Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Evaluation of panoramic radiomorphometric indices related to low bone density in sickle cell disease

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Osteoporosis International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Summary

In sickle cell disease, erythroid hyperplasia causes trabecular destruction leading to low bone density. This condition could be suspected by the radiomorphometric indices and your diagnosis becomes relevant in a multidisciplinary context of health care for sickle cell subjects, providing prognostics and contributing to determine adequate therapeutic and preventive actions.

Introduction

The aim of this study was to assess the risk of low bone density in subjects with sickle cell disease (SCD) through analysis of panoramic radiographic exams by radiomorphometric indices.

Methods

Seventy-eight Brazilian subjects with SCD took part in this study and were subdivided into four groups: (I) 31 SCD subjects aged under 40 years; (II) 13 SCD subjects aged 40 years or more; (III) 12 normal subjects aged under 40 years; and (IV) 22 normal subjects aged 40 years or more. In the panoramic radiographs, the mandibular cortical index (MCI) classification, increased spacing of the trabecular bone, panoramic mandibular index (PMI), and mental index (MI) were evaluated. Exact Fisher's test was used to compare age between the different groups. Descriptive analysis of the data was performed to evaluate the simple visual estimation of low bone density (increased bone trabecular space and MCI), and a one-way analysis of variance (Bonferroni criteria) was used to compare the means of the quantitative indices (PMI and MI). The significance level was p < 0.05.

Results

In the MCI classification, C2 was more prevalent, especially in groups I and IV. Increased spacing of the trabecular bone was more frequent in groups I and II. MI did not show a statistically significant difference among the groups. PMI showed a statistically significant difference only between groups III and IV.

Conclusions

The radiomorphometric indices applied in the present study can be used on panoramic radiographs to detect the presence of low bone density in SCD subjects.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Creary M, Williamson D, Kulkarni R (2007) Sickle cell disease: current activities, public health implications, and future directions. J Womens Health (Larchmt) 16:575–582

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Steinberg MH (1998) Pathophysiology of sickle cell disease. Baillieres Clin Haematol 11:163–184

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Gurevitch O, Slavin S (2006) The hematological etiology of osteoporosis. Med Hypotheses 67:729–735

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Benson BW, Prihoda TJ, Glass BJ (1991) Variations in adult cortical bone mass as measured by a panoramic mandibular index. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 71:349–356

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Bozic M, Hren NI (2005) Osteoporosis and mandibles. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 35:178–184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Çakur B, Dagistan S, Sahin A, Harorli A, Yilmaz A (2009) Reliability of mandibular cortical index and mandibular bone mineral mass density in the detection of osteoporotic women. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 38:255–261

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Brinker MR, Thomas KA, Meyers SJ, Texada T, Humbert JR, Cook SD, Gitter R (1998) Bone mineral density of the lumbar spine and proximal femur is decreased in children with sickle cell anemia. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ) 27:43–49

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Nelson DA, Rizvi S, Bhattacharyya T, Ortega J, Lachant N, Swerdlow P (2003) Trabecular and integral bone density in adults with sickle cell disease. J Clin Densitom 6:125–129

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Sadat-Ali M, Al Elq AH (2007) Sickle cell anaemia: is it a cause for secondary osteoporosis? West Afr J Med 26:134–137

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Sadat-Ali M, Al-Elq AH, Sultan O, Al-Turki H, Bukhari R, Al-Mulhim E (2008) Low bone mass due to sickle cell anemia: is it becoming a real issue? West Afr J Med 27:218–223

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Miller RG, Segal JB, Ashar BH, Leung S, Ahmed S, Siddique S, Rice T, Lanzkron S (2006) High prevalence and correlates of low bone mineral density in young adults with sickle cell disease. Am J Hematol 81:236–241

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Sarrai M, Duroseau H, D’Augustine J, Moktan S, Bellevue R (2007) Bone mass density in adults with sickle cell disease. Br J Haematol 136:666–672

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Soliman AT, Bererhi H, Darwish A, Alzalabani MM, Wali Y, Ansari B (1998) Decreased bone mineral density in prepubertal children with sickle cell disease: correlation with growth parameters, degree of siderosis and secretion of growth factors. J Trop Pediatr 44:194–198

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. VanderJagt DJ, Harmatz P, Scott-Emuakpor AB, Vichinsky E, Glew RH (2002) Bioelectrical impedance analysis of the body composition of children and adolescents with sickle cell disease. J Pediatr 140:681–687

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Almeida A, Roberts I (2005) Bone involvement in sickle cell disease. Br J Haematol 129:482–490

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Woods KF, Ramsey LT, Callahan LA, Mensah GA, Litaker MS, Kutlar A, Barbeau P, Gutin B (2001) Body composition in women with sickle cell disease. Ethn Dis 2001(11):30–35

    Google Scholar 

  17. Klemetti E, Kolmakov S, Kroger H (1994) Pantomography in assessment of the osteoporosis risk group. Scand J Dent Res 102:68–72

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Ledgerton D, Horner K, Devlin H, Worthington H (1997) Panoramic mandibular index as a radiomorphometric tool: an assessment of precision. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 26:95–100

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Dagistan S, Bilge OM (2010) Comparison of antegonial index, mental index, panoramic mandibular index and mandibular cortical index values in the panoramic radiographs of normal males and male patients with osteoporosis. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 39:290–294

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Sanger RG, Greer RO Jr, Averbach RE (1977) Differential diagnosis of some simple osseous lesions associated with sickle-cell anemia. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 43:538–545

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Mourshed F, Tuckson CR (1974) A study of the radiographic features of the jaws in sickle-cell anemia. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 37:812–819

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Dermibaş Kaya A, Aktener BO, Unsal C (2004) Pulpal necrosis with sickle cell anaemia. Int Endod J 37:602–606

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. White SC, Cohen JM, Mourshed FA (2000) Digital analysis of trabecular pattern in jaws of patients with sickle cell anemia. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 29:119–124

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Faber TD, Yoon DC, White SC (2002) Fourier analysis reveals increased trabecular spacing in sickle cell anemia. J Dent Res 81:214–218

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Kiswanjaya B, Yoshihara A, Deguchi T, Hanada N, Miyazaki H (2010) Relationship between the mandibular inferior cortex and bone stiffness in elderly Japanese people. Osteoporos Int 21:433–438

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Tagushi A, Tsuda M, Ohtsuka M, Komada I, Sanada M, Nakamoto T, Inagaki K, Nogushi T, Kudo Y, Suei Y, Tanimoto K, Bollen AM (2006) Use of dental panoramic radiographs in identifying younger postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. Osteoporos Int 17:387–394

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Devlin H, Horner K (2002) Mandibular radiomorphometric indices in the diagnosis of reduced skeletal bone mineral density. Osteoporos Int 13:373–378

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Gulsahi A, Yuzugullu B, Imirzalioglu P, Genç Y (2008) Assessment of panoramic radiomorphometric indices in Turkish patients of different age groups, gender and dental status. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 33:96–105

    Google Scholar 

  29. Mahl CRW, Licks R, Fontanella VRC (2008) Comparison of morphometric indices obtained from dental panoramic radiography for identifying individuals with osteoporosis/osteopenia. Radiol Bras 41:183–187, Article in Portuguese

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Horner K, Devlin H (1998) The relationship between mandibular bone mineral density and panoramic radiographic measurements. J Dent 26:337–343

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Gulsahi A, Paksoy CS, Ozden S, Kucuk NO, Cebeci AR, Genc Y (2010) Assessment of bone mineral density in the jaws and its relationship to radiomorphometric indices. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 39:284–289

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Çankur B, Dagistan S, Sumbullu MA (2010) No correlation between mandibular and non-mandibular measurements in osteoporotic men. Acta Radiol 51:789–792

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Damilakis J, Vlasiadis K (2010) Have panoramic indices the power to identify women with low BMD at the axial skeleton? Phys Med 27:39–43

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We are thankful to Professor Marilda Souza Gonçalves, School of Pharmacy—Federal University of Bahia, for carrying out the electrophoresis exams of the subjects and FAPESB (Bahia Research Support Foundation) for the financial support in this study.

Conflicts of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to F. S. Neves.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Neves, F.S., Oliveira, L.S.A.F., Torres, M.G.G. et al. Evaluation of panoramic radiomorphometric indices related to low bone density in sickle cell disease. Osteoporos Int 23, 2037–2042 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-011-1810-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-011-1810-z

Keywords

Navigation