Skip to main content
Log in

Wharton–Sheares–George vaginoplasty: a safe and efficient technique in patients with Mayer–Rokitansky–Küster–Hauser syndrome

  • IUJ Video
  • Published:
International Urogynecology Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis

Mayer–Rokitansky–Küster–Hauser (MRKH) syndrome is a condition with an underdeveloped or absent vagina and uterus due to embryological growth failure of the Müllerian ducts. Many techniques have been described to construct a neovagina with an acceptable depth that allows penetrative intercourse. This is a step-by-step video tutorial on the Wharton–Sheares–George surgical technique for vaginoplasty in patients with MRKH syndrome.

Method

With Wharton–Sheares–George vaginoplasty, the rudimentary Müllerian ducts are incrementally dilated by pushing Hegar dilators in the direction of the pelvic axis, and the resulting median raphe is then intersected using diathermy. As a result, a neovagina is created and an estriol-coated vaginal mold is inserted for 3 days. The patient receives comprehensive discharge instructions, a self-dilation program three times a day, and a monthly follow-up.

Results

A 3-month follow-up showed a high subjective degree of satisfaction with surgery and sexual satisfaction in both patients.

Conclusion

Wharton–Sheares–George vaginoplasty is a safe and efficient technique for creating a neovagina for patients with MRKH syndrome.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

References

  1. Chen N, Song S, Bao X, Zhu L. Update on Mayer–Rokitansky–Küster–Hauser syndrome. Front Med. 2022;16(6):859–72. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11684-022-0969-3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Lee MH. Non-surgical treatment of vaginal agenesis using a simplified version of Ingram’s method. Yonsei Med J. 2006;47(6):892–5. https://doi.org/10.3349/ymj.2006.47.6.892.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Wang YY, Duan H, Zhang XN, Wang S. Neovagina creation: a novel improved laparoscopic Vecchietti procedure in patients with Mayer–Rokitansky–Küster–Hauser syndrome. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2021;28(1):82–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2020.04.006.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Piro C, Asensio M, Martín JA, Giné C, Ormaetxea E, Chicaiza E. Vaginoplastia con sigma: a propósito de 5 casos [Sigmoid colon vaginoplasty: experience with five cases]. Cir Pediatr. 2006;19(1):19–22.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Navarro V, Acién MI, Acién P. Classical McIndoe technique versus the McIndoe technique with a neovaginal PACIENA Prosthesis® and no skin graft. J Clin Med. 2020;9(11):3648. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm9113648.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Samantray SR, Mohapatra I, Harshini N. Laparoscopic Davydov’s colpopoiesis for a case of Mayer–Rokitansky–Kuster–Hauser (MRKH) syndrome. Cureus. 2021;13(3):e13974. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.13974.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Kuessel L, Wenzl R, Marschalek ML, Slavka G, Doerfler D, Husslein H. Using the Wharton–Sheares–George method to create a neovagina in patients with Mayer–Rokitansky–Küster–Hauser syndrome: a step-by-step video tutorial. Fertil Steril. 2016;106(7):e20–1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.08.030.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Schätz T, Huber J, Wenzl R. Creation of a neovagina according to Wharton–Sheares–George in patients with Mayer–Rokitansky–Küster–Hauser syndrome. Fertil Steril. 2005;83(2):437–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2004.06.079.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Zhou J-H, Sun J, Yang C-B, Xie Z-W, Shao W-Q, Jin H-M. Long-term outcomes of transvestibular vaginoplasty with pelvic peritoneum in 182 patients with Rokitansky’s syndrome. Fertil Steril. 2010;94(6):2281–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kölle A, Taran FA, Rall K, Schöller D, Wallwiener D, Brucker SY. Neovagina creation methods and their potential impact on subsequent uterus transplantation: a review. BJOG. 2019;126(11):1328–35. https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.15888.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Thanks to Ervin Kocjancic, MD, PhD (Department of Surgery–Urology, University of Chicago) for review of the manuscript and Donald Reindl for copyediting assistance with this manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bruno Deval.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

All the authors completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form. The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Consent

Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for publication of this video article and any accompanying images.

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Brief summary

Wharton–Sheares–George vaginoplasty is a safe and efficient technique for creating a neovagina for patients with MRKH syndrome.

Supplementary information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (MP4 68059 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rhazi, I., Lukanović, D., Blaganje, M. et al. Wharton–Sheares–George vaginoplasty: a safe and efficient technique in patients with Mayer–Rokitansky–Küster–Hauser syndrome. Int Urogynecol J 35, 467–470 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-023-05632-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-023-05632-z

Keywords

Navigation