Skip to main content
Log in

On the Distribution of Heat in Fibered Magnetic Fields

  • Published:
Communications in Mathematical Physics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We study the equilibrium temperature distribution in a model for strongly magnetized plasmas in dimensions two and three. Provided the magnetic field is sufficiently structured (integrable in the sense that it is fibered by co-dimension one invariant tori, on most of which the field lines ergodically wander) and the effective thermal diffusivity transverse to the tori is small, it is proved that the temperature distribution is well approximated by a function that only varies across the invariant surfaces. The same result holds for “nearly integrable” magnetic fields up to a “critical” size. In this case, a volume of non-integrability is defined in terms of the temperature defect distribution and is related to the non-integrable structure of the magnetic field, confirming a physical conjecture of Paul et al (J Plasma Phys 88(1):905880107, 2022). Our proof crucially uses a certain quantitative ergodicity condition for the magnetic field lines on a full measure set of invariant tori, which is automatic in two dimensions for magnetic fields without null points and, in higher dimensions, is guaranteed by a Diophantine condition on the rotational transform of the magnetic field.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. We suppose that with B as in (1.13), the functions \(\theta , \phi , \psi \) together form a coordinate system in D. Then for any smooth \(u:D \rightarrow {\mathbb {R}}\), we have \( \nabla u = \partial _\psi u \nabla \psi + \partial _\phi u \nabla \phi + \partial _\theta u \nabla \theta \) and so, writing \( J = \nabla \psi \times \nabla \theta \cdot \nabla \phi ,\) which is nonvanishing by our assumption, we have the formula

    $$\begin{aligned} (B\cdot \nabla ) u = \left[ \partial _\phi u + \iota (\psi , \theta , \phi ) \partial _\theta u + \tau (\psi , \theta , \phi ) \partial _\psi u\right] J, \end{aligned}$$
    (1.14)

    where \( \tau (\psi , \theta , \phi ):= -\partial _\theta \chi (\psi , \theta , \phi )\) and where we have introduced the rotational transform \( \iota (\psi , \theta , \phi ):= \partial _\psi \chi (\psi , \theta , \phi ). \) There is a simple interpretation of the function \(\chi \). Consider any integral curve of B, parametrized by \(\phi \). That is, we consider \(\Psi (\phi ), \vartheta (\phi )\) defined by

    $$\begin{aligned} \frac{\textrm{d}}{\textrm{d}\phi } \Psi&= \frac{B\cdot \nabla \psi }{B\cdot \nabla \phi } = -\partial _\theta \chi ,\qquad \frac{\textrm{d}}{\textrm{d}\phi } \vartheta =\frac{B\cdot \nabla \theta }{B\cdot \nabla \phi } = \partial _\psi \chi , \end{aligned}$$
    (1.16)

    with the understanding that the quantities on the right-hand sides are evaluated at \((\psi , \theta , \phi ) = (\Psi (\phi ), \vartheta (\phi ), \phi )\). Thus the integral curves of B satisfy a Hamiltonian system with Hamiltonian \(\chi \). Note that if \(\partial _\theta \chi = 0\), the above system is integrable (has a conserved quantity) since \(\psi \) is constant along the flow. This also be seen from the formula (1.14).

References

  1. Braginskii, S.I.: Transport Processes in Plasma, ed. MA Leontovich (New York, USA: Consultants Bureau), 201 (1965)

  2. Hudson, S.R., Breslau, J.: Temperature contours and ghost surfaces for chaotic magnetic fields. Phys. Rev. Lett. 100(9), 095001 (2008)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. Helander, P., Sigmar, D.: Collisional Transport in Magnetized Plasmas. Cambridge University Press, United Kingdom (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Helander, P., Hudson, S.R., Paul, E.J.: On heat conduction in an irregular magnetic field. Part 1. J. Plasma Phys. 88(1), 905880107 (2022)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Paul, E.J., Hudson, S.R., Helander, P.: Heat conduction in an irregular magnetic field. Part 2. Heat transport as a measure of the effective non-integrable volume. J. Plasma Phys. 88(1), 90588 (2022)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Arnold, V.I.: On the topology of three-dimensional steady flows of an ideal fluid. In Vladimir I. Arnold-Collected Works, pp. 25–28. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg (1966)

  7. Arnold, V.I., Khesin, B.A.: Topological Methods in Hydrodynamics, Vol. 125. Springer Nature (2021)

  8. Freidberg, J.P.: “Ideal magnetohydrodynamics”. United States (1987)

  9. Grad, H.: Toroidal containment of a plasma. The Physics of Fluids 10(1), 137–154 (1967)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. Grad, H.: Theory and applications of the nonexistence of simple toroidal plasma equilibrium. International Journal of Fusion Energy 3(2), 33–46 (1985)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Helander, P.: Theory of plasma confinement in non-axisymmetric magnetic fields, Reports on Progress in Physics

  12. Constantin, P., Drivas, T.D., Ginsberg, D.: On quasisymmetric plasma equilibria sustained by small force. J. Plasma Phys. 87(1), 905870111 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Constantin, P., Drivas, T.D., Ginsberg, D.: Flexibility and rigidity of free boundary MHD equilibria. Nonlinearity, 35(5), 2363 J.W.S. Cassels, “An introduction to diophantine approximation” , Cambridge Univ. Press (1957) (2022)

  14. Cassels, J.W.S.: An Introduction to Diophantine Approximation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Sternberg, S.: On Differential Equations on the Torus. Am. J. Math. 79(2), 397–402 (1957)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. MacKay, R.S.: Finding the Complement of the Invariant Manifolds Transverse to a Given Foliation for a 3D Flow. Regul. Chaot. Dyn. 23, 797–802 (2018)

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. Arnold, Vladimir I.: Proof of a theorem of AN Kolmogorov on the invariance of quasi-periodic motions under small perturbations of the Hamiltonian. Russian Mathematical Surveys 18.5: 9 (1963)

  18. Cornfeld, I.P., Sossinskii, A.B., Fomin, S.V., Sinai, Y.G.: Ergodic Theory. Springer, New York (1982)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  19. Treschev, D., Zubelevich, O.: Introduction to the Perturbation Theory of Hamiltonian Systems. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, Germany (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Gariepy, R.F., Evans, L.C.: Measure Theory and Fine Properties of Functions, Revised CRC Press, United Kingdom (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Constantin, P., Drivas, T.D., Ginsberg, D.: Flexibility and rigidity in steady fluid motion. Commun. Math. Phys. 385(1), 521–563 (2021)

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank P. Constantin, P. Helander, S. Hudson, E. Paul, and P. Torres de Lizaur and H. Yu for insightful discussions. The research of TDD was partially supported by the NSF DMS-2106233 grant and NSF CAREER award #2235395. The work of DG was partially supported by the Simons Center for Hidden Symmetries and Fusion Energy award # 601960. The studies of HG are supported by the Ford Foundation and the NSF Graduate Research Fellowship under grant DGE-2039656.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Daniel Ginsberg.

Additional information

Communicated by K. Nakanishi.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix A. Geometric Identities from the Co-area Formula

Appendix A. Geometric Identities from the Co-area Formula

In this section we collect some geometric formulas that we will use repeatedly. In what follows, we fix \(\psi :D\rightarrow {\mathbb {R}}\) such that \(|\nabla \psi |\ne 0\) on D and so that the level surfaces \(S_\psi \) are codimension one manifolds which foliate D. Let \(\psi _- =\inf _D \psi \) and \(\psi _+= \sup _D \psi \). We will use the co-area formula

$$\begin{aligned} \int _{D} u\, \textrm{d}\mu = \int _{\psi _-}^{\psi _+}\int _{S_\psi } \frac{u}{|\nabla \psi |} \, \textrm{d}{\mathscr {H}}^{(d-1)}\textrm{d} \psi , \end{aligned}$$
(A.1)

see e.g. [20]. We start with a simple result that generalizes Lemma E.2 from [21].

Lemma A.1

If \(F \in H^2(D)\), we have

$$\begin{aligned} \frac{\textrm{d}}{\textrm{d} \psi } \int _{S_\psi } F \, \textrm{d}{\mathscr {H}}^{(d-1)} = \int _{S_{\psi }} {{\,\textrm{div}\,}}\left( \frac{\nabla \psi }{|\nabla \psi |} F\right) \,{\frac{ \textrm{d}{\mathscr {H}}^{(d-1)}}{|\nabla \psi |}}. \end{aligned}$$
(A.2)

Proof

We start with the observation that

$$\begin{aligned} \int _{S_{\psi _2}} F \, \textrm{d}{\mathscr {H}}^{(d-1)} - \int _{S_{\psi _1}} F\, \textrm{d}{\mathscr {H}}^{(d-1)} = \int _{D_{\psi _1, \psi _2}} {{\,\textrm{div}\,}}\left( \frac{\nabla \psi }{|\nabla \psi |} F\right) \, \textrm{d}\mu , \end{aligned}$$
(A.3)

where \(D_{\psi _1, \psi _2} = \cup _{\psi _1 \le \psi ' \le \psi _2} S_{\psi '}\) denotes the region bounded by the surfaces \(S_{\psi _1}, S_{\psi _2}\). Indeed, by the divergence theorem,

$$\begin{aligned} \int _{D_{\psi _1, \psi _2}} {{\,\textrm{div}\,}}\left( \frac{\nabla \psi }{|\nabla \psi |} F\right) \, \textrm{d}\mu= & {} \int _{S_{\psi _2}} n^{S_{\psi _2}}\cdot \frac{\nabla \psi }{|\nabla \psi |} F \, \textrm{d}{\mathscr {H}}^{(d-1)} \nonumber \\{} & {} + \int _{S_{\psi _1}} n^{S_{\psi _1}}\cdot \frac{\nabla \psi }{|\nabla \psi |} F \, \textrm{d}{\mathscr {H}}^{(d-1)}, \end{aligned}$$
(A.4)

where \(n^{S_{\psi }}\) denotes the outward-pointing unit normal to \(S_\psi \). Then

$$\begin{aligned} n^{S_{\psi _2}} = \frac{\nabla \psi }{|\nabla \psi |}\Big |_{S_{\psi _2}} \quad \text {and} \quad n^{S_{\psi _1}} = -\frac{\nabla \psi }{|\nabla \psi |}\Big |_{S_{\psi _1}}, \end{aligned}$$
(A.5)

so (A.4) gives (A.3). Dividing (A.3) by \(\psi _2 - \psi _1\) and taking the limit gives (A.2). \(\square \)

In particular, if \(F = F(\psi )\) is constant on \(S_\psi \), writing \(\Delta F = {{\,\textrm{div}\,}}(\nabla F) = {{\,\textrm{div}\,}}(\nabla \psi F')\) we have

$$\begin{aligned} \int _{S_\psi } \Delta F{ \frac{\textrm{d}{\mathscr {H}}^{(d-1)}}{|\nabla \psi |}}= & {} \frac{\textrm{d}}{\textrm{d}\psi } \left( \int _{S_{\psi }} |\nabla \psi | F' \textrm{d}{\mathscr {H}}^{(d-1)}\right) \nonumber \\= & {} \frac{\textrm{d}}{\textrm{d}\psi } \left( \left[ \int _{S_\psi } |\nabla \psi | \textrm{d}{\mathscr {H}}^{(d-1)}\right] F'\right) . \end{aligned}$$
(A.6)

Another consequence of the formula (A.1) is the following

Lemma A.2

Let X be a vector field defined in D with the property that \(X|_{S_{\psi }}\) is tangent to \(S_\psi \). Then the divergence \({{\,\textrm{div}\,}}X\) in D is related to the divergence operator \({{\,\textrm{div}\,}}_{S_\psi }\) on \(S_\psi \) by

$$\begin{aligned} \frac{{{\,\textrm{div}\,}}X}{|\nabla \psi |} \Big |_{S_\psi } = {{\,\textrm{div}\,}}_{S_\psi }\left( \left[ \frac{ X}{|\nabla \psi |}\right] \Big |_{S_\psi }\right) . \end{aligned}$$
(A.7)

In particular, if X is divergence-free in D, then \(\varrho := {|\nabla \psi |^{-1}}\big |_{S_\psi }\) is a density conserved by X on \(S_\psi \).

Proof

This can be seen by working in local coordinates but it is simpler to use (A.1) and note that if \(u \in C^\infty (D)\) is any test function then

$$\begin{aligned} -\int _D {{\,\textrm{div}\,}}X u\, \textrm{d}\mu&= \int _D (X\cdot \nabla ) u\, \textrm{d}\mu = \int _{\psi _-}^{\psi _+} \int _{S_\psi } (X\cdot \nabla ) u\,\frac{ \textrm{d}{\mathscr {H}}^{(d-1)}}{|\nabla \psi |}\\&= \int _{\psi _-}^{\psi _+} \int _{S_\psi } (X\cdot \nabla ^T) u \frac{ \textrm{d}{\mathscr {H}}^{(d-1)}}{|\nabla \psi |} \\&= -\int _{\psi _-}^{\psi _+} \int _{S_\psi } {{\,\textrm{div}\,}}_{S_\psi }\left( \frac{ X}{|\nabla \psi |} \right) u \, \textrm{d}{\mathscr {H}}^{(d-1)}, \end{aligned}$$

where we used that \(X\cdot \nabla = X\cdot \nabla ^T\) on \(S_\psi \), where \(\nabla ^T\) denotes the tangential gradient on \(S_\psi \),

$$\begin{aligned} \nabla ^T U = \left( \nabla - \frac{\nabla \psi }{|\nabla \psi |^2} \nabla \psi \cdot \nabla \right) u \end{aligned}$$
(A.8)

whenever u is an extension of U from \(S_\psi \) to a neighborhood of \(S_\psi \). By (A.1), the left-hand side is

$$\begin{aligned} -\int _{\psi _-}^{\psi _+} \int _{S_\psi } \frac{{{\,\textrm{div}\,}}X}{|\nabla \psi |} u\, \textrm{d}{\mathscr {H}}^{(d-1)}. \end{aligned}$$
(A.9)

Then (A.7) follows since u is arbitrary. \(\square \)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Drivas, T.D., Ginsberg, D. & Grayer, H. On the Distribution of Heat in Fibered Magnetic Fields. Commun. Math. Phys. 405, 57 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00220-023-04886-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00220-023-04886-4

Navigation