Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Measurement of the Q-tip angle before and after tension-free vaginal tape-obturator (TVT-O): preoperative urethral mobility may predict surgical outcome

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Urogynecology Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis

The purpose of this study was to compare the results of the Q-tip test before and after the tension-free vaginal tape-obturator (TVT-O) in women with stress urinary incontinence (SUI) to determine the value of the Q-tip test in predicting the outcome of transobturator tape (TOT).

Methods

Between June 2008 and June 2009, 59 women with SUI who underwent the TVT-O procedure and were followed up for at least 6 months were analyzed. Urethral hypermobility was defined as a maximal straining angle greater than 30° as measured by the Q-tip test. Parameters of evaluation included a comprehensive medical history, physical examination, Q-tip test, stress test, and urodynamic study, which included determination of the Valsalva leak point pressure. Cure was defined as no leakage of urine postoperatively either subjectively or objectively, whereas failure was defined as the objective loss of urine during the stress test.

Results

The patients were divided into two groups according to their preoperative Q-tip angle: <30° (group 1, n = 21) and ≥30° (group 2, n = 38). The Q-tip angle decreased significantly in both groups: from 25.9 ± 5.98° preoperatively to 18.4 ± 7.23° postoperatively in group 1 (p = 0.04) and from 36.6 ± 6.75° preoperatively to 24.1 ± 5.48° postoperatively in group 2 (p = 0.03). The difference was obviously pronounced in group 2. The incontinence cure rate was significantly higher in group 2 (97.4 %) than in group 1 (85.7 %; p = 0.04).

Conclusions

Our results suggest that mobility of the proximal urethra is associated with a high rate of success of the TVT-O procedure.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. DeLancey JO (1994) Structural support of the urethra as it relates to stress urinary incontinence: the hammock hypothesis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 170(6):1713–1720

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. DeLancey JO (1989) Pubourethral ligament: a separate structure from the urethral supports (“pubo-urethral ligaments”). Neurourol Urodyn 8:53–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Ulmsten U, Henriksson L, Johnson P, Varhos G (1996) An ambulatory surgical procedure under local anesthesia for treatment of female urinary incontinence. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 7(2):81–85

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Delorme E (2001) Transobturator urethral suspension: mini-invasive procedure in the treatment of stress urinary incontinence in women. Prog Urol 11:1306–1313

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Paick JS, Cho MC, Oh SJ, Kim SW, Ku JH (2007) Is proximal urethral mobility important for transobturator tape procedure in management of female patients with stress urinary incontinence? Urology 70(2):246–250

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Minaglia S, Ozel B, Hurtado E et al (2005) Effect of transobturator tape procedure on proximal urethral mobility. Urology 65:55–59

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Lukacz ES, Luber KM, Nager CW (2003) The effects of the tension-free vaginal tape on proximal urethral position: a prospective, longitudinal evaluation. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 14:179–184

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Klutke JJ, Carlin BI, Klutke CG (2000) The tension-free vaginal tape procedure: correction of stress incontinence with minimal alteration in proximal urethral mobility. Urology 55:512–514

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Bakas P, Liapis A, Creatsas G (2002) Q-tip test and tension-free vaginal tape in the management of female patients with genuine stress incontinence. Gynecol Obstet Invest 53:170–173

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. McLennan MT, Melick CF, Cannon S (2004) The position of the urethrovesical junction after incontinence surgery: early postoperative changes. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 15(1):44–48

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Deval B, Levardon M, Samain E et al (2003) A French multicenter clinical trial of SPARC for stress urinary incontinence. Eur Urol 44:254–258

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Crystle D, Charme L, Copeland W (1971) Q-tip test in stress urinary incontinence. Obstet Gynecol 38:313–315

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Haylen BT, de Ridder D, Freeman RM et al (2010) An International Urogynecological Association (IUGA)/International Continence Society (ICS) joint report on the terminology for female pelvic floor dysfunction. Int Urogynecol J 21:5–26

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. McGuire EJ, Lytton B, Pepe V, Kohorn EI (1976) Stress urinary incontinence. Obstet Gynecol 47:255–264

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Enhorning G (1961) Simultaneous recording of intravesical and intra-urethral pressure. A study on urethral closure in normal and stress incontinent women. Acta Chir Scand Suppl 276:1–68

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Lo TS, Horng SG, Liang CC et al (2004) Ultrasound assessment of mid-urethra tape at three-year follow-up after tension-free vaginal procedure. Urology 63:671–675

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Sarlos D, Kuronen M, Schaer G (2003) How does tension-free vaginal tape correct stress incontinence? Investigation by perineal ultrasound. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 14:395–398

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Fritel X, Zabak K, Pigne A et al (2002) Predictive value of urethral mobility before suburethral tape procedure for urinary stress incontinence in women. J Urol 168:2472–2475

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Ulmsten U, Petros P (1995) Intravaginal slingplasty (IVS): an ambulatory surgical procedure for treatment of female urinary incontinence. Scand J Urol Nephrol 29:75–82

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Dietz HP, Vancaillie P, Svehla M, Walsh W, Steensma AB, Vancaillie TG (2001) Mechanical properties of implant materials used in incontinence surgery. Neurourol Urodyn 20:530

    Google Scholar 

  21. Bergman A, Koonings PP, Ballard CA (1989) Negative Q-tip test as a risk factor for failed incontinence surgery in women. J Reprod Med 34:193–197

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Karram MM, Bhatia NN (1988) The Q-tip test: standardization of the technique and its interpretation in women with urinary incontinence. Obstet Gynecol 71:807–811

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflicts of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sun-Ouck Kim.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kim, SO., Jung, H.S., Jang, W.S. et al. Measurement of the Q-tip angle before and after tension-free vaginal tape-obturator (TVT-O): preoperative urethral mobility may predict surgical outcome. Int Urogynecol J 24, 1005–1009 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-012-1978-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-012-1978-6

Keyword

Navigation