Abstract
The superconducting gravimeter (SG) has a long-period instrumental noise called the parasitic mode at periods around 100 s, whose precise mechanism has not yet been identified. In this paper, another instrumental noise is detected at much higher frequencies by analyzing the high-rate gravity channel of two SGs in Japan. This is also a parasitic oscillation, characterized by frequencies on the order of 1 Hz and very high Q values. Detailed spectra indicate that the noise actually consists of two modes with small frequency separations. Based on a simple theory on the rotational motions of the superconducting sphere in the gravity sensor, the observed modes are tentatively identified as rotational oscillations of the sphere about two orthogonal axes in the horizontal plane. Interactions between the parasitic modes are investigated using the spectra acquired on an earthquake, to conclude that the low-frequency parasitic mode is likely to be a rotational motion of the sphere about the vertical axis.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Banka D, Crossley D (1999) Noise levels of superconducting gravimeters at seismic frequencies. Geophys J Int 139: 87–97
Goodkind JM (1999) The superconducting gravimeter. Rev Sci Instr 70: 4131–4152
GWR Instruments (1997) Gravity circuit card revision 2.1: users manual
Ikeda H, Doi K, Fukuda Y, Shibuya K, Yoshizaki R (2005) Installation of superconducting gravimeter in the Antarctica. Phys C 426–431: 759–763
Imanishi Y (2001) Development of a high-rate and high-resolution data acquisition system based on a real-time operating system. J Geod Soc Jpn 47: 52–57
Imanishi Y (2005) On the possible cause of long period instrumental noise (parasitic mode) of a superconducting gravimeter. J Geod 78: 683–690
Imanishi Y, Sato T, Asari K (1996) Measurement of mechanical responses of superconducting gravimeters. J Geod Soc Jpn 42: 115–117
Imanishi Y, Sato T, Higashi T, Sun W, Okubo S (2004) A network of superconducting gravimeters detects submicrogal coseismic gravity changes. Science 306: 476–478
Imanishi Y, Segawa J, Furuya I, Kashiwabara S, Takayama H, Nishimae Y (1997) Gravity observation by means of a superconducting gravimeter at Matsushiro, Japan. In: IAG proceedings “Gravity, Geoid and Marine Geodesy”, pp 115–122
Lamb H (1932) Hydrodynamics, 6th edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Landau LD, Lifshitz EM (1976) Mechanics, 3rd edn. Translated from the Russian by Sykes JB and Bell JS. Butterworth-Heineman, Oxford
Moffatt HK, Shimomura Y (2002) Spinning eggs—a paradox resolved. Nature 416: 385–386
Prothero WA (1967) A cryogenic gravimeter. Ph.D. thesis, University of California, San Diego
Prothero WA, Goodkind JM (1968) A superconducting gravimeter. Rev Sci Instrum 39: 1257–1262
Warburton RJ, Brinton EW (1995) Recent developments in GWR Instruments’ superconducting gravimeters. In: Poitevin C (ed) Proceedings of the second workshop on nontidal gravity changes: intercomparison between absolute and superconducting gravimeters, pp 23–56
Zürn W, Widmer R, Richter B, Wenzel H-G (1995) Comparison of free oscillation spectra from different instruments. Bull Inf Marées Terrestres 122: 9173–9179
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Imanishi, Y. High-frequency parasitic modes of superconducting gravimeters. J Geod 83, 455–467 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-008-0253-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-008-0253-6