Skip to main content
Log in

A dynamic two-axis interpolation test with linear and rotary axes in five-axis machine tool

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper presents a new dynamic two-axis interpolation test method for dynamic accuracy calibration of rotary axis in a five-axis machine tool based on the double ball bar(DBB). The proposed method only requires synchronous movement of a single rotary axis and a single linear axis which is parallel to the average line of the rotary axis. The measurement trajectory is a spatial curve formed by the intersection of spherical and cylindrical surface, which are the reachable operating space of the DBB and the reachable operating space of the two moving axes, respectively. Compared to the circular tests described in ISO10791.6, which need at least three axes to synchronize motion, the proposed method can be effectively applied to the matching of servo parameters and the adjusting of the dynamic errors of the rotary axis, without the interference of additional linear axes. Meanwhile, the error trajectory pattern obtained by this method has the characteristics of orthogonality and regular variation, which is similar to the circular test of linear axis. So it can guide the calibration and optimization of rotating axis conveniently and effectively. Simulation results show that the proposed method can effectively identify the inverse error, scaling mismatch error, servo mismatch error, squareness error, and other error sources of the rotary axis. The proposed method is verified through experiments on a five-axis machine tool.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Xiang S, Yang J (2014) Using a double ball bar to measure 10 position-dependent geometric errors for rotary axes on five-axis machine tools. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 75(1-4):559–572. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-014-6155-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Xiang S, Yang J, Zhang Y (2013) Using a double ball bar to identify position-independent geometric errors on the rotary axes of five-axis machine tools. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 70(9-12):2071–2082. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-013-5432-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Chen GS, Mei XS, Li HL (2013) Geometric error modeling and compensation for large-scale grinding machine tools with multi-axes. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 69(9-12):2583–2592. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-013-5203-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bringmann B, Maglie P (2009) A method for direct evaluation of the dynamic 3D path accuracy of NC machine tools. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 58(1):343–346. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirp.2009.03.104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Jie L, Xie F, Liu XJ, Dong Z, Song Z, Li W (2017) A geometric error identification method for the swiveling axes of five-axis machine tools by static R-test. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 89(9-12):3393–3405

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Slamani M, Mayer R, Balazinski M, Zargarbashi SHH, Engin S, Lartigue C (2010) Dynamic and geometric error assessment of an XYC axis subset on five-axis high-speed machine tools using programmed end point constraint measurements. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 50(9-12):1063–1073. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-010-2584-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Andolfatto L, Lavernhe S, Mayer JRR (2011) Evaluation of servo, geometric and dynamic error sources on five-axis high-speed machine tool. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 51(10-11):787–796. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2011.07.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Ibaraki S, Yu N (2017) Formulation of the influence of rotary axis geometric errors on five-axis on-machine optical scanning measurement—application to geometric error calibration by “chase-the-ball” test. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 2:1–11

    Google Scholar 

  9. Zargarbashi SHH, Angeles J (2015) Identification of error sources in a five-axis machine tool using FFT analysis. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 76(5-8):1353–1363

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Zhong L, Bi Q, Wang Y (2017) Volumetric accuracy evaluation for five-axis machine tools by modeling spherical deviation based on double ball-bar kinematic test. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 122:106–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2017.06.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Ibaraki S, Oyama C, Otsubo H (2011) Construction of an error map of rotary axes on a five-axis machining center by static R-test. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 51(3):190–200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2010.11.011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Zhong L, Bi Q, Huang N, Wang Y (2018) Dynamic accuracy evaluation for five-axis machine tools using S trajectory deviation based on R-test measurement. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 125:20–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2017.11.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. ISO 10791-6:2014, Test conditions for machining centres. Part 6. Accuracy of speeds and interpolations, ISO, Geneva.

  14. Kato N, Tsutsumi M, Sato R (2013) Analysis of circular trajectory equivalent to cone-frustum milling in five-axis machining centers using motion simulator. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 64:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2012.07.013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. ISO 230-4:2005, Test code for machine tools. Part 4. Circular tests for numerically controlled machine tools, ISO, Geneva..

  16. Pahk HJ, Kim YS, Moon JH (1997) A new technique for volumetric error assessment of CNC machine tools incorporating ball bar measurement and 3D volumetric error model. Int J Mach Tool Manu 37(11):1583–1596

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Hong SW, Shin YJ, Lee HS (1997) An efficient method for identification of motion error sources from circular test results in NC machines. Int J Mach Tool Manu 37(3):327–340

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Lei W-T, Wang W-C, Fang T-C (2014) Ballbar dynamic tests for rotary axes of five-axis CNC machine tools. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 82-83:29–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2014.03.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Lei WT, Paung IM, Yu C-C (2009) Total ballbar dynamic tests for five-axis CNC machine tools. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 49(6):488–499. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2009.01.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Tsutsumi M, Yumiza D, Utsumi K, Sato R (2007) Evaluation of synchronous motion in five-axis machining centers with a tilting rotary table. J Adv Mech Des Syst Manuf 1(1):24–35. https://doi.org/10.1299/jamdsm.1.24

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors gratefully acknowledge the financial support of the National Science and Technology Major Project (No. 2018ZX04005001).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yuhan Wang.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhong, L., Yu, J., Bi, Q. et al. A dynamic two-axis interpolation test with linear and rotary axes in five-axis machine tool. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 106, 91–104 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-019-04609-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-019-04609-x

Keywords

Navigation