Abstract.
We evaluate the usefulness of the Hodrick-Prescott (HP) filter as a proxy for rational expectations, using long runs of annual US inflation data. Our conclusion is that while the HP series are not fully rational in the sense of Muth (1961), they do generally meet the criterion of `weak rationality' recently proposed by Grant and Thomas (1999). They are also rational proxy predictors of direction for, following Merton (1981), agents would not change their prior in the opposite direction to these `forecasts'. However, smoother HP `forecasts' are more prone to inefficiency and less useful predictors of direction.
Similar content being viewed by others
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
First Version Received: May 2000/Final Version Received: May 2001
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ash, J., Easaw, J., Heravi, S. et al. Are Hodrick-Prescott `forecasts' rational?. Empirical Economics 27, 631–643 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1007/s001810100107
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s001810100107