Skip to main content
Log in

Acceleration-based methodology to assess the blast mitigation performance of explosive ordnance disposal helmets

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Shock Waves Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

To design the next generation of blast mitigation helmets that offer increasing levels of protection against explosive devices, manufacturers must be able to rely on appropriate test methodologies and human surrogates that will differentiate the performance level of various helmet solutions and ensure user safety. Ideally, such test methodologies and associated injury thresholds should be based on widely accepted injury criteria relevant within the context of blast. Unfortunately, even though significant research has taken place over the last decade in the area of blast neurotrauma, there currently exists no agreement in terms of injury mechanisms for blast-induced traumatic brain injury. In absence of such widely accepted test methods and injury criteria, the current study presents a specific blast test methodology focusing on explosive ordnance disposal protective equipment, involving the readily available Hybrid III mannequin, initially developed for the automotive industry. The unlikely applicability of the associated brain injury criteria (based on both linear and rotational head acceleration) is discussed in the context of blast. Test results encompassing a large number of blast configurations and personal protective equipment are presented, emphasizing the possibility to develop useful correlations between blast parameters, such as the scaled distance, and mannequin engineering measurements (head acceleration). Suggestions are put forward for a practical standardized blast testing methodology taking into account limitations in the applicability of acceleration-based injury criteria as well as the inherent variability in blast testing results.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20
Fig. 21

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bolander, R., Mathie, B., Bir, C., Ritzel, D., VandeVord, P.: Skull flexure as a contributing factor in the mechanism of injury in the rat when exposed to a shock wave. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 39(10), 2550–2559 (2011). doi:10.1007/s10439-011-0343-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Cernak, I., Wang, Z., Jiang, J., Bian, X., Savic, J.: Ultrastructural and functional characteristics of blast injury-induced neurotrauma. J. Trauma-Inj. Infect. Crit. Care 50(4), 695–706 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Cernak, I., Savic, J., Ignjatovic, D., Jevtic, M.: Blast injury from explosive munitions. J. Trauma-Inj. Infect. Crit. Care 47(1), 96–103 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Haladuick, T., Cronin, D.S., Lockhart, P., Singh, D., Bouamoul, A., Ouellet, S., Dionne, J.P.: Head kinematics resulting from simulated blast loading scenarios. In: Personal Armour Systems Symposium (PASS), Nuremberg (2012)

  5. Versace, V.: A review of the severity index. In: Proceedings of the Fifteenth Stapp Car Crash Conference, pp. 771–796 (1971). doi:10.4271/710881

  6. King, A.I., Yang, K.H., Zhang, L., Hardy, W., Viano, D.C.: Is head injury caused by linear or angular acceleration? In: Proceedings of the Annual Conference of the International Research Council on Biomechanics of Injury (IRCOBI), Lisbon (2003)

  7. Ommaya, A.K.: Head Injury Biomechanics. George G. Snively Memorial Lecture, Denver, Association for the Advancement of Automotive Medicine (1984)

  8. Thibault, L., Gennarelli, T.: Brain injury: an analysis of neural and neurovascular trauma in the nonhuman primate. In: 34th Annual Conference of the Association for the Advancement of Automotive Medicine, Scottsville (1990)

  9. Newman, J.A.: A generalized model for brain injury threshold (GAMBIT). In: Proceedings of International Conference on the Biomechanics of Impact (IRCOBI), pp. 121–131 (1986)

  10. Newman, J.A., Shewchenko, N., Welbourne, E.: A proposed new biomechanical head injury assessment function–the maximum power index. Stapp Car Crash J. 44, 215–247 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Newman, J., Barr, C., Beusenberg, M.C., Fournier, E., Shewchenko, N., Welbourne, E., Withnall, C.: A new biomechanical assessment of mild traumatic brain injury. Part 2: Results and conclusions. In: Proceedings of the International Research Council on the Biomechanics of Injury conference (IRCOBI) (2000)

  12. Takhounts, E.G., Craig, M.J., Moorhouse, K., McFadden, J., Hasija, V.: Development if brain injury criteria (BrIC). Stapp Car Crash J. 57, 243–266 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Ouellet, S., Bouamoul, A., Gauvin, R., Williams, K.V., Martineau, L.: Development of a biofidelic head surrogate for blast-induced traumatic brain injury assessment. In: Proceedings from the 2012 Personal Armour Systems Symposium Conference (PASS), Nuremberg (2012)

  14. Simmonds, K.E., Matic, P., Chase, M., Leung, A.: GelMan: a physical model for measuring the response to blast. NRL Rev. 156–158 (2004)

  15. Public Safety Bomb Suit Standard, NIJ Standard-0117.01: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Washington (2012)

  16. National Highway Traffic Safety Admin., DOT, 49 CFR Ch. V (10-1-11 Edition), Part 572—Anthropomorphic Test Devices, Subpart E—Hybrid III Test Dummy (1997)

  17. Instrumentation for Impact Test, Part 1, Electronic Instrumentation, SAE J211-1 (1995)

  18. Kingery, C., Bulmarsh, G.: Airblast parameters from TNT spherical air burst and hemispherical surface burst. ARBRL-TR-02555. US Army Ballistic Research Laboratory, Aberdeen Proving Ground (1984)

  19. Kimpara, H., Nakahira, Y., Iwamoto, M., Rowson, S., Duma, S.: Head injury prediction methods based on 6 degree of freedom head acceleration measurements during impact. J. Automot. Eng. 2, 13–19 (2011). doi:10.20485/jsaeijae.2.2_13

    Google Scholar 

  20. Mital, N.K., King, A.I.: Computation of rigid body rotation in three-dimensional space from body-fixed linear acceleration measurements. J. Appl. Mech. 46(4), 925–930 (1979). doi:10.1115/1.3424679

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Levine, J., Dionne, J.P., Bueley, D., Makris, A.: Blast and impact induced linear and rotational head acceleration. In: Proceedings from the 2014 Personal Armour Systems Symposium Conference (PASS), Cambridge (2014)

  22. Lissner, H.R., Lebow, M., Evans, F.G.: Experimental studies on the relation between acceleration and intracranial pressure changes in man. Surg. Gynecol. Obstet. 111, 329–338 (1960)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Bass, C.R., Davis, M., Rafaels, K., Rountree, S., Harris, R.M., Sanderson, E., Andrefsky, W., Dimarco, G., Zielinski, M.: A methodology for assessing blast protection in explosive ordnance disposal bomb suits. Int. J. Occup. Saf. Ergon. 11(4), 347–361 (2005). doi:10.1080/10803548.2005.11076655

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Baker, W.: Explosions in Air. University of Texas Press, Austin (1973)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Levine, J., Dionne, J.P., Makris, A.: Blast injury charts for EOD scenarios based on scaled explosive parameters. In: Proceedings from the 21st Military Aspects of Blast and Simulation (MABS), Jerusalem (2012)

  26. Dionne, J.P., Levine, J., Makris, A.: Development of a blast severity comparative tool. In: Proceedings from the 22nd Military Aspects of Blast and Simulation (MABS), Oxford (2014)

  27. Dionne, J.P., Cheng, M., Levine, J., Makris A.: Tertiary blast injury and the need for impact protection. In: Proceedings from the 2016 Personal Armour Systems Symposium Conference (PASS), Amsterdam (2016)

  28. Levine, J., Cheng, M., Dionne, J.P., Makris, A.: Launched distance by the force of the blast. In: Proceedings from the 23rd Military Aspects of Blast and Simulation (MABS), Halifax (2016)

  29. Bass, C.R., Rafaels, K., Salzar, R.: Pulmonary injury risk assessment for short-duration blasts. J. Trauma-Inj. Infect. Crit. Care 65(3), 604–615 (2008). doi:10.1097/TA.0b013e3181454ab4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Nerenberg, J., Dionne, J.P., Makris, A., Fisher, G.: Evaluation of the ABS-LPU Ensemble for Compliance with US Army Advanced Bomb Suit Program. UXO Countermine Forum, Orlando (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Dionne, J.P., McKenzie, I., Levine, J., Makris, A.: Higher mobility PPE alternative to EOD suits for specific military operations. In: Proceedings from the 2012 Personal Armour Systems Symposium Conference (PASS), Nuremberg (2012)

  32. Ohrt, A.P., Dailey, T.G., Bogosian, D.D.: Statistical variation of airblast parameters from bare and cased explosive cylinders. In: Proceedings from the 22nd Military Aspects of Blast and Simulation (MABS), Oxford (2014)

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the hard work of their former and current colleagues Doug Bueley, Clint Hedge, Matthew Keown, Robert Beland, Scott Thiel, Julia White, Mark Smith, Ewan Smith, and Terry Rohachuk. The authors also like to thank the support and technical staffs at DRDC Suffield, DRDC Valcartier, CERL, CFB Petawawa, NSWC Indian Head, and the MREL Group of Companies.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. P. Dionne.

Additional information

Communicated by O. Petel and S. Ouellet.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Dionne, J.P., Levine, J. & Makris, A. Acceleration-based methodology to assess the blast mitigation performance of explosive ordnance disposal helmets. Shock Waves 28, 5–18 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00193-017-0737-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00193-017-0737-5

Keywords

Navigation