Skip to main content
Log in

Application of AdaBoost for stator fault diagnosis in three-phase permanent magnet synchronous motors based on vibration–current data fusion analysis

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Electrical Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Permanent magnet synchronous motors (PMSMs) are of wide utilization in various industrial applications for their precise control capabilities. Hereby, these PMSMs are consistently subjected to operational faults that might lead to heavy consequences effecting overall safety. Responsively, health state monitoring techniques for early failure detection are of paramount necessity to ensure optimum performance and longevity of such applications. A qualification-based methodology is presented in the current study in response to fault diagnosis of three-phased PMSMs using vibration–current fusion of data analytics. Stator faults were induced as inter-turn short circuits by the use of bypassing resistances where experimental datasets from a manufactured test rig were acquired which are current and vibration time-domain signals then progressed into statistical features. Different operating cases were diagnosed and classified based on AdaBoost, a currently-growing machine learning model. Utilizing vibration statistical features alone has improved fault detection to 83.0%, while the vibration–current data fusion has achieved an accuracy of 90.7% which was the highest of them all. The precision, F1 score, and recall values were all of 0.907 that sill validated the accuracy results of the data fusion methodology. This study highlights the potential of the data fusion analysis in early fault diagnosis of which enables proactive maintenance strategies, and enhances reliability of PMSMs in various applications of industrial machinery in addition to renewable energy systems.

.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The data are available from the cited article [53] as open access.

References

  1. Pietrzak P, Wolkiewicz M (2022) machine learning-based stator current data-driven PMSM stator winding fault diagnosis. Sensors. https://doi.org/10.3390/s22249668

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Tang J, Liang C, Wang Y, Lu S, Zhou J (2021) A stator fault diagnosis method based on the offline motor parameter measurement for PMSM. World Electr Veh J. https://doi.org/10.3390/wevj12040248

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Pietrzak P, Wolkiewicz M (2023) Demagnetization fault diagnosis of permanent magnet synchronous motors based on stator current signal processing and machine learning algorithms. Sensors. https://doi.org/10.3390/s23041757

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Mahafzah KA, Obeidat MA, Mansour AM, Al-Shetwi AQ, Ustun TS (2022) Artificial-intelligence-based open-circuit fault diagnosis in VSI-Fed PMSMs and a novel fault recovery method. Sustainability. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142416504

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Huang W, Chen J, Hu J, Lv K, Liu H (2023) Search-coil based stator interturn fault detection in permanent magnet machines running under dynamic condition. Electronics (Basel). https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics12132827

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Gao A, Feng Z, Liang M (2021) Permanent magnet synchronous generator stator current AM-FM model and joint signature analysis for planetary gearbox fault diagnosis. Mech Syst Signal Process 149:107331. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2020.107331

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Moosavi SS, Djerdir A, Amirat YA, Khaburi DA (2015) Demagnetization fault diagnosis in permanent magnet synchronous motors: a review of the state-of-the-art. J Magn Magn Mater 391:203–212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmmm.2015.04.062

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Xia Y, Li X, Luo Y (2023) Inter-turn short circuit fault detection of PMSM based on wavelet packet energy spectrum and CEEMDAN-HT. J Electr Eng Technol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42835-023-01597-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Park CH, Kim H, Suh C, Chae M, Yoon H, Youn BD (2022) A health image for deep learning-based fault diagnosis of a permanent magnet synchronous motor under variable operating conditions: instantaneous current residual map. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 226:108715. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2022.108715

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Li T, Ma R, Zhang Z (2021) Diagnosis of open-phase fault of five-phase permanent magnet synchronous motor by harmonic current analysis. Microelectron Reliab 126:114205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.microrel.2021.114205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Sheng L, Sun Q, Li W, Ye G (2023) Research on gear crack fault diagnosis model based on permanent magnet motor current signal. ISA Trans 135:188–198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isatra.2022.10.001

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Zeng C, Huang S, Lei J, Wan Z, Yang Y (2021) Online rotor fault diagnosis of permanent magnet synchronous motors based on stator tooth flux. IEEE Trans Ind Appl 57:2366–2377. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIA.2021.3058541

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Zafarani M, Goktas T, Akin B (2016) A comprehensive magnet defect fault analysis of permanent-magnet synchronous motors. IEEE Trans Ind Appl 52:1331–1339. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIA.2015.2487440

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Yassa N, Rachek M (2020) Modeling and detecting the stator winding inter turn fault of permanent magnet synchronous motors using stator current signature analysis. Math Comput Simul 167:325–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matcom.2018.04.012

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. Zhang Y, Liu G, Zhao W, Zhou H, Chen Q, Wei M (2021) Online diagnosis of slight interturn short-circuit fault for a low-speed permanent magnet synchronous motor. IEEE Trans Transp Electrif 7:104–113. https://doi.org/10.1109/TTE.2020.2991271

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Liu G, Yu W, Wang X, Teng Y, Chen Z (2023) Analysis of electromagnetic characteristics of typical faults in permanent magnet wind generators. Glob Energy Interconnect 6:103–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloei.2023.02.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Ghermoul O, Benguesmia H, Benyettou L (2023) Finite element modeling for electric field and voltage distribution along the cap and pin insulators under pollution. Diagnostyka 24:1–9. https://doi.org/10.29354/diag/159517

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Al-Haddad LA, Jaber AA (2023) Influence of operationally consumed propellers on multirotor UAVs airworthiness: finite element and experimental approach. IEEE Sens J. https://doi.org/10.1109/JSEN.2023.3267043

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Moosavi SS, Djerdir A, Ait-Amirat Y, Khaburi DA (2015) ANN based fault diagnosis of permanent magnet synchronous motor under stator winding shorted turn. Electr Power Syst Res 125:67–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsr.2015.03.024

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Li Y, Wang Y, Zhang Y, Zhang J (2021) Diagnosis of Inter-turn short circuit of permanent magnet synchronous motor based on deep learning and small fault samples. Neurocomputing 442:348–358. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neucom.2020.04.160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Liu Z, Xiao W, Cui J, Mei L (2022) Application of an information fusion method to the incipient fault diagnosis of the drilling permanent magnet synchronous motor. J Pet Sci Eng 219:111124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2022.111124

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Yan X, She D, Xu Y, Jia M (2021) Deep regularized variational autoencoder for intelligent fault diagnosis of rotor–bearing system within entire life-cycle process. Knowl Based Syst 226:107142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2021.107142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Yan X, Liu Y, Xu Y, Jia M (2021) Multichannel fault diagnosis of wind turbine driving system using multivariate singular spectrum decomposition and improved Kolmogorov complexity. Renew Energy 170:724–748. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2021.02.011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Yan X, She D, Xu Y (2023) Deep order-wavelet convolutional variational autoencoder for fault identification of rolling bearing under fluctuating speed conditions. Expert Syst Appl 216:119479. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2022.119479

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Yan X, Liu Y, Jia M (2019) Health condition identification for rolling bearing using a multi-domain indicator-based optimized stacked denoising autoencoder. Struct Health Monit 19:1602–1626. https://doi.org/10.1177/1475921719893594

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Yan X, Liu Y, Jia M (2020) Multiscale cascading deep belief network for fault identification of rotating machinery under various working conditions. Knowl Based Syst 193:105484. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2020.105484

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Yan X, Liu Y, Xu Y, Jia M (2020) Multistep forecasting for diurnal wind speed based on hybrid deep learning model with improved singular spectrum decomposition. Energy Convers Manag 225:113456. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2020.113456

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Chen Y, Rao M, Feng K, Niu G (2023) Modified varying index coefficient autoregression model for representation of the nonstationary vibration from a planetary gearbox. IEEE Trans Instrum Meas 72:1–12. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIM.2023.3259048

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Han T, Xie W, Pei Z (2023) Semi-supervised adversarial discriminative learning approach for intelligent fault diagnosis of wind turbine. Inf Sci (N Y). 648:119496. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2023.119496

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Chen Y, Schmidt S, Heyns PS, Zuo MJ (2021) A time series model-based method for gear tooth crack detection and severity assessment under random speed variation. Mech Syst Signal Process 156:107605. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2020.107605

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Yao J, Han T (2023) Data-driven lithium-ion batteries capacity estimation based on deep transfer learning using partial segment of charging/discharging data. Energy 271:127033. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2023.127033

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Al-Haddad LA, Jaber A (2022) Applications of machine learning techniques for fault diagnosis of UAVs

  33. Jaber AA, Bicker R (2018) Development of a condition monitoring algorithm for industrial robots based on artificial intelligence and signal processing techniques. Int J Electr Comput Eng (2088–8708) 8:996

    Google Scholar 

  34. Ogaili AAF, Hamzah MN, Jaber AA (2022) Integration of machine learning (ML) and finite element analysis (FEA) for predicting the failure modes of a small horizontal composite blade. Int J Renew Energy Res (IJRER) 12:2168–2179

    Google Scholar 

  35. Al-Haddad LA, Jaber AA (2023) Improved UAV blade unbalance prediction based on machine learning and ReliefF supreme feature ranking method. J Braz Soc Mech Sci Eng 45:463. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40430-023-04386-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Al-Haddad LA, Jaber AA, Al-Haddad SA, Al-Muslim YM (2023) Fault diagnosis of actuator damage in UAVs using embedded recorded data and stacked machine learning models. J Supercomput. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11227-023-05584-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Al-Haddad LA, Jaber AA, Ibraheem L, Al-Haddad SA, Ibrahim NS, Abdulwahed FM (2023) Enhancing wind tunnel computational simulations of finite element analysis using machine learning-based algorithms. Eng Technol J 15:120. https://doi.org/10.30684/etj.2023.142873.1552

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Mayr A, Binder H, Gefeller O, Schmid M (2014) The evolution of boosting algorithms: from machine learning to statistical modelling. Methods Inf Med 53:419–427. https://doi.org/10.3414/ME13-01-0122

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Wan S, Li X, Yin Y, Hong J (2021) Milling chatter detection by multi-feature fusion and Adaboost-SVM. Mech Syst Signal Process 156:107671. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2021.107671

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Li H, Chen Q, Zhao J, Wu M (2015) Nondestructive detection of total volatile basic nitrogen (TVB-N) content in pork meat by integrating hyperspectral imaging and colorimetric sensor combined with a nonlinear data fusion. LWT-Food Sci Technol 63:268–274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2015.03.052

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Al-Haddad LA, Jaber AA (2022) An intelligent quadcopter unbalance classification method based on stochastic gradient descent logistic regression. In: 2022 3rd information technology to enhance E-learning and other application (IT-ELA), pp 152–156. https://doi.org/10.1109/IT-ELA57378.2022.10107922

  42. Al-Haddad LA, Jaber AA (2023) An intelligent fault diagnosis approach for multirotor UAVs based on deep neural network of multi-resolution transform features. Drones 7:82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Demšar J, Zupan B, Leban G, Curk T (2004) Orange: from experimental machine learning to interactive data mining. In: Boulicaut J-F, Esposito F, Giannotti F, Pedreschi D (eds) Knowledge discovery in databases: PKDD 2004. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp 537–539

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  44. Demšar J, Zupan B (2013) Orange: data mining fruitful and fun-a historical perspective. Informatica 37:55

    Google Scholar 

  45. Zhang X, Guo B, Wang Y, Hu L, Yang N, Mao H (2022) A detection method for crop fungal spores based on microfluidic separation enrichment and AC impedance characteristics. J Fungi. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof8111168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Li Y, Chai G, Wang Y, Lei L, Zhang X (2022) ACE R-CNN: an attention complementary and edge detection-based instance segmentation algorithm for individual tree species identification using UAV RGB images and LiDAR data. Remote Sens (Basel). https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14133035

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Ma Z, Chen Y, Fan Y, He X, Luo W, Shu J (2023) An improved AoT-DCGAN and T-CNN hybrid deep learning model for intelligent diagnosis of PTCs quality under small sample space. Appl Sci. https://doi.org/10.3390/app13158699

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Sherazi SWA, Zheng H, Lee JY (2023) A machine learning-based applied prediction model for identification of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) outcomes and mortality in patients during the hospital stay. Sensors. https://doi.org/10.3390/s23031351

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. Hossin M, Sulaiman MN (2015) A review on evaluation metrics for data classification evaluations. Int J Data Min Knowl Manag Process 5:01–11. https://doi.org/10.5121/ijdkp.2015.5201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Neiva MB, Bruno OM (2023) Exploring ordered patterns in the adjacency matrix for improving machine learning on complex networks. Phys A Stat Mech Its Appl. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2023.129086

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Valero-Carreras D, Alcaraz J, Landete M (2023) Comparing two SVM models through different metrics based on the confusion matrix. Comput Oper Res 152:106131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cor.2022.106131

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  52. Freeman V (2023) Production and perception of prevelar merger: two-dimensional comparisons using Pillai scores and confusion matrices. J Phon 97:101213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2023.101213

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Jung W, Yun S-H, Lim Y-S, Cheong S, Park Y-H (2023) Vibration and current dataset of three-phase permanent magnet synchronous motors with stator faults. Data Brief 47:108952. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dib.2023.108952

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. Al-Haddad LA, Jaber AA, Neranon P, Al-Haddad SA (2023) Investigation of frequency-domain-based vibration signal analysis for UAV unbalance fault classification. Eng Technol J 41:1–9. https://doi.org/10.30684/etj.2023.137412.1348

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Xu Z, Li X, Cheng W, Zhao G, Tang L, Yang Y, Wu Y, Zhang P, Wang Q (2023) Rapid and accurate determination methods based on data fusion of laser-induced breakdown spectra and near-infrared spectra for main elemental contents in compound fertilizers. Talanta. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.talanta.2023.125004

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Qi P, Chiaro D, Piccialli F (2023) FL-FD: federated learning-based fall detection with multimodal data fusion. Inf Fusion 99:101890. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inffus.2023.101890

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Wang Z, Yao L, Cai Y, Zhang J (2020) Mahalanobis semi-supervised mapping and beetle antennae search based support vector machine for wind turbine rolling bearings fault diagnosis. Renew Energy 155:1312–1327. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2020.04.041

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Li P, Xu X, Yang S, Jiang X (2023) Open circuit fault diagnosis strategy of PMSM drive system based on grey prediction theory for industrial robot. Energy Rep 9:313–320. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2022.10.433

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  59. Wang Z, Li G, Yao L, Cai Y, Lin T, Zhang J, Dong H (2023) Intelligent fault detection scheme for constant-speed wind turbines based on improved multiscale fuzzy entropy and adaptive chaotic Aquila optimization-based support vector machine. ISA Trans 138:582–602. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isatra.2023.03.022

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Shuai H, Junxia L, Lei W, Wei Z (2023) Research on acoustic fault diagnosis of bearings based on spatial filtering and time-frequency domain filtering. Measurement 221:113533. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2023.113533

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This research received no fund or grant from any institution.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

SSS helped in conceptualization; AAJ helped in methodology; STAl-A, ETA, and LAAl-h helped in formal analysis; LAAl-H contributed to writing—original draft preparation; and LAAl-H and AAAl-Z contributed to writing—review and editing. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Luttfi A. Al-Haddad.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare. All co-authors have seen and agree with the contents of this manuscript, and there is no financial interest to report.

Ethical and informed consent for data used

In this paper, the authors affirm acquiring the test rig experimental data from a published article in a journal concerned in publishing experimental datasets. The data are online and free to use as the article is published in open-access format and, hence, already subjected to regulations and guidelines of publisher. We hereby consent on complying with ethical data practices and have cited the article accordingly [53].

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Al-Haddad, L.A., Shijer, S.S., Jaber, A.A. et al. Application of AdaBoost for stator fault diagnosis in three-phase permanent magnet synchronous motors based on vibration–current data fusion analysis. Electr Eng (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00202-023-02195-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00202-023-02195-6

Keywords

Navigation