Abstract.
We consider whether oil prices can account for business cycle asymmetries. We test for asymmetries based on the Markov switching autoregressive model popularized by Hamilton (1989), using the tests devised by Clements and Krolzig (2000). We find evidence against the conventional wisdom that recessions are more violent than expansions: while some part of the downturn in economic activity that characterises recessionary periods can be attributed to dramatic changes in the price of oil, post-War US economic growth is characterized by the steepness of expansions.
Similar content being viewed by others
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
First Version Received: December 2000/Final Version Received: September 2001
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Clements, M., Krolzig, HM. Can oil shocks explain asymmetries in the US Business Cycle?. Empirical Economics 27, 185–204 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1007/s001810100114
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s001810100114