Skip to main content
Log in

Residual stress analysis of TC4/Inconel718 functionally graded material produced by laser additive manufacturing based on progressive activation element method

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

With the continuous development of preparation technology, laser additive manufacturing (LAM) has become one of the effective ways to manufacture functionally graded materials due to its unique layer-by-layer stacking technology. However, the repeated and repeated rapid heating and cooling processes in the manufacturing process will generate large residual stress inside the structure, resulting in the destruction of the structure. In this paper, based on a new finite element method called progressive activation element (PAE), a thermo-mechanical coupling model for simulating the process of LAM is established, and the influence of laser power and composition ratio of transition layers on the residual stress of the overall structure is discussed. The results show that there is a positive correlation between the laser power and the residual stress. The PAE method is compared with the traditional “Model Change” method, and it is found that the PAE method has advantages in computational efficiency, especially when calculating the residual stress of functionally graded materials; the efficiency can be improved by about 1650%. When the TC4/Inconel718 functionally graded material is prepared experimentally, the optimal composition ratio of the transition layers is 8:2. This paper provides reference for the understanding and reasonable suppression of residual stress of functionally graded materials in LAM.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Pu HY, Liang G, Naceur H, Zhao JL, Yi J, Luo J, Coutellier D, Wang L, Bai RQ (2023) Thermo-mechanical analysis of Ti-6Al-4V Taylor bar using advanced joint path strategies based on additive manufacturing. CIRP J Manuf Sci Tec 40:167–179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirpj.2022.11.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Guo S, Chen M, You LM, Wei Y, Cai C, Wei QS, Zhang HL, Zhou K (2023) 3D printed hierarchically porous zero-valent copper for efficient pollutant degradation through peroxymonosulfate activation. Sep Purif Technol 305:122437. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2022.122437

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Tang HB, Huang HJ, Liu CY, Liu Z, Yan WT (2021) Multi-Scale modelling of structure-property relationship in additively manufactured metallic materials. Int J Mech Sci 194:106185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2020.106185

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Hong XY, Xiao GQ, Zhang YC, Zhou J (2021) Research on gradient additive manufacturing of ultra-large hot forging die based on automatic wire arc additive manufacturing technology. Int J Adv Manuf Tech 116:2243–2254. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-021-07424-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Du DF, Wang L, Dong AP, Yan WT, Zhu GL, Sun BD (2022) Promoting the densification and grain refinement with assistance of static magnetic field in laser powder bed fusion. Int J Mach Tool Manu 183:103956. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2022.103965

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Masayuki N, Toshio H, Ryuzo W, Watanabe R (1987) Functionally gradient materials in pursuit of super heat resistant materials for spacecraft. J Soc Comp Mat 13(6):257–264. https://doi.org/10.6089/jscm.13.257

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Arcam User Manual, Arcam AB, 2011.

  8. Denlinger ER, Michaleris P (2016) Effect of stress relaxation on distortion in additive manufacturing process modeling. Addit Manuf 12:51–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2016.06.011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Fergani O, Berto F, Welo T, Liang SY (2016) Analytical modelling of residual stress in additive manufacturing. Fatigue Fract Eng M 40(6):971–978. https://doi.org/10.1111/ffe.12560

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Bai RQ, Liang G, Naceur H, Coutellier D, Zhao JL, Yi J, Luo J, Wang L, Pu HY (2023) Influence of the advanced joint path strategies on the energy absorption capacity of Ti-6Al-4V Taylor bar based on additive manufacturing. J Therm Stresses 46(2):140–162. https://doi.org/10.1080/01495739.2022.2149646

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Mercelis P, Kruth J (2006) Residual stresses in selective laser sintering and selective laser melting. Rapid Prototyping J 12(5):254–265. https://doi.org/10.1108/13552540610707013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Prabhakar P, Sames WJ, Dehoff R, Babu SS (2015) Computational modeling of residual stress formation during the electron beam melting process for inconel 718. Addit Manuf 7:83–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2015.03.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Kempen K, Thijs L, Vrancken B, Buls S, Humbeeck J, Kruth J (2013) Producing crack-free, high density M2 Hss parts by selective laser melting: preheating the baseplate. In: Proceedings of the 24th international solid freeform fabrication symposium. University of Texas at Austin, Austin(TX), pp 131–139. https://doi.org/10.26153/tsw/15419

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Zhao XM, Lin X, Chen J, Xue L, Huang WD (2009) The effect of hot isostatic pressing on crack healing, microstructure, mechanical properties of Rene88DT superalloy prepared by laser solid forming. Mat Sci Eng A-Struct 504(1-2):129–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2008.12.024

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Grilli N, Tarleton E, Cocks ACF (2021) Coupling a discrete twin model with cohesive elements to understand twin-induced fracture. Int J Fract 227:173–192. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10704-020-00504-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Dacner CEJ, Achintha M, Salter CJ, Fernie JA, Todd RI (2012) Residual stress distribution in a functionally graded alumina-silicon carbide material. Scripta Mater 67:281–284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scriptamat.2012.05.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Jeong SG, Ahn SY, Kim ES, Karthik AG, Baik Y, Seong D, Kim YS, Woo WC, Kim HS (2022) Effect of substrate yield strength and grain size on the residual stress of direct energy deposition additive manufacturing measured by neutron diffraction. Mat Sci Eng A-Struct 851:143632. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2022.143632

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Denlinger ER, Heigel JC, Michaleris P, Palmer TA (2015) Effect of inter-layer dwell time on distortion and residual stress in additive manufacturing of titanium and nickel alloys. J Mater Process Tech 215:123–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2014.07.030

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Gordon JV, Haden CV, Nied HF, Vinci RP, Harlow DG (2018) Fatigue crack growth anisotropy, texture and residual stress in austenitic steel made by wire and arc additive manufacturing. Mat Sci Eng A-Struct 724:431–438. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2018.03.075

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Jing H, Ge P, Zhang Z, Chen JQ, Liu ZM, Liu WW (2022) Numerical studies of the effects of the substrate structure on the residual stress in laser directed energy additive manufacturing of thin-walled products. Metals 12:462. https://doi.org/10.3390/met12030462

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Wu AS, Brown DW, Kumar M, Gallegos FG, King WE (2014) An experimental investigation into additive manufacturing-induced residual stresses in 316L stainless steel. Metall Mater Trans A 45:6260–6270. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11661-014-2549-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Lu XF, Cervera M, Chiumenti M, Lin X (2021) Residual stresses control in additive manufacturing. J Manuf Mater Process 5:138. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmmp5040138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Saunders N, Li X, Miodownik AP, Schille JP (2003) An integrated approach to the calculation of materials properties for Ti-alloys. In: Ti-2003: Proc 10th World Conference on Titanium, Hamburg, Germany

  24. Guo ZL, Saunders N, Miodownik AP, Schille JP (2007) Quantification of high temperature strength of nickel-based superalloys. Mater Sci Forum 546-549:1319–1326. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.546-549.1319

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Luo XL, Liu MH, Li ZH, Li HY, Shen JB (2021) Butong reyuan moxing dui xuanqu jiguang ronghua 18Ni300 wenduchang jisuan jieguo de yingxiang [The influence of different heat source models on the calculation results of the laser melting 18Ni300 temperature field]. Chin J Lasers 48(14):52–62. https://doi.org/10.3788/CJL202148.1402005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Grilli N, Hu DJ, Yushu D, Chen F, Yan WT (2022) Crystal plasticity model of residual stress in additive manufacturing using the element elimination and reactivation method. Comput Mech 69:825–845. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00466-021-02116-z

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  27. Zhan Y, Liu C, Zhang JJ, Mo GZ, Liu CS (2019) Measurement of residual stress in laser additive manufacturing TC4 titanium alloy with the laser ultrasonic technique. Mat Sci Eng A-Struct 762:138093. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2019.138093

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author contributions

The work presented here was performed in collaboration among all authors. Hongjian Zhao designed, analyzed, and wrote the paper. Chi Gao, Zihao Wang, Quanyi Wang, Changsheng Liu and Yu Zhan provided and analyzed the experimental data. All authors contributed to and approved the manuscript.

Hongjian Zhao (first author): conceptualization, methodology, software, validation, formal analysis, investigation, writing—original draft

Chi Gao: formal analysis, writing—original draft

Zihao Wang: software, formal analysis

Quanyi Wang: validation

Changsheng Liu: resources, supervision, funding acquisition

Yu Zhan (corresponding author): visualization, resources, writing—review and editing, funding acquisition

Funding

This study is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China Project (Grant No. 51771051), the Natural Science Foundation of Liaoning Province Project (Grant No. 2021-MS-102), the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (Grant No. N2105021), and the National Training Program of Innovation and Entrepreneurship for Undergraduates (Grant No.230033).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yu Zhan.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhao, H., Gao, C., Wang, Z. et al. Residual stress analysis of TC4/Inconel718 functionally graded material produced by laser additive manufacturing based on progressive activation element method. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 129, 1443–1453 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-023-12348-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-023-12348-3

Keywords

Navigation