Skip to main content
Log in

A general equilibrium analysis of corporate control and the stock market

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Economic Theory Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper studies a general equilibrium model with an investor-controlled firm. Shareholders can vote on the firm’s production plan in an assembly if they dislike management’s decision. Prior to that they may trade shares on the stock market. Since stock market trades determine the distribution of votes, trading is strategic. There is always an equilibrium, where share trading leads to an ownership structure that supports competitive behavior. But there may also be equilibria, where monopolistic behavior prevails.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aghion P., Bolton P.: An incomplete contracts approach to financial contracting. Rev Econ Stud 59, 473–494 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arrow K.J.: A difficulty in the concept of social welfare. J Polit Econ 58, 328–346 (1950)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arrow K.J.: Social Choice and Individual Values, 2nd edn. Wiley, New York (1963)

    Google Scholar 

  • Bagnoli M., Lipman B.L.: Successful takeovers without exclusion. Rev Financ Stud 1, 89–110 (1988)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bejan C.: The objective of a privately owned firm under monopolistic competition. Econ Theory 37, 99–118 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bejan, C.: Production and financial decisions under uncertainty. University of Minnesota (2004) (unpublished)

  • Benninga S., Muller E.: Majority choice and the objective function of the firm under uncertainty. Bell J Econ 10, 670–682 (1979)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burkart M., Gromb D., Panunzi F.: Why higher takeover premia protect minority shareholders. J Polit Econ 106, 172–204 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeMarzo P.M.: Majority voting and corporate control: the rule of the dominant shareholder. Rev Econ Stud 60, 713–734 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dierker E., Dierker H.: General equilibrium with imperfect competition. J Eur Econ Assoc 4, 436–445 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dierker, E., Dierker, H.: Drèze Equilibria and Welfare Maxima. Econ Theory (2009). doi:10.1007/s00199-009-0476-7

  • Dierker E., Dierker H., Grodal B.: Nonexistence of constrained efficient equilibria when markets are incomplete. Econometrica 70, 1245–1251 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dierker E., Dierker H., Grodal B.: Are incomplete markets able to achieve minimal efficiency?. Econ Theory 25, 75–87 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dierker E., Grodal B.: Profit maximization mitigates competition. Econ Theory 7, 139–160 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dierker E., Grodal B.: The price normalization problem in imperfect competition and the objective of the firm. Econ Theory 14, 257–284 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dierker H., Grodal B.: Non-Existence of Cournot-Walras Equilibrium in a General Equilibrium Model with Two Oligopolists. In: Hildenbrand, W., Mas-Colell, A. (eds) Contributions to Mathematical Economics, North-Holland, New York (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  • Dorofeenko V., Lang L.H.P., Ritzberger K., Shorish J.: Who controls allianz?—measuring the separation of dividend and control rights under cross-ownership among firms. Ann Finance 4, 75–103 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drèze J.H.: Investment under private ownership: optimality, equilibrium, and stability. In: Drèze, J.H. (eds) Allocation under Uncertainty: Equilibrium and Optimality, pp. 129–166. Wiley, New York (1974)

    Google Scholar 

  • Drèze J.H.: (Uncertainty and) the firm in general equilibrium theory. Econ J 95, 1–20 (1985)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gabszewicz J.J., Vial J.-P.: Oligopoly à la Cournot” in a general equilibrium analysis. J Econ Theory 4, 381–400 (1972)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grodal B.: Profit maximizing behavior in general equilibrium models with imperfect competition (in Danish). Econ Essays 28, 79–89 (1984)

    Google Scholar 

  • Grodal, B.: Profit maximization and imperfect competition. In: Allen, B. (ed.) Economics in a changing world. Proceedings of the Tenth World Congress of the International Economic Association, Moscow, vol. 2., pp. 3-22. St. Martin’s Press, New York (1996)

  • Grossman S.J., Hart O.D.: A theory of competitive equilibrium in stock market economies. Econometrica 47, 293–329 (1979)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grossman S.J., Hart O.D.: Takeover bids, the free-rider problem, and the theory of the corporation. Bell J Econ 11, 42–64 (1980)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grossman S.J., Hart O.D.: One share-one vote and the market for corporate control. J Financ Econ 20, 175–202 (1988)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haller H.: Market power, objectives of the firm, and objectives of shareholders. J Inst Theor Econ 142, 716–726 (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris M., Raviv A.: Corporate governance: voting rights and majority rules. J Financ Econ 20, 203–235 (1988)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirshleifer D.A., Titman S.: Share tendering strategies and the success of hostile takeover bids. J Polit Econ 98, 295–324 (1990)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holmström B., Tirole J.: Financial intermediation, loanable funds, and the real sector. Q J Econ 112, 663–691 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jensen M.C., Meckling W.: Theory of the firm: managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. J Financ Econ 3, 305–360 (1976)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelsey D., Milne F.: Imperfect competition and corporate governance. J Public Econ Theory 10, 1115–1141 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kreps D.M.: A Course in Microeconomic Theory. Harvester Wheatsheaf, New York (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  • La Porta R., Lopez-de-Silanes F., Shleifer A.: Corporate ownership around the world. J Finance 54, 471–517 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • La Porta R., Lopez-de Silanes F., Shleifer A., Vishny R.: Investor protection and corporate valuation. J Finance 57, 1147–1170 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maug E.G., Yilmaz B.: Two-class voting: a mechanism for conflict resolution. Am Econ Rev 92, 1448–1471 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milne F.: The firm’s objective function as a collective choice problem. Public Choice 37, 473–486 (1981)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Modigliani F., Perotti E.: Protection of minority interest and the development of security markets. Manag Dec Econ 18, 519–528 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Müller H.M., Panunzi F.: Tender offers and leverage. Q J Econ 119, 1217–1248 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nenova T.: The value of corporate voting rights and control: a cross-country analysis. J Financ Econ 68, 325–351 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  • Palfrey T.R., Rosenthal H.: A strategic calculus of voting. Public Choice 41, 7–53 (1983)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palfrey T.R., Rosenthal H.: Voter participation and strategic uncertainty. Am Polit Sci Rev 9, 62–78 (1985)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ritzberger K.: Shareholder voting. Econ Lett 86, 69–72 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts K.W.S.: Voting over income tax schedules. J Public Econ 8, 329–340 (1977)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rydqvist K.B.: Takeover bids and the relative prices of shares that differ in their voting rights. J Bank Finance 20, 1407–1425 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zingales L.: The value of the voting right: a study of the milan stock exchange experience. Rev Financ Stud 7, 125–148 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Klaus Ritzberger.

Additional information

We would like to thank Larry Blume, Egbert Dierker, Yossef Spiegel, Alexander Stomper, an anonymous referee, and seminar and conference participants at Exeter, Vienna, Oxford, Copenhagen, Maastricht, Cape Town, and Konstanz, SAET 2007, EFMA 2007, and ESEM 2007.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Demichelis, S., Ritzberger, K. A general equilibrium analysis of corporate control and the stock market. Econ Theory 46, 221–254 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00199-009-0511-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00199-009-0511-8

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation