Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Futures price dynamics of CO2 emission allowances

  • Published:
Empirical Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We analyze the pricing and lead–lag relationship between spot and futures prices of CO2 emission allowances in the EU emission trading scheme. We show that the cost-of-carry hypothesis between spot and futures prices holds for the trial period. In this period we focus on how fast a deviation from equilibrium due to shocks is restored. We derive testable restrictions on the loading coefficients and the short term dynamics within a vector error correction model. Previous studies in this field did not take into account the effects of lagged differences in the determination of the speed of adjustment. The results indicate that deviations from equilibrium are restored faster for the futures price series maturing in 2006 than for the futures price series maturing in 2007. Furthermore, we conduct an impulse response analysis using local projections with conditional confidence bands. Finally, we give an outlook for the Kyoto commitment period which is already running. In this time period so far we find that the cost-of-carry hypothesis does not hold.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Akaike H (1974) A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE T Autom Contr AC 19: 716–723

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alberola E, Chevallier J (2009) European carbon prices and banking restrictions: evidence from phase I (2005–2007). Energy J 30(3): 51–80

    Google Scholar 

  • Alberola E, Chevallier J, Cheze B (2008) Price drivers and structural breaks in european carbon prices 2005–2007. Energy Policy 36(2): 787–797

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baillie RT, Booth G, Tse Y, Zabotina T (2002) Price discovery and common factor models. J Financial Markets 5(3):309–321

    Google Scholar 

  • Benz E, Hengelbrock J (2008) Liquidity and price discovery in the european CO2 futures market: an intraday analysis. Working paper, Bonn Graduate School of Economics

  • Bredin D, Muckley C (2011) An emerging equilibrium in the EU emissions trading scheme. Energy Econ 33(2): 353–362

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chevallier J (2010a) Carbon prices during the EU ETS phase II: dynamics and volume analysis. Working paper, Université Paris Dauphine

  • Chevallier J (2010) A note on cointegrating and vector autoregressive relationships between CO2 allowances spot and futures prices. Econ Bull 30(2): 1564–1584

    Google Scholar 

  • Chevallier J, Ielpo F, Mercier L (2009) Risk aversion and institutional information disclosure on the european carbon market: a case-study of the 2006 compliance event. Energy Policy 37: 15–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daskalakis G, Psychoyios D, Markellos RN (2009) Modelling CO2 emission allowance prices and derivatives. Evidence from the european trading scheme. J Bank Financ 33(7): 1230–1241

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Engle RF, Granger CWJ (1987) Co-integration and error correction: representation, estimation, and testing. Econometrica 55: 251–276

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Engle RF, Kozicki S (1993) Testing for common features. J Bus Econ Stat 11(4): 369–380

    Google Scholar 

  • Figuerola-Ferreti I, Gonzalo J (2010) Modelling and measuring price discovery in commodity markets. J Econ 158(1): 95–107

    Google Scholar 

  • Franchi M, Paruolo P (2011) A characterization of vector autoregressive processes with common cyclical features. J Econ 163(70): 105–117

    Google Scholar 

  • Franses PH, Haldrup N (1994) The effects of additive outliers on tests for unit roots and cointegration. J Bus Econ Stat 12(4): 471–478

    Google Scholar 

  • Gonzalo J, Granger CWJ (1995) Estimation of common long-memory components in cointegrated systems. J Bus Econ Stat 13(1): 27–35

    Google Scholar 

  • Gregory AW, Hansen BE (1996) Residual-based tests for cointegration in models with regime shifts. J Econ 70(1): 99–126

    Google Scholar 

  • Gregory AW, Nason J, Watt D (1996) Testing for structural breaks in cointegrated relationships. J Econ 71(1–2): 321–341

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton JD (1994) Time series analysis. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Hasbrouck J (1995) One security, many markets: determining the contributions to price discovery. J Finance 50: 1175–1199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hull JC (2006) Options, futures and other derivatives. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs

    Google Scholar 

  • Johansen S, Juselius K (1990) Maximum likelihood estimation and inference on cointegration—with applications to the demand for money. Oxf Bull Econ Stat 52(2): 169–210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jordà O (2005) Estimation and inference of impulse responses by local projections. Am Econ Rev 95(1): 161–182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jordà O (2009) Simultaneous confidence regions for impulse responses. Rev Econ Stat 91(3): 629–647

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joyeux R, Milunovich G (2010) Testing market efficiency in the EU carbon futures market. Appl Financ Econ 20: 803–809

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Juselius K (2006) The cointegrated VAR model: methodology and applications. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Kilian L, Kim YJ (2011) How reliable are local projection estimators of impulse responses. Rev Econ Stat 93(4): 1460–1466

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lanne M, Lütkepohl H, Saikkonen P (2002) Comparison of unit root tests for time series with level shifts. J Time Ser Anal 23(6): 667–685

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lütkepohl H (2005) New introduction to multiple time series analysis. Springer, Heidelberg

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • MacKinnon JG (1991) Critical values for cointegration tests in long-run economic relationships. In: Engle RF, Granger CWJ (eds) Long-run economic relationships-readings in cointegration. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 267–276

    Google Scholar 

  • Newey WK, West KD (1987) A simple, positive semi-definite, heteroskedasticity and autocorrelation consistent covariance matrix. Econometrica 55: 703–708

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Niblock SJ, Harrison JL (2012) Do dynamic linkages exist among European carbon markets?. IBER 11(1): 33–44

    Google Scholar 

  • Paruolo P (2003) Common dynamics in I(1) VAR systems. Discussion paper 2003/35, Department of Economics, University of Insubria

  • Ross SA (1997) Hedging long-run commitments: exercises in incomplete market pricing. Econ Notes Banca Monte 26: 99–132

    Google Scholar 

  • Saikkonen P, Lütkepohl H (2000) Testing for the cointegrating rank of a VAR process with structural shifts. J Bus Econ Stat 18(4): 451–464

    Google Scholar 

  • Saikkonen P, Lütkepohl H (2002) Testing for a unit root in a time series with a level shift at unknown time. Econ Theory 18: 313–348

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scheffé H (1953) A method for judging all contrasts in the analysis of variance. Biometrika 40: 87–104

    Google Scholar 

  • Schleicher C (2007) Codependence in cointegrated autoregressive models. J Appl Econ 22: 137–

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwarz G (1978) Estimating the dimension of a model. Ann Stat 6: 461–464

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwarz T, Szakmary A (1994) Price discovery in petroleum markets: arbitrage, cointegration, and the time interval of analysis. J Futures Markets 14(2): 147–167

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Theissen E (2002) Price discovery in floor and screen trading systems. J Empir Finance 9: 455–474

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trenkler C, Weber E (2012) Codependent VAR models and the pseudo-structural form. Working paper ECON 12-10, University of Mannheim, Department of Economics

  • Trenkler C, Weber E (2013) Testing for codependence of cointegrated variables. Appl Econ 45: 1953–1964

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uhrig-Homburg M, Wagner M (2009) Futures price dynamics of CO2 emission allowances: an empirical analysis of the trial period. J Deriv (Winter 2009(17(2): 73–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Economics, University of Mannheim, L7, 3-5, 68131, Mannheim, Germany

    Marcel Gorenflo

Authors
  1. Marcel Gorenflo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marcel Gorenflo.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gorenflo, M. Futures price dynamics of CO2 emission allowances. Empir Econ 45, 1025–1047 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00181-012-0645-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00181-012-0645-6

Keywords

JEL Classification

Search

Navigation