Abstract
The compositional, structural, and enzymatic digestibility of starches isolated from common wheat and dicoccum wheat were determined to find out the possible reason for hypoglycemic nature of dicoccum wheat. The gelatinization temperature range (65±3 °C) as well as the elution profile of both the starches on Sepharose CL-2B gel were comparable, but the peak (PV, 233 RVU) and set back viscosity (SB, 140 RVU) of dicoccum wheat starch were higher than common wheat starch (PV, 211 RVU; SB, 113 RVU) as recorded in rapid visco-analyser (RVA). The degree of crystallinity (DOC: 29%) and the thermal energy (TE: 142.35 J) of dicoccum wheat starch were considerably higher than the DOC (23%) and TE (67.82 J) of the common wheat starch. The starches were digested with alpha-amylase (human salivary), beta-amylase (barley malt), pullulanase (Klebsiella pneumoniae), and amyloglucosidase (Aspergillus niger), and the solubilized fraction was separated from the undigested fraction (residue) by centrifugation. Characterization of the sugars in the solubilized fraction from alpha-amylase were glucose, maltose, and oligosaccharides of 3–7 DP, maltose from beta-amylase, maltotriose from pullulanase and glucose from amyloglucosidase. However, the molecular weight (M w) of the residues from the enzymatic digestion of dicoccum wheat starch was slightly higher than that of the common wheat starch. The microscopic examination of residues also exhibited a few bigger chunks in case of dicoccum wheat starch and a large number of smaller sized pieces in the case of common wheat starch. Since, starch is the major component of wheat, these parameters may help to explain subtle differences in the digestibility that exist between common wheat and dicoccum wheat.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Kimber G, Sears R (1983) In: Sakamoto S (ed) Proceedings of the 6th international wheat genetic symposium, Plant Germplasm Institute, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan, pp 1195–1496
Stallknecht GF, Gilbertson KM, Ranney JE (1996), In: Janick (ed) Progress in new crops, ASHS press, Alexandria, VA
Singh T, Maninder K, Bains GS (1983) J Food Sci 48:1135–1138
Lineback DR, Rasper VF (1988) Wheat chemistry and technology, AACC, St. Paul, Minesota, USA, pp 355–356
Soulaka AB, Morrison WR (1985) J Sci Food Agric 36:709–718
Brand JC, Nicholson PL, Thoburn AW, Trushwell AS (1985) Am J Clin Nutr 42:1192–1196
Mohan BH, Anitha G, Malleshi NG, Tharanathan RN (2005) Carbohydr Polym 59:43–50
Holm J, Hagander B, Bjork I, Elliasson AC, Lundquist I (1989) J Nutr 119:1631–1638
Adkins GK, Greenwood CT (1966) Starch 18:213–218
AAAC (2000) Approved methods of the AACC, American Association of Cereal Chemists, St Paul, MN, USA
Sowbhagya CM, Bhattacharya KR (1979) Starch 31:159–163
Leach HW, McCowenan, Schoch TJ (1959) Cereal Chem 36:534–544
Batey IL, Curtin BM (2000) Cereal Chem 77:754–760
Rosa APB, Lopez OP, Trejo AC, Falomir CO, Irapuato (1989) Starch 41:424–428
Norman WH, Cheetham, Leping T (1998) Carbohydr Polym 36:277–284
Nara S, Komiya T (1983) Starch 35:407–410
Miller GL (1959) Anal Chem 31:426–428
Dubois M, Gilles KA, Hamilton JK, Rebers PA, Smith F (1956) Anal Biochem 28:350–356
Chinnaswamy R, Bhattacharya KR (1986) Starch 38:51–57
Madhusudhan B, Tharanathan RN (1996) Carbohydr Res 284:101–109
Tharanathan RN, Ramadas Bhat U (1988) Starch 40:378–382
Sineviratne HD, Biliaderis CG (1991) J Cereal Sci 13:129–143
Atwell WA, Hood LF, Lineback DR, Marston EV, Zobel HF (1988) Cereal Foods World 33:306–311
Stevens DJ, Elton GAH (1971) Starch 23:8–11
Longston J, LeGrys GA (1981) Starch 33:410–414
Krueger BR, Knutson CA, Inglett GE, Walker CE (1987) J Food Sci 52:715–718
Imberty A, Chanza H, Perez S, Buleon A, Tran V (1988) J Mol Biol 206:365–378
Grenat C, Rodosta S, Anger H, Damaschum G (1993) Starch 45:309–314
Acknowledgement
The authors thank Dr. R. N. Tharanathan, CFTRI, Mysore, for useful suggestion and discussion towards GPC and SE-HPLC analysis and Dr. S. Subramanyan, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore, for X-ray analysis. The technical assistance of Ms. Anitha Gopal, toward isolation and enzymatic digestion of starches is greatfully acknowledged
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mohan, B.H., Malleshi, N.G. Characteristics of native and enzymatically hydrolyzed common wheat (Triticum aestivum) and dicoccum wheat (Triticum dicoccum) starches. Eur Food Res Technol 223, 355–361 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00217-005-0212-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00217-005-0212-x