Abstract
Parenteral nutrition (PN) is typically administered to individuals with gastrointestinal dysfunction, a contraindication for enteral feeding, and a need for nutritional therapy. When PN is the only energy source in patients, it is defined as total parenteral nutrition (TPN). TPN is a life-saving approach for different patient populations, both in infants and adults. However, despite numerous benefits, TPN can cause adverse effects, including metabolic disorders and liver injury. TPN-associated liver injury, known as intestinal failure-associated liver disease (IFALD), represents a significant problem affecting up to 90% of individuals receiving TPN. IFALD pathogenesis is complex, depending on the TPN components as well as on the patient’s medical conditions. Despite numerous animal studies and clinical observations, the molecular mechanisms driving IFALD remain largely unknown. The present study was set up to elucidate the mechanisms underlying IFALD. For this purpose, human liver spheroid co-cultures were treated with a TPN mixture, followed by RNA sequencing analysis. Subsequently, following exposure to TPN and its single nutritional components, several key events of liver injury, including mitochondrial dysfunction, endoplasmic reticulum stress, oxidative stress, apoptosis, and lipid accumulation (steatosis), were studied using various techniques. It was found that prolonged exposure to TPN substantially changes the transcriptome profile of liver spheroids and affects multiple metabolic and signaling pathways contributing to liver injury. Moreover, TPN and its main components, especially lipid emulsion, induce changes in all key events measured and trigger steatosis.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Parenteral nutrition (PN) is a form of artificial nutrition serving as a life-saving approach for various malnourishment-associated conditions and diseases. PN consists of a mixture of lipid emulsions, carbohydrates, amino acids, vitamins, minerals, electrolytes, and trace elements, which is delivered intravenously to patients with impaired gastrointestinal function and/or not suitable for enteral feeding (Berlana 2022). Indications for PN include gastrointestinal obstruction and motility disorders, short bowel syndrome, malignancies, hypercatabolic states, as well as premature birth, among others (Berger and Pichard 2022). PN can be administered via a smaller peripheral vein (peripheral PN) or through a large central vein (central PN) and can be applied as a short-term as well as a long-term treatment (Berlana 2022). When intravenously administered PN is the only source of energy, it is defined as total parenteral nutrition (TPN), as opposed to supplemental parenteral nutrition indicating a combination of intravenous nutrition with oral or enteral nutrition used to avoid energy deficits (Berger et al. 2022; Berlana 2022). Despite the evident benefits, TPN treatment can cause health complications with potentially fatal outcomes. Besides problems related to venous access and catheter site infections, distinct adverse effects linked to the nutrition and metabolic conditions of the patients can manifest, including hyperglycemia, dehydration, electrolyte imbalance, thrombosis, encephalopathy, bone disorders, and liver injury (Sobotka and Camilo 2009; Berlana 2022). The latter, which is commonly known as PN-associated liver disease or intestinal failure-associated liver disease (IFALD), is one of such complications occurring during TPN treatment (Lal et al. 2018). In the context of IFALD, liver injury is usually manifested as steatosis, cholestasis, or a combination of both conditions. The incidence of IFALD in patients receiving TPN can be as high as 90%, depending on the underlying conditions (Kumpf 2006; Lakananurak and Tienchai 2019; Bischoff et al. 2020; Weylandt et al. 2023). In extreme cases of long-term TPN, end-stage liver disease might occur with a rather high mortality rate of up to 34% within 4 years (Chan et al. 1999; Cavicchi et al. 2000). The main risk factors linked to disease development are patient related (i.e., lack of enteral feeding, gut dysbiosis, and infections) and PN related (i.e., caloric overload, intravenous lipid emulsion composition, and (micro)nutrient deficiency or excessive administration) (Lakananurak and Tienchai 2019; Lee et al. 2020).
Although several mechanisms have been proposed, the pathogenesis of IFALD is not yet fully understood and warrants further investigation. Some of the most studied TPN-related mechanisms are those associated with the composition of lipid emulsions and subsequent lipotoxicity (Driscoll 2023). In this respect, the omega-6 to omega-3 fatty acids ratio and the amount of plant-derived phytosterols, especially high in soybean-based lipid emulsions, are of particular importance. While a high omega-6 to omega-3 fatty acid ratio promotes inflammation, a high abundance of phytosterols can affect bile acid metabolism (Zaloga 2015; Notz et al. 2022; Driscoll 2023). Consequently, intravenously administered lipids can cause both hepatic steatosis and cholestasis (Driscoll 2023). In addition, lipid overload can trigger severe saturated free fatty acids-mediated lipotoxicity, which is driven by mitochondrial oxidative stress, endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress, activation of pro-inflammatory signaling cascades, and apoptosis (Cazanave and Gores 2010). Similarly, excessive glucose infusion may compromise mitochondrial fatty acid beta-oxidation and promote hepatic de novo lipogenesis, hence contributing to steatosis (Gabe and Culkin 2010; Kovacic and Somanathan 2013). Additional mechanisms involved in glucose toxicity are oxidative stress and inflammation (Kovacic and Somanathan 2013). Micronutrients (i.e., manganese and copper) have been proposed to inflict liver damage secondary to mitochondrial dysfunction, oxidative stress, disruption in intracellular calcium and iron metabolism, inflammation, protein misfolding, ER stress, and apoptosis (Howard et al. 2007; Olson et al. 2019; Chandra and Keshavkant 2021; Pajarillo et al. 2022).
Thus far, IFALD has been mainly investigated in clinical patients and animal experimentation. Despite providing crucial insight into pathophysiology, clinical studies are often conducted in patients with underlying pathological conditions, which challenges the distinction between driving mechanisms and causes (Zafirovska et al. 2023; Tabone et al. 2024). TPN-related animal research has primarily focused on the use of surgical and preterm rodent and pig models, which has provided critical findings on pathophysiological processes underlying liver injury in the context of IFALD (Sangild et al. 2014; Burrin et al. 2020). Although useful, the translational value of such animal studies is questionable given well-known interspecies differences (Martić-Kehl et al. 2012). The shortcomings of clinical research and animal experimentation in the IFALD field could be overcome, at least in part, by the use of human-centered in vitro systems that allow in-depth investigation at the mechanistic level (Soldatow et al. 2013; Serras et al. 2021; Yang et al. 2023). In the present study, a three-dimensional (3D) spheroid co-culture system consisting of both human parenchymal and non-parenchymal liver cells was used to elucidate the mechanisms of TPN-associated liver injury.
Materials and methods
Chemicals and reagents
Unless stated otherwise, all chemicals and reagents were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA), prepared and used according to the manufacturer’s instructions. CELLSTAR® culture 96-well ultra-low attachment (ULA) plates were obtained from Greiner Bio-One (Frickenhausen, Germany). Parenteral nutrition SmofKabiven®, trace elements concentrate Addaven®, liposoluble vitamins Vitalipid® Novum Adult, and water-soluble vitamins Soluvit® Novum, all produced by Fresenius Kabi (Kriens, Switzerland), were kindly provided by the Department of Clinical Nutrition of the Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel (Brussels, Belgium).
Cell culture and human liver spheroid co-culture characterization
Human liver spheroid co-cultures were set up using C3A cells, a clonal derivative of the human hepatoma HepG2 cell line (CRL-10741, ATCC, Manassas, VA, USA), and LX-2 cells, an immortalized activated human hepatic stellate cell (HSC) line (SCC064, Sigma-Aldrich). C3A and LX-2 cells were cultured in minimum essential medium (MEM) (Gibco, Waltham, MA, USA) supplemented with 1 mM sodium pyruvate, 1% non-essential amino acids (Gibco), 10% fetal bovine serum (Gibco), 100 U/ml penicillin, and 100 μg/ml streptomycin at 37 °C, at 5% (v/v) CO2. As schematically shown in Fig. 1A, liver spheroids were generated by seeding C3A and LX-2 cells at a ratio of 10:1 (500 C3A cells/well and 50 LX-2 cells/well in a total volume of 100 μL; day 0) on 96-well ULA plates for 72 h under gentle shaking, as described previously (Dos Santos et al. 2023). Spheroid growth over time was monitored by taking images using a Nikon Eclipse Ti-S microscope (Nikon, Tokyo, Japan) with a 10 × objective. Spheroid area, sphericity, and contours were determined by manually tracing the outlines of spheroids’ edges in ImageJ (version 1.54d; National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA) from bright-field images taken from at least 25 spheroids on day 3 and day 9 following cell seeding. The spheroid area was extracted from the corresponding built-in measure. The spheroid sphericity was defined and calculated as the ratio of the circumference of a perfect circle with an area identical to that of the spheroid and the circumference of the spheroid itself. Spheroid contours were extracted as XY-coordinates in ImageJ and overlays of individual contours were prepared in R (version 4.2.0).
Cell exposure to TPN and its single components
A sterile three-chamber bag of SmofKabiven® parenteral nutrition (1497 mL), containing amino acid solution with electrolytes (750 mL), glucose (446 mL; 2.33 M), and lipid emulsion (281 mL), as well as trace elements concentrate Addaven® (10 mL), and vitamins preparations Vitalipid® Novum Adult and Soluvit® Novum (10 mL) was prepared according to the manufacturer’s instructions and used for cell culture experiments. The TPN mixture prepared for in vitro testing reflects the quantity and ratios of all single components contained in a final mixture preparation used in clinical settings (Table 1). Starting from day 3 following cell seeding, human liver spheroid co-cultures were exposed to TPN and its components for a variable period, ranging from 24 to 144 h (Fig. 1A). MEM cell culture medium was used to prepare different concentrations of TPN and its single components.
Cell viability
Human liver spheroid co-cultures were exposed to TPN and its single components for 24, 48, 72, and 144 h. Cell viability was determined by measuring the total adenosine triphosphate (ATP) content using the CellTiter-Glo® 3D Cell Viability Assay (G9682, Promega, Leiden, Netherlands) and by following manufacturer’s instructions. Briefly, 70 μL of cell culture medium per well was removed, 30 μL of Cell TiterGlo® 3D reagent was added, and the spheroids were lysed by pipetting up and down vigorously. Following a 20-min incubation at 37 °C in the dark, 50 μL per well of the mixture lysate was transferred to a white plate (Lumitrac, Greiner Bio-One GmbH, Frickenhausen, Germany) and the bioluminescence signal was measured using SpectraMax iD3 Multi-Mode Reader (Molecular Devices, San Jose, CA, USA). At least 3 human liver spheroids per treatment condition and 15 for growth assessment over time were used to measure the total ATP.
RNA extraction, cDNA synthesis, and real-time RT-qPCR analysis
Total RNA from approximately 65 human liver spheroids cultured for 3 days and 9 days (time points corresponding to the start of the treatments and the longest treatment duration, respectively) was isolated using the RNeasy Mini kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) according to the manufacturer’s instructions and quantified using the NanoDrop® ND-1000 spectrophotometer (ThermoFisher Scientific, Merelbeke, Belgium). The synthesis of complementary DNA (cDNA) was performed using 800 ng of total mRNA per sample and by means of the iScriptTM Reverse Transcription Supermix (Bio-Rad, Temse, Belgium). Real-time reverse transcription quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) analysis was performed using 10 ng of cDNA, Taqman® Fast Advanced Mastermix (Applied Biosystems, Waltham, MA, USA) and Taqman probes (ALB, Hs00609411_m1; HNF1A, Hs00167041_m1; APOB, Hs00181142_m1; CYP7A1, Hs00167982_m1; SLC27A2, Hs00167982_m1; DES, Hs00157258_m1; PDGFRB, Hs01019589_m1; COL1A1, Hs00164004_m1; ACTA2, Hs00426835_g1; HPRT1, Hs02800695_m1), following manufacturer’s instructions and using StepOnePlus™ real-time PCR system (Applied Biosystems, Waltham, MA, USA). Relative mRNA expression levels were calculated according to the Pfaffl method (Pfaffl 2001). HPRT1 was used as a housekeeping gene for normalization purposes.
RNA sequencing and transcriptome analysis
Total RNA from approximately 65 human liver spheroid co-cultures treated with 1% TPN for 24 and 144 h was extracted employing the RNeasy Mini kit (Qiagen), and only the RNA samples of high quality (RNA integrity number > 7.0) as measured using the 4150 TapeStation (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA) were used. Library preparation and RNA sequencing were performed with BGI Genomics (Hong Kong, China) using DNBSEQ™ sequencing technology, as previously described (Drmanac et al. 2010). Sequence reads were checked for quality and filtered using SOAPnuke software (v1.5.2; BGI Genomics) (Cock et al. 2010; Chen et al. 2018b). The filtered clean reads were aligned to the reference human genome assembly GRCh38.p13 (version GCF_000001405.39_GRCh38.p13) using HISAT2 software (v2.0.4) and mapped to the reference transcripts using Bowtie2 software (v2.2.5), and the gene expression level of each sample was calculated using RSEM (v1.2.8) (Li and Dewey 2011; Langmead and Salzberg 2012). Differential gene expression (DEG) analysis was performed using the DESeq2 analysis method (Love et al. 2014). Transcripts with a log2-transformed gene expression fold change |log2(FC)|> 0.58 and adjusted p value (Q value) < 0.05 were deemed significantly differentially expressed. The Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) was used to perform the enrichment analysis of DEGs (Kanehisa 2000).
Mitochondrial membrane potential detection
Liver spheroid co-cultures were exposed to TPN and its single components for 24 and 144 h. Mitochondrial membrane potential (MMP, ΔΨM) was assessed using the cationic Rhodamine 123 probe (Ex/Em = 505/534 nm), accumulating in the negatively charged mitochondrial matrix, to stain liver spheroid co-cultures, as explained elsewhere (Dos Santos et al. 2023). The dye accumulation is inversely proportional to MMP. Briefly, after 24- or 144-h exposure to TPN and its single components, 8–12 human liver spheroid co-cultures were pooled, gently disaggregated into single-cell suspension using TrypLE™ Express (Gibco, Waltham, MA, USA), and, by pipetting up and down, washed with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and incubated with Rhodamine 123 (1.25 μM) for 30 min at 37 °C in the dark. Subsequently, cells were washed and resuspended in PBS and analyzed using Attune Acoustic Focusing Cytometer (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA). Measured fluorescence was used to quantify relative MMP normalized against untreated control. As a positive control, human liver spheroid co-cultures exposed to carbonyl cyanide 4-(trifluoromethoxy) phenylhydrazone (FCCP) (20 μM) for 72 h were used (Sakamuru et al. 2016; Dos Santos et al. 2023).
ER stress detection
Liver spheroid co-cultures were exposed to TPN and its single components for 24 and 144 h. ER stress was determined using thioflavin T (ThT; Ex/Em = 440/490 nm) to quantify intracellular protein aggregates (Verwilst et al. 2019; Dos Santos et al. 2023). Following exposure to TPN and its single components for 24 or 144 h, at least eight human liver spheroid co-cultures were pooled, gently disaggregated into single-cell suspension using TrypLE™ Express, and, by pipetting up and down, washed with PBS and stained with ThT (15 μM). Following 30 min of incubation at 37 °C in the dark, the suspension of single cells was washed once, resuspended in PBS and analyzed using the Attune Acoustic Focusing Cytometer. Detected fluorescence was used to quantify relative protein aggregates, and therefore ER stress, normalized against untreated control. Thapsigargin (Tg; 10 μM) treatment of human liver spheroid co-cultures for 72 h was used as a positive control (Lindner et al. 2020; Dos Santos et al. 2023).
Intracellular reactive oxygen species detection
Intracellular reactive oxygen species (ROS) levels were measured using chloromethyl-2′,7′-dichlorofluorescein diacetate (CM-H2DCFDA; Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA), according to the manufacturer’s instructions. In short, after 2 h of exposure to TPN and its single components, human liver spheroid co-cultures were washed with PBS and stained with CM-H2DCFDA (10 μM). Following incubation of 25 min at 37 °C in the dark, human liver spheroid co-cultures were washed with PBS and lysed using 1% Triton X-100. A 100 μL of lysate per sample was transferred to a black 96 well-plate and the fluorescence signal was measured using SpectraMax iD3 Multi-Mode Reader (Ex/Em = 492/518 nm). Fluorescence values recorded were used to quantify relative intracellular ROS against untreated control. Human liver spheroid co-cultures exposed to menadione (100 μM) for 2 h were used as a positive control for ROS assessment (Criddle et al. 2006). At least six human liver spheroids per condition were used to measure the ROS levels.
Apoptosis analysis
Liver spheroid co-cultures were exposed to TPN and its single components for 144 h. Apoptotic cells were detected using eBioscience™ Annexin V apoptosis detection kit (Invitrogen, Waltham, MA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Following 144 h exposure to TPN, 12 human liver spheroid co-cultures per sample were pooled, washed with PBS, and gently disaggregated into single-cell suspension using TrypLE™ Express and by pipetting up and down. Subsequently, cells were washed with binding buffer and stained with FITC-conjugated annexin V. Following a 15-min incubation at room temperature in the dark, cells were washed with binding buffer, stained with propidium iodide (PI), and analyzed using Attune Acoustic Focusing Cytometer. Analyzed cells were expressed as a percentage of apoptotic cells (Annexin V+PI−/+). Human liver spheroid co-cultures exposed to camptothecin (CPT; 10 μM) for 48 h were used as a positive control for apoptosis assessment (Traganos et al. 1996; Dos Santos et al. 2023).
Intracellular lipid accumulation detection using flow cytometry
Liver spheroid co-cultures were exposed to TPN and its single components for 24 and 144 h. Intracellular lipid accumulation in human liver spheroid co-cultures was quantified using BODIPY™ 493/503 neutral lipid dye and flow cytometry (Boeckmans et al. 2020). Briefly, following 24 or 144 h of exposure to TPN and its single components, at least eight human liver spheroid co-cultures were pooled, gently disaggregated into single-cell suspension using TrypLE™ Express, and, by pipetting up and down, washed with PBS and stained with BODIPY™ 493/503 neutral lipid dye (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Merelbeke, Belgium) (2 μM). Following 10 min of incubation at 37 °C in the dark, the suspension of single cells was analyzed using the Attune Acoustic Focusing Cytometer. Detected fluorescence was used to quantify intracellular lipid accumulation, normalized against untreated control. Spheroids treated with valproic acid sodium salt (VPA; 5 mM) for 48 h were used as a positive control (Bai et al. 2017).
Fluorescent staining of intracellular lipids
Liver spheroid co-cultures were exposed to either TPN (5%) or lipid emulsion (0.95%) for 144 h and VPA (5 mM) for 48 h. To stain intracellular lipids, at least six human liver spheroid co-cultures per sample were pooled and washed briefly with PBS. Subsequently, human liver spheroid co-cultures were fixed with 4% (w/v) paraformaldehyde for at least 30 min at room temperature and thoroughly washed with PBS for 5 min. Next, spheroids were quickly embedded into a PolyFreeze tissue freezing medium and stored for 2 h at − 20 °C. Spheroid-containing solid frozen blocks were then sliced using a cryotome (MICROM GmbH HM 525, Walldorf, Germany). The obtained sections of 16 μm thickness were placed onto a microscope slide (SuperFrost®Plus, VWR, Leuven, Belgium) and immediately used for fluorescent staining. Following a short washing with PBS (5 min), sections were incubated with 2 μM BODIPY™ 493/503 neutral lipid dye (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Merelbeke, Belgium) for 15 min at room temperature in the dark, washed with PBS for 5 min, and imaged using a Nikon Eclipse Ti-S microscope with a 10 × objective.
Data analysis
All data are presented as mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM). Statistical analysis was performed using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Dunnett’s multiple comparison test or an unpaired t test. A p value < 0.05 was considered significant. GraphPad Prism (version 10.1.1; GraphPad Software Inc., La Jolla, CA, USA) was used for statistical analysis. All experiments were repeated independently at least three times.
Results
Human liver spheroid co-culture establishment and characterization
Human liver spheroid co-cultures were successfully generated using 500 C3A cells and 50 LX-2 cells in a ratio of 10 to 1 cultured on ULA plates for 72 h (3 days). The average diameter of each spheroid after 3 days of culture, which corresponds to the starting point for TPN treatment, was approximately 200 μm, while the size of the growing spheroids reached approximately 500 μm in diameter after 9 days of culture, corresponding to the longest TPN exposure time of 144 h (Fig. 1A, B). ATP content and spheroid area measured on day 3 and day 9 of the culture period showed growth over time (Fig. 1C, D) with sustained sphericity (Fig. 1E, F). Moreover, the expression of typical markers of hepatocytes (Fig. 1G) and HSCs (Fig. 1H) remained stable over time suggesting that both cell types preserve their function in the 3D spheroid configuration. The expression levels of the housekeeping gene HPRT1 used for normalization were stable and did not change over time (Fig. S1).
Effect of TPN exposure on cell viability
To assess the effect of TPN on cell viability, the ATP assay was performed following different exposure times ranging from 24 to 144 h. Concentrations of up to 1% of TPN did not affect cell viability regardless of the exposure time (Fig. 2A). A concentration of 5% caused a reduction in cell viability of around 25% only after 144 h of treatment. Concentrations of 25% and 50% appeared to be highly toxic, since cell viability was reduced by 50%-100% in a time- and concentration-dependent manner. The solution of amino acids and electrolytes also appeared to have no effect up to 2.5% at all exposure times tested, while concentrations of 12.5% and 25% caused a time-dependent reduction of cell viability by 40%-80% (Fig. 2B). Exposure to increasing concentrations of glucose confirmed that the two highest concentrations (7.5% and 15%) were cytotoxic, especially after 72 and 144 h of treatment, with a drop in cell viability by 30%–85% (Fig. 2C). A reduction of cell viability of approximately 25% was observed for 1.5% glucose after 144 h of exposure. Lipids appear to have no effect for short-term exposures of 24–48 h (Fig. 2D). At higher exposure times (144 h), there was a reduction of cell viability starting from a 15% reduction at the concentration of 0.2% of lipids, and reaching a 60% reduction of cell viability at lipids concentration of 9.5%. Both trace elements (Fig. 2E) and vitamins (Fig. 2F) did not significantly affect cell viability at any of the concentrations and exposure times tested.
Effect of short-term and long-term TPN exposure on the liver spheroid transcriptome
RNA sequencing and transcriptomics analysis of human liver spheroid co-cultures exposed to 1% TPN for 24 and 144 h were performed to gain a deeper insight into molecular signatures and pathways most affected after short-term and long-term exposure to TPN. A concentration of 1% was selected based on the cell viability results and preliminary data of functionality assays, which suggested that at the concentration of 1% the effects of TPN could be detected, without compromising cell viability. A heat map representation of DEGs showed that both untreated control samples and the TPN-exposed samples display similar expression patterns among each other both for 24- and 144-h exposure times (Fig. 3A, B). The numbers of DEGs were higher after 144 h of exposure compared to 24 h of exposure to TPN, indicating that the duration of exposure affects gene expression (Fig. 2C, D). Transcriptomic profiling revealed that 98 and 1,300 genes were differentially expressed following 24 and 144 h of treatment, respectively. DEGs at both time points were subjected to KEGG enrichment analysis in order to determine the most affected molecular pathways and biological processes (Kanehisa 2000). Various metabolic and signaling pathways seemed to be affected, especially after 144 h of exposure (Fig. 3E, F). Among those were several pathways involved in metabolic processes (i.e., fatty acids and cholesterol metabolism, steroid biosynthesis, glycolysis, gluconeogenesis, insulin signaling, amino acids and protein metabolism, glutathione metabolism, and PPAR signaling), cellular responses to stress (i.e., PI3K-Akt, MAPK, HIF-1, TGF-β and FoxO), and cell death processes (i.e., apoptosis, necroptosis, ferroptosis, and TNF-α signaling) (Figure S2-10). The altered expression of several nuclear receptors, transcription factors, and receptors involved in peroxisomal fatty acid beta-oxidation, indicative of steatosis development, is depicted in Fig. S11.
Cellular stress response to TPN exposure
MMP or ΔΨM was measured following exposures of human liver spheroid co-cultures to TPN and its components. Only the highest concentration of TPN (5%) and lipids (0.95%) tested for 144 h of exposure induced a reduction of the MMP by 30% and 33%, respectively (Fig. 4A, D). Glucose and amino acids and electrolytes did not affect MMP at any concentration or time point tested (Fig. 4B, C). Positive control FCCP induced approximately a 50% reduction of MMP (Fig. 4E). Next, intracellular protein aggregates were measured to determine ER stress. It was found that after 144 h of exposure, all TPN concentrations tested increased ER stress response by 65%–75% (Fig. 4F). Amino acids and electrolytes (0.5%), as well as glucose (1.5%), caused not more than a 30% increase in ER stress on 144 h of exposure (Fig. 4G, H). Lipid emulsion, on the other hand, caused an increase in ER stress after 144 h of exposure by 35%-70% for all concentrations, and even a 40% increase for the concentration of 0.95% after 24 h of exposure (Fig. 4I). A 70% increase in ER stress was also observed for positive control Tg (Fig. 4J). Intracellular ROS were measured as an indicator of oxidative stress following a short exposure time of 2 h. The data suggest that there is a trend in TPN causing ROS generation, especially at the concentration of 5% for which a threefold increase was detected (Fig. 4K). Similar results were found for amino acids and electrolytes and glucose with a clear trend toward increased oxidative stress with a 2.3-fold increase for the highest concentrations (Fig. 4L, M). A 2.2-fold increase in ROS levels was also detected for lipid emulsion (0.2% and 0.95%) (Fig. 4N), as well as a steep 3.5-fold increase for positive control menadione (Fig. 4O).
Cell death response to TPN exposure
Induction of apoptosis was measured using Annexin V and PI combined staining to distinguish between early and late apoptotic cells following exposure to TPN and components for 144 h. While only a minor increase in early apoptotic cells was observed for all treatment conditions, a significant increase in late apoptotic cells (Annexin V+PI+) was detected for several concentrations tested. A two to fourfold concentration-dependent increase for TPN and lipid emulsion (Fig. 5A, D, F), a 3.5-fold increase for amino acids and electrolytes (Fig. 5B, F), and a 1.8- to 2.6-fold increase for glucose (Fig. 5C, F) was observed. The exposure to CPT, used as a positive control, induced a tenfold increase in early apoptotic cells and a 3.5-fold increase in the number of late apoptotic cells (Fig. 5E, F).
Steatotic response to TPN exposure
To assess the induction of steatosis, intracellular lipid accumulation was measured both after 24 and 144 h of exposure to TPN. A 30% increase in intracellular lipid accumulation was observed for 24-h exposure to 5% TPN, and a 50% increase for 1% and 5% TPN after 144 h of exposure (Fig. 6A), suggesting that the TPN-induced steatosis is a time-dependent rather than a dose-dependent effect. Amino acids and electrolytes (Fig. 6B) and glucose (Fig. 6C) did not cause any significant increase in steatosis regardless of the exposure time. However, lipid emulsion, similarly to TPN, induced an increase of 25% for the highest tested concentration after 24 h of treatment, and a 45% and a 65% increase in steatosis for 0.2% and 0.95% concentrations of lipid emulsion, respectively, for 144 h of exposure (Fig. 6D). A 30% increase in intracellular lipid accumulation was also detected after exposure to VPA, a well-known steatogenic drug (Fig. 6E). Fluorescent staining of intracellular neutral lipids confirmed that steatosis was induced by TPN, lipid emulsion, and VPA (Fig. 6F–I).
Discussion
TPN is a life-saving nutritional support effective in counteracting malnutrition and assisting patients to reach and maintain a proper nutritional status (Berlana 2022). Notwithstanding its major benefits, the number and severity of TPN-associated complications cannot be disregarded. IFALD is one of the most common TPN-associated metabolic complications. The pathogenesis of IFALD is complex and underlying mechanisms remain elusive (Sobotka and Camilo 2009; Berlana 2022; Mihajlovic et al. 2024). Most of the known mechanisms described to contribute to IFALD are linked to toxicity of single components or inadequate administration of TPN (Berlana 2022). Among those, lipotoxicity is one of the most documented observations related to the composition of lipid emulsions (i.e.,, phytosterol content, omega-6 fatty acid content), which contribute to liver injury (Driscoll 2023). Other IFALD mechanisms are those linked to glucose toxicity as well as injury mediated by micronutrient toxicity (e.g., manganese, copper, aluminum) or nutrient deficiency (e.g., carnitine, choline, vitamin E) (Howard et al. 2007; Gabe and Culkin 2010; Berlana 2022; Zafirovska et al. 2023). Liver damage also seems to be dictated by the patient’s health status including lack of enteral feeding, gut dysbiosis, short bowel syndrome, central line infections, and immature bile acid metabolism and enterohepatic circulation occurring in preterm neonates (Di Dato et al. 2022; Rosseel et al. 2023; Zafirovska et al. 2023).
In the present study, human liver spheroid co-cultures were used to study the mechanisms involved in IFALD. The results suggested that lipotoxicity plays a major role in TPN-associated liver damage. Detected intracellular lipid accumulation and subsequent cellular damage are consistent with observations of steatosis secondary to lipid overload and high infusion rates that exceed the hepatic metabolization rate of fatty acids and phospholipids (Meisel et al. 2011; Moon et al. 2017; Jordan et al. 2020). Identified lipotoxicity-mediating mechanisms include ER stress, mitochondrial dysfunction, oxidative stress, and apoptosis, complying with previous reports describing fatty acids- and/or triglyceride-induced hepatic injury (Wei et al. 2006; Cazanave and Gores 2010; Cao et al. 2012; Lee et al. 2015; Ress 2016; Liu et al. 2018; Maitiabula et al. 2022; Fromenty and Roden 2023; Zheng et al. 2023). Although it has been reported that infusion of higher amounts of glucose and amino acids can also bear steatotic potential, no direct effect of either glucose or amino acids on intracellular lipid accumulation was observed in the present study (Villanueva-Ortega et al. 2020; Gunnar et al. 2023). Nonetheless, the results of this study support available scientific data regarding mechanisms of glucose-mediated and amino acids-mediated toxicity, specifically those involved in oxidative stress, apoptosis and alterations of liver metabolic processes (Kawahito et al. 2009; Lynch and Adams 2014; Zhenyukh et al. 2017; Martínez et al. 2017; Panahi et al. 2018; Acito et al. 2020; Liu et al. 2023). High glucose levels have also been suggested to amplify fatty acid-induced ER stress and to contribute synergistically to lipotoxicity (Bachar et al. 2009; Yin et al. 2015). A qualitative summary of the results of this study performed for comparative purposes indicates that the amino acids and electrolytes solution appears to be the least toxic among all components, only slightly inducing oxidative stress and ER stress (Fig. 7). Similarly, glucose seems rather innocuous, exerting only minor adverse effects associated with oxidative stress and mitochondrial dysfunction. On the other hand, lipid emulsion is the component that majorly affects almost all parameters tested in the present study, in particular induction of ER stress and steatosis, and to a certain degree apoptosis, thereby significantly contributing to the overall adverse outcome of TPN on liver cells.
Key events evaluated in the present study and shown to be involved in TPN-associated liver damage, as well as results of transcriptomic analysis, are consistent with hepatotoxicity-related adverse outcome pathways (AOP), especially AOP of liver steatosis (Vinken 2013; Ankley and Edwards 2018; Knapen et al. 2018; Arnesdotter et al. 2021). Several molecular initiating events in the AOP network for liver steatosis, including modulation of nuclear receptors (i.e., aryl hydrocarbon receptor, liver X receptor, pregnane X receptor), suppression of transcription factors (i.e., hepatocyte nuclear factor 4 alpha, nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2), and inhibition of peroxisomal fatty acid beta-oxidation (i.e., decreased activation of PPARs), also emerged in the transcriptomics analysis of the present study, further supporting the notion of TPN-mediated liver injury (Mellor et al. 2016; Arnesdotter et al. 2021). These molecular initiating events are known to affect lipid metabolism at different levels, and the RNA-sequencing data confirmed that various pathways, such as fatty acid degradation and biosynthesis, cholesterol metabolism, PPAR signaling and the increased hepatic influx of fatty acids were affected by TPN, indicating steatosis development (Mellor et al. 2016). Similar to previous reports, the results of the current study support the findings that perturbations in metabolic pathways are among the key effects of TPN exposure. In particular, the pathways related to insulin signaling, AMPK or FoxO are known to regulate metabolic processes, such as glycogenesis, gluconeogenesis, de novo lipogenesis and fatty acid beta-oxidation, thus contributing to steatotic injury (Mihaylova and Shaw 2011; Guthrie 2022; Jiang et al. 2022). Furthermore, the transcriptomic analysis showed that different types of programmed cell death were enriched in TPN-treated cells, including apoptosis, necroptosis and ferroptosis. The latter displayed a greater degree of pathway enrichment among the induced cell death pathways, which is in accordance with emerging studies demonstrating an important role for ferroptosis in IFALD pathogenesis (Jiang et al. 2022; Cheng et al. 2022).
Indicative of TPN-induced hepatic injury is the observation of significant enrichment of the TGF-β signaling pathway. Profibrogenic TGF-β is known to be orchestral in inducing activation and transdifferentiation of HSCs and extracellular matrix production, being hallmarks of liver fibrosis (Dewidar et al. 2019). An additional notion supporting the role of HSCs in TPN-induced liver injury is the enrichment of the pathway of retinol metabolism and extracellular matrix-receptor interactions (Carmona et al. 2019; Dewidar et al. 2019). These results underscore the potential impact of HSCs in contributing to TPN-induced liver injury and warrant further investigation into their role in the molecular pathogenesis of IFALD.
Despite providing important molecular and cellular insights into mechanisms of liver injury secondary to TPN exposure, a limitation of the present study is the lack of direct clinical translation. This is particularly reflected in attempts to correlate the dosages of TPN used in vitro to those observed in clinics during a TPN regimen. Computational toxicology methods that predict chemical toxicity and correlate in vitro and in vivo concentrations are available and could aid in the efforts needed to increase clinical relevance (Rodríguez-Belenguer et al. 2023a, b). In particular, physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) modeling can facilitate quantitative in vitro to in vivo extrapolation (QIVIVE) and allow to combine in silico and in vitro parameters and convert in vitro concentration–response curves into relevant in vivo exposures (Rietjens et al. 2011; Wilk-Zasadna et al. 2015; Chen et al. 2018a). However, the PBPK modeling of complex mixtures, such as TPN, containing a myriad of metabolically active substances and nutrients with different physicochemical and pharmacokinetic properties, remains a challenge and requires significant efforts, availability of appropriate modeling platforms, and interdisciplinary collaborations to perform accurate and clinically relevant modeling (Groothuis et al. 2015; Wilk-Zasadna et al. 2015; Paini et al. 2019; Moreau et al. 2022).
In conclusion, the present study confirmed the involvement of several key events in TPN-induced liver damage and indicated that lipid emulsion, among all major TPN components, seemed to be the main culprit of the observed adverse outcomes. A combination of advanced heterotypic cell models, suitable in vitro and omics analysis, systems toxicology approaches, including AOPs and their networks and PBPK modeling holds great promise for advancing the translational research oriented toward unraveling further IFALD mechanisms and encouraging the safe use of TPN.
Data availability
The RNA-seq datasets generated during the current study are available in the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) repository, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE264357. All other data generated or analysed during this study are included in this published article and its supplementary information files.
References
Acito M, Bartolini D, Ceccarini MR et al (2020) Imbalance in the antioxidant defence system and pro-genotoxic status induced by high glucose concentrations: in vitro testing in human liver cells. Toxicol in Vitro 69:105001. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tiv.2020.105001
Ankley GT, Edwards SW (2018) The adverse outcome pathway: a multifaceted framework supporting 21st century toxicology. Curr Opin Toxicol 9:1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cotox.2018.03.004
Arnesdotter E, Spinu N, Firman J et al (2021) Derivation, characterisation and analysis of an adverse outcome pathway network for human hepatotoxicity. Toxicology 459:152856. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tox.2021.152856
Bachar E, Ariav Y, Ketzinel-Gilad M et al (2009) Glucose amplifies fatty acid-induced endoplasmic reticulum stress in pancreatic β-cells via activation of mTORC1. PLoS One 4:e4954. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0004954
Bai X, Hong W, Cai P et al (2017) Valproate induced hepatic steatosis by enhanced fatty acid uptake and triglyceride synthesis. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 324:12–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.taap.2017.03.022
Berger MM, Pichard C (2022) When is parenteral nutrition indicated? J Intensive Med 2:22–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jointm.2021.11.006
Berger MM, Burgos R, Casaer MP et al (2022) Clinical nutrition issues in 2022: what is missing to trust supplemental parenteral nutrition (SPN) in ICU patients? Crit Care 26:271. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-022-04157-z
Berlana D (2022) Parenteral nutrition overview. Nutrients 14:4480. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu14214480
Bischoff SC, Bernal W, Dasarathy S et al (2020) ESPEN practical guideline: clinical nutrition in liver disease. Clin Nutr 39:3533–3562. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clnu.2020.09.001
Boeckmans J, Natale A, Rombaut M et al (2020) Flow cytometric quantification of neutral lipids in a human skin stem cell-derived model of NASH. MethodsX 7:101068. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mex.2020.101068
Burrin D, Sangild PT, Stoll B et al (2020) Translational advances in pediatric nutrition and gastroenterology: new insights from pig models. Annu Rev Anim Biosci 8:321–354. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-animal-020518-115142
Cao J, Dai D-L, Yao L et al (2012) Saturated fatty acid induction of endoplasmic reticulum stress and apoptosis in human liver cells via the PERK/ATF4/CHOP signaling pathway. Mol Cell Biochem 364:115–129. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11010-011-1211-9
Carmona R, Barrena S, Muñoz-Chápuli R (2019) Retinoids in stellate cells: development, repair, and regeneration. JDB 7:10. https://doi.org/10.3390/jdb7020010
Cavicchi M, Beau P, Crenn P et al (2000) Prevalence of liver disease and contributing factors in patients receiving home parenteral nutrition for permanent intestinal failure. Ann Intern Med 132:525–532. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-132-7-200004040-00003
Cazanave SC, Gores GJ (2010) Mechanisms and clinical implications of hepatocyte lipoapoptosis. Clin Lipidol 5:71–85. https://doi.org/10.2217/clp.09.85
Chan S, McCowen KC, Bistrian BR et al (1999) Incidence, prognosis, and etiology of end-stage liver disease in patients receiving home total parenteral nutrition. Surgery 126:28–34. https://doi.org/10.1067/msy.1999.98925
Chandra J, Keshavkant S (2021) Mechanisms underlying the phytotoxicity and genotoxicity of aluminum and their alleviation strategies: a review. Chemosphere 278:130384. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.130384
Chen L, Ning J, Louisse J et al (2018a) Use of physiologically based kinetic modelling-facilitated reverse dosimetry to convert in vitro cytotoxicity data to predicted in vivo liver toxicity of lasiocarpine and riddelliine in rat. Food Chem Toxicol 116:216–226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fct.2018.04.012
Chen Y, Chen Y, Shi C et al (2018b) SOAPnuke: a MapReduce acceleration-supported software for integrated quality control and preprocessing of high-throughput sequencing data. GigaScience. https://doi.org/10.1093/gigascience/gix120
Cheng S-Y, Jiang L, Wang Y, Cai W (2022) Emerging role of regulated cell death in intestinal failure-associated liver disease. Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hbpd.2022.12.004
Cock PJA, Fields CJ, Goto N et al (2010) The Sanger FASTQ file format for sequences with quality scores, and the Solexa/Illumina FASTQ variants. Nucleic Acids Res 38:1767–1771. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkp1137
Criddle DN, Gillies S, Baumgartner-Wilson HK et al (2006) Menadione-induced reactive oxygen species generation via redox cycling promotes apoptosis of murine pancreatic acinar cells. J Biol Chem 281:40485–40492. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M607704200
Dewidar B, Meyer C, Dooley S, Meindl-Beinker N (2019) TGF-β in hepatic stellate cell activation and liver fibrogenesis—updated 2019. Cells 8:1419. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells8111419
Di Dato F, Iorio R, Spagnuolo MI (2022) IFALD in children: What’s new? A narrative review. Front Nutr 9:928371. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnut.2022.928371
Dos Santos RB, Leroy K, Mihajlovic M et al (2023) Evaluation of functional candidate biomarkers of non-genotoxic hepatocarcinogenicity in human liver spheroid co-cultures. Arch Toxicol 97:1739–1751. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00204-023-03486-4
Driscoll DF (2023) Proinflammatory mediators in lipid emulsions and parenteral nutrition-associated liver disease: review of leading factors. J Parenter Enteral Nutr 47:710–717. https://doi.org/10.1002/jpen.2507
Drmanac R, Sparks AB, Callow MJ et al (2010) Human genome sequencing using unchained base reads on self-assembling DNA nanoarrays. Science 327:78–81. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1181498
Fromenty B, Roden M (2023) Mitochondrial alterations in fatty liver diseases. J Hepatol 78:415–429. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhep.2022.09.020
Gabe SM, Culkin A (2010) Abnormal liver function tests in the parenteral nutrition fed patient. Frontline Gastroenterol 1:98–104. https://doi.org/10.1136/fg.2009.000521
Groothuis FA, Heringa MB, Nicol B et al (2015) Dose metric considerations in in vitro assays to improve quantitative in vitro–in vivo dose extrapolations. Toxicology 332:30–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tox.2013.08.012
Gunnar R, Mutanen A, Merras-Salmio L, Pakarinen MP (2023) Histopathological liver steatosis linked with high parenteral glucose and amino acid supply in infants with short bowel syndrome. J Parenter Enteral Nutr 47:41–50. https://doi.org/10.1002/jpen.2416
Guthrie G (2022) Parenteral nutrition associated hepatic steatosis and NAFLD intersect at AMPK. Cell Mol Gastroenterol Hepatol 14:724–725. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcmgh.2022.06.005
Howard L, Ashley C, Lyon D, Shenkin A (2007) Autopsy tissue trace elements in 8 long-term parenteral nutrition patients who received the current US Food and Drug Administration formulation. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr 31:388–396. https://doi.org/10.1177/0148607107031005388
Jiang L, Wang N, Cheng S et al (2022) RNA-sequencing identifies novel transcriptomic signatures in intestinal failure-associated liver disease. J Pediatr Surg 57:158–165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2021.12.015
Jordan T, Popovič P, Rotovnik Kozjek N (2020) Liver steatosis in adult patients on home parenteral nutrition. Eur J Clin Nutr 74:255–260. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41430-019-0455-4
Kanehisa M (2000) KEGG: Kyoto encyclopedia of genes and genomes. Nucleic Acids Res 28:27–30. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/28.1.27
Kawahito S, Kitahata H, Oshita S (2009) Problems associated with glucose toxicity: role of hyperglycemia-induced oxidative stress. WJG 15:4137. https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.15.4137
Knapen D, Angrish MM, Fortin MC et al (2018) Adverse outcome pathway networks I: development and applications. Environ Toxicol Chem 37:1723–1733. https://doi.org/10.1002/etc.4125
Kovacic P, Somanathan R (2013) Sugar toxicity—fundamental molecular mechanisms: α-dicarbonyl, electron transfer, and radicals. J Carbohydr Chem 32:105–119. https://doi.org/10.1080/07328303.2012.762102
Kumpf VJ (2006) Parenteral nutrition-associated liver disease in adult and pediatric patients. Nutr Clin Pract 21:279–290. https://doi.org/10.1177/0115426506021003279
Lakananurak N, Tienchai K (2019) Incidence and risk factors of parenteral nutrition-associated liver disease in hospitalized adults: a prospective cohort study. Clin Nutr ESPEN 34:81–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clnesp.2019.08.009
Lal S, Pironi L, Wanten G et al (2018) Clinical approach to the management of Intestinal Failure Associated Liver Disease (IFALD) in adults: a position paper from the Home Artificial Nutrition and Chronic Intestinal Failure Special Interest Group of ESPEN. Clin Nutr 37:1794–1797. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clnu.2018.07.006
Langmead B, Salzberg SL (2012) Fast gapped-read alignment with Bowtie 2. Nat Methods 9:357–359. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.1923
Lee J, Homma T, Kurahashi T et al (2015) Oxidative stress triggers lipid droplet accumulation in primary cultured hepatocytes by activating fatty acid synthesis. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 464:229–235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbrc.2015.06.121
Lee WS, Chew KS, Ng RT et al (2020) Intestinal failure-associated liver disease (IFALD): insights into pathogenesis and advances in management. Hepatol Int 14:305–316. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12072-020-10048-8
Li B, Dewey CN (2011) RSEM: accurate transcript quantification from RNA-Seq data with or without a reference genome. BMC Bioinform 12:323. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-12-323
Lindner P, Christensen SB, Nissen P et al (2020) Cell death induced by the ER stressor thapsigargin involves death receptor 5, a non-autophagic function of MAP1LC3B, and distinct contributions from unfolded protein response components. Cell Commun Signal 18:12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12964-019-0499-z
Liu J, Yang P, Zuo G et al (2018) Long-chain fatty acid activates hepatocytes through CD36 mediated oxidative stress. Lipids Health Dis 17:153. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12944-018-0790-9
Liu Y, Lin M, Mu X et al (2023) Protective effect of solanesol in glucose-induced hepatocyte injury: mechanistic insights on oxidative stress and mitochondrial preservation. Chem Biol Interact 383:110676. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cbi.2023.110676
Love MI, Huber W, Anders S (2014) Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2. Genome Biol 15:550. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13059-014-0550-8
Lynch CJ, Adams SH (2014) Branched-chain amino acids in metabolic signalling and insulin resistance. Nat Rev Endocrinol 10:723–736. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrendo.2014.171
Maitiabula G, Tian F, Wang P et al (2022) Liver PP2A-Cα protects from parenteral nutrition-associated hepatic steatosis. Cell Mol Gastroenterol Hepatol 14:669–692. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcmgh.2022.05.008
Martić-Kehl MI, Schibli R, Schubiger PA (2012) Can animal data predict human outcome? Problems and pitfalls of translational animal research. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 39:1492–1496. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-012-2175-z
Martínez Y, Li X, Liu G et al (2017) The role of methionine on metabolism, oxidative stress, and diseases. Amino Acids 49:2091–2098. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00726-017-2494-2
Meisel JA, Le HD, De Meijer VE et al (2011) Comparison of 5 intravenous lipid emulsions and their effects on hepatic steatosis in a murine model. J Pediatr Surg 46:666–673. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2010.08.018
Mellor CL, Steinmetz FP, Cronin MTD (2016) The identification of nuclear receptors associated with hepatic steatosis to develop and extend adverse outcome pathways. Crit Rev Toxicol 46:138–152. https://doi.org/10.3109/10408444.2015.1089471
Mihajlovic M, Rosseel Z, de Waele E, Vinken M (2024) Parenteral nutrition-associated liver injury: clinical relevance and mechanistic insights. Toxicol Sci. https://doi.org/10.1093/toxsci/kfae020
Mihaylova MM, Shaw RJ (2011) The AMPK signalling pathway coordinates cell growth, autophagy and metabolism. Nat Cell Biol 13:1016–1023. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncb2329
Moon HJ, Hwang IW, Lee JW, Hong SY (2017) A case of fat overload syndrome after rapid infusion of SMOFlipid emulsion in an adult. Am J Emerg Med 35:660.e3-660.e4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajem.2015.08.044
Moreau M, Mallick P, Smeltz M et al (2022) Considerations for improving metabolism predictions for in vitro to in vivo extrapolation. Front Toxicol 4:894569. https://doi.org/10.3389/ftox.2022.894569
Notz Q, Lee Z-Y, Menger J et al (2022) Omega-6 sparing effects of parenteral lipid emulsions—an updated systematic review and meta-analysis on clinical outcomes in critically ill patients. Crit Care 26:23. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-022-03896-3
Olson LM, Wieruszewski PM, Jannetto PJ et al (2019) Quantitative assessment of trace-element contamination in parenteral nutrition components. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr 43:970–976. https://doi.org/10.1002/jpen.1668
Paini A, Leonard JA, Joossens E et al (2019) Next generation physiologically based kinetic (NG-PBK) models in support of regulatory decision making. Comput Toxicol 9:61–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comtox.2018.11.002
Pajarillo E, Nyarko-Danquah I, Digman A et al (2022) Mechanisms of manganese-induced neurotoxicity and the pursuit of neurotherapeutic strategies. Front Pharmacol 13:1011947. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2022.1011947
Panahi G, Pasalar P, Zare M et al (2018) High glucose induces inflammatory responses in HepG2 cells via the oxidative stress-mediated activation of NF-κB, and MAPK pathways in HepG2 cells. Arch Physiol Biochem 124:468–474. https://doi.org/10.1080/13813455.2018.1427764
Pfaffl MW (2001) A new mathematical model for relative quantification in real-time RT-PCR. Nucleic Acids Res 29:45e–445. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/29.9.e45
Ress C (2016) Mechanisms of intrahepatic triglyceride accumulation. WJG 22:1664. https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v22.i4.1664
Rietjens IMCM, Louisse J, Punt A (2011) Tutorial on physiologically based kinetic modeling in molecular nutrition and food research. Mol Nutr Food Res 55:941–956. https://doi.org/10.1002/mnfr.201000655
Rodríguez-Belenguer P, Mangas-Sanjuan V, Soria-Olivas E, Pastor M (2023a) Integrating mechanistic and toxicokinetic information in predictive models of cholestasis. J Chem Inf Model. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jcim.3c00945
Rodríguez-Belenguer P, March-Vila E, Pastor M et al (2023b) Usage of model combination in computational toxicology. Toxicol Lett 389:34–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.toxlet.2023.10.013
Rosseel Z, Cortoos P-J, Jonckheer J et al (2023) Parenteral nutrition, sepsis, acute heart failure and hepatotoxic drugs are related to liver test disturbances in critically ill patients. Nutrients 15:2612. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu15112612
Sakamuru S, Attene-Ramos MS, Xia M (2016) Mitochondrial membrane potential assay. Methods Mol Biol 1473:17–22. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-6346-1_2
Sangild PT, Ney DM, Sigalet DL et al (2014) Animal models of gastrointestinal and liver diseases. Animal models of infant short bowel syndrome: translational relevance and challenges. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 307:G1147–G1168. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpgi.00088.2014
Serras AS, Rodrigues JS, Cipriano M et al (2021) A critical perspective on 3D liver models for drug metabolism and toxicology studies. Front Cell Dev Biol 9:626805. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcell.2021.626805
Sobotka L, Camilo ME (2009) Basics in clinical nutrition: Metabolic complications of parenteral nutrition. e-SPEN Eur e J Clin Nutr Metab 4:e120–e122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eclnm.2009.01.001
Soldatow VY, LeCluyse EL, Griffith LG, Rusyn I (2013) In vitro models for liver toxicity testing. Toxicol Res 2:23–39. https://doi.org/10.1039/C2TX20051A
Tabone T, Mooney P, Donnellan C (2024) Intestinal failure–associated liver disease: Current challenges in screening, diagnosis, and parenteral nutrition considerations. Nut in Clin Pract. https://doi.org/10.1002/ncp.11116
Traganos F, Seiter K, Feldman E et al (1996) Induction of apoptosis by camptothecin and topotecan. Ann N Y Acad Sci 803:101–110. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.1996.tb26380.x
Verwilst P, Kim K, Sunwoo K et al (2019) Revealing protein aggregates under thapsigargin-induced ER stress using an ER-targeted thioflavin. ACS Sens 4:2858–2863. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssensors.9b00568
Villanueva-Ortega E, Méndez-García LA, Garibay-Nieto GN et al (2020) Growth hormone ameliorates high glucose-induced steatosis on in vitro cultured human HepG2 hepatocytes by inhibiting de novo lipogenesis via ChREBP and FAS suppression. Growth Hormon IGF Res 53–54:101332. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ghir.2020.101332
Vinken M (2013) The adverse outcome pathway concept: a pragmatic tool in toxicology. Toxicology 312:158–165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tox.2013.08.011
Wei Y, Wang D, Topczewski F, Pagliassotti MJ (2006) Saturated fatty acids induce endoplasmic reticulum stress and apoptosis independently of ceramide in liver cells. Am J Physiol-Endocrinol Metab 291:E275–E281. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpendo.00644.2005
Weylandt KH, Karber M, Xiao Y et al (2023) Impact of intravenous fish oil on omega-3 fatty acids and their derived lipid metabolites in patients with parenteral nutrition. J Parenter Enteral Nutr 47:287–300. https://doi.org/10.1002/jpen.2448
Wilk-Zasadna I, Bernasconi C, Pelkonen O, Coecke S (2015) Biotransformation in vitro: an essential consideration in the quantitative in vitro-to-in vivo extrapolation (QIVIVE) of toxicity data. Toxicology 332:8–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tox.2014.10.006
Yang S, Ooka M, Margolis RJ, Xia M (2023) Liver three-dimensional cellular models for high-throughput chemical testing. Cell Rep Methods 3:100432. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crmeth.2023.100432
Yin X, Zheng F, Pan Q et al (2015) Glucose fluctuation increased hepatocyte apoptosis under lipotoxicity and the involvement of mitochondrial permeability transition opening. J Mol Endocrinol 55:169–181. https://doi.org/10.1530/JME-15-0101
Zafirovska M, Zafirovski A, Rotovnik Kozjek N (2023) Current insights regarding intestinal failure-associated liver disease (IFALD): a narrative review. Nutrients 15:3169. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu15143169
Zaloga GP (2015) Phytosterols, lipid administration, and liver disease during parenteral nutrition. J Parenter Enteral Nutr. https://doi.org/10.1177/0148607115595978
Zheng Y, Wang S, Wu J, Wang Y (2023) Mitochondrial metabolic dysfunction and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: new insights from pathogenic mechanisms to clinically targeted therapy. J Transl Med 21:510. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12967-023-04367-1
Zhenyukh O, Civantos E, Ruiz-Ortega M et al (2017) High concentration of branched-chain amino acids promotes oxidative stress, inflammation and migration of human peripheral blood mononuclear cells via mTORC1 activation. Free Radic Biol Med 104:165–177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2017.01.009
Acknowledgements
We thank Dr. Bruna dos Santos Rodrigues and Dr. Elif Ince Ergüç for their excellent technical support and fruitful discussions, and Mr. Arne Loosen for the technical assistance.
Funding
This work was supported by the European Union Horizon 2020 research program MSCA COFUND IMPACT grant agreement 101034352 with co-funding from the VUB-Industrial Research Fund, the Johns Hopkins Center for Alternatives to Animal Testing-US, the Alternatives Research and Development Foundation-US, the Research Foundation Flanders-Belgium, the Methusalem program of the Flemish Government-Belgium and the University Hospital of the Vrije Universiteit Brussel-Belgium (Scientific Fund Willy Gepts).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Mihajlovic, M., De Boever, S., Tabernilla, A. et al. Investigation of parenteral nutrition-induced hepatotoxicity using human liver spheroid co-cultures. Arch Toxicol (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00204-024-03773-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00204-024-03773-8