Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Does the impact of urinary incontinence on quality of life differ based on age?

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Urogynecology Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis

The purpose of this study was to evaluate if the impact of urinary incontinence (UI) on quality of life (QOL) differs between women based on age.

Methods

A retrospective review of patients presenting for the management of UI was performed. Patients with UI and their corresponding degree of bother were identified by their responses to validated questionnaires. Distributions of comorbidities and types of UI were presented as frequencies and compared between age cohorts with a chi-square test. Mean scale scores were assessed for normality and a one-way analysis of variance with a post hoc Scheffé’s test was used to compare the scores.

Results

Of 765 patients meeting inclusion criteria, 22.4 % were <45, 28.9 % were 45–55, and 48.8 % were >55 years of age. Women older than 55 were significantly more likely to have urge UI and mixed UI than their counterparts (p < 0.001). Women <45 and 45–55 were more negatively impacted in their ability to perform physical activities compared to women >55 (p = 0.004), whereas women >55 were significantly less likely to feel frustrated by their incontinence than women <45 (p = 0.022). However, there was no significant difference in overall impact of incontinence among groups (p = 0.585).

Conclusions

UI equally impacts the functional and psychological QOL in women regardless of age. UI in women <55 results in a greater negative impact on level of physical activity, whereas women <45 are significantly more frustrated.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Buckley BS, Lapitan MC, Epidemiology Committee of the Fourth International Consultation on Incontinence, Paris, 2008 (2010) Prevalence of urinary incontinence in men, women, and children—current evidence: findings of the Fourth International Consultation on Incontinence. Urology 76(2):265–270

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Melville JL, Katon W, Delaney K et al (2005) Urinary incontinence in US women: a population-based study. Arch Intern Med 165:537–542

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Wagner TH, Hu TW (1998) Economic costs of urinary incontinence in 1995. Urology 51:355–361

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Patrick DL, Martin ML, Bushnell DM et al (1999) Quality of life of women with urinary incontinence: further development of the Incontinence Quality of Life Instrument (I-QOL). Urology 53:71–76

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Weber AM (2007) Epidemiology and psychosocial impact of pelvic floor disorders. In: Walters MD, Karram MM (eds) Urogynecology and reconstructive pelvic surgery, 3rd edn. Mosby, Philadelphia, pp 44–54

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Ko Y, Lin SJ, Salmon JW et al (2005) The impact of urinary incontinence on quality of life of the elderly. Am J Manag Care 11:S103–S111

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Grimby A, Milson I, Molander U et al (1993) The influence of urinary incontinence on the quality of life of elderly women. Age Ageing 22:82–88

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Tennstedt SL, Fitzgerald MP, Nager CW et al (2007) Quality of life in women with stress urinary incontinence. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 18:543–549

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Schimpf MO, Patel M, O’Sullivan DM, Tulikangas PK (2009) Difference in quality of life in women with urge urinary incontinence compared to women with stress urinary incontinence. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 20:781–786

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Barber MD, Kuchibhatla MN, Pieper CF et al (2001) Psychometric evaluation of 2 comprehensive condition-specific quality of life instruments for women with pelvic floor disorders. Am J Obstet Gynecol 185:1388–1395

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Barber MD, Walters MD, Bump RC (2005) Short forms of two condition-specific quality-of-life questionnaires for women with pelvic floor disorders (PFDI-20 and PFIQ-7). Am J Obstet Gynecol 193:103–113

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Uebersax JA, Wyman JF, Shumaker SA et al. (1995) Short forms to assess life quality and symptom distress for urinary incontinence in women: the Incontinence Impact Questionnaire and the Urogenital Distress Inventory. Continence Program for Women Research Group. Neurourol Urodyn 14:131–139

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Haylen BT, de Ridder D, Freeman RM, Swift SE, Berghmans B, Lee J, Monga A, Petri E, Rizk DE, Sand PK, Shaer GN (2010) An International Urogynecological Association (IUGA)/International Continence Society (ICS) joint report on the terminology for female pelvic floor dysfunction. Int Urogynecol J 21:5–26

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Frick AC, Huang AJ, Van den Eeden SK et al (2009) Mixed urinary incontinence: greater impact on quality of life. J Urol 182(2):596–600

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Huang AJ, Brown JS, Kanaya AM et al (2006) Quality-of-life impact and treatment of urinary incontinence in ethnically diverse older women. Arch Intern Med 166(18):2000–2006

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Rohr G, Christensen K, Ulstrup K et al (2004) Reproducibility and validity of simple questions to identify urinary incontinence in elderly women. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 83:969–972

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflicts of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Urogynecology, Hartford Hospital, 85 Seymour Street, Suite 525, Hartford, CT, 06106, USA

    Hema D. Brazell & Christine A. LaSala

  2. Department of Research Administration, Hartford Hospital, 80 Seymour Street, Hartford, CT, 06106, USA

    David M. O’Sullivan

Authors
  1. Hema D. Brazell
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. David M. O’Sullivan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Christine A. LaSala
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hema D. Brazell.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Brazell, H.D., O’Sullivan, D.M. & LaSala, C.A. Does the impact of urinary incontinence on quality of life differ based on age?. Int Urogynecol J 24, 2077–2080 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-012-2005-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-012-2005-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation