Skip to main content
Log in

Transformable parallel-serial manipulator for robotic machining

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Robotic manipulators have been conventionally used for position-controlled tasks such as pick-and-place, spray painting and arc welding, where the tools do not experience contact forces from external objects. In recent years, however, there is an increasing interest in using robotic manipulators to perform machining work, for e.g. drilling, polishing, deburring and milling. This is due to the greater dexterity of robots as compared to that of CNC machines (6 axes vs. 3 or 5 axes), as well as the lower cost of industrial manipulators. Nevertheless, in such machining applications, the object exerts external forces onto the tools and thus onto the robots, and robots would generally deflect because of their low joint and link stiffness. This deflection prevents the tools from cutting, drilling or milling the objects into the correct depth, and therefore the dimension of the machined object would not be accurate. In this paper, a novel design of robotic manipulator is proposed, which combines the advantages of both parallel and serial robots, and is suitable for machining applications. The manipulator acts as a stiff parallel manipulator when carrying out machining tasks, but transforms into a serial articulated manipulator when maneuvering through a large area. Experimental results show that the proposed manipulator has a higher stiffness than a serial manipulator of the same size, and that it outperforms conventional serial robots in carrying out machining work.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Carnegie Mellon University (2003) Robot hall of fame—unimate. http://www.robothalloffame.org/inductees/03inductees/unimate.html. Accessed 15 June 2017

  2. Pan Z, Zhang H, Wang J (2006) Chatter analysis of robotic machining process. J Mater Process Technol 173:301–309

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Chen Y, Dong F (2013) Robot machining: recent development and future research issues. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 66:1489–1497

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Ang MH, Wang W, Loh RNK, Low TS (1997) Passive compliance from robot limbs and its usefulness in robotic automation. J Intell Robot Syst 20:1–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Sun YC, Lai CY (2014) Robotic finishing. In: Nee A Y C (ed) Handbook manufacturing engineering and technology. Springer, London, pp 2445–2468

  6. Lai CY (2014) Improving transient performance in robotics force control using nonlinear damping. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/ASME international conference advanced intelligent mechatronics. Besancon

  7. International Federation of Robotics (2013) https://www.robotics.org. Accessed: 18 Feb 2012

  8. Schreck G, Surdilovic D, Krueger J (2014) HEPHESTOS: hard material small-batch industrial machining robot. In: Proceedings of the 45th international symposium on robotics (ISR 2014) and 8th German conference on robotics (ROBOTIK) . Munich

  9. Matsuoka SI, Shimizu K, Yamazaji N, Oki Y (1999) High-speed end milling of an articulated robot and its characteristics. J Mater Process Technol 95:83–89

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Chablat D, Wenger P (2003) Architecture optimization of a 3-DOF translational mechanism for machining applications, the Orthoglide. IEEE Trans Robot Autom 19(3):403–410

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Lee MK (1997) Design of a high stiffness machining robot arm using double parallel mechanisms. In: Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on robotics and automation. Nagoya

  12. Huang YM, Dong LX, Wang XU, Gao F, Liu YC, Minami M, Asakura T (1997) Development of a new type of machining robot—a new type of driving mechanism. In: Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on intelligent processing systems. Beijing

  13. Oiwa T (2005) Error compensation system for joints, links and machine frame of parallel kinematics machines. Int J Robot Res 24(12):1087–1102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Wang J, Zhang H, Fuhlbrigge T (2009) Improving machining accuracy with robot deformation compensation. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/RSJ international conference on intelligent robots and systems. St. Louis

  15. Abele E, Weigold M, Kulook M (2006) Increasing the accuracy of milling industrial robot. Prod Eng 13(2):221–224

    Google Scholar 

  16. DeVlieg R, Sitton K, Feikert E, Inmam J (2002). ONCE (One-sided Cell End-Effector) robotic drilling system. Society of Automotive Engineers

  17. Zargarbashi SHH, Khan W, Angeles J (2012) Posture optimization in robot-assisted machining operations. Mech Mach Theory 51:74–86

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Sharon A, Hardt DE (1984) Enhancement of robot accuracy using endpoint feedback and a macro-micro manipulator system. In: Proceedings of the American control conference. San Diego

  19. Khatib O (1990) Reduced effective inertia in macro/mini manipulator system. In: Proceedings of the 5th international symposium on robotics research

  20. Lai CY (2014) Decoupling of macro-mini manipulator using adaptive neural networks. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/ASME international conference on advanced intelligent mechatronics, Besancon

  21. Mohammad AEK, Hong J, Wang D (2018) Design of a force-controlled end-effector with low-inertia effect for robotic polishing using macro-mini robot approach. Robot Comput Integr Manuf 49:54–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Burgard W, Moors M, Fox D, Simmons R, Thrun S (2000) Collaborative multi-robot exploration. In: Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on robotics and automation. San Francisco

  23. Fregene K, Madhavan R, Kennedy D (2004) Coordinated control of multiple terrain mapping UGVs. In: Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on robotics. New Orleans

  24. Kim J, Bonadies S, Lee A, Gadsden SA (2017) A cooperative exploration strategy with efficient backtracking for mobile robots. In: Proceedings of the IEEE international symposium robotics and intelligent sensors. Ottawa

  25. Kohlmaier M (2015) ABB robotics—trends and innovations. In: Forum robotics

  26. Craig JJ (1989) Introduction to robotics—mechanics and control, 2nd edn. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs

    Google Scholar 

  27. Chen SF, Kao I (2000) Conservative congruence transformation for joint and Cartesian stiffness matrices of robotic hands and fingers. Int J Robot Res 19(9):835–847

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Polulu (2017) Power HD High-Torque Servo 1501MG. https://www.pololu.com/product/1057. Accessed 24 June 2017

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chow Yin Lai.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lai, C.Y., Villacis Chavez, D.E. & Ding, S. Transformable parallel-serial manipulator for robotic machining. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 97, 2987–2996 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-018-2170-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-018-2170-z

Keywords

Navigation