Skip to main content
Log in

Characteristics of native and enzymatically hydrolyzed common wheat (Triticum aestivum) and dicoccum wheat (Triticum dicoccum) starches

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
European Food Research and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The compositional, structural, and enzymatic digestibility of starches isolated from common wheat and dicoccum wheat were determined to find out the possible reason for hypoglycemic nature of dicoccum wheat. The gelatinization temperature range (65±3 °C) as well as the elution profile of both the starches on Sepharose CL-2B gel were comparable, but the peak (PV, 233 RVU) and set back viscosity (SB, 140 RVU) of dicoccum wheat starch were higher than common wheat starch (PV, 211 RVU; SB, 113 RVU) as recorded in rapid visco-analyser (RVA). The degree of crystallinity (DOC: 29%) and the thermal energy (TE: 142.35 J) of dicoccum wheat starch were considerably higher than the DOC (23%) and TE (67.82 J) of the common wheat starch. The starches were digested with alpha-amylase (human salivary), beta-amylase (barley malt), pullulanase (Klebsiella pneumoniae), and amyloglucosidase (Aspergillus niger), and the solubilized fraction was separated from the undigested fraction (residue) by centrifugation. Characterization of the sugars in the solubilized fraction from alpha-amylase were glucose, maltose, and oligosaccharides of 3–7 DP, maltose from beta-amylase, maltotriose from pullulanase and glucose from amyloglucosidase. However, the molecular weight (M w) of the residues from the enzymatic digestion of dicoccum wheat starch was slightly higher than that of the common wheat starch. The microscopic examination of residues also exhibited a few bigger chunks in case of dicoccum wheat starch and a large number of smaller sized pieces in the case of common wheat starch. Since, starch is the major component of wheat, these parameters may help to explain subtle differences in the digestibility that exist between common wheat and dicoccum wheat.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kimber G, Sears R (1983) In: Sakamoto S (ed) Proceedings of the 6th international wheat genetic symposium, Plant Germplasm Institute, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan, pp 1195–1496

  2. Stallknecht GF, Gilbertson KM, Ranney JE (1996), In: Janick (ed) Progress in new crops, ASHS press, Alexandria, VA

  3. Singh T, Maninder K, Bains GS (1983) J Food Sci 48:1135–1138

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Lineback DR, Rasper VF (1988) Wheat chemistry and technology, AACC, St. Paul, Minesota, USA, pp 355–356

    Google Scholar 

  5. Soulaka AB, Morrison WR (1985) J Sci Food Agric 36:709–718

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Brand JC, Nicholson PL, Thoburn AW, Trushwell AS (1985) Am J Clin Nutr 42:1192–1196

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Mohan BH, Anitha G, Malleshi NG, Tharanathan RN (2005) Carbohydr Polym 59:43–50

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Holm J, Hagander B, Bjork I, Elliasson AC, Lundquist I (1989) J Nutr 119:1631–1638

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Adkins GK, Greenwood CT (1966) Starch 18:213–218

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. AAAC (2000) Approved methods of the AACC, American Association of Cereal Chemists, St Paul, MN, USA

    Google Scholar 

  11. Sowbhagya CM, Bhattacharya KR (1979) Starch 31:159–163

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Leach HW, McCowenan, Schoch TJ (1959) Cereal Chem 36:534–544

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Batey IL, Curtin BM (2000) Cereal Chem 77:754–760

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Rosa APB, Lopez OP, Trejo AC, Falomir CO, Irapuato (1989) Starch 41:424–428

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Norman WH, Cheetham, Leping T (1998) Carbohydr Polym 36:277–284

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Nara S, Komiya T (1983) Starch 35:407–410

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Miller GL (1959) Anal Chem 31:426–428

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Dubois M, Gilles KA, Hamilton JK, Rebers PA, Smith F (1956) Anal Biochem 28:350–356

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Chinnaswamy R, Bhattacharya KR (1986) Starch 38:51–57

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Madhusudhan B, Tharanathan RN (1996) Carbohydr Res 284:101–109

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Tharanathan RN, Ramadas Bhat U (1988) Starch 40:378–382

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Sineviratne HD, Biliaderis CG (1991) J Cereal Sci 13:129–143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Atwell WA, Hood LF, Lineback DR, Marston EV, Zobel HF (1988) Cereal Foods World 33:306–311

    Google Scholar 

  24. Stevens DJ, Elton GAH (1971) Starch 23:8–11

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Longston J, LeGrys GA (1981) Starch 33:410–414

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Krueger BR, Knutson CA, Inglett GE, Walker CE (1987) J Food Sci 52:715–718

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Imberty A, Chanza H, Perez S, Buleon A, Tran V (1988) J Mol Biol 206:365–378

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Grenat C, Rodosta S, Anger H, Damaschum G (1993) Starch 45:309–314

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

The authors thank Dr. R. N. Tharanathan, CFTRI, Mysore, for useful suggestion and discussion towards GPC and SE-HPLC analysis and Dr. S. Subramanyan, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore, for X-ray analysis. The technical assistance of Ms. Anitha Gopal, toward isolation and enzymatic digestion of starches is greatfully acknowledged

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to N. G. Malleshi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mohan, B.H., Malleshi, N.G. Characteristics of native and enzymatically hydrolyzed common wheat (Triticum aestivum) and dicoccum wheat (Triticum dicoccum) starches. Eur Food Res Technol 223, 355–361 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00217-005-0212-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00217-005-0212-x

Keywords

Navigation