Abstract
Summary
We undertook cluster analysis in 11,003 patients who had sustained ≥ 1 fragility fracture, to find associations between fracture sites and comorbidities. We identified three distinct groups of fracture sites and four clusters of fractures and comorbidities. Knowledge of factors associated with fracture sites will aid prophylaxis in at-risk patients.
Introduction
Fragility fracture (FF) prevalence is increasing. Subsequent fractures lead to greater morbidity and mortality. Few data are available on the association between FF sites and comorbidities.
Objectives:
-
1.
Establish the most common sites of FF and clusters within patients.
-
2.
Identify patterns of co-existing FF and associated comorbidities.
Methods
We retrospectively reviewed clinical records of patients undergoing bone mineral density estimation at a district hospital in North-West England, 2004–2016, identifying those who had sustained ≥ 1 FF. Demographics, FF site(s), comorbidities, and medications were recorded. Cluster analysis was performed on fracture sites alone, and sites and comorbidities, using Jaccard similarity coefficient. Results were plotted on a dendrogram and divided into clusters.
Results
Of 28,868 patients, 11,003 had sustained ≥ 1 FF, 84.6% female, with overall mean age 67.5 years and median T-score − 1.12 SD. FF of the forearm was more frequent (n = 5045), most commonly co-existing with tibia/fibula fractures. Three FF site clusters were identified: ankle and elbow; forearm, tibia/fibula, ribs and spine; and pelvis, femur and humerus. When including comorbidities, four clusters were identified: forearm, tibia/fibula, spine, associated with family history of FF, smoking, corticosteroids and bisphosphonates; pelvis associated with hyperparathyroidism, PMR, coeliac disease and HRT; femur and humerus associated with IBD and RA; and ribs associated with alcohol and hyperthyroidism.
Conclusion
Cluster analysis demonstrated three fracture site clusters, and four subgroups of FF sites and comorbidities. Cluster analysis is a novel method to evaluate comorbidities associated with FF sites. Knowledge of factors associated with FF sites will aid prophylaxis in at-risk patients.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
References
Kanis JA, Oden A, Johnell O, Jonsson B, De Laet C, Dawson A (2001) The burden of osteoporotic fractures: A method for setting intervention thresholds. Osteoporos Int
National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE). Osteoporosis : assessing the risk of fragility fracture - Clinical Guideline (CG146). 2012;(August):1–14. Available from: https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/cg146/resources/osteoporosis-assessing-the-risk-of-fragility-fracture-pdf-35109574194373
Ensrud KE (2013) Epidemiology of fracture risk with advancing age. J Gerontol - Ser A Biol Sci Med Sci
Deloumeau A, Moltó A, Roux C, Briot K (2017) Determinants of short term fracture risk in patients with a recent history of low-trauma non-vertebral fracture. Bone [Internet]. [cited 2021 Dec 22];105:287–91. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28842362/
Van Geel TACM, Van Helden S, Geusens PP, Winkens B, Dinant GJ (2009) Clinical subsequent fractures cluster in time after first fractures. Ann Rheum Dis [Internet]. [cited 2021 Dec 22];68(1):99–102. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18677009/
Adachi JD, Berger C, Barron R, Weycker D, Anastassiades TP, Davison KS et al (2019) Predictors of imminent non-vertebral fracture in elderly women with osteoporosis, low bone mass, or a history of fracture, based on data from the population-based Canadian Multicentre Osteoporosis Study (CaMos). Arch Osteoporos [Internet]. [cited 2021 Dec 22];14(1). Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31098708/
Schnell AD, Curtis JR, Saag KG (2018) Importance of Recent Fracture as Predictor of Imminent Fracture Risk. Curr Osteoporos Rep [Internet]. [cited 2021 Dec 22];16(6):738–45. Available from: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11914-018-0487-z
Hansen L, Petersen KD, Eriksen SA, Langdahl BL, Eiken PA, Brixen K et al (2014) Subsequent fracture rates in a nationwide population-based cohort study with a 10-year perspective. Osteoporos Int [Internet]. [cited 2021 Dec 22];26(2):513–9. Available from: https://link.springer.com/article/https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-014-2875-2
Morin SN, Lix LM, Leslie WD (2014) The Importance of Previous Fracture Site on Osteoporosis Diagnosis and Incident Fractures in Women. J Bone Miner Res [Internet]. [cited 2021 Dec 22];29(7):1675–80. Available from: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/jbmr.2204
Siris ES, Chen YT, Abbott TA, Barrett-Connor E, Miller PD, Wehren LE et al (2004) Bone mineral density thresholds for pharmacological intervention to prevent fractures. Arch Intern Med 164(10):1108–1112
Kanis JA, Johnell O, De Laet C, Johansson H, Oden A, Delmas P et al (2004) A meta-analysis of previous fracture and subsequent fracture risk. Bone [Internet]. [cited 2021 Dec 22];35(2):375–82. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15268886/
Balasubramanian A, Zhang J, Chen L, Wenkert D, Daigle SG, Grauer A et al (2019) Risk of subsequent fracture after prior fracture among older women. Osteoporos Int [Internet]. [cited 2021 Dec 22];30(1):79. Available from: /pmc/articles/PMC6332293/
Bliuc D, Nguyen TV, Eisman JA, Center JR (2014) The Impact of Nonhip Nonvertebral Fractures in Elderly Women and Men. J Clin Endocrinol Metab [Internet]. [cited 2021 Dec 22];99(2):415–23. Available from: https://academic.oup.com/jcem/article/99/2/415/2536821
Iconaru L, Moreau M, Kinnard V, Baleanu F, Paesmans M, Karmali R et al (2019) Does the Prediction Accuracy of Osteoporotic Fractures by BMD and Clinical Risk Factors Vary With Fracture Site? JBMR Plus [Internet]. [cited 2021 Dec 22];3(12). Available from: /pmc/articles/PMC6894722/
Banefelt J, Åkesson KE, Spångéus A, Ljunggren O, Karlsson L, Ström O et al (2019) Risk of imminent fracture following a previous fracture in a Swedish database study. Osteoporos Int [Internet]. [cited 2021 Dec 22];30(3):601. Available from: /pmc/articles/PMC6422949/
Söreskog E, Ström O, Spångéus A, Åkesson KE, Borgström F, Banefelt J et al (2020) Risk of major osteoporotic fracture after first, second and third fracture in Swedish women aged 50 years and older. Bone [Internet]. [cited 2021 Dec 22];134. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32070789/
Morin SN, Yan L, Lix LM, Leslie WD (2021) Long-term risk of subsequent major osteoporotic fracture and hip fracture in men and women: a population-based observational study with a 25-year follow-up. Osteoporos Int [Internet]. [cited 2021 Dec 22];32(12):2525–32. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34165587/
Holm JP, Hyldstrup L, Jensen JEB (2016) Time trends in osteoporosis risk factor profiles: a comparative analysis of risk factors, comorbidities, and medications over twelve years. Endocrine [Internet]. [cited 2021 Dec 22];54(1):241–55. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27178283/
Sale JEM, Frankel L, Bogoch E, Gignac M, Hawker G, Elliot-Gibson V, et al (2020) Few fragility fracture patients perceive that their bone health is affected by their comorbidities and medications. Osteoporos Int [Internet]. [cited 2021 Dec 22];31(10):2047–55. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32504095/
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Dey, M., Bukhari, M. Cluster analysis demonstrates co-existing sites of fragility fracture and associated comorbidities. Osteoporos Int 33, 1613–1618 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-022-06377-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-022-06377-z