Abstract
The time-varying biases within carrier phase observations will be integrated with satellite clock offset parameters in the precise clock estimation. The inconsistency among signal-dependent phase biases within a satellite results in the inadequacy of the current L1/L2 ionospheric-free (IF) satellite clock products for the GPS precise point positioning (PPP) involving L5 signal. The inter-frequency clock bias (IFCB) estimation approaches for triple-frequency PPP based on either uncombined (UC) observations or IF combined observations within a single arbitrary combination are proposed in this study. The key feature of the IFCB estimation approaches is that we only need to obtain a set of phase-specific IFCB (PIFCB) estimates between the L1/L5 and L1/L2 IF satellite clocks, and then, we can directly convert the obtained L1/L5 IF PIFCBs into L5 UC PIFCBs and L1/L2/L5 IF PIFCBs by multiplying individual constants. The mathematical conversion formula is rigorously derived. The UC and IF triple-frequency PPP models are developed. Datasets from 171 stations with a globally even distribution on seven consecutive days were adopted for analysis. After 24-h observation, the UC and IF triple-frequency PPP without PIFCB corrections can achieve an accuracy of 8, 6 and 13 mm, and 8, 5 and 13 mm in east, north and up coordinate components, respectively, while the corresponding positioning accuracy of the cases with PIFCB consideration can be improved by 38, 33 and 31%, and 50, 40 and 23% to 5, 4 and 9 mm, and 4, 3 and 10 mm in the three components, respectively. The corresponding improvement in convergence time is 17, 1 and 22% in the three components in UC model, respectively. Moreover, the phase observation residuals on L5 frequency in UC triple-frequency PPP and of L1/L2/L5 IF combination in IF triple-frequency PPP are reduced by about 4 mm after applying PIFCB corrections. The performance improvement in UC triple-frequency PPP over UC dual-frequency PPP is 7, 4 and 2% in terms of convergence time in the three components, respectively. The daily solutions of UC triple-frequency PPP have a comparable positioning accuracy to the UC dual-frequency PPP.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Boehm J, Niell A, Tregoning P, Schuh H (2006) Global Mapping Function (GMF): a new empirical mapping function based on numerical weather model data. Geophys Res Lett 33:L07304
Cai C, He C, Santerre R, Pan L, Cui X, Zhu J (2016) A comparative analysis of measurement noise and multipath for four constellations: GPS, BeiDou, GLONASS and Galileo. Surv Rev 48(349):287–295. https://doi.org/10.1179/1752270615Y.0000000032
Feng Y (2008) GNSS three carrier ambiguity resolution using ionosphere-reduced virtual signals. J Geod 82(12):847–862
Gerdan GP (1995) A comparison of four methods of weighting double difference pseudorange measurements. Aust Surv 40(4):60–66. https://doi.org/10.1080/00050334.1995.10558564
Guo J, Geng J (2017) GPS satellite clock determination in case of inter-frequency clock biases for triple-frequency precise point positioning. J Geod. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-017-1106-y
Guo F, Zhang X, Wang J (2015) Timing group delay and differential code bias corrections for BeiDou positioning. J Geod 89(5):427–445. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-015-0788-2
Kouba J (2009) A guide to using international GNSS service (IGS) products. http://igscb.jpl.nasa.gov/igscb/resource/pubs/UsingIGSProductsVer21.pdf. Accessed 10 Feb 2018
Li Z, Yuan Y, Li H, Ou J, Huo X (2012) Two-step method for the determination of the differential code biases of COMPASS satellites. J Geod 86(11):1059–1076. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-012-0565-4
Li H, Chen Y, Wu B, Hu X, He F, Tang G, Gong X, Chen J (2013) Modeling and initial assessment of the inter-frequency clock bias for COMPASS GEO satellites. Adv Space Res 51(12):2277–2284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2013.02.012
Li H, Li B, Xiao G, Wang J, Xu T (2016) Improved method for estimating the inter-frequency satellite clock bias of triple-frequency GPS. GPS Solut 20(4):751–760. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10291-015-0486-9
Montenbruck O, Hauschild A, Steigenberger P, Langley RB (2010) Three’s the challenge: a close look at GPS SVN62 triple-frequency signal combinations finds carrier-phase variations on the new L5. GPS World 21(8):8–19
Montenbruck O, Hugentobler U, Dach R, Steigenberger P, Hauschild A (2012) Apparent clock variations of the Block IIF-1 (SVN62) GPS satellite. GPS Solut 16(3):303–313. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10291-011-0232-x
Montenbruck O, Hauschild A, Steigenberger P, Hugentobler U, Teunissen P, Nakamura S (2013) Initial assessment of the COMPASS/BeiDou-2 regional navigation satellite system. GPS Solut 17(2):211–222. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10291-012-0272-x
Montenbruck O, Hauschild A, Steigenberger P (2014) Differential code bias estimation using multi-GNSS observations and global ionosphere maps. Navigation US 61(3):191–201. https://doi.org/10.1002/navi.64
Pan L, Zhang X, Li X, Liu J, Li X (2017a) Characteristics of inter-frequency clock bias for Block IIF satellites and its effect on triple-frequency GPS precise point positioning. GPS Solut 21(2):811–822. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10291-016-0571-8
Pan L, Li X, Zhang X, Li X, Lu C, Zhao Q, Liu J (2017b) Considering inter-frequency clock bias for BDS triple-frequency precise point positioning. Remote Sens 9(7):734. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs9070734
Petit G, Luzum B (2010) IERS Conventions 2010 (IERS Technical Note No. 36). Verlag des Bundesamts für Kartographie und Geodäsie, Frankfurt am Main, p 179. ISBN:3-89888-989-6
Simsky A (2006) Three’s the charm: triple-frequency combinations in future GNSS. InsideGNSS:38–41, July/August
Steigenberger P, Hauschild A, Montenbruck O, Rodriguez-Solano C, Hugentobler U (2013) Orbit and clock determination of QZS-1 based on the CONGO network. Navig J Inst Navig 60(1):31–40. https://doi.org/10.1002/navi.27
Zhao Q, Sun B, Dai Z, Hu Z, Shi C, Liu J (2015) Real-time detection and repair of cycle slips in triple-frequency GNSS measurements. GPS Solut 19(3):381–391. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10291-014-0396-2
Zhao Q, Wang G, Liu Z, Hu Z, Dai Z, Liu J (2016) Analysis of BeiDou satellite measurements with code multipath and geometry-free ionospheric-free combinations. Sensors 16(1):123. https://doi.org/10.3390/s16010123
Zhao L, Ye S, Song J (2017) Handling the satellite inter-frequency biases in triple-frequency observations. Adv Space Res 59(8):2048–2057. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2017.02.002
Acknowledgements
The financial supports from National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 41474025 and 41774034) are greatly appreciated.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Pan, L., Zhang, X., Guo, F. et al. GPS inter-frequency clock bias estimation for both uncombined and ionospheric-free combined triple-frequency precise point positioning. J Geod 93, 473–487 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-018-1176-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-018-1176-5