Skip to main content
Log in

Nondegeneracy for stable solutions to the one-phase free boundary problem

  • Published:
Mathematische Annalen Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We prove the nondegeneracy condition for stable solutions to the one-phase free boundary problem. The proof is by a De Giorgi iteration, where we need the Sobolev inequality of Michael and Simon and, consequently, an integral estimate for the mean curvature of the free boundary. We then apply the nondegeneracy estimate to obtain local curvature bounds for stable free boundaries in dimension n, provided the Bernstein-type theorem for stable, entire solutions in the same dimension is valid. In particular, we obtain this curvature estimate in \(n=2\) dimensions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The paper has no associated data.

References

  1. Allen, M., Petrosyan, A.: A two-phase problem with a lower-dimensional free boundary. Interfaces Free Bound. 14(3), 307–342 (2012)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Alt, H.W., Caffarelli, L.A., Friedman, A.: Variational problems with two phases and their free boundaries. Trans. Am. Math. Soc. 282(2), 431–461 (1984)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Caffarelli, L.A., Alt, H.W.: Existence and regularity for a minimum problem with free boundary. J. Reine Angew. Math. 325, 105–144 (1981)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Caffarelli, L.A., Jerison, D., Kenig Carlos E.: Global energy minimizers for free boundary problems and full regularity in three dimensions. In: Noncompact Problems at the Intersection of Geometry, Analysis, and Topology, Contemp. Math., vol. 350, pp. 83–97. Amer. Math. Soc., Providence (2004)

  5. Caffarelli, L.A., Roquejoffre, J.-M., Sire, Y.: Variational problems with free boundaries for the fractional Laplacian. J. Eur. Math. Soc. 12(5), 1151–1179 (2010)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Caffarelli, L.A., Salsa, S.: A Geometric Approach to Free Boundary Problems, Graduate Studies in Mathematics, vol. 68. American Mathematical Society, Providence (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Caffarelli, L.A., Shahgholian, H., Yeressian, K.: A minimization problem with free boundary related to a cooperative system. Duke Math. J. 167(10), 1825–1882 (2018)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Chodosh, O., Li, C.: Stable minimal hypersurfaces in \({\mathbb{R}}^{4}\). arXiv preprint arXiv:2108.11462 (2021)

  9. David, G., Engelstein, M., Toro, T.: Free boundary regularity for almost-minimizers. Adv. Math. 350, 1109–1192 (2019)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. David, G., Toro, T.: Regularity of almost minimizers with free boundary. Calc. Var. Partial Differ. Equ. 54(1), 455–524 (2015)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. De Silva, D., Jerison, D., Shahgholian, H.: Inhomogeneous global minimizers to the one-phase free boundary problem. Communications in Partial Differential Equations, pp. 1–24 (2022)

  12. De Silva, D., Roquejoffre, J.-M.: Regularity in a one-phase free boundary problem for the fractional Laplacian. Annales de l’IHP Analyse non linéaire 29(3), 335–367 (2012)

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. De Silva, D., Savin, O.: Regularity of Lipschitz free boundaries for the thin one-phase problem. J. Eur. Math. Soc. 17(6), 1293–1326 (2015)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. De Silva, D., Savin, O.: Almost minimizers of the one-phase free boundary problem. Commun. Partial Differ. Equ. 45(8), 913–930 (2020)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. De Silva, D., Jerison, D.: A singular energy minimizing free boundary. J. Reine Angew. Math. [Crelle’s Journal] 2009(635):1–21 (2009)

  16. Friedman, A.: Variational Principles and Free-boundary Problems. R.E. Krieger Publishing Company, Malabar (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Hauswirth, L., Hélein, F., Pacard, F.: On an overdetermined elliptic problem. Pac. J. Math. 250(2), 319–334 (2011)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  18. Jerison, D., Kamburov, N.: Structure of one-phase free boundaries in the plane. Int. Math. Res. Not. 2016(19), 5922–5987 (2016)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  19. Jerison, D., Perera, K.: Higher critical points in an elliptic free boundary problem. J. Geom. Anal. 28(2), 1258–1294 (2018)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  20. Jerison, D., Savin, O.: Some remarks on stability of cones for the one-phase free boundary problem. Geom. Funct. Anal. 25(4), 1240–1257 (2015)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  21. Kinderlehrer, D., Nirenberg, L.: Regularity in elliptic free boundary problems. Annali della Scuola Normale Superiore di Pisa-Classe di Scienze 4(2), 373–391 (1977)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  22. Liu, Y., Wang, K., Wei, J.: On smooth solutions to one phase-free boundary problem in \({\mathbb{R} }^n\). Int. Math. Res. Not. 2021(20), 15682–15732 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Mazzoleni, D., Terracini, S., Velichkov, B.: Regularity of the optimal sets for some spectral functionals. Geom. Funct. Anal. 27(2), 373–426 (2017)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  24. Mazzoleni, D., Terracini, S., Velichkov, B.: Regularity of the free boundary for the vectorial Bernoulli problem. Anal. PDE 13(3), 741–764 (2020)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  25. Michael, J.H., Simon, L.M.: Sobolev and mean-value inequalities on generalized submanifolds of \({\mathbb{R} }^n\). Commun. Pure Appl. Math. 26(3), 361–379 (1973)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Wang, K.: The structure of finite Morse index solutions to two free boundary problems in \({{\mathbb{R}}}^2\). arXiv preprint arXiv:1506.00491 (2015)

  27. White, B.: Lectures on minimal surface theory. arXiv preprint arXiv:1308.3325 (2013)

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kelei Wang.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that there are no conflict of interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

N. Kamburov was partially supported by Proyecto Fondecyt Regular No. 1201087. K. Wang was supported by National Key R &D Program of China (No. 2022YFA1005602) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 12131017).

Appendix A: Auxiliary results

Appendix A: Auxiliary results

We recall the notion of a viscosity solution of (1) (see [6]). First we define viscosity super- and subsolutions.

Definition A.1

A viscosity supersolution of (1) in a domain \(D\subseteq {\mathbb {R}}^n\) is a non-negative function \(w\in C(D)\) such that \(\Delta w \le 0\) in \(D^+(w)\) and for every \(x_0\in F(w)\) with a tangent ball B from the positive side (\(x_0\in \partial B\) and \(B\subset D^+(w)\)), there is \(\alpha \le 1\) such that

$$\begin{aligned} u(x) = \alpha \langle x-x_0, \nu \rangle ^+ + o(|x-x_0|) \end{aligned}$$

as \(x\rightarrow x_0\) non-tangentially in B, with \(\nu \) the inner normal to \(\partial B\) at \(x_0\).

Definition A.2

A viscosity subsolution of (1) in a domain \(D\subseteq {\mathbb {R}}^n\) is a non-negative function \(w\in C(D)\) such that \(\Delta w \ge 0\) in \(D^+(w)\) and for every \(x_0\in F(w)\) with a tangent ball B in the zero set (\(x_0\in \partial B\) and \(B\subset \{w=0\}\)), there is \(\alpha \ge 1\) such that

$$\begin{aligned} u(x) = \alpha \langle x-x_0, \nu \rangle ^+ + o(|x-x_0|) \end{aligned}$$

as \(x\rightarrow x_0\) non-tangentially in \(B^c\), with \(\nu \) the outer normal to \(\partial B\) at \(x_0\).

A viscosity solution in D is a function that is both a supersolution and a subsolution in the sense above.

The class of viscosity solutions is particularly well suited for taking uniform limits. We quote the following result

Lemma A.3

[18, Lemma 4.4] Let \(u_k\in C(D)\) be a sequence of viscosity solutions of (1) in D such that \(u_k\rightarrow u\) uniformly and u is Lipschitz continuous. Then u is also a viscosity supersolution of (1) in D. If, in addition, \(\overline{D^{+}(u_k)} \rightarrow \overline{D^{+}(u)}\) locally in the Hausdorff distance, then u is a viscosity subsolution, as well.

As a corollary, we have the following well known result (see [6, Lemma 1.21] or [18, Proposition 4.2] for the proof) describing uniform limits of Lipschitz continuous and non-degenerate viscosity solutions.

Proposition A.4

Let \(D\subseteq {\mathbb {R}}^n\) be a domain and \(\{u_k\} \subset C(D)\) be a sequence of viscosity solutions of (1) in D which satisfies

  • (Uniform Lipschitz continuity) There exists a constant C, such that

    $$\begin{aligned} \Vert \nabla u_k\Vert _{L^{\infty }(D)} \le C; \end{aligned}$$
  • (Uniform non-degeneracy) There exists a constant c, such that

    for every \(B_r(x) \subseteq D\), centered at a free boundary point \(x\in F(u_k)\).

Then any limit \(u \in C(\overline{D})\) of a uniformly convergent on compacts subsequence \(u_k \rightarrow u\) satisfies

  1. (1)

    \(\overline{D^+(u_k)} \rightarrow \overline{D^+(u)}\) and \(F(u_k) \rightarrow F(u)\) locally in the Hausdorff distance;

  2. (2)

    \(1_{\{u_k>0\}} \rightarrow 1_{\{u>0\}}\) in \(L^1_{\text {loc}}(D)\);

Moreover, u is a Lipschitz continuous, non-degenerate viscosity solution of (1).

In the next proposition we establish the fact that globally defined viscosity solutions of the one-phase FBP have a gradient bounded by 1.

Proposition A.5

Let \(u:{\mathbb {R}}^n\rightarrow [0,\infty )\) be an entire viscosity solution of the one-phase FBP (1), with \(F(u)\ne \emptyset \), and let \(\Omega :=\{x\in {\mathbb {R}}^n: u(x)>0\}\) denote the positive phase of u. Then

$$\begin{aligned} |\nabla u(x)| \le 1 \quad \text {for all } x\in \Omega . \end{aligned}$$

Furthermore, if \(|\nabla u(x_0)| = 1\) for some \(x_0\in \Omega \), then \(|\nabla u (x)|\equiv 1\) in the connected component \({\mathcal {C}}\) of \(\Omega \), containing \(x_0\), so that \(u|_{{\mathcal {C}}}(x) = (x-p)\cdot e\) for some \(p\in {\mathbb {R}}^n\) and unit vector \(e\in {\mathbb {R}}^n\).

Proof

We sketch out the argument from [26, Proposition 2.1], written for a closely related problem.

First, we show that there is a dimensional constant \(C>0\) such that

$$\begin{aligned} |\nabla u|\le C \quad \text {in } \Omega . \end{aligned}$$

Pick any \(x\in \Omega \). By rescaling and recentering, we may assume that \(x=0\) and \(d(x, F(u))=1\). By applying the Harnack inequality plus gradient estimates to u in \(B_1\), it suffices to show that \(u(0)\le C_0\). Let \(p\in F(u)\cap \partial B_1\) and note that \(B_1\) is a ball touching F(u) from the positive side.

By the Harnack inequality, we know that \(u\ge cu(0)\) in \(B_{1/2}\). Consider the harmonic function h in the annulus \(B_1{\setminus } B_{1/2}\), having boundary values \(h=cu(0)\) on \(\partial B_{1/2}\) and \(h=0\) on \(\partial B_1\). Then \(h_\nu (p) = c_0 u(0)\), where \(\nu \) denotes the inner unit normal to \(\partial B_1\) at p. On the other hand, the maximum principle implies \(h\le u\) in \(B_1{\setminus } B_{1/2}\), so that the Hopf Lemma, in conjunction with the viscosity supersolution property, yields the desired bound

$$\begin{aligned} 1 \ge u_\nu (p) \ge h_\nu (p) = c_0 u(0). \end{aligned}$$

Therefore, the supremum \(L:=\sup _{\Omega } |\nabla u|\le C\) is positive and finite. Let \(x_k\in \Omega \) be a sequence of points such that \(|\nabla u(x_k)| \rightarrow L\) as \(k\rightarrow \infty \). Define the following rescales of u

$$\begin{aligned} v_k(x):=d_k^{-1} u(x_k + d_k x), \quad \text {where } d_k:=d(x_k, F(u)). \end{aligned}$$

Then the \(v_k\) satisfy: \(\Vert \nabla v_k\Vert _{L^\infty }\le L\), the distance \(d(0,F(v_k))=1\) and \(|\nabla v_k(0)|=|\nabla u(x_k)| \rightarrow L\) as \(k\rightarrow \infty \). Thus, the sequence of uniformly Lipschitz continuous, viscosity solutions \(\{v_k\}\) subconverges uniformly on compact subsets of \({\mathbb {R}}^n\) to the globally defined, Lipschitz continuous function v, which is harmonic in its positive phase \(\tilde{\Omega }:=\{v>0\}\), satisfies \(\Vert \nabla v\Vert _{L^\infty }\le L\), and which is a viscosity supersolution on account of Lemma A.3. Furthermore, since \(v_k\rightarrow v\) uniformly on \(\overline{B_1}\) and \(v_k-v\) is harmonic in \(B_1\), we have

$$\begin{aligned} |\nabla v(0) - \nabla v_k(0)| \le C \Vert v_k - v\Vert _{C(B_1)} \rightarrow 0 \quad \text {as } k\rightarrow \infty , \end{aligned}$$

so that \(|\nabla v(0)|=L\).

However, since \(\Delta |\nabla v|^2 =2|\nabla ^2 v|^2 \ge 0\) in \(\tilde{\Omega }\), we know that \(|\nabla v|^2\) is subharmonic in \(\tilde{\Omega }\), so that the strong maximum principle implies that \(|\nabla v|\equiv L\) in the connected component \({\mathcal {C}}\) of \(\tilde{\Omega }\) containing 0. Therefore, \(2|\nabla ^2 v|^2 = \Delta |\nabla v|^2 = 0\) in \({\mathcal {C}}\), so that v is a linear function in \({\mathcal {C}}\) with slope \(L>0\). This means that the component \({\mathcal {C}}\) is actually a half-space and for some \(p\in {\mathbb {R}}^n\), and unit vector \(e\in {\mathbb {R}}^n\), we have

$$\begin{aligned} v(x) = L(x-p)\cdot e \quad \text {for all } x\in {\mathcal {C}}. \end{aligned}$$

We now infer that \(L\le 1\) from the fact that v is a viscosity supersolution to (1).

To establish the remaining part of the proposition (regarding the possibility of \(|\nabla u(x_0)|=1\)), we use the verbatim argument from the paragraph above. \(\square \)

We end the appendix with the following lemma.

Lemma A.4

Let u be a classical solution to (1) in \(B_1\subset {\mathbb {R}}^n\) which is Lipschitz continuous and nondegenerate (with universal constants) in \(B_1\). Assume that \(0\in F(u)\) and that the second fundamental form A of F(u) is bounded

$$\begin{aligned} |A(p)| \le C \quad \text {for all } p\in F(u), \end{aligned}$$

by some absolute constant \(C>0\). Then there exists a constant \(c\in (0,1)\) such that, in a suitable Euclidean coordinate system, the connected component \({\mathcal {C}}\) of \(B_c^+(u)\), whose boundary contains 0, is the supergraph:

$$\begin{aligned} {\mathcal {C}}= \{x=(x',x_n)\in B_{c}: x_n> f(x')\}, \end{aligned}$$
(47)

for some \(f:B_{c}'\rightarrow {\mathbb {R}}\) with \(\Vert f\Vert _{C^2(B_c')}\le 1/c\).

Proof

Since the curvature of F(u) is bounded by an absolute constant, there is a small absolute constant \(c>0\), such that the component F of \(F(u)\cap B_{c}\) containing 0, is given by a graph

$$\begin{aligned} F = \{(x',x_n)\in B_{c}: x_n= f(x')\}, \end{aligned}$$

with \(\Vert f\Vert _{C^2(B_c')}\le 1/c\). Let us show that, by possibly reducing the constant c, the connected component \({\mathcal {C}}\) of \(B_c^+(u)\) bordering the origin, is the supergraph (47).

Assume that this last statement is false. Then there exist a sequence \(c_k\rightarrow 0\) and a sequence of counterexamples \(\{u_k\}\) such that the component \({\mathcal {C}}_k\) of \(B_{c_k}^+(u_k)\) bordering 0 has at least two free boundary connected components: the connected component \(F_k\) of 0 in \(F(u_k)\cap B_{c_k}\), and another component \(\tilde{F}_k\). Choose \(\tilde{F_k}\) to be the closest such component to \(F_k\) and set \(d_k:=\text {dist}(F_k,\tilde{F}_k)\le c_k\). Consider now the rescaled solutions

$$\begin{aligned} v_k(x):=d_k^{-1} [u_k{\mathcal {C}}_k](d_k x) \quad \text {in } B_{d_k^{-1}c_k}\supseteq B_1, \end{aligned}$$

and denote by \(G_k:=d_k^{-1}F_k\), \(\tilde{G}_k:=d_k^{-1}\tilde{F}_k\). We have that

$$\begin{aligned} \text {dist}(G_k, \tilde{G}_k) = 1, \end{aligned}$$
(48)

while the curvature

$$\begin{aligned} |A_{G_k}|\le d_k \sup |A_{F(u_k)}| \le c_k C \rightarrow 0. \end{aligned}$$

Now, according to Proposition A.4 the uniformly Lipschitz continuous and nondegenerate \(v_k\) converge to the limit \(v=x_n^+\) uniformly on compacts, with \(G_k\) converging to a subset \(G\subseteq \{x_n=0\}\). On the other hand, by the Hausdorff convergence of the free boundaries, (48) suggests that F(v) also has a component sitting at a unit distance away from G. This yields a contradiction and the proof of the lemma is complete. \(\square \)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kamburov, N., Wang, K. Nondegeneracy for stable solutions to the one-phase free boundary problem. Math. Ann. 388, 2705–2726 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00208-023-02591-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00208-023-02591-0

Mathematics Subject Classification

Navigation