature defect distribution and is related to the non-integrable structure of the magnetic field, confirming a physical conjecture of Paul et al (J Plasma Phys 88(1):905880107, 2022). Our proof crucially uses a certain quantitative ergodicity condition for the magnetic field lines on a full measure set of invariant tori, which is automatic in two dimensions for magnetic fields without null points and, in higher dimensions, is guaranteed by a Diophantine condition on the rotational transform of the magnetic field.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
We suppose that with B as in (1.13), the functions \(\theta , \phi , \psi \) together form a coordinate system in D. Then for any smooth \(u:D \rightarrow {\mathbb {R}}\), we have \( \nabla u = \partial _\psi u \nabla \psi + \partial _\phi u \nabla \phi + \partial _\theta u \nabla \theta \) and so, writing \( J = \nabla \psi \times \nabla \theta \cdot \nabla \phi ,\) which is nonvanishing by our assumption, we have the formula
$$\begin{aligned} (B\cdot \nabla ) u = \left[ \partial _\phi u + \iota (\psi , \theta , \phi ) \partial _\theta u + \tau (\psi , \theta , \phi ) \partial _\psi u\right] J, \end{aligned}$$(1.14)where \( \tau (\psi , \theta , \phi ):= -\partial _\theta \chi (\psi , \theta , \phi )\) and where we have introduced the rotational transform \( \iota (\psi , \theta , \phi ):= \partial _\psi \chi (\psi , \theta , \phi ). \) There is a simple interpretation of the function \(\chi \). Consider any integral curve of B, parametrized by \(\phi \). That is, we consider \(\Psi (\phi ), \vartheta (\phi )\) defined by
$$\begin{aligned} \frac{\textrm{d}}{\textrm{d}\phi } \Psi&= \frac{B\cdot \nabla \psi }{B\cdot \nabla \phi } = -\partial _\theta \chi ,\qquad \frac{\textrm{d}}{\textrm{d}\phi } \vartheta =\frac{B\cdot \nabla \theta }{B\cdot \nabla \phi } = \partial _\psi \chi , \end{aligned}$$(1.16)with the understanding that the quantities on the right-hand sides are evaluated at \((\psi , \theta , \phi ) = (\Psi (\phi ), \vartheta (\phi ), \phi )\). Thus the integral curves of B satisfy a Hamiltonian system with Hamiltonian \(\chi \). Note that if \(\partial _\theta \chi = 0\), the above system is integrable (has a conserved quantity) since \(\psi \) is constant along the flow. This also be seen from the formula (1.14).
References
Braginskii, S.I.: Transport Processes in Plasma, ed. MA Leontovich (New York, USA: Consultants Bureau), 201 (1965)
Hudson, S.R., Breslau, J.: Temperature contours and ghost surfaces for chaotic magnetic fields. Phys. Rev. Lett. 100(9), 095001 (2008)
Helander, P., Sigmar, D.: Collisional Transport in Magnetized Plasmas. Cambridge University Press, United Kingdom (2005)
Helander, P., Hudson, S.R., Paul, E.J.: On heat conduction in an irregular magnetic field. Part 1. J. Plasma Phys. 88(1), 905880107 (2022)
Paul, E.J., Hudson, S.R., Helander, P.: Heat conduction in an irregular magnetic field. Part 2. Heat transport as a measure of the effective non-integrable volume. J. Plasma Phys. 88(1), 90588 (2022)
Arnold, V.I.: On the topology of three-dimensional steady flows of an ideal fluid. In Vladimir I. Arnold-Collected Works, pp. 25–28. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg (1966)
Arnold, V.I., Khesin, B.A.: Topological Methods in Hydrodynamics, Vol. 125. Springer Nature (2021)
Freidberg, J.P.: “Ideal magnetohydrodynamics”. United States (1987)
Grad, H.: Toroidal containment of a plasma. The Physics of Fluids 10(1), 137–154 (1967)
Grad, H.: Theory and applications of the nonexistence of simple toroidal plasma equilibrium. International Journal of Fusion Energy 3(2), 33–46 (1985)
Helander, P.: Theory of plasma confinement in non-axisymmetric magnetic fields, Reports on Progress in Physics
Constantin, P., Drivas, T.D., Ginsberg, D.: On quasisymmetric plasma equilibria sustained by small force. J. Plasma Phys. 87(1), 905870111 (2021)
Constantin, P., Drivas, T.D., Ginsberg, D.: Flexibility and rigidity of free boundary MHD equilibria. Nonlinearity, 35(5), 2363 J.W.S. Cassels, “An introduction to diophantine approximation” , Cambridge Univ. Press (1957) (2022)
Cassels, J.W.S.: An Introduction to Diophantine Approximation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2022)
Sternberg, S.: On Differential Equations on the Torus. Am. J. Math. 79(2), 397–402 (1957)
MacKay, R.S.: Finding the Complement of the Invariant Manifolds Transverse to a Given Foliation for a 3D Flow. Regul. Chaot. Dyn. 23, 797–802 (2018)
Arnold, Vladimir I.: Proof of a theorem of AN Kolmogorov on the invariance of quasi-periodic motions under small perturbations of the Hamiltonian. Russian Mathematical Surveys 18.5: 9 (1963)
Cornfeld, I.P., Sossinskii, A.B., Fomin, S.V., Sinai, Y.G.: Ergodic Theory. Springer, New York (1982)
Treschev, D., Zubelevich, O.: Introduction to the Perturbation Theory of Hamiltonian Systems. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, Germany (2009)
Gariepy, R.F., Evans, L.C.: Measure Theory and Fine Properties of Functions, Revised CRC Press, United Kingdom (2015)
Constantin, P., Drivas, T.D., Ginsberg, D.: Flexibility and rigidity in steady fluid motion. Commun. Math. Phys. 385(1), 521–563 (2021)
Acknowledgements
We thank P. Constantin, P. Helander, S. Hudson, E. Paul, and P. Torres de Lizaur and H. Yu for insightful discussions. The research of TDD was partially supported by the NSF DMS-2106233 grant and NSF CAREER award #2235395. The work of DG was partially supported by the Simons Center for Hidden Symmetries and Fusion Energy award # 601960. The studies of HG are supported by the Ford Foundation and the NSF Graduate Research Fellowship under grant DGE-2039656.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Communicated by K. Nakanishi.
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Appendix A. Geometric Identities from the Co-area Formula
Appendix A. Geometric Identities from the Co-area Formula
In this section we collect some geometric formulas that we will use repeatedly. In what follows, we fix \(\psi :D\rightarrow {\mathbb {R}}\) such that \(|\nabla \psi |\ne 0\) on D and so that the level surfaces \(S_\psi \) are codimension one manifolds which foliate D. Let \(\psi _- =\inf _D \psi \) and \(\psi _+= \sup _D \psi \). We will use the co-area formula
see e.g. [20]. We start with a simple result that generalizes Lemma E.2 from [21].
Lemma A.1
If \(F \in H^2(D)\), we have
Proof
We start with the observation that
where \(D_{\psi _1, \psi _2} = \cup _{\psi _1 \le \psi ' \le \psi _2} S_{\psi '}\) denotes the region bounded by the surfaces \(S_{\psi _1}, S_{\psi _2}\). Indeed, by the divergence theorem,
where \(n^{S_{\psi }}\) denotes the outward-pointing unit normal to \(S_\psi \). Then
so (A.4) gives (A.3). Dividing (A.3) by \(\psi _2 - \psi _1\) and taking the limit gives (A.2). \(\square \)
In particular, if \(F = F(\psi )\) is constant on \(S_\psi \), writing \(\Delta F = {{\,\textrm{div}\,}}(\nabla F) = {{\,\textrm{div}\,}}(\nabla \psi F')\) we have
Another consequence of the formula (A.1) is the following
Lemma A.2
Let X be a vector field defined in D with the property that \(X|_{S_{\psi }}\) is tangent to \(S_\psi \). Then the divergence \({{\,\textrm{div}\,}}X\) in D is related to the divergence operator \({{\,\textrm{div}\,}}_{S_\psi }\) on \(S_\psi \) by
In particular, if X is divergence-free in D, then \(\varrho := {|\nabla \psi |^{-1}}\big |_{S_\psi }\) is a density conserved by X on \(S_\psi \).
Proof
This can be seen by working in local coordinates but it is simpler to use (A.1) and note that if \(u \in C^\infty (D)\) is any test function then
where we used that \(X\cdot \nabla = X\cdot \nabla ^T\) on \(S_\psi \), where \(\nabla ^T\) denotes the tangential gradient on \(S_\psi \),
whenever u is an extension of U from \(S_\psi \) to a neighborhood of \(S_\psi \). By (A.1), the left-hand side is
Then (A.7) follows since u is arbitrary. \(\square \)
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Drivas, T.D., Ginsberg, D. & Grayer, H. On the Distribution of Heat in Fibered Magnetic Fields. Commun. Math. Phys. 405, 57 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00220-023-04886-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00220-023-04886-4