Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Effects of interferential current stimulation in women with pelvic organ prolapse: a prospective randomized sham-controlled study

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Urogynecology Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis

The objective was to investigate the effects of interferential (IF) current stimulation on pelvic floor symptoms, prolapse stages, pelvic floor muscle (PFM) strength/endurance, quality of life (QoL), sexual function, perception of subjective improvement (PSI), and satisfaction in women with pelvic organ prolapse (POP).

Methods

The patients were randomly divided into the IF (n=13) and sham groups (n=12). Lifestyle advice was given in both groups. Active IF current was applied in the IF group and sham IF was applied in the sham group 3 days a week for 8 weeks. The following tools were used for data evaluation: pelvic floor symptom severity with the Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory-20 (PFDI-20), POP with the simplified POP-quantification system, PFM strength/endurance with a perineometer, QoL with the Prolapse Quality of Life Scale (P-QoL), and sexual function with the Pelvic Organ Prolapse/Urinary Incontinence Sexual Function Scale (PISQ-12). Evaluations were made before treatment (BT), mid-term (MT, 4th week), and after treatment (AT). PSI and satisfaction were evaluated AT with Likert-type scales.

Results

In the intergroup comparison AT, a greater increase in PFM strength/endurance, P-QoL-role limitations, P-QoL-sleep/energy scores, PSI, and satisfaction level, and a decrease in cystocele stages were observed in the IF group than in the sham group (p<0.05). Further, there was a greater increase in PFM endurance in the IF group in MT (p<0.05).

Conclusions

Interferential current stimulation was effective in improving POP stage, PFM strength/endurance, and QoL in women with POP. IF current stimulation can be used as a complementary treatment method in women with POP.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Weintraub AY, Glinter H, Marcus-Braun N. Narrative review of the epidemiology, diagnosis and pathophysiology of pelvic organ prolapse. Int Braz J Urol. 2020;46(1):5–14. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2018.0581.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Haylen BT, Maher CF, Barber MD, et al. An International Urogynecological Association (IUGA)/International Continence Society (ICS) joint report on the terminology for female pelvic organ prolapse (POP). Int Urogynecol J. 2016;27(2):165–94. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-015-2932-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists and the American Urogynecologic Society. Pelvic organ prolapse. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2019;25(6):397–408. https://doi.org/10.1097/SPV.0000000000000794.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Ashton-Miller JA, DeLancey JOL. Functional anatomy of the female pelvic floor. Ann NY Acad Sci. 2007;1101:266–96. https://doi.org/10.1196/annals.1389.034.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Hua TJ, Zhong C, Wen W, Wu R, Liu Y, Fang DL. Quantifying levator ani muscle elasticity under normal and prolapse conditions by shear wave elastography: a preliminary study. J Ultrasound Med. 2020;39(7):1379–88. https://doi.org/10.1002/jum.15232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Hagen S, Stark D. Conservative prevention and management of pelvic organ prolapse in women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011;12:CD003882.

    Google Scholar 

  7. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE): Clinical Guidelines. Urinary incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse in women: management. https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng123. Accessed 12 Dec 2021.

  8. Dmochowski R, Lynch CM, Efros M, Cardozo L. External electrical stimulation compared with intravaginal electrical stimulation for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence in women: a randomized controlled noninferiority trial. Neurourol Urodyn. 2019;38(7):1834–43. https://doi.org/10.1002/nau.24066.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Yıldız N. Pelvik Taban Disfonksiyonunda Elektriksel Stimulasyon Tedavisi. In: Karan A, editor. Ürojinekolojide Fizik Tedavi ve Rehabilitasyon. Istanbul: Nobel Medical Bookstore; 2016. p. 71–80.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Laycock J, Jerwood D. Does pre-modulated interferential therapy cure genuine stress incontinence? Physiotherapy. 1993;79(8):553–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Turkan A, Inci Y, Fazli D. The short-term effects of physical therapy in different intensities of urodynamic stress incontinence. Gynecol Obstet Investig. 2005;59(1):43–8. https://doi.org/10.1159/000081133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Demirtürk F, Akbayrak T, Karakaya IC, et al. Interferential current versus biofeedback results in urinary stress incontinence. Swiss Med Wkly. 2008;138(21–22):317–21.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Wang Q, Zhao Y, Huang L, Zhang J, Shen W. Evaluation of the effect of electrical stimulation combined with biofeedback therapy for postpartum pelvic organ prolapse: a static and dynamic magnetic resonance imaging study. Natl Med J China. 2019;99(5):375–9. https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.0376-2491.2019.05.011.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Yang S, Sang W, Feng J, et al. The effect of rehabilitation exercises combined with direct vagina low voltage low frequency electric stimulation on pelvic nerve electrophysiology and tissue function in primiparous women: a randomised controlled trial. J Clin Nurs. 2017;26(23–24):4537–47. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.13790.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Zhong F, Miao W, Yu Z, Hong L, Deng N. Clinical effect of electrical stimulation biofeedback therapy combined with pelvic floor functional exercise on postpartum pelvic organ prolapse. Am J Transl Res. 2021;13(6):6629–37.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Toprak Celenay S, Akbayrak T, Kaya S, Ekici G, Beksac S. Validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory-20. Int Urogynecol J. 2012;23(8):1123–7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-012-1729-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Parekh M, Swift S, Lemos N, et al. Multicenter inter-examiner agreement trial for the validation of simplified POPQ system. Int Urogynecol J. 2011;22(6):645–50. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-011-1395-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Frawley H, Shelly B, Morin M, et al. An International Continence Society (ICS) report on the terminology for pelvic floor muscle assessment. Neurourol Urodyn. 2021;40(5):1217–60. https://doi.org/10.1002/nau.24658.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Kaya S, Akbayrak T, Gursen C, Beksac S. Short-term effect of adding pelvic floor muscle training to bladder training for female urinary incontinence: a randomized controlled trial. Int Urogynecol J. 2015;26(2):285–93. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-014-2517-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Seven M, Akyüz A, Açıkel C. Ürogenital prolapsus yaşam kalitesi ölçeğinin geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması. TAF Prev Med Bull. 2008;7(4):317–22.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Cam C, Sancak P, Karahan N, Sancak A, Celik C, Karateke A. Validation of the short form of the Pelvic Organ Prolapse/Urinary Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire (PISQ-12) in a Turkish population. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2009;146(1):104–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2009.05.016.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Orhan C, Akbayrak T, Özgül S, et al. Effects of vaginal tampon training added to pelvic floor muscle training in women with stress urinary incontinence: randomized controlled trial. Int Urogynecol J. 2019;30(2):219–29. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-018-3585-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Hendriks A, Vrielink M, Smets E, Van Es S, De Haes J. Improving the assessment of (in)patients' satisfaction with hospital care. Med Care. 2001;39(3):270–83. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005650-200103000-00007.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Moortgat P, Anthonissen M, Meirte J, Van Daele U, Maertens K. The physical and physiological effects of vacuum massage on the different skin layers: a current status of the literature. Burns Trauma. 2016;4:34. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41038-016-0053-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Li C, Gong Y, Wang B. The efficacy of pelvic floor muscle training for pelvic organ prolapse: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int Urogynecol J. 2016;27(7):981–92. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-015-2846-y.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Veldman MP, Gondin J, Place N, Maffiuletti NA. Effects of neuromuscular electrical stimulation training on endurance performance. Front Physiol. 2016;7:544. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2016.00544.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Orhan A. Kadınlarda Üriner İnkontinans ve Pelvik Organ Prolapsusu Birlikteliği: Pelvik Taban Disfonksiyonları Terminolojisine Farklı Bir Bakış. Kontinans ve Nöroüroloji Bülteni. 2019;6:22–6.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Koch L, Jansen L, Herrmann A, et al. Quality of life in long-term breast cancer survivors—a 10-year longitudinal population-based study. Acta Oncol. 2013;52(6):1119–28. https://doi.org/10.3109/0284186X.2013.774461.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Spruijt J, Vierhout M, Verstraeten R, Janssens J, Burger C. Vaginal electrical stimulation of the pelvic floor: a randomized feasibility study in urinary incontinent elderly women. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2003;82(11):1043–8. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0412.2003.00130.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Barber MD, Visco AG, Wyman JF, Fantl JA, Bump RC. Sexual function in women with urinary incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse. Obstet Gynecol. 2002;99(2):281–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0029-7844(01)01727-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Z. Korkut: project development, data collection, data analysis and interpretation, manuscript writing/editing; E. Turen Demir: data collection, data interpretation and manuscript writing/editing; S. Toprak Celenay: project development, data analysis and interpretation and manuscript writing/editing.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Seyda Toprak Celenay.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

None.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Korkut, Z., Demir, E.T. & Celenay, S.T. Effects of interferential current stimulation in women with pelvic organ prolapse: a prospective randomized sham-controlled study. Int Urogynecol J 34, 279–289 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-022-05402-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-022-05402-3

Keywords

Navigation