Abstract
Several previous reports suggested that many commercially available antibodies directed against G protein-coupled receptors (GPCR) lack sufficient selectivity. Accordingly, it has been proposed that receptor antibodies should be validated by at least one of several criteria, such as testing tissues or cells after knockout or silencing of the corresponding gene. Here, we tested whether 12 commercially available antibodies directed against α-adrenergic receptor (AR) subtypes (α1A/B/D, α2A/B/C), atypical chemokine receptor 3 (ACKR3), and vasopressin receptor 1A (AVPR1A) suffice these criteria. We detected in flow cytometry experiments with human vascular smooth muscle cells that the fluorescence signals from each of these antibodies were reduced by 46 ± 10 %–91 ± 2 % in cells treated with commercially available small interfering RNA (siRNA) specific for each receptor, as compared with cells that were incubated with non-targeting siRNA. The tested antibodies included anti-ACKR3 (R&D Systems, mab42273), for which specificity has previously been demonstrated. Staining with this antibody resulted in 72 ± 5 % reduction of the fluorescence signal after ACKR3 siRNA treatment. Furthermore, staining with anti-α1A-AR (Santa Cruz, sc1477) and anti-ACKR3 (Abcam, ab38089), which have previously been reported to be non-specific, resulted in 70 ± 19 % and 80 ± 4 % loss of the fluorescence signal after α1A-AR and ACKR3 siRNA treatment, respectively. Our findings demonstrate that the tested antibodies show reasonable selectivity for their receptor target under our experimental conditions. Furthermore, our observations suggest that the selectivity of GPCR antibodies depends on the method for which the antibody is employed, the species from which cells/tissues are obtained, and on the type of specimens (cell, tissue/cell homogenate, or section) tested.
References
Alexander SP, Benson HE, Faccenda E, Pawson AJ, Sharman JL, Spedding M, Peters JA, Harmar AJ, Collaborators C (2013) The concise guide to PHARMACOLOGY 2013/14: G protein-coupled receptors. Br J Pharmacol 170:1459–1581
Beermann S, Seifert R, Neumann D (2012) Commercially available antibodies against human and murine histamine H(4)-receptor lack specificity. Naunyn Schmiedeberg’s Arch Pharmacol 385:125–135
Berahovich RD, Penfold ME, Schall TJ (2010) Nonspecific CXCR7 antibodies. Immunol Lett 133:112–114
Bohmer T, Pfeiffer N, Gericke A (2014) Three commercial antibodies against alpha1-adrenergic receptor subtypes lack specificity in paraffin-embedded sections of murine tissues. Naunyn Schmiedeberg’s Arch Pharmacol 387:703–706
Cecyre B, Thomas S, Ptito M, Casanova C, Bouchard JF (2014) Evaluation of the specificity of antibodies raised against cannabinoid receptor type 2 in the mouse retina. Naunyn Schmiedeberg’s Arch Pharmacol 387:175–184
Cernecka H, Pradidarcheep W, Lamers WH, Schmidt M, Michel MC (2014) Rat beta(3)-adrenoceptor protein expression: antibody validation and distribution in rat gastrointestinal and urogenital tissues. Naunyn Schmiedeberg’s Arch Pharmacol 387:1117–1127
Fredriksson R, Schioth HB (2005) The repertoire of G-protein-coupled receptors in fully sequenced genomes. Mol Pharmacol 67:1414–1425
Gupta A, Devi LA (2006) The use of receptor-specific antibodies to study G-protein-coupled receptors. Mt Sinai J Med 73:673–681
Hamdani N, van der Velden J (2009) Lack of specificity of antibodies directed against human beta-adrenergic receptors. Naunyn Schmiedeberg’s Arch Pharmacol 379:403–407
Jensen BC, Swigart PM, Simpson PC (2009) Ten commercial antibodies for alpha-1-adrenergic receptor subtypes are nonspecific. Naunyn Schmiedeberg’s Arch Pharmacol 379:409–412
Michel MC, Wieland T, Tsujimoto G (2009) How reliable are G-protein-coupled receptor antibodies? Naunyn Schmiedeberg’s Arch Pharmacol 379:385–388
Pradidarcheep W, Stallen J, Labruyere WT, Dabhoiwala NF, Michel MC, Lamers WH (2009) Lack of specificity of commercially available antisera against muscarinergic and adrenergic receptors. Naunyn Schmiedeberg’s Arch Pharmacol 379:397–402
Saini V, Marchese A, Majetschak M (2010) CXC chemokine receptor 4 is a cell surface receptor for extracellular ubiquitin. J Biol Chem 285:15566–15576
Talmont F, Mouledous L (2014) Evaluation of commercial antibodies against human sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor 1. Naunyn Schmiedeberg’s Arch Pharmacol 387:427–431
Talmont F, Mouledous L, Boue J, Mollereau C, Dietrich G (2012) Denatured G-protein coupled receptors as immunogens to generate highly specific antibodies. PLoS One 7:e46348
Tripathi A, Vana PG, Chavan TS, Brueggemann LI, Byron KL, Tarasova NI, Volkman BF, Gaponenko V, Majetschak M (2015) Heteromerization of chemokine (C-X-C motif) receptor 4 with alpha1A/B-adrenergic receptors controls alpha1-adrenergic receptor function. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 112:E1659–E1668
Vaidehi N, Bhattacharya S, Larsen AB (2014) Structure and dynamics of G-protein coupled receptors. Adv Exp Med Biol 796:37–54
Venkatakrishnan AJ, Deupi X, Lebon G, Tate CG, Schertler GF, Babu MM (2013) Molecular signatures of G-protein-coupled receptors. Nature 494:185–194
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Grant support
This research was supported by the National Institute of General Medical Sciences (Awards R01GM107495 and T32GM008750); by the National Cancer Institute (Awards R01CA135341 and R01CA188427); by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (Award R21HL118588); and by a grant that was awarded and administered by the U.S. Army Medical Research and Materiel Command (USAMRMC)/Medical Research Acquisition Activity (USAMRAA) at Fort Detrick, MD, under Contract Number W81XWH-15-1-0262. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Tripathi, A., Gaponenko, V. & Majetschak, M. Commercially available antibodies directed against α-adrenergic receptor subtypes and other G protein-coupled receptors with acceptable selectivity in flow cytometry experiments. Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's Arch Pharmacol 389, 243–248 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00210-015-1196-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00210-015-1196-0