Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Pessary use in advanced pelvic organ prolapse

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Urogynecology Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The objective of this study was to review our experience with pessary use for advanced pelvic organ prolapse. Charts of patients treated for Stage III and IV prolapse were reviewed. Comparisons were made between patients who tried or refused pessary use. A successful trial of pessary was defined by continued use; a failed trial was defined by a patient’s discontinued use. Thirty-two patients tried a pessary; 45 refused. Patients who refused a pessary were younger, had lesser degree of prolapse, and more often had urinary incontinence. Most patients (62.5%) continued pessary use and avoided surgery. Unsuccessful trial of pessary resorting to surgery included four patients (33%) with unwillingness to maintain, three patients (25%) with inability to retain and two patients (17%) with vaginal erosion and/or discharge. Our findings suggest that pessary use is an acceptable first-line option for treatment of advanced pelvic organ prolapse.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Cundiff GW, Weidner AC, Visco AG, Bump RC, Addison WA (2000) A survey of pessary use by members of the American urogynecologic society. Obstet Gynecol 95(6 Pt 1):931–935

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Pott-Grinstein E, Newcomer JR (2001) Gynecologists’ patterns of prescribing pessaries. J Reprod Med 46(3):205–208

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Wu V, Farrell SA, Baskett TF, Flowerdew G (1997) A simplified protocol for pessary management. Obstet Gynecol 90(6):990–994

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Sulak PJ, Kuehl TJ, Shull BL (1993) Vaginal pessaries and their use in pelvic relaxation. J Reprod Med 38(12):919–923

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Bash KL (2000) Review of vaginal pessaries. Obstet Gynecol Surv 55(7):455–460

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Myers DL, LaSala CA, Murphy JA (1998) Double pessary use in grade 4 uterine and vaginal prolapse. Obstet Gynecol 91(6):1019–1020

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Singh K, Reid WM (2001) Non-surgical treatment of uterovaginal prolapse using double vaginal rings. BJOG 108(1):112–113

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Walters MD, Iannetta LT (1997) Combination of pessary and periurethral collagen injections for nonsurgical treatment of uterovaginal prolapse and genuine stress urinary incontinence. Obstet Gynecol 90(4 Pt 2):691–692

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Scotti RJ, Flora R, Greston WM, Budnick L, Hutchinson-Colas J (2000) Characterizing and reporting pelvic floor defects: the revised New York classification system. Int Urogynecol J 11:48–60

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Bump RC, Mattiasson A, Bo K, Brubaker LP, DeLancey JO, Klarskov P, Shull BL, Smith AR (1996) The standardization of terminology of female pelvic organ prolapse and pelvic floor dysfunction. Am J Obstet Gynecol 175(1):10–17

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Crystle CD, Charme LS, Copeland WE (1971) Q-tip test in stress urinary incontinence. Obstet Gynecol 38:313

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Zeitlin MP, Lebherz TB (1992) Pessaries in the geriatric patient. J Am Geriatr Soc 40(6):635–639

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Poma PA (2000) Nonsurgical management of genital prolapse. A review and recommendations for clinical practice. J Reprod Med 45(10):789–797

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kenneth Powers.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Powers, K., Lazarou, G., Wang, A. et al. Pessary use in advanced pelvic organ prolapse. Int Urogynecol J 17, 160–164 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-005-1311-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-005-1311-8

Keywords

Navigation