Skip to main content
Log in

Intercomparison on measurements of PCBs in pork fat during the Belgian PCB-crisis

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract.

During the Belgian PCB crisis (1999/2000) the quality of the data from the PCB monitoring were studied with a proficiency testing experiment. Pork fat that was spiked at the Institute for Reference Materials and Measurements (EC-JRC-IRMM) was sent out as unknown to all laboratories that participated in the monitoring. In parallel, the material was certified on the basis of the results of several leading PCB laboratories throughout Europe that did not participate in the monitoring. During the first round 15 to 25% deviation was experienced, while in the end of this multistep intercalibration procedure the average deviation for the respective PCBs was 10.9% (PCB 28), 13.1% (PCB 52), 10.1% (PCB 101), 10.7% (PCB 118), 10.7% (PCB 138), 9.1% (PCB 153), 8.1% (PCB 180) and 8.2% for the sum of the 7 PCBs. The concentrations measured for the higher volatile PCB 28 had a tendency to show lower levels, while for PCB 180 this was less pronounced. On the other hand, PCB 153 showed results rather to the higher side. During this exercise the material was also tested for stability by one of the certifying laboratories.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Electronic Publication

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bester, K., Beernaert, H., Bernreuther, A. et al. Intercomparison on measurements of PCBs in pork fat during the Belgian PCB-crisis. Anal Bioanal Chem 374, 305–313 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-002-1417-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-002-1417-5

Navigation