Skip to main content
Log in

Internal quality of fresh and cold stored celery petioles described by sensory profile, chemical and instrumental measurements

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
European Food Research and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Internal quality of fresh and cold stored celery petioles of four different accessions (two green cultivars, one yellow cultivar and one yellow local ecotype) was characterised by descriptive analysis of sensory properties of aspect, flavour and texture, chemical determinations (organic acids, sugars, dietary fibre, flavonoids, carotenoids) and instrumental measurements of texture (stiffness, fracture toughness, maximum shear force). In the growing conditions as adopted in the experiment, different genotypes produced petioles with quite similar and low levels of dry matter, but with significant differences in some texture (flexibility, fracturability, hardness, crunchiness and fibrousness), flavour (odour and total flavour) and taste (saltiness and bitterness) attributes. After fortnight of cold storage (2 °C, 75–85% RH) differences between genotypes were still perceived in some texture attributes, particularly flexibility, fracturability and hardness. On the other hand, significant differences were no longer observed in total flavour, whereas lowered differences were still perceived in odour. Green type cultivars distinguished for higher fibrousness, bitter taste and harsh after effect. Sweetness was not linearly correlated to total and individual sugar contents, whereas organic acids content was probably too low to cause perceivable sourness; moreover, the sensory perception of fibrousness during chewing seemed to be related to other constituents in addition to fibre. Finally the low contents of flavones (apigenin 0.76–3.11 mg/kg and luteolin 0.50–1.74 mg/kg) and carotenoids (lutein 0.60–1.58 mg/kg and β-carotene 0.20–0.71 mg/kg) in all genotypes suggested a poor relevance of celery petioles devoid of leaves as dietary sources of these bioactive compounds.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Gómez PA, Artés F (2004) Postharvest Biol Technol 34:203–209

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Gómez PA, Artés F (2004) Eur J Hort Sci 69:215–219

    Google Scholar 

  3. Prakash A, Inthajak P, Huibregtse H, Caporaso F, Foley DM (2000) J Food Sci 65:1070–1075

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Fillion L, Kilcast D (2002) Food Qual Preference 13:23–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Viña SZ, Chaves AR (2003) J Sci Food Agric 83:1308–1314

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Alvarez MD, Saunders DEJ, Vincent JFV, Jeronimidis J (2000) J Texture Stud 31:457–473

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Wassenhove FA van, Dirinck PJ, Schamp NM, Vulsteke GA (1990) J Agric Food Chem 38:220–226

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Martens M (1986) Determining sensory quality of vegetables: a multivariate study. Dr. Agric. Thesis. Agricultural University of Norway, Ås.

  9. Tsao SJJ, Lo HF (2004) Vegetables: types and biology. In: Hui YH, Ghazala S, Graham DM, Murrell KD, Nip WK (eds) Handbook of vegetable preservation and processing. Marcel Dekker Inc., New York, pp 1–22

    Google Scholar 

  10. Salunkhe DK, Desay BB (1984) Celery, lettuce, and endive. In: Postharvest biotechnology of vegetables, vol II. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, pp 5–22

    Google Scholar 

  11. Wills R, Mc Glasson B, Graham D, Joyce D (1998) Postharvest. An introduction to the physiology and handling of fruit, vegetables and ornamentals. University of New South Wales Press Ltd, Sydney, pp 230–240

    Google Scholar 

  12. Pantastico EB, Subramanyam H, Bhatti MB, Ali N, Akamine EK (1975) Postharvest physiology: harvest indices. In: Pantastico EB (ed) Postharvest physiology, handling and utilisation of tropical and subtropical fruits and vegetables. AVI Publishing, Westport, CT, pp 77–98

    Google Scholar 

  13. Mozaffarieh M, Sacu S, Wedrich A (2003) Nutr J 2:20–27.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Slattery ML, Benson J, Curtin K, Ma KN, Schaeffer D, Potter JD (2000) Am J Clin Nutr 71:575–582

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Hertog MGL, Hollman PCH, Venema DP (1992) J Agric Food Chem 40:1591–1598

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Rice-Evans C, Miller NJ, Paganga G (1996) Free Radic Biol Med 20:933–956

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. AOAC (1995) Method 920.151—solids (total) in fruits and fruits products. In: Horwitz W (ed) AOAC official methods of analysis. AOAC International, Gaithersburg, MD

    Google Scholar 

  18. Brera C (1996) Carboidrati singoli o in miscela. Metodo per HPLC. In: Baldini M, Fabietti F, Giammarioli S, Onori R, Orefice L, Stacchini A (eds) Metodi di analisi utilizzati per il controllo chimico degli alimenti. Istituto Superiore di Sanità, Roma, pp 66–67

    Google Scholar 

  19. Prosky L, Asp NG, Schweizer TF, Devries JW, Furda I (1988) J Assoc Anal Chem 71(5):1017–1023

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Raffo A, Paoletti F, Antonelli M (2004) Eur Food Res Technol 219:360–368

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Shewfelt R, Henderson J (2003)Acta Hort 604:49–59

    Google Scholar 

  22. Evers AM, Ketoja E, Hägg M, Plaami S, Häkkinen U, Pessala R (1997) Plant Foods Human Nutr 51:173–186

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Souci SW, Fachmann W, Kraut H (1994) Food composition and nutrition tables, 5th edn. medpharm Scientific publishers, Stuttgart

    Google Scholar 

  24. US Department of Agriculture, Agricultural research service (2004) USDA nutrient database for standard reference. http://www.nal.usda.gov/fnic/foodcomp/ (Release 17, 2004)

  25. Keller F (1991) New Phytol 117:423–429

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Belitz HD, Grosch W (1987) Food chemistry. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg

    Google Scholar 

  27. Plessi M (1995) La Rivista di Scienza dell’Alimentazione 24(1):23–33

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Martens M, Baardseth P (1987) Sensory quality. In: Weichmann J (ed) Postharvest physiology of vegetables. Marcel Dekker Inc, New York, pp 427–454

    Google Scholar 

  29. Hermann K (1976) J Food Technol 11:433–448

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Crozier A, Lean MEJ, Mc Donald MS, Black C (1997) J Agric Food Chem 45:590–595

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Mangels AR, Holden JM, Beecher GR, Forman MR, Lanza E (1993) J Am Diet Assoc 93:284–296

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Holland B, Unwin ID, Buss DH (1991) Vegetables, herbs and spices. The composition of foods, 4th edn. The Royal Society of Chemistry, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was a part of the “Qualità Alimentare” programme supported by Ministero per le Politiche Agricole Forestali. Mario Brancaleone (ARSIAL) is especially acknowledged for bringing us into contact with the farm that provided celery samples. We are indebted also to Aldo Bertone for technical assistance.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Antonio Raffo.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Raffo, A., Sinesio, F., Moneta, E. et al. Internal quality of fresh and cold stored celery petioles described by sensory profile, chemical and instrumental measurements. Eur Food Res Technol 222, 590–599 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00217-005-0098-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00217-005-0098-7

Keywords

Navigation