Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Determining surface roughness of machining process types using a hybrid algorithm based on time series analysis and wavelet transform

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper, the surface roughness of the machined workpieces are estimated using a hybrid algorithm based on time series analysis and wavelet transform and differences between contact method with this method are presented. The suggested method is based on the exact recognition of the surface dynamic properties in lapping, external grinding, flat grinding, turning, and horizontal milling processes using the largest Lyapunov exponent parameter in time series analysis. This method has the unique ability to reduce image noise and remove image curvature which are produced due to reflection of light or surface geometric curvature in the mentioned machining process. Also, in order to select the appropriate length of the captured images and increasing accuracy of estimating the surface roughness, the image entropy criterion in image processing is used. The results show that the estimated surface roughness are considerably close to the measured surface roughness by the contact method.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Vesselenyi T, Dzitac I, Dzitac S, Vaida V (2008) Surface roughness image analysis using quasi-fractal characteristics and fuzzy clustering methods. Int J Comp Commun Control III(3):304–316

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Prabhu S, Karthik Saran S, Majumder D, Teja PVS (2015) A review on applications of image processing in inspection of cutting tool surfaces. Appl Mech Mat 766–767:635–642

    Google Scholar 

  3. Fadare DA, Oni AO (2009) Development and application of a machine vision system for measurement of tool wear. ARPN J Eng Appl Sci 4(4):42–49

    Google Scholar 

  4. Demircioglu P, Durakbasa MN (2011) Investigations on machined metal surfaces through the stylus type and optical 3D instruments and their mathematical modeling with the help of statistical techniques. Measurement 44(4):611–619. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2010.12.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Durakbasa MN et al (2011) The factors affecting surface roughness measurements of the machined flat and spherical surface structures—the geometry and the precision of the surface. Measurement 44(10):1986–1999

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Ramapriya S., Srivatsa S. K., Estimation of surface roughness parameter using wavelets based feature extraction. IJCSNS Int J Comp Sci Netw Secur, (2008), VOL.8, pp. 282–288

  7. F. Luk, V. Huynh (1987) A vision system for in-process surface quality assessment. Proceedings of the Vision, SME Conference, Detroit, Michigan, pp.12–43

  8. Lu RS, Yun Tian G (2006) On-line measurement of surface roughness by laser light scattering. Meas Sci Technol 17(6):1496–1502

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. WS Hunko, V Chandrasekaran (2015) Matlab image processing as a viable tool to study low surface roughness, Proceedings of the ASME Int Mech Eng Congress and Exp, pp. 1–10

  10. Nammi S, Ramamoorthy B (2014) Effect of surface lay in the surface roughness evaluation using machine vision. Optik Intern J Light Electron Optics 125(15):3954–3960

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. OM Koura (2015) Applicability of image processing for evaluation of surface roughness. IOSR Journal of Engineering, Vol. 05, pp 01–08

  12. Grzesik W, Brol S (2009) Wavelet and fractal approach to surface roughness characterization after finish turning of different workpiece materials. J Mater Process Technol 209(5):2522–2531

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. M Samie Tootooni, C Liu, D Roberson, R Donovan, PK Rao, ZJ Kong, STS Bukkapatnam (2016) Online non-contact surface finish measurement in machining using graph theory-based image analysis. J Manuf Syst, vol. 41, pp.266–276

  14. Shahabi HH, Ratnam MM (2010) Prediction of surface roughness and dimensional deviation of workpiece in turning: a machine vision approach. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 48(1-4):213–226. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-009-2260-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Gadelmawla ES (2004) A vision system for surface roughness characterization using the gray level co-occurrence matrix. NDT & E Int 37(7):577–588

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Ramapriya S., Srivatsa S. K., Estimation of surface roughness parameter using wavelets based feature extraction, IJCSNS Int J Compu Sci Netw Secur, (2008), VOL.8 , pp. 282–288

  17. Pour M (2016) Simultaneous application of time series analysis and wavelet transform for determining surface roughness of the ground workpieces. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 85(5-8):1793–1805

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Mallat S (1989) Theory for multiresolution signal decomposition: the wavelet representation. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 11(7):674–693

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Tsai D, Hsiao B (2001) Automatic surface inspection using wavelet reconstruction. Pattern Recogn 34(6):1285–1305

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Kiran MB, Ramamoorthy B, Radhakrishnan V (1998) Evaluation of surface roughness by vision system. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 38(5-6):685–690. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0890-6955(97)00118-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Shahabi HH, Ratman MM (2009) Noncontact roughness measurement of turned parts using machine vision. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 46(1-4):275–284. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-009-2101-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Srivatsa T, Ravi Keerthi C, Srinivas HK, Umbar R, Madhusudhan T (2016) Surface roughness evaluation of turned surfaces using wavelet packet transform. Imperial J Interdisciplinary Res (ijir) 2(6):978–988

    Google Scholar 

  23. Xue-wu Z, Yan-quiong D, Yan-yun L, Ai-ye S, Rui-yu L (2011) A vision inspection system for the surface defects of strongly reflected metal based on multi-class SVM. Expert Syst Appl 38(5):5930–5939

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. K Stępień, W Makiela, A Stoić, I Samardžić. Defining the criteria to select the wavelet type for the assessment of surface quality, doi: https://doi.org/10.17559/tv-20140124110406

  25. Haralick R, Shanmugam K, Dinstein I (1973) Textural features for image classification. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern 3(6):610–621. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSMC.1973.4309314

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. L Min, L Gao, X Zhang, Z Wang (2014) Surface roughness measurement based on image texture analysis, The 7th International Congress on Image and Signal Processing, pp. 514–519

  27. SJ Badashah, P. Subbaiah (2012) Surface roughness prediction with denoising using wavelet filter. Int J Adv Eng Technol, pp 168–177

  28. Ravi Keerthi C, Srinivasa Pai P, Vishwanatha JS (2014) Wavelet transform based recognition of machined surfaces using computer vision. Appl Mech Mater 592–594:801–805

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Samtaş G (2014) Measurement and evaluation of surface roughness based on optic system using image processing and artificial neural network. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 73:353–364

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Duparré A, Ferre-Borrull J, Gliech S, Notni G, Steinert J and Bennett J M 2002 Surface characterization techniques for determining the root-mean-square roughness and power spectral densities of optical components. Appl. Opt.41154

  31. Krolczyk GM, Maruda RW, Nieslony P, Wieczorowski M (2016) Surface morphology analysis of duplex stainless steel (DSS) in clean production using the power spectral density. Measurement 94:464–470

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Kubiak KJ, Bigerelle M, Mathia TG, Dubois A, Dubar L (2014) Dynamic evolution of interface roughness during friction and wear processes. Scanning 36:30–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Majumdar A, Bhushan B (1990) Role of fractal geometry in roughness characterisation and contact mechanics of surface. J Tri ASME 112:205–216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Vandenberg S, Osborne CF (1992) Digital image processing techniques, fractal dimensionality and scale-space applied to surface roughness. Wear 159:17–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. J.J. Gagnepain, C. Roques-Carmes, Fractal approach to two-dimensional and three-dimensional surface roughness, (1986), 109, 119–126

  36. Jiang Z, Wang H, Fei B (2001) Research into application of fractal geometry in characterising machined surfaces. Int J Mach Tool Manuf 41:2179–2185. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0890-6955(01)00085-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Kamguem R, Tahan SA, Songmene V (2013) Evaluation of machined part surface roughness using image texture gradient factor. Int J Precis Eng Manuf 14(2):183–190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Nieslony, Krolczyk GM, Zak K, Maruda RW, Legutko S (2016) Comparative assessment of the mechanical and electromagnetic surfaces of explosively clad Ti–steel plates after drilling process. Precision Eng xxx:xxx–xxx

    Google Scholar 

  39. Leach R, Weckenmann A, Coupland J, Hartmann W (2014) Interpreting theprobe-surface interaction of surface measuring instruments, or what is asurface? Surf Topogr: Metrol Prop 2:035001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Merola M, Ruggiero A, De Mattia JS, Affatato S (2016) On the tribological behavior of retrieved hip femoral heads affected by metallic debris. A comparative investigation by stylus and optical profilometer for a new roughness measurement protocol. Measurement 90:365–371

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Han JG, Ren WX, Sun ZS (2005) Wavelet packet based damage identification of beam structures. Int J Solids Struct 4:6610–6627

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  42. Zawada-Tomkiewicz A (2010) Estimation of surface roughness parameter based on machined surface image. Metrol Meas Syst. XVII(3):493–504

    Google Scholar 

  43. Z. Wang, A.C. Bovik (2002) A universal image quality index. IEEE Signal Processing Letters, no. 9/3, pp. 81–84

  44. Danesh M, Khalili K, Ohadi AR (2014) Determination of cutting tool vibration level using wavelet transorm and haralic features in surface image of work piece. J Solid Fluid Mech 3:47–57 (In Persian)

    Google Scholar 

  45. Morala-Argüello P, Barreiro J, Alegre E (2012) A evaluation of surface roughness classes by computer vision using wavelet transform in the frequency domain. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 59:213–220

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. B. Y. Lee; Y. S. Tang 2001 Surface roughness inspection by computer vision in turning operations. International Journal of Machine tools and Manufacture, Elsevier Science Ltd.

  47. B. Julitta, M. Vallverdu, U. S.P. Melia, N. Tupaika, M. Jospin, E. W. Jensen, M. M. R. F. Struys, H. E. M. Vereecke, P. Caminal (2011) Auto-mutual information function of the EEG as a measure of depth of anesthesia, 33rd Annual International Conference of the IEEE EMBS, Boston, Massachusetts USA, August 30 - September

  48. Frazier C, Kockelman KM (2004) Chaos theory and transportation systems: instructive example. Transp Res Record: J Transp Res Board 1897:9–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Cao L (1997) Practical method for determining the minimum embedding dimension of a scalar time series. Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena 110:43–50

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  50. B. Henry, N. Lovell, F. Camacho (2000) Nonlinear dynamics time series analysis. In: Nonlinear biomedical signal processing, Vol. 2, Dynamic Analysis and Modeling, Wiley-IEEE Press, pp.20–21

  51. Krolczyk GM, Krolczyk JB, Maruda RW, Legutko S, Tomaszewski M (2016) Metrological changes in surface morphology of high-strength steels in manufacturing processes. Measurement 88:176–185

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The author disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. This study was supported by Quchan University of Technology (grant number 95/5029).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Mechanical Engineering, Quchan University of Technology, Quchan, Iran

    Masoud Pour

Authors
  1. Masoud Pour
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Masoud Pour.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pour, M. Determining surface roughness of machining process types using a hybrid algorithm based on time series analysis and wavelet transform. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 97, 2603–2619 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-018-2070-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-018-2070-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation