Skip to main content
Log in

Experimental studies on multistage single point incremental forming of thin high carbon steel sheet

  • Original Article
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The incremental sheet forming process has gained interest from industrial and research institutions due to its intrinsic advantages, such as process flexibility and a low unit processing cost. However, achieving vertical features in the process is not possible in a single pass due to thinning and tearing of the sheet at the transition zone between vertical and horizontal features, e.g., the wall and base of a part. This limitation has been overcome by using multistage single point incremental forming (MSPIF), which introduces several intermediate tool-pass stages during the process. MSPIF has been shown to mitigate sheet thinning even when the maximum wall angle is reached. Prior research has reported promising results for aluminum alloys, low- and medium-carbon steel alloys, and formable stainless steels. There is a paucity of reported research that explores the suitability of MSPIF for less formable metals such as high-carbon steels, alloy steels, and titanium alloys. Work herein reports a series of experimental studies examining the feasibility of MSPIF for forming high-carbon steel sheets to achieve steep wall angles (70°). The effect of varying tool step down, tool path, and MSPIF strategies on process performance is studied. Selected process performance measures include surface roughness and geometrical conformance. Only one of the six strategies explored reached the maximum slope angle required (70°) for both spiral and contoured tool path movement techniques and for both tool vertical step-down values. While increasing vertical step-down from 0.5 mm/rev to 1.5 mm/rev increases surface roughness, it is found that varying tool path movement does not have a measurable effect. For the geometrical conformance, the overall profile of the formed part is the closest to the nominal profile when vertical stepdown is 1.5 mm/rev and contoured tool path movements are used.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kumar Y. Kumar S (2015) Incremental Sheet Forming (ISF). In: Narayanan RG and Dixit US (eds) Advances in Material Forming and Joining. In Topics in Mining, Metallurgy and Materials Engineering. , New Delhi: Springer India 29–46. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-2355-9_2.

  2. Jeswiet J, Micari F, Hirt G, Bramley A, Duflou J, Allwood J (2005) Asymmetric Single Point Incremental Forming of Sheet Metal. CIRP Ann 54(2):88–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0007-8506(07)60021-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Harfoush A, Haapala KR, Tabei A (2021) Application of Artificial Intelligence in Incremental Sheet Metal Forming: A Review. Procedia Manuf 53:606–617. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2021.06.061

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bhatt DK, Rana J, Shah K, Patel KJ (2016) Incremental Sheet Metal Forming Process: A Review. Int. J. Eng. Res 4(10):9

    Google Scholar 

  5. Emmens WC, Sebastiani G, van den Boogaard AH (2010) The technology of Incremental Sheet Forming—A brief review of the history. J Mater Process Technol 210(8):981–997. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2010.02.014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Hartmann C, Opritescu D, Volk W (2019) An artificial neural network approach for tool path generation in incremental sheet metal free-forming. J Intell Manuf 30(2):757–770. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-016-1279-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Kumar A, Gulati V, Kumar P, Singh V, Kumar B, Singh H (2019) Parametric effects on formability of AA2024-O aluminum alloy sheets in single point incremental forming. J Mater Res Technol 8(1):1461–1469. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmrt.2018.11.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Cheng Z, Li Y, Xu C, Liu Y, Ghafoor S, Li F (2020) Incremental sheet forming towards biomedical implants: a review. J Mater Res Technol 9(4):7225–7251. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmrt.2020.04.096

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Nasulea D, Oancea G (2017) Incremental deformation: A literature review. MATEC Web Conf 121:03017. https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201712103017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Jeswiet J et al (2008) Metal forming progress since 2000. CIRP J Manuf Sci Technol 1(1):2–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirpj.2008.06.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Gohil A, Modi B (2021) Review of the effect of process parameters on performance measures in the incremental sheet forming process. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part B J Eng Manuf. 235(3):303–332. https://doi.org/10.1177/0954405420961215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Vignesh G, Pandivelan C, Narayanan CS (2020) Review on multi-stage incremental forming process to form vertical walled cup. Mater Today Proc 27:2297–2302

  13. Nimbalkar DH, Nandedkar VM (2013) Review of Incremental Forming of Sheet Metal Components. Int J Eng Res Appl 3(5):39–51

  14. Möllensiep D, Ohm M, Störkle DD, Kuhlenkötter B (2019) Experimental validation of smoothed machine learning-based parameterization of local support in robot-based incremental sheet forming: Experimentelle Validierung geglätteter, auf maschinellem Lernen basierender Parametrierung des lokalen Gegenhalters in der roboterbasierten inkrementellen Blechumformung. In: Wulfsberg JP, Hintze W, Behrens B-A (eds) Production at the leading edge of technology, Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, pp. 483–492. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-60417-5_48

  15. Störkle DD, Seim P, Thyssen L, Kuhlenkötter B (2016) Machine learning in incremental sheet forming. In: Proceedings of ISR. 47st International Symposium on Robotics, Munich, pp 1–7

  16. Suresh K, Regalla SP, Kotkundae N (2018) Finite element simulations of multi stage incremental forming process. Mater Today Proc 5(2):3802–3810

  17. Gandla PK, Pandre S, Suresh K, Kotkunde N (2022) A critical analysis of formability and quality parameters for forming a dome shape using multi-stage strategies in incremental forming process. J Mater Res Technol 19:1037–1048. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmrt.2022.05.064

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Yoganjaneyulu G, Manikandan RCN, Sathiya Narayanan C (2020) Investigations on multi-sheets single point incremental forming of commercial pure titanium alloys. Mater. Manuf. Process 35(9):1002–1009. https://doi.org/10.1080/10426914.2020.1753882

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Suresh Kumar D, Ethiraj N (2018) Experimental investigation on AISI 304 steel sheets formed by multi stage incremental forming. IOP Conf Ser Mater Sci Eng 402:012107. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/402/1/012107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Mirnia MJ, MollaeiDariani B, Vanhove H, Duflou JR (2014) Thickness improvement in single point incremental forming deduced by sequential limit analysis. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 70(9–12):2029–2041. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-013-5447-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Li J, Yang F, Zhou Z (2015) Thickness distribution of multi-stage incremental forming with different forming stages and angle intervals. J Cent South Univ 22(3):842–848. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11771-015-2591-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Ghafoor S, Li Y, Zhao G, Li J, Ullah I, Li F (2022) Deformation characteristics and formability enhancement during ultrasonic-assisted multi-stage incremental sheet forming. J Mater Res Technol 18:1038–1054. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmrt.2022.03.036

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Liu Z, Daniel WJ, Li Y, Liu S, Meehan PA (2014) Multi-pass deformation design for incremental sheet forming: analytical modeling, finite element analysis and experimental validation. J Mater Process Technol 214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2013.11.010.

  24. Liu Z, Li Y, Meehan PA (2013) Vertical Wall Formation and Material Flow Control for Incremental Sheet Forming by Revisiting Multistage Deformation Path Strategies. Mater Manuf Process 28(5):562–571. https://doi.org/10.1080/10426914.2013.763964

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Verbert J et al (2008) Multi-Step toolpath approach to overcome forming limitations in single point incremental forming. Int J Mater Form 1(S1):1203–1206. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12289-008-0157-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Shi X, Hussain G, Zha G, Wu M, Kong F (2014) Study on formability of vertical parts formed by multi-stage incremental forming. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 75(5–8):1049–1053. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-014-6192-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Gonzalez MM, Lutes NA, Fischer JD, Woodside MR, Bristow DA, Landers RG (2019) Analysis of geometric accuracy and thickness reduction in multistage incremental sheet forming using digital image correlation. Procedia Manuf 34:950–960. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2019.06.105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Buffa G, Gucciardi M, Fratini L, Micari F (2020) Multi-directional vs. mono-directional multi-step strategies for single point incremental forming of non-axisymmetric components. J Manuf Process 55:22–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmapro.2020.03.055

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Skjoedt M, Bay N, Endelt B, Ingarao G (2008) Multi Stage Strategies for Single Point Incremental Forming of a Cup. Int J Mater Form 1(S1):1199–1202. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12289-008-0156-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Bambach M, TalebAraghi B, Hirt G (2009) Strategies to improve the geometric accuracy in asymmetric single point incremental forming. Prod. Eng. 3(2):145–156. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11740-009-0150-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Ramkumar K, Paulraj G, Elangovan K, Sathiya Narayanan C (2018) Archives of Metallurgy and Materials. https://doi.org/10.24425/AMM.2018.125096

  32. An Z, Yan D, Qie J, Lu Z, Gao Z (2020) Effect of Process Parameters on Formability of a AZ31 Magnesium Alloy Thin-Walled Cylindrical Part Formed by Multistage Warm Single-Point Incremental Forming. Front Mater 7:151. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmats.2020.00151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Fujita T, Nakamura AN, Iizuka S (2004) High-carbon steel sheets for power train parts formable high-carbon steel sheets suitable for one-piece forming [J]. JFE Technical Report (4):44

  34. Chung YD, Fujii H, Ueji R, Tsuji N (2010) Friction stir welding of high carbon steel with excellent toughness and ductility. Scr Mater 63(2):223–226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scriptamat.2010.03.060

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Duflou JR et al. (2008) Process window enhancement for single point incremental forming through multi-step toolpaths. CIRP Ann 57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirp.2008.03.030.

  36. Silva MB, Skjoedt M, Martins PAF, Bay N (2008) Revisiting the fundamentals of single point incremental forming by means of membrane analysis. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 48(1):73–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2007.07.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Lela B, Bajić D, Jozić S (2009) Regression analysis, support vector machines, and Bayesian neural network approaches to modeling surface roughness in face milling. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 42(11–12):1082–1088. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-008-1678-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the School of Mechanical, Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering at Oregon State University as well as CESMII-The Smart Manufacturing Institute for their support of this research. The authors gratefully acknowledge Michael Callaway, Scott Campbell, Anuj Gupte, and Gavin Padgett of Oregon State University for their assistance with material testing and analysis.

Funding

The authors declare that no funds, grants, or other support were received during the preparation of this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation, data collection and analysis were performed by Asmaa Harfoush. The first draft of the manuscript was written by Asmaa Harfoush and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Asmaa Harfoush.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Harfoush, A., Fan, Z. & Haapala, K.R. Experimental studies on multistage single point incremental forming of thin high carbon steel sheet. Int J Adv Manuf Technol (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-024-13712-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-024-13712-7

Keywords

Navigation