Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A collaborative multidisciplinary design methodology for additive manufacturing with a left-handed mouse as a case study

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Additive manufacturing has seen remarkable growth in recent years and a rising evolution of industrial applications for direct manufacturing. Many industries are looking to adopt this technology to take advantage of its benefits, such as design freedom and component mass reduction. However, design teams need to gain the experience, training, and design knowledge that allow them to consider the capabilities of this new technology. Existing design methodologies for additive manufacturing only consider a subset of the design process. Most research studies focus on either design heuristics, or design principles, or design rules, and do not provide a structuring and comprehensive design methodology tailored to additive manufacturing. This paper aims to provide designers and companies with a systematic and creative integrated design methodology in a user-centered approach. The benefits and constraints of AM are structured for greater understanding, through the design heuristics, principles, and design rules related to the process. Furthermore, we integrate visualization and prototyping throughout the process to ensure product quality and user fidelity. Hence, this study aims to provide a new methodology for product design for AM that covers the entire process, from the requirement to production. The proposed user-centered methodology integrates the different stakeholders, throughout the project life cycle. Finally, we evaluate the proposed methodology by designing a left-handed mouse as a case study. Novice designers for new product development with AM can also use this solution.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of data and material

Not applicable.

Code availability

Not applicable.

References

  1. Rosen DW (2014) Research supporting principles for design for additive manufacturing. Virtual Phys Prototyp 9(4):225–232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Guo N, Leu MC (2013) Additive manufacturing: technology, applications and research needs. Front Mech Eng 8(3):215–243

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Gibson I, Rosen D, Stucker B (2015) Additive manufacturing technologies: 3D printing, rapid prototyping, and direct digital manufacturing (no. 3). Springer, p. 510

  4. Jiang R, Kleer R, Piller FT (2017) Predicting the future of additive manufacturing: a Delphi study on economic and societal implications of 3D printing for 2030. Technol Forecast Soc Change 117:84–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Blösch-Paidosh A, Shea K (2022) Industrial evaluation of design heuristics for additive manufacturing. Des Sci 8:e13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Lindwall A, Dordlofva C, ÖhrwallRönnbäck A, Törlind P (2022) Innovation in a box: exploring creativity in design for additive manufacturing in a regulated industry. J Eng Des 33(8–9):567–586

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Calignano F et al (2017) Overview on additive manufacturing technologies. Proc IEEE 105(4):593–612

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Pradel P, Zhu Z, Bibb R, Moultrie J (2018) Investigation of design for additive manufacturing in professional design practice. J Eng Des 29(4–5):165–200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Gebhardt A, Hötter J-S (2016) Additive manufacturing: 3D printing for prototyping and manufacturing. Carl Hanser Verlag GmbH Co KG, Munich

    Book  Google Scholar 

  10. Kumke M, Watschke H, Vietor T (2016) A new methodological framework for design for additive manufacturing. Virtual Phys Prototyp 11(1):3–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Kim H, Zhao Y, Zhao L (2016) "Process-level modeling and simulation for HP's Multi Jet Fusion 3D printing technology," in 2016 1st international workshop on cyber-physical production systems (CPPS), pp. 1–4: IEEE

  12. Zwier MP, Wits WW (2016) Design for additive manufacturing: automated build orientation selection and optimization. Procedia Cirp 55:128–133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Borgianni Y, Pradel P, Berni A, Obi M, Bibb R (2022) An investigation into the current state of education in Design for Additive Manufacturing. J Eng Des 33(7):461–490

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Pradel P, Zhu Z, Bibb R, Moultrie J (2018) A framework for mapping design for additive manufacturing knowledge for industrial and product design. J Eng Des 29(6):291–326

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Diegel O, Nordin A, Motte D (2019) A practical guide to design for additive manufacturing. Springer, Berlin

    Book  Google Scholar 

  16. Blessing LT, Chakrabarti A (2009) DRM: A design reseach methodology. Springer, Berlin

    Book  Google Scholar 

  17. Oh Y, Zhou C, Behdad S (2018) Part decomposition and assembly-based (Re) design for additive manufacturing: a review. Addit Manuf 22:230–242

    Google Scholar 

  18. Telenko C, O'Rourke JM, Conner Seepersad C, Webber ME (2016) A compilation of design for environment guidelines. J Mech Des 138(3)

  19. Pahl G, Beitz W, Feldhusen J, Grote K-H (2007) Engineering Design: a systematic approach, 3rd ed. Springer, Berlin, p 617

    Book  Google Scholar 

  20. Ulrich KT, Eppinger SD (2016) Product design and development, Sixth edition. McGraw-Hill Education, New York

    Google Scholar 

  21. Anderson DM (2020) Design for manufacturability: how to use concurrent engineering to rapidly develop low-cost, high-quality products for lean production. Productivity Press, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  22. Valjak F, Bojčetić N (2019) Conception of design principles for additive manufacturing. In Proceedings of the Design Society: International Conference on Engineering Design, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 689–698: Cambridge University Press

  23. Valjak F, Lindwall A (2021) Review of design heuristics and design principles in design for additive manufacturing. Proc Des Soc 1:2571–2580

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Blösch-Paidosh A, Shea K (2019) Design heuristics for additive manufacturing validated through a user study. J Mech Des 141(4)

  25. Adam GA, Zimmer D (2015) On design for additive manufacturing: evaluating geometrical limitations. Rapid Prototyp J. 21:662–670

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Vaughan MR, Crawford RH (2013) Effectiveness of virtual models in design for additive manufacturing: a laser sintering case study. Rapid Prototyp J

  27. Tang Y, Hascoet J-Y, Zhao YF (2014) Integration of topological and functional optimization in design for additive manufacturing." In Engineering Systems Design and Analysis, vol. 45837, p. V001T06A006: American Society of Mechanical Engineers

  28. Liu S, Li Q, Chen W, Tong L, Cheng G (2015) An identification method for enclosed voids restriction in manufacturability design for additive manufacturing structures. Front Mech Eng 10(2):126–137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Ko H, Moon SK, Hwang J (2015) Design for additive manufacturing in customized products. International Journal of Precision Engineering Manufacturing 16(11):2369–2375

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Salonitis K (2016) Design for additive manufacturing based on the axiomatic design method. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 87(1):989–996

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Doutre P-T et al (2017) “Comparison of some approaches to define a CAD model from topological optimization in design for additive manufacturing,” in Advances on Mechanics. Springer, Design Engineering and Manufacturing, pp 233–240

    Google Scholar 

  32. Zadpoor AA (2017) Design for additive bio-manufacturing: from patient-specific medical devices to rationally designed meta-biomaterials. Int J Mol Sci 18(8):1607. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms18081607

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Xiong Y et al (2019) Data-driven design space exploration and exploitation for design for additive manufacturing. J Mech Des 141(10)

  34. Després N, Cyr E, Setoodeh P, Mohammadi M (2020) Deep learning and design for additive manufacturing: a framework for microlattice architecture. Jom 72(6):2408–2418

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Posser T, Freitas de Oliveira B (2020) Design for additive manufacturing applied for mass reduction of a two-stroke engine cylinder for portable machine. International Journal on Interactive Design Manufacturing 14(2):709–717

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Opgenoord MM, Willcox KE (2019) Design for additive manufacturing: cellular structures in early-stage aerospace design. Structural Multidisciplinary Optimization 60(2):411–428

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  37. Kamps T, Gralow M, Schlick G, Reinhart G (2017) Systematic biomimetic part design for additive manufacturing. Procedia Cirp 65:259–266

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Spallek J, Krause D (2016) Process types of customisation and personalisation in design for additive manufacturing applied to vascular models. Procedia CIRP 50:281–286

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Rezayat H, Bell JR, Plotkowski AJ, Babu SS (2018) Multi-solution nature of topology optimization and its application in design for additive manufacturing. Rapid Prototyp J 25:1475–1481

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Brackett D, Ashcroft I, Hague R (2011) Topology optimization for additive manufacturing. In 2011 International Solid Freeform Fabrication Symposium: University of Texas at Austin

  41. Hällgren S, Pejryd L, Ekengren J (2016) (Re) Design for additive manufacturing. Procedia Cirp 50:246–251

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Blösch-Paidosh A, Shea K (2019) Design heuristics for additive manufacturing cards. ETH Zurich. https://doi.org/10.3929/ethz-b-000537327

  43. Ponche R, Hascoët J-Y, Kerbrat O, Mognol P (2012) A new global approach to design for additive manufacturing: a method to obtain a design that meets specifications while optimizing a given additive manufacturing process is presented in this paper. Virtual Phys Prototyp 7(2):93–105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Meisel N, Williams C (2015) An investigation of key design for additive manufacturing constraints in multimaterial three-dimensional printing. J Mech Des 137(11)

  45. Leutenecker-Twelsiek B, Klahn C, Meboldt M (2016) Considering part orientation in design for additive manufacturing. Procedia Cirp 50:408–413

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Wang Y, Blache R, Xu X (2017) Design for additive manufacturing in the cloud platform. In International Manufacturing Science and Engineering Conference, vol. 50749, p. V003T04A029: American Society of Mechanical Engineers

  47. Gross J, Park K, Kremer GEO (2018) Design for additive manufacturing inspired by TRIZ. In International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, vol. 51791, p. V004T05A004: American Society of Mechanical Engineers

  48. Kim S, Rosen DW, Witherell P, Ko H (2018) Linking part design to process planning by design for additive manufacturing ontology. In Conference on Progress in Additive Manufacturing (Pro‑AM 2018), vol. 303, p. 308

  49. Olsen J, Kim IY (2020) Design for additive manufacturing: 3D simultaneous topology and build orientation optimization. Structural Multidisciplinary Optimization 62(4):1989–2009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Saliba S, Kirkman-Brown J, Thomas-Seale L (2020) Temporal design for additive manufacturing. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 106(9):3849–3857

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Kuo Y-H, Cheng C-C (2019) Self-supporting structure design for additive manufacturing by using a logistic aggregate function. Structural Multidisciplinary Optimization 60(3):1109–1121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Kadkhoda-Ahmadi S, Hassan A, Asadollahi-Yazdi E (2019) Process and resource selection methodology in design for additive manufacturing. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 104(5):2013–2029

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Hu Y, Fadel GM, Blouin VY, White DR (2006) Optimal design for additive manufacturing of heterogeneous objects using ultrasonic consolidation. Virtual Phys Prototyp 1(1):53–62

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Laverne F, Segonds F, Anwer N, Le Coq M (2015) Assembly based methods to support product innovation in design for additive manufacturing: an exploratory case study. J Mech Des 137(12):121701

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Yang S, Tang Y, Zhao YF (2016) Assembly-level design for additive manufacturing: issues and benchmark. In International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, vol. 50107, p. V02AT03A028: American Society of Mechanical Engineers

  56. Sossou G, Demoly F, Montavon G, Gomes S (2018) An additive manufacturing oriented design approach to mechanical assemblies. Journal of Computational Design Engineering 5(1):3–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Deka A, Behdad S (2018) OAPS: an optimization algorithm for part separation in assembly design for additive manufacturing. In International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, vol. 51791, p. V004T05A018: American Society of Mechanical Engineers

  58. Vayre B, Vignat F, Villeneuve F (2012) Designing for additive manufacturing. Procedia CIrP 3:632–637

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Maidin SB, Campbell I, Pei E (2012) Development of a design feature database to support design for additive manufacturing,". Assembly Automation 32:235–244

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Asadollahi-Yazdi E, Gardan J, Lafon P (2017) Integrated design for additive manufacturing based on skin-skeleton approach. Procedia Cirp 60:217–222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. François M, Segonds F, Rivette M, Turpault S, Peyre P (2019) Design for additive manufacturing (DfAM) methodologies: a proposal to foster the design of microwave waveguide components. Virtual Phys Prototyp 14(2):175–187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Wiberg A, Persson J, Ölvander J (2019) Design for additive manufacturing–a review of available design methods and software. Rapid Prototyp J

  63. Saadlaoui Y, Milan J-L, Rossi J-M, Chabrand P (2017) Topology optimization and additive manufacturing: Comparison of conception methods using industrial codes. J Manuf Syst 43:178–186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Ahmadi S et al (2014) Mechanical behavior of regular open-cell porous biomaterials made of diamond lattice unit cells. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 34:106–115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Dong G, Tang Y, Zhao YF (2017) A survey of modeling of lattice structures fabricated by additive manufacturing. J Mech Des 139(10):100906

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Hussein A, Hao L, Yan C, Everson R, Young P (2013) Advanced lattice support structures for metal additive manufacturing. J Mater Process Technol 213(7):1019–1026

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Seharing A, Azman AH, Abdullah S (2020) A review on integration of lightweight gradient lattice structures in additive manufacturing parts. Adv Mech Eng 12(6):1687814020916951

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Nagesha B, Dhinakaran V, Shree MV, Kumar KM, Chalawadi D, Sathish T (2020) Review on characterization and impacts of the lattice structure in additive manufacturing. Materials Today: Proceedings 21:916–919

    Google Scholar 

  69. Blösch-Paidosh A, Ahmed-Kristensen S, Shea K (2019) "Evaluating the potential of design for additive manufacturing heuristic cards to stimulate novel product redesigns," in International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, vol. 59186, p. V02AT03A036: American Society of Mechanical Engineers

  70. Newell A, George A, Papakostas N, Lhachemi H, Malik A, Shorten R (2019) On design for additive manufacturing: review of challenges and opportunities utilising visualisation technologies. In 2019 IEEE International Conference on Engineering, Technology and Innovation (ICE/ITMC), pp. 1–7: IEEE

  71. Rodrigue H, Rivette M (2010) An assembly-level design for additive manufacturing methodology. In IDMME-virtual concept

  72. Prabhu R, Bracken J, Armstrong CB, Jablokow K, Simpson TW, Meisel NA (2020) Additive creativity: investigating the use of design for additive manufacturing to encourage creativity in the engineering design industry. International Journal of Design Creativity Innovation 8(4):198–222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  73. IDEO (2015) DesignKit: The Field Guide to Human-Centered Design

  74. Kwon J, Choi Y, Hwang Y (2021) Enterprise design thinking: an investigation on user-centered design processes in large corporations. Designs 5(3):43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  75. Kroll E, Condoor SS, Jansson DG (2001) Innovative conceptual design: theory and application of parameter analysis. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  76. Gershenson JK, Stauffer LA (1999) A taxonomy for design requirements from corporate customers. Res Eng Design 11(2):103–115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  77. Jemghili R, Taleb AA, Mansouri K (2022) "Additive manufacturing taxonomy regarding product attributes. In 2022 2nd International Conference on Innovative Research in Applied Science, Engineering and Technology (IRASET), pp. 1–7: IEEE

  78. ISO/ASTM 52900:2015(E), Additive manufacturing — General principles — Terminology, 2015

  79. Gibson I, Rosen D, Stucker B, Khorasani M (2021) Additive Manufacturing Technologies, Third ed. Springer

  80. Rodriguez-Calero IB, Coulentianos MJ, Daly SR, Burridge J, Sienko KH (2020) Prototyping strategies for stakeholder engagement during front-end design: design practitioners’ approaches in the medical device industry. Des Stud 71:100977

    Article  Google Scholar 

  81. Bordegoni M, Cugini U, Caruso G, Polistina S (2009) Mixed prototyping for product assessment: a reference framework. Int J Interact Des Manuf 3(3):177–187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  82. Deininger M, Daly SR, Lee JC, Seifert CM, Sienko KH (2019) Prototyping for context: exploring stakeholder feedback based on prototype type, stakeholder group and question type. Res Eng Design 30(4):453–471

    Article  Google Scholar 

  83. Elverum CW, Welo T, Tronvoll S (2016) Prototyping in new product development: Strategy considerations. Procedia cirp 50:117–122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  84. Choi S, Chan A (2004) A virtual prototyping system for rapid product development. Comput Aided Des 36(5):401–412

    Article  Google Scholar 

  85. Leiva G, Nguyen C, Kazi RH, Asente P (2020) Pronto: Rapid augmented reality video prototyping using sketches and enaction. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 1–13

  86. Ngo TD, Imbalzano Gabriele, Nguyen Kate T.Q., Hui David (2018) Additive manufacturing (3D printing): a review of materials, methods, applications and challenges,". Composites Part B: Engineering 143:172–196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  87. Faraji A, Farahmand MR (2014) An ergonomic computer mouse for professional designers. In Applied Mechanics and Materials, vol. 440, pp. 194–198: Trans Tech Publ

  88. Nunes IL (2017) Advances in human factors and systems interaction. Springer, Berlin

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

A special thanks to Professor Prof. HABZI Abdelhak and Ms. ANAJAR Aicha student at the National Higher School of Art and Design, University Hassan II of Casablanca, for their excellent design concepts and their support.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

This work was carried out in collaboration with all authors: Mrs. Rajae Jemghili, Prof. Abdelmajid Ait Taleb, and Prof. Khalifa Mansouri. Mrs. Rajae Jemghili designed the study, reviewed the article, and drafted the original manuscript. Prof. Abdelmajid Ait Taleb and Prof. Khalifa Mansouri reviewed the draft manuscript. The final manuscript was read and approved by all authors.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rajae JEMGHILI.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval

Not applicable.

Consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

I, author Mrs. Rajae JEMGHILI, give my consent for the publication of identifiable details, which can include a photograph(s) and or details within the text (“Material”) to be published in the above Journal and Article.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

JEMGHILI, R., AIT TALEB, A. & MANSOURI, K. A collaborative multidisciplinary design methodology for additive manufacturing with a left-handed mouse as a case study. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 125, 4925–4951 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-023-11051-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-023-11051-7

Keywords

Navigation