Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Chatter detection in robotic drilling operations combining multi-synchrosqueezing transform and energy entropy

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Robotic drilling shows higher efficiency and precision than the manual drilling, which has great application prospects in the aviation manufacturing. Nevertheless, due to the detrimental effects on surface quality, tool wear, the safety of the robot and machining efficiency, chatter vibration has been a major obstacle to achieve stable and efficient robotic drilling. Therefore, it is particularly significant to detect and manage to suppress the chatter as early as possible. This paper presents a novel approach to identify the chatter in robotic drilling process based on multi-synchrosqueezing transform (MSST) and energy entropy. To begin with, matrix notch filters are designed to effectively eliminate the interference of spindle rotating frequency and its harmonics to the measured vibration signal. Subsequently, the filtered signal is processed by the MSST to obtain concentrated time-frequency representation. Then, the signal is divided equally into finite frequency bands and the subcomponent corresponding to each frequency band is reconstructed through the reverse MSST. Finally, in consideration of the change of the vibration signal in frequency and energy distribution when chatter occurs, the energy entropy is computed as the chatter detection indicator. The proposed chatter detection method was validated by robotic drilling experiments with different tools, machining parameters, and workpiece material, and the results indicate that the proposed method can effectively detect the chatter before it is fully developed and recognize the chatter earlier than the synchroextracting-based method.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Iglesias I, Sebastián MA, Ares JE (2015) Overview of the state of robotic machining: current situation and future potential. Procedia Engineering 132:911–917

    Google Scholar 

  2. Chen Y, Dong F (2013) Robot machining: recent development and future research issues. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 66(9-12):1489–1497

    Google Scholar 

  3. Olsson T, Haage M, Kihlman H, Johansson R, Nilsson K, Robertsson A, Bjorkman M, Isaksson R, Ossbahr G, Brogardh T (2010) Cost-efficient drilling using industrial robots with high-bandwidth force feedback. Robot Comput Integr Manuf 26(1):24–38

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bu Y, Liao W, Tian W, Zhang J, Zhang L (2017) Stiffness analysis and optimization in robotic drilling application. Precision Engineering 49:388–400

    Google Scholar 

  5. Garnier S, Subrin K, Waiyagan K (2017) Modelling of robotic drilling. Procedia CIRP 58:416–421

    Google Scholar 

  6. Pan Z, Zhang H, Zhu Z, Wang J (2006) Chatter analysis of robotic machining process. J Mater Process Technol 173:301–309

    Google Scholar 

  7. Yuan L, Pan Z, Ding D, Sun S, Li W (2018) A review on chatter in robotic machining process regarding both regenerative and mode coupling mechanism. IEEE-ASME T Mech 23(5):2240–2251

    Google Scholar 

  8. Qin CJ, Tao JF, Liu CL (2017) Stability analysis for milling operations using an Adams-Simpson-based method. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 92(1–4):969–979

    Google Scholar 

  9. Mejri S, Gagnol V, Le T-P, Sabourin L, Ray R, Paultre P (2016) Dynamic characterization of machining robot and stability analysis. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 82(1–4):351–359

    Google Scholar 

  10. Qin CJ, Tao JF, Liu CL (2018) A predictor-corrector-based holistic-discretization method for accurate and efficient milling stability analysis. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 96(5–8):2043–2054

    Google Scholar 

  11. Safi SM, Amirabadi H, Lirabi I, Khalili K, Rahnama S (2013) A new approach for chatter prediction in robotic milling based on signal processing in time domain. Applied Mechanics and Materials 346:45–51

    Google Scholar 

  12. Qin CJ, Tao JF, Li L, Liu CL (2017) An Adams-Moulton-based method for stability prediction of milling processes. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 89(9–12):3049–3058

    Google Scholar 

  13. Guo Y, Dong H, Wang G et al (2016) Vibration analysis and suppression in robotic boring process. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 101:102–110

    Google Scholar 

  14. Qin CJ, Tao JF, Liu CL (2019) A novel stability prediction method for milling operations using the holistic-interpolation scheme. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part C: Journal of Mechanical Engineering Science 233(13):4463–4475

    Google Scholar 

  15. Quintana G, Stepan CJ (2011) Chatter in machining processes: a review. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 51(5):363–376

    Google Scholar 

  16. Sun YX, Xiong ZH (2016) An optimal weighted wavelet packet entropy method with application to real-time chatter detection. IEEE/ASME Trans Mechatron 21(4):2004–2014

    Google Scholar 

  17. Ji Y, Wang X, Liu Z, Yan Z, Jiao L, Wang D et al (2017) EEMD-based online milling chatter detection by fractal dimension and power spectral entropy. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 92(1-4):1185–1200

    Google Scholar 

  18. Chen Y, Li H, Hou L, Wang J, Bu X (2018) An intelligent chatter detection method based on EEMD and feature selection with multi-channel vibration signals. Measurement 127:356–365

    Google Scholar 

  19. Tao JF, Qin CJ, Xiao DY, Shi HT, Liu CL (2019) A pre-generated matrix-based method for real-time robotic drilling chatter monitoring. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cja.2019.09.001

  20. Cao H, Zhou K, Chen X, Zhang X (2017) Early chatter detection in end milling based on multi-feature fusion and 3σ criterion. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 92(9-12):4387–4397

    Google Scholar 

  21. Tansel IN, Li M, Demetgul M, Bickraj K, Kaya B, Ozcelik B (2012) Detecting chatter and estimating wear from the torque of end milling signals by using Index Based Reasoner (IBR). Int J Adv Manuf Technol 58(1–4):109–118

    Google Scholar 

  22. Liu Y, Wu B, Ma J, Zhang D (2017) Chatter identification of the milling process considering dynamics of the thin-walled workpiece. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 89(5–8):1765–1773

    Google Scholar 

  23. Liu Y, Wang XF, Lin J, Zhao W (2016) Early chatter detection in gear grinding process using servo feed motor current. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 83(9–12):1801–1810

    Google Scholar 

  24. Aslan D, Altintas Y (2018) On-line chatter detection in milling using drive motor current commands extracted from CNC. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 132:64–80

    Google Scholar 

  25. Li Y, Zhou S, Lin J, Wang X (2016) Regenerative chatter identification in grinding using instantaneous nonlinearity indicator of servomotor current signal. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 89:799–790

    Google Scholar 

  26. Cao H, Yue Y, Chen X, Zhang X (2017) Chatter detection in milling process based on synchro squeezing transform of sound signals. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 89(9–12):2747–2755

    Google Scholar 

  27. Nair U, Krishna BM, Namboothiri VNN, Nampoori VPN (2010) Permutation entropy based real-time chatter detection using audio signal in turning process. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 46(1):61–68

    Google Scholar 

  28. Thaler T, Potočnik P, Bric I, Govekar E (2014) Chatter detection in band sawing based on discriminant analysis of sound features. Appl Acoust 77:114–121

    Google Scholar 

  29. Tao JF, Qin CJ, Xiao DY, Shi HT, Ling X, Li BC, Liu CL (2019) Timely chatter identification for robotic drilling using a local maximum synchrosqueezing-based method. J Int Manufacturing https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-019-01509-5

  30. Rafal R, Pawel L, Krzysztof K, Bogdan K, Jerzy W (2015) Chatter identification methods on the basis of time series measured during titanium superalloy milling. Int J Mech Sci 99:196–207

    Google Scholar 

  31. Shao Y, Deng X, Yuan Y, Mechefske CK, Chen Z (2014) Characteristic recognition of chatter mark vibration in a rolling mill based on the non-dimensional parameters of the vibration signal. J Mech Sci Technol 28(6):2075–2080

    Google Scholar 

  32. Liu C, Zhu L, Ni C (2018) Chatter detection in milling process based on VMD and energy entropy. Mech Syst Signal Process 105:169–182

    Google Scholar 

  33. Cao H, Zhou K, Chen X (2015) Chatter identification in end milling process based on EEMD and nonlinear dimensionless indicators. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 92:52–59

    Google Scholar 

  34. Tangjitsitcharoen S, Saksri T, Ratanakuakangwan S (2013) Advance in chatter detection in ball end milling process by utilizing wavelet transform. J Intell Manuf 26(3):1–15

    Google Scholar 

  35. Liu C, Zhu L, Ni C (2017) The chatter identification in end milling based on combining EMD and WPD. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 91(9-12):3339–3348

    Google Scholar 

  36. Auger F, Flandrin P, Lin YT, McLaughlin S, Meignen S, Oberlin T, Wu HT (2013) Time-frequency reassignment and synchrosqueezing: an overview. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine 30(6):32–41

    Google Scholar 

  37. Daubechies I, Lu J, H-T W (2011) Synchrosqueezed wavelet transforms: an empirical mode decomposition-like tool. Appl Comput Harmon Anal 30(2):243–261

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  38. Yu G, Yu M, Xu C (2017) Synchroextracting transform. IEEE Trans Ind Electron 64(10):8042–8054

    Google Scholar 

  39. Wang S, Chen X, Cai G, Chen B, Li X, He Z (2014) Matching demodulation transform and synchrosqueezing in time-frequency analysis. IEEE Trans Signal Process 62(1):69–84

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  40. Oberlin T, Meignen S, Perrier V (2015) Second-order synchrosqueezing transform or invertible reassignment? towards ideal time-frequency representations. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing 63(5):1335–1344

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  41. Tao JF, Qin CJ, Liu CL (2019) A synchroextracting-based method for early chatter identification of robotic drilling process. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 100:273–285

    Google Scholar 

  42. Yu G, Wang ZH, Zhao P (2018) Multi-synchrosqueezing Transform. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics 66(7):5441–5455

    Google Scholar 

  43. Wan SK, Li XH, Chen W, Hong J (2017) Investigation on milling chatter identification at early stage with variance ratio and Hilbert–Huang transform. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 95:3563–3573

    Google Scholar 

  44. Piskorowski J (2010) Digital q-varying notch IIR filter with transient suppression. IEEE Trans Instrum Meas 59(4):866–872

    Google Scholar 

  45. Vishnu P, Ramalingam CS (2017) On the connection between matrix notch filter and maximum likelihood estimation of sinusoidal parameters. 2017 11th International Conference on Signal Processing and Communication Systems (ICSPCS), https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSPCS.2017.8270467

Download references

Funding

This work was partially supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (Grant Nos. 2017YFB1302601 and 2018YFB1306703).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chengjin Qin.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tao, J., Zeng, H., Qin, C. et al. Chatter detection in robotic drilling operations combining multi-synchrosqueezing transform and energy entropy. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 105, 2879–2890 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-019-04526-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-019-04526-z

Keywords

Navigation