Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Overview on development of acoustic emission monitoring technology in sawing

  • Critical Review
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Carrying out supervising of sawing equipment through advanced sensor is an important study in modern automatic sawing technology. The application of monitoring techniques can greatly increase the life of saw blades, lower the cost, reduce the secondary machining, and improve work quality and productivity in sawing. The acoustic emission (AE) monitoring techniques are studied mainly in this paper. Aiming at the advantages such as high sensitivity, wide application range, and good correlation, the basic principles and key technologies of AE monitoring technology are introduced. Then the study status is reviewed in the fields of online monitoring in sawing surface quality, sawing vibration, saw blade conditions, and its application in automation control technology by AE monitoring technology. The disadvantages and future development trend of AE monitoring techniques in sawing are demonstrated.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Asiltürk İ, Ünüvar A (2008) Intelligent adaptive control and monitoring of band sawing. 2008 13th International Power Electronics and Motion Control Conference. Poznan:967–973

  2. Pan BS, Liang LH, Zhang YX, Xe SJ (2013) Theory and method of metal cutting bandsawing machine design. Tsinghua University Press, Beijing

    Google Scholar 

  3. Porankiewicz B, Jóźwiak K, Wieczorek D, Idzikowski I (2015) Specific wear on the rake face made of sintered carbide cutting edge during milling of laminated wood. Europ J Wood & Wood Prod 73(1):35–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Waldemar GJ, Fábio Henrique Antunes V, Carlos A, Manoel Sampaio A, Marcos Tadeu G (2014) Artificial neural networks applied to band sawing process control. Appl Mech Mater 590:458–462

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Wojnarowski J, Wójcik IA (2005) Application of the rigid finite element method to modelling of free vibrations of a band saw frame. Mechanism & Machine Theory 40(2):241–258

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Nasir V, Cool J (2018) A review on wood machining: characterization, optimization, and monitoring of the sawing process. Wood Mater Sci Eng 15(1):1–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Nasir V, Mohammadpanah A, Cool J (2018) The effect of rotation speed on the power consumption and cutting accuracy of guided circular saw: experimental measurement and analysis of saw critical and flutter speeds. Wood Mater Sci Eng 15(3):140–146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Asiltürk İ, Ünüvar A (2008) Intelligent adaptive control and monitoring of band sawing using a neural-fuzzy system. J Mater Process Technol 209(5):2302–2313

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Chen GJ, Ni J, Liu TT, Chen HP, Xu M (2013) Study on fault diagnosis technology for band sawing machine. Adv Mater Res 718-720:1160–1164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kurada S, Bradley C (1997) A machine vision system for tool wear assessment. Tribol Int 30(4):295–304

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Wong YS, Nee AYC, Li XQ, Reisdorf C (1997) Tool condition monitoring using laser scatter pattern. J Mater Process Technol 63(1-3):205–210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Cho DW, Lee SJ, Chu CN (1999) The state of machining process monitoring research in Korea. Int J Mach Tool Manu 39(11):1697–1715

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Teti R, Jemielniak K, O’Donnell G, Dornfeld D (2010) Advanced monitoring of machining operations. Annals Manuf Technol 59(2):717–739

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Goli G, Fioravanti M, Marchal R, Uzielli L, Busoni S (2010) Up-milling and down-milling wood with different grain orientations-the cutting forces behaviour. Europ J Wood & Wood Prod 68(4):385–395

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Lauro CH, Brandão LC, Baldo D, Reis RA, Davim JP (2014) Monitoring and processing signal applied in machining processes-a review. Measurement 58:73–86

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Mokbel AA, Maksoud TMA (2000) Monitoring of the condition of diamond grinding wheels using acoustic emission technique. J Mater Process Technol 101(1-3):292–297

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Kim HY, Kim SR, Kim JH, Kim SH (2001) Process monitoring of centerless grinding using acoustic emission. J Mater Process Technol 111(1):273–278

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Li XC, Ju S, Luo TF, Li M (2020) Effect of moisture content on propagation characteristics of acoustic emission signal of Pinus massoniana lamb. Europ J Wood & Wood Prod 78(1):185–191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Iskra P, Tanaka C (2006) A comparison of selected acoustic signal analysis techniques to evaluate wood surface roughness produced during routing. Wood Sci Technol 40(3):247–259

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Szwajka K, Zielińska-Szwajka J, Górski J (2016) Neural networks based in process tool wear prediction system in milling wood operations. Int Symp Inst Sci Technol 7133:713312–713318

    Google Scholar 

  21. Aguilera A, Barros JL, Rolleri A, Méausoone PJ CJ, Aguilar C (2013) Assessment of machining performance for wood moulding. Advances on Trials Running with Sharp Cutting Edge. Pro Ligno 9(4):398–407

    Google Scholar 

  22. Aguilera A, Méausoone PJ, Rolleri A, Barros JL, Burgos F, Aguilar C (2016) Advances on indirect methods to evaluate tool wear for radiata pine solid wood molding. Wear 350-351:27–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Aguilera A, Rolleri A, Burgos F (2016) Cutting distance as factor to evaluate the quality of wood machined surfaces: a preliminary study. Maderas Ciencia Y Tecnología 18(1):3–8

    Google Scholar 

  24. Mohammadpanah A, Lehmann B, White J (2019) Development of a monitoring system for guided circular saws: an experimental investigation. Wood Mater Sci Eng 14(2):99–106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Wang LH, Yang JW, Zhang YH, Zhao XP, Xie YY (2018) Tool wear recognition base on SDAE. China Mech Eng 29(17):2038–2045

    Google Scholar 

  26. Chiaki T, Zhao CR, Tetsuya N, Yoshihiko N, Akira T (1993) An adaptive control optimization for circular sawing. For Prod J 43(9):61–65

    Google Scholar 

  27. Cyra G, Tanaka C, Yoshinobu M (1998) Effects of helical angle of router bit on acoustic emission. J Wood Sci 44(3):169–176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Eftekharnejad B, Mba D (2008) Seeded fault detection on helical gears with acoustic emission. Appl Acoust 70(4):547–555

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Wang ZX, Liu XL, Li MY, LIANG SY, Wang LH, Li YQ, Meng BY (2020) Intelligent monitoring and control technology of cutting chatter. J Mech Eng 56(24):1–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Abellan-Nebot JV, Subirón FR (2010) A review of machining monitoring systems based on artificial intelligence process models. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 47(1-4):237–257

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Byrne G, Dornfeld D, Inasaki I, Ketteler G, König W, Teti R (1995) Tool condition monitoring (TCM)- the status of research and industrial application. Annals Manuf Technol 44(2):541–567

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Haber RE, Haber RH, Alique JR, Ros S (2002) Application of knowledge-based systems for supervision and control of machining processes. Handbook Soft Eng Knowl Eng 2:673–710

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  33. Ghosh N, Ravi YB, Patra A, Mukhopadhyay S, Paul S, Mohanty AR, Chattopadhyay AB (2007) Estimation of tool wear during CNC milling using neural network-based sensor fusion. Mech Syst Signal Process 21(1):466–479

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Zhou Y, Orban P, Nikumb S (2002) Sensors for intelligent machining-a research and application survey. In: IEEE International Conference on Systems, vol 2, pp 1005–1010

    Google Scholar 

  35. Stein JL, Wang CH (1990) Analysis of power monitoring on AC induction drive systems. J Dyn Syst Measurement Control Trans ASME 112(2):239–248

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Dey S, Stori JA (2005) A Bayesian network approach to root cause diagnosis of process variations. Int J Mach Tool Manu 45(1):75–91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Lin SC, Lin RJ (1996) Tool wear monitoring in face milling using force signals. Wear 198(1-2):136–142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Aknouche H, Outahyon A, Nouveau C, Marchal R, Zerizer A, Butaud JC (2009) Tool wear effect on cutting forces: In routing process of Aleppo pine wood. J Mater Process Technol 209(6):2918–2922

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Moradpour P, Doosthoseini K, Scholz F, Tarmian A (2013) Cutting forces in bandsaw processing of oak and beech wood as affected by wood moisture content and cutting directions. Europ J Wood & Wood Prod 71(6):747–754

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Jemielniak K, Kosmol J (1995) Tool and process monitoring - state of art and future prospects. Scientific Papers of The Institute of Mechanical Engineering and Automation of The Technical University of Wroclaw 61:90–112

    Google Scholar 

  41. Chen JC, Chen WL (1999) A tool breakage detection system using an accelerometer sensor. J Intell Manuf 10(2):187–197

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  42. Delio T, Tlusty J, Smith S (1992) Use of audio signals for chatter detection and control. Trans ASME J 114(2):146–157

    Google Scholar 

  43. O’Donnell G, Young P, Kelly K, Byrne G (2001) Towards the improvement of tool condition monitoring systems in the manufacturing environment. J Mater Process Technol 119(1):133–139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Ertekin YM, Kwon Y, Tseng TL (2003) Identification of common sensory features for the control of CNC milling operations under varying cutting conditions. Int J Mach Tool Manu 43(9):897–904

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Chen JC, Huang LH, Lan AX, Lee S (1999) Analysis of an effective sensing location for an in-process surface recognition system in turning operations. J Ind Technol 15(3):1–6

    Google Scholar 

  46. Bahr B, Motavalli S, Arfi T (1997) Sensor fusion for monitoring machine tool conditions. Int J Comput Integra TED Manu 10:314–323

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Li XL (2002) A brief review: acoustic emission method for tool wear monitoring during turning. Int J Mach Tool Manu 42(2):157–165

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Ohtsu M (2008) Acoustic emission testing. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg

    Google Scholar 

  49. Ali Al-Obaidil SM, Salman Leong M, Raja Hamzah RI, Abdelrhman AM (2012) A review of acoustic emission technique for machinery condition monitoring: defects detection & diagnostic. Appl Mech Mater 229-231:1476–1480

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Aguilera A (2011) Cutting energy and surface roughness in medium density fiberboard rip sawing. Europ J Wood & Wood Prod 69(1):11–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Jemielniak K (2000) Some aspects of AE application in tool condition monitoring. Ultrasonics 38(1-8):604–608

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Dhale A, khan F. (2013) Acoustic emission method for selection of optimum cutting parameters in turning using different fluids: a review. Int J Inno Res Dev 2(7)

  53. Reddy TS, Reddy CE (2010) Real time monitoring of surface roughness by acoustic emissions in CNC turning. J Eng Sci Technol Rev 3(1):111–115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Li XL, Yuan ZJ (1998) Tool wear monitoring with wavelet packet transform fuzzy clustering method. Wear 219(2):145–154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Li XL, Dong S, Yuan ZJ (1999) Discrete wavelet transforms for tool breakage monitoring. Int J Mach Tool Manu 39(12):1935–1944

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Blum T, Inasaki I (1990) A study on acoustic emission from the orthogonal cutting process. J Eng Industry 112(3):203–211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Zhao C, Tanaka C, Nakao T, Takahashi A (1991) Relationships between surface-finish qualities and acoustic emission count rates in circular sawing II. Mokuzai Gakkaishi 37:434–440

    Google Scholar 

  58. Liang SY, Hecker RL, Landers RG (2004) Machining process monitoring and control: the state-of-the-art. J Manu Sci Eng Trans ASME 126:297–310

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Li MY, Shang ZD, Cai HC, Dong GQ (2010) Acoustic emission detection and signal processing. Science & Technology Press, Beijing

    Google Scholar 

  60. Thaler T, Potočnik P, Bric I, Govekar E (2014) Chatter detection in band sawing based on discriminant analysis of sound features. Appl Acoust 77(mar):114–121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Iskra P, Hernández RE (2012) Toward a process monitoring of CNC wood router. Sensor selection and surface roughness prediction. Wood Sci Technol 46(1-3):115–128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Choudhury SK, Bartarya G (2003) Role of temperature and surface finish in predicting tool wear using neural network and design of experiments. Int J Mach Tool Manu 43(7):747–753

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Barcik Ŝ (1996) Experimental cutting on the log band saw. Europ J Wood & Wood Prod 54(3):153–156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Woulfe M (2000) On the relationship between acoustic emission and surface integrity in machining. University of College Dublin, Eire

    Google Scholar 

  65. Jemielniak K (2001) Some aspects of acoustic emission signal preprocessing. J Mater Process Technol 109(3):242–247

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Sutowski P, Święcik R (2018) The estimation of machining results and efficiency of the abrasive electro-discharge grinding process of Ti6Al4V titanium alloy using the high-frequency acoustic emission and force signals. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 94(1):1263–1282

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Kishawy HA, Hegab H, Umer U, Mohany A (2018) Application of acoustic emissions in machining processes: analysis and critical review. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 98(5-8):1391–1407

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Tanaka C, Nakao T, Nishino Y, Hamaguchi T, Takahashi A (1992) Detection of wear degree of cutting tool by acoustic emission signal (in Japanese). Mokuzai Gakkaishi 38(9):841–846

    Google Scholar 

  69. Tanaka C, Cyra G, Nakao T, Yoshinobu M, Katayamla H (1997) On-line control of router feed-speed in routing. Mokuzai Gakkaishi 43:544–550

    Google Scholar 

  70. Cyra G, Tanaka C, Yoshinobu M, Nishino Y (1998) Effect of helical angle of router bit on acoustic emission. J Wood Sci 44:169–176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  71. Zhu NF, Tanaka C, Ohtani T, Ohtani T (2000) Automatic detection of a damaged cutting tool during machining I: method to detect damaged band saw teeth during sawing. J Wood Sci 46(6):437–443

    Article  Google Scholar 

  72. Dornfeld D (1992) Application of acoustic emission techniques in manufacturing. NDT & E Int 25(6):259–269

    Article  Google Scholar 

  73. Yang ZS, Yan W, Jin L, Li F, Hou ZT (2020) A novel feature representation method based on original waveforms for acoustic emission signals. Mech Syst Signal Process 135:106356

    Article  Google Scholar 

  74. Yu JT (2018) Research on acoustic emission signal processing algorithm. Chemical Industry Press, Beijing

  75. Wu JJ, Zhao JB, Qiao HC, Sun BY, Lu Y (2019) A new acoustic emission on-line monitoring method of laser shock peening. Optik. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijleo163578

  76. Murase Y, Matsumoto K, Ohuchi T (2008) Acoustic emission and cutting resistance in cutting of solid wood, MDF and particleboard. J Faculty Agri Kyushu Univ 53(2):485–490

    Article  Google Scholar 

  77. Chai MY, Zhang ZX, Duan Q (2018) A new qualitative acoustic emission parameter based on Shannon’s entropy for damage monitoring. Mech Syst Signal Process 100:617–629

    Article  Google Scholar 

  78. Behnia A, Chai HK, Shiotani T (2014) Advanced structural health monitoring of concrete structures with the aid of acoustic emission. Constr Build Mater 65:282–302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  79. Corral IB, Flórez JÁ, Fernández AD (2018) Acoustic emission analysis for the detection of appropriate cutting operations in honing processes. Mech Syst Signal Process 99:873–885

    Article  Google Scholar 

  80. Vicuña CM, Höweler C (2017) A method for reduction of acoustic emission (AE) data with application in machine failure detection and diagnosis. Mech Syst Signal Process 97:44–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  81. Baccar D, Söffker D (2017) Identification and classification of failure modes in laminated composites by using a multivariate statistical analysis of wavelet coefficients. Mech Syst Signal Process 96:77–87

    Article  Google Scholar 

  82. Ngoc LL, McCallion H (1999) Self-induced vibration of bandsaw blades during cutting ARCHIVE Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part C 1989-1996, (203-210). J Mech Eng Sci 213(4):371–380

    Google Scholar 

  83. Kaimi NZ, Heidary H, Minak G, Ahmadi M (2013) Effect of the drilling process on the compression behavior of glass/epoxy laminates. Compos Struct 98:59–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  84. Lemaster RL, Klamecki BE, Dornfeld DA (1982) Analysis of acoustic emission in slow speed wood cutting. Wood Science 15(2):150–160

    Google Scholar 

  85. Aguilera A, Zamora R (2007) Wood machining process monitoring of blackwood (Acacia melanoxylon) with acoustic emission technique and his relationship with resulting surface roughness. Maderas: Ciencia Y Technol 9(3):323–332

    Google Scholar 

  86. Yang ZS (2013) Research on the indirect monitoring technique of grinding burn and its interrelated problems in precision grinding process. Zhejiang University, Hangzhou

    Google Scholar 

  87. Rogers LM (1979) The application of vibration signature analysis and acoustic emission source location to on-line condition monitoring of anti-friction bearings. Tribol Int 12(2):51–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  88. Siddhpura A, Paurobally R (2013) A review of flank wear prediction methods for tool condition monitoring in a turning process. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 65(1-4):371–393

    Article  Google Scholar 

  89. Griffin JM, Diaz F, Geerling E, Clasing M, Ponce V, Taylor C, Turner S, Michael EA, Mena FP, Bronfman L (2017) Control of deviations and prediction of surface roughness from micro machining of THz waveguides using acoustic emission signals. Mech Syst Signal Process 85:1020–1034

    Article  Google Scholar 

  90. Wu WG, Xin ZJ (2009) Metal cutting principle and tool. National Defence Industry Press, Beijing

    Google Scholar 

  91. Liu YW, Zhen XG, Zhou DZ, Liang XC (2000) Research on the cutting mechanism of the friction saw. Mech Tech 9:12–13

    Google Scholar 

  92. Liang SY, Dornfeld DA (1989) Tool wear detection using time series analysis of acoustic emission. J Eng Ind 111(3):199–205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  93. Chen B, Bi SH, Jiao HW, Deng ZH, Zhuo RJ, Liu GY (2021) On-line wear monitoring research of bandsaw blade by acoustic emission. Tool Technol 55(04):32–38

    Google Scholar 

  94. Standard B (2010) ASTM E976-00-2010 Standard Guide for determining the reproducibility of acoustic emission sensor response. American Society for Testing & Materials, Pennsylvania

    Google Scholar 

  95. Zhu JH, Shi CY, Feng KM, Song YY (2017) Application situation and trend of acoustic emission technology in grinding process. Tool Technol 51(09):22–27

    Google Scholar 

  96. Wang B, Liu ZQ (2017) Acoustic emission signal analysis during chip formation process in high-speed machining of 7050-T7451 aluminum alloy and Inconel 718 superalloy. J Manuf Process 27:114–125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  97. Talebzadeh M, Roberts TM (2001) Correlation of crack propagation and acoustic emission rates. Key Eng Mater 204-205:341–350

    Article  Google Scholar 

  98. Roberts TM, Talebzadeh M (2003) Acoustic emission monitoring of fatigue crack propagation. J Constr Steel Res 59(6):695–712

    Article  Google Scholar 

  99. Li GH, Liu ZY (2004) High frequency fatigue monitoring of metals based on acoustic emission technology. China Mech Eng 13:77–81

    Google Scholar 

  100. Biancolini ME, Brutti C, Paparo G, Zanini A (2006) Fatigue cracks nucleation on steel, acoustic emission and fractal analysis. Int J Fatigue 28(12):1820–1825

    Article  Google Scholar 

  101. Nasir V, Nourian S, Avramidis S, Cool J (2018) Stress wave evaluation by accelerometer and acoustic emission sensor for thermally modified wood classification using three types of neural networks. Europ J Wood & Wood Prod 77:45–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  102. Zhang P (2002) Research on integrated acoustic emission signal processing platform. Tsinghua University, Beijing

    Google Scholar 

  103. Geng RS, Shen GT, Liu SF (2002) A study on modal acoustic emission theory. Non-Destructive Testing 24(07):302–306

    Google Scholar 

  104. Liao CJ, Li XJ, Liu DS (2008) Application of STFT in feature extraction of acoustic emission signal. Chin J Sci Instrum 29(09):1862–1867

    Google Scholar 

  105. Bianchi D, Mayrhofer E, Gröschl M, Betz G, Vernes A (2015) Wavelet packet transform for detection of single events in acoustic emission signals. Mech Syst Signal Process 64-65:441–451

    Article  Google Scholar 

  106. Kedadouche M, Thomas M, Tahan A (2016) A comparative study between empirical wavelet transforms and empirical mode decomposition methods: Application to bearing defect diagnosis. Mech Syst Signal Process 81:88–107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  107. Siracusano G, Lamonaca F, Tomasello R, Garescì F, Corte AL, Carnì DL, Carpentieri M, Grimaldi D, Finocchio G (2016) A framework for the damage evaluation of acoustic emission signals through Hilbert-Huang transform. Mech Syst Signal Process 75:109–122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  108. Antoni J (2006) The spectral kurtosis: a useful tool for character-rising non-stationary signals. Mech Syst Signal Process 20(2):282–307

    Article  Google Scholar 

  109. Liu YJ (2013) Morphological filtering and fractal feature extraction method for acoustic emission signals of journal bearings. Changsha University of Science & Technology

  110. Yu Y, Yang P, Yang LJ (2013) Acoustic emission characteristics of rotor rubbing based on wavelet transform and statistical analysis. J Vibrat Shock 32(09):130–134

    Google Scholar 

  111. Potočnik P, Thaler T, Govekar E (2013) Multisensory chatter detection in band sawing. Procedia CIRP 8:469–474

    Article  Google Scholar 

  112. Liu Q, Chen X, Gindy N (2005) Fuzzy pattern recognition of AE signals for grinding burn. Int J Mach Tool Manu 45(7-8):811–818

    Article  Google Scholar 

  113. Hu YN, Wang CY, Hu SS, Chen BD, Chen CX (2008) Dynamic characteristics analysis of diamond saw blade with multi-hole base and different segment width. Key Eng Mater 375-376:369–374

    Article  Google Scholar 

  114. Zheng DG, Hu SS, Wang CY, Hu YN, Chen BD, Tan CH (2015) Multi-scale analysis on dynamic characteristics of dry cutting plain concrete with diamond saw blades. Diamond & Abrasives Engineering 35(03):40–45+51

    Google Scholar 

  115. Hu SS, Hu YN, Chen BD, Wang Y, Lai XD (2013) The dynamic characteristics of concrete sawing based on wavelet multi-scale analysis. Mater Sci Forum 770:303–307

    Article  Google Scholar 

  116. Zhang MQ, Gao Z, Wu HR, Li Y, Huang GQ (2015) Experimental study on the characteristics of acoustic emission signal during granite sawing. J Huaqiao Unive Nat Sci 36(06):615–619

    Google Scholar 

  117. Cool J, Hernández RE (2011) Improving the sanding process of black spruce wood for surface quality and water-based coating adhesion. For Prod J 61(5):372–380

    Google Scholar 

  118. Cool J, Hernández RE (2016) Impact of three alternative surfacing processes on weathering performance of an exterior water-based coating. Wood Fiber Sci 8(1):43–53

    Google Scholar 

  119. Albrecht D, Möhring HC (2018) Potentials for the optimization of sawing processes using the example of band sawing machines. Procedia Manuf 21:567–574

    Article  Google Scholar 

  120. Zhao C, Tanaka C, Nakao T, Takahashi A, Tsuzii T (1990) Relationship between surface finish qualities and acoustic emission count rate. J Japan Wood Res Society 36(3):169–173

    Google Scholar 

  121. Pittner S, Kamarthi SV, Wongsiripatanakul P, Wongvasu N (2000) Correlation between acoustic emission statistics and surface roughness in finish turning. https://doi.org/10.9774/GLEA-F.978-1-909493-38-4_2

  122. Wang YY, Zhang YL, Tan DP, Zhang YC (2021) Key technologies and development trends in advanced intelligent sawing equipments. Chinese J Mech Eng 34(1):1–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  123. Saglam H (2011) Tool wear monitoring in bandsawing using neural networks and Taguchi’s design of experiments. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 55(9-12):969–982

    Article  Google Scholar 

  124. Gospodarič B, Bučar B, Fajdiga G (2015) Active vibration control of circular saw blades. Europ J Wood & Wood Prod 73(2):151–158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  125. Chiou RY, Liang SY (2000) Analysis of acoustic emission in chatter vibration with tool wear effect in turning. Int J Mach Tool Manu 40:927–941

    Article  Google Scholar 

  126. Simeone A, Segreto T, Teti R (2013) Residual stress condition monitoring via sensor fusion in turning of Inconel 718. Procedia CIRP 12:67–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  127. Axinte DA, Gindy N (2003) Tool condition monitoring in broaching. Wear 254:370–382

    Article  Google Scholar 

  128. Zhu NF, Tanaka C, Ohtani T (2001) Automatic detection of a damaged cutting tool during machining II: Method to detect gullet crack in a bandsaw during sawing. J Wood Sci Soc 47(6):490–492

    Article  Google Scholar 

  129. Gao JG, Jiang ZF, Luo LP (2017) Effect of spindle parameters of woodworking band saw on the AE value of crack band Saw blade in compound material processing (1). Mater Sci Eng 191(1):012–023

    Google Scholar 

  130. Nasir V, Cool J, Sassani F (2019) Acoustic emission monitoring of sawing process: artificial intelligence approach for optimal sensory feature selection. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 102(9-12):4179–4197

    Article  Google Scholar 

  131. GradišEk J, Kalveram M, Tamás I, Weinert K (2005) On stability prediction for milling. Int J Mach Tool Manu 45(7-8):769–781

    Article  Google Scholar 

  132. Chen JK, Jin YY, Zhou Z (2019) Review of wound roll stress in roll-to-roll manufacturing of flexible electronics. Chin Sci Bull 64(Z1):555–565

    Article  Google Scholar 

  133. Siddhpura M, Paurobally R (2012) A review of chatter vibration research in turning. Int J Mach Tool Manu 61:27–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  134. Griffin JM, Chen X (2009) Multiple classification of the acoustic emission signals extracted during burn and chatter anomalies using genetic programming. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 45(11-12):1152–1168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  135. Gradišek J, Baus A, Goverkar E, Klocke F, Grabec I (2003) Automatic chatter detection in grinding. Int J Mach Tool Manu 43(14):1397–1403

    Article  Google Scholar 

  136. Mohammadpanah A, Hutton SG (2015) Maximum operation speed of spline saws. J Wood Mater Sci Eng 11:142–146. https://doi.org/10.1080/17480272.2015.1108998

    Article  Google Scholar 

  137. Cao HR, Lei YG, He ZJ (2013) Chatter identification in end milling process using wavelet packets and Hilbert-Huang transform. Int J Mach Tool Manu 69:11–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  138. Govekar E, Gradišek J, Grabec I (2000) Analysis of acoustic emission signals and monitoring of machining processes. Ultrasonics 38:598–603

    Article  Google Scholar 

  139. Yao ZH, Mei DQ, Chen ZC (2010) On-line chatter detection and identification based on wavelet and support vector machine. J Mater Process Technol 210:713–719

    Article  Google Scholar 

  140. Damaren CJ, Ngoc LL (2000) Robust active vibration control of a bandsaw blade. J Vib Acoust 122:69–76

    Article  Google Scholar 

  141. Okai R (2009) Influence of vibration coupling between bandsaw frame and feed-carriage system on sawdust spillage and surface quality of work-piece during sawing. Europ J Wood & Wood Prod 67(2):189–195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  142. Gao JG (2001) Computer simulation and experimental study of mechanical tension system of band saw machine. Northeast Forestry University, Harbin

    Google Scholar 

  143. Gao JG, Jian ZH (2016) Band saw blade off the horizontal vibration displacement and main frequency variation before and after tooth. J North China Univ Nat Sci Ed 17(04):549–552

    Google Scholar 

  144. Gao Z (2015) Experimental research on the characteristics of acoustic emission signal during stone sawing process. Huaqiao University

  145. Sarwar M, Persson M, Hellbergh H, Haider J (2009) Measurement of specific cutting energy for evaluating the efficiency of bandsawing different workpiece materials. Int J Mach Tool Manu 49(12-13):958–965

    Article  Google Scholar 

  146. Hernández RE, Moura LF (2007) Effects of knife jointing and wear on the planed surface quality of northern red oak wood. Wood Fiber Sci 34(4):540–552

    Google Scholar 

  147. Wen XL, An LQ, Ding ZS, Wang ZH, Sun WL (2000) The study on contributing factors of teeth fracture and off-teeth of double alloy belt saw-blade. J Agri Univ Hebei 23(4):93–95

    Google Scholar 

  148. Zhu N, Tanaka C, Ohtani T (2002) Automatic detection of damaged bandsaw teeth during sawing. Europ J Wood & Wood Prod 60(3):197–201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  149. Wang X, Xiao Y, Dong H, Gong TK (2009) Monitoring and analysis of high-speed dry machining process. China Mech Eng 20(04):394–396+400

    Google Scholar 

  150. Liu Y, Cheng T, Zuo T (2001) Adaptive control constraint of machining processes. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 17(10):720–726

    Article  Google Scholar 

  151. Tanaka C, Nakao T, Takahashi A (1990) On-line control of feed-speed in circular sawing. Europ J Wood and Wood Prod 48(4):139–145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  152. Chen GJ, Ni J, Liu TT, Chen HP, Xu M (2013) Study on the online detection technology of the band saw equipment. Adv Mater Res 753(755):2329–2333

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Availability of data and materials

We confirm that data is open and transparent.

Code availability

Not applicable.

Funding

This work was supported by the Special Fund for the Construction of Hunan Innovative Province (Grant No. 2020GK2003), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. U1809221), the Natural Science Foundation of Hunan Province (Grant No. 2018JJ3165), and Hunan University of Science and Technology and the Bichamp Cutting Technology (Hunan) Co., Ltd. school-enterprise cooperation project.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Hunan Provincial Key Laboratory of High Efficiency and Precision Machining of Difficult to Machine Material, Hunan University of Science and Technology, Xiangtan, 411201, Hunan, China

    Rongjin Zhuo, Zhaohui Deng, Bing Chen & Shenghao Bi

  2. Intelligent Manufacturing Institute, Hunan University of Science and Technology, Xiangtan, 411201, Hunan, China

    Rongjin Zhuo, Zhaohui Deng, Bing Chen & Shenghao Bi

  3. Bichamp Cutting Technology (Hunan) Co., Ltd., Changsha, 410200, Hunan, China

    Guoyue Liu

Authors
  1. Rongjin Zhuo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Zhaohui Deng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Bing Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Guoyue Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Shenghao Bi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Rongjin Zhuo: Conceptualization, investigation, writing—original draft, writing—review and editing.

Zhaohui Deng: Writing—review and editing, funding acquisition.

Bing Chen: Writing—review and editing.

Guoyue Liu: Funding acquisition.

Shenghao Bi: Review and editing.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Guoyue Liu.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhuo, R., Deng, Z., Chen, B. et al. Overview on development of acoustic emission monitoring technology in sawing. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 116, 1411–1427 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-021-07559-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-021-07559-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation