Skip to main content
Log in

GC-MS detection of central nervous tissues as TSE risk material in meat products: analytical quality and strategy

  • Short Communication
  • Published:
Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The detection of central nervous system (CNS) tissue (i.e. brain and spinal cord) by the use of GC-MS and certain fatty acids (FAs) as their methyl esters (FAMEs) was previously shown to be a very promising approach towards identification of CNS tissue as a specified risk material (SRM) in meat products, contrasting available immunochemical methods. This GC-MS method promised to allow quantification of CNS material as low as 0.01%. Here, we show that the CNS-relevant FAMEs C22:6, C24:1ω9, C24:1ω7, C24:0 and C24-OH are present in pure muscle and adipose tissue samples in detectable amounts. Thus, limits of detection are not feasible as quality parameters in this analytical GC-MS approach. Instead, cut-off values have to be applied as calculated from the baseline content of the respective FAME in CNS-free samples and its variation for a given statistical security. Furthermore, the FAs used for quantification of the CNS showed distinct differences depending on species and age. This finding is in accordance with previous studies where it had been concluded that species and age differentiation of CNS might be possible with GC-MS. However, it was not taken into account that it also necessitates a strict analytical strategy for quantification of the CNS content: identification of the presence of CNS (step 1); identification of species and age (step 2); and quantification by use of a species- and age-specific CNS calibration (step 3). Differences between the FA content of the CNS used for calibrating and the CNS in the sample will cause up to fivefold deviation from the true CNS content. Our results show that the FA best suited for identification (step 1) and quantification (step 3) purposes is cerebronic acid C24-OH after silylation. Further in-depth studies are needed in order to elucidate variability of brain FA content and to determine analytical limits. However, the present GC-MS approach is already a highly promising supplement to existing immunochemical methods for the detection of traces of CNS material in meat products.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. European Commission (2001) EC directive 2001/101. Off J L 310:19–21 http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/pri/en/oj/dat/2001/I_310/I_31020011128en00190021.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  2. Will RG, Ironside JW, Zeidler M, Cousens SN, Estibeiro K, Alperovitch A, Poser S, Pocchiari M, Hoffmann A (1996) Lancet 347:921–925

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. European Commission (1999) Opinion of the scientific steering committee on the human exposure risk via food with respect to BSE, adopted on 10 December 1999 http://europa.eu.int/comm/food/fs/sc/ssc/out67_en.pdf

  4. European Commission (2001) EC regulation 999/2001. Off J L 14:1–40 http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/pri/en/oj/dat/2001/I_147/I_14720010531en00010040.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  5. Lücker E, Eigenbrodt E, Wenisch S, Leiser R, Bülte M (1999) J Food Prot 62:268–276

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Lücker E, Eigenbrodt E, Wenisch S, Leiser R, Bülte M (2000) J Food Prot 63:258–263

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Schmidt GR, Hossner KL, Yemm RS, Gould DH, O’Callaghan JP (1999) J Food Prot 62:394–397

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Agazzi ME, Barrero Moreno J, von Holst C, Lücker E, Anklam E (2004) Food Control 15:297–301

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Niederer M, Bollhalder R (2001) Mitt Lebensm Hyg 92:133–144

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Biedermann W, Lücker E, Hensel A (2002) Berl Münch Tierärztl Wschr 115:131–134

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Biedermann W, Lücker E, Poerschmann J, Lachhab S, Truyen U, Hensel A (2004) Anal Bioanal Chem 379:1031–1038, http://www.springeronline.com

    Google Scholar 

  12. Noti A, Biedermann-Brehm S, Biedermann M, Grob K (2002) Mitt Lebensm Hyg 93:387–401

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Lücker E, Biedermann W, Lachhab S, Hensel A (2002) Fleischwirtschaft 82:123–128

    Google Scholar 

  14. Lachhab S, Biedermann W, Lücker E, Hensel A (2003) In: Proceedings of DVG 24–27 September 2002. Garmisch-Partenkirchen ISBN 3-936815-59-3, pp 502–507

  15. Barcarolo R, Bau A, Barrero Moreno J, Dimitrova J, Anklam E (2003) J Sep Sci 26:1347–1352

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. MacNaughton SJ, Stephen JR, Venosa AD, Davis GA, Chang YJ, White DC (1999) Appl Environ Microbiol 65:3566–3574 http://www.ncbi.nha.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=pubmed&dopt=Abstract&list_uids=10427050

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was financially supported by the German Federal Ministry of Consumer Protection, Food and Agriculture.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ernst Lücker.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lücker, E., Biedermann, W., Lachhab, S. et al. GC-MS detection of central nervous tissues as TSE risk material in meat products: analytical quality and strategy. Anal Bioanal Chem 380, 866–870 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-004-2845-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-004-2845-1

Keywords

Navigation