Skip to main content
Log in

Cutting characteristics of porcine tenderloin tissue along tangential direction of surface

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In some special surgeries, e.g., burnt necrotic tissue removing process and skin grafting process, the cutting edge of scalpel moves along the tangential direction of tissue surface to achieve the cutting of biological tissue. This cutting pattern, which is similar with the turning process of metal material, is essential different from the vertical cutting presented in literatures. As a first endeavor, the cutting characteristics along tangential direction of porcine tenderloin surface are investigated experimentally, where the bottom surface of tissue is fixed and the top surface is free. A set of advanced devices especially for ex vivo porcine tenderloin cutting, which can easily adjust the variable under different operating conditions, are designed and manufactured. The real-time device records quantitatively the cutting forces and tissue deformations, which is for evaluating the cutting energies and the fracture toughness, and analyzing the whole cutting process in detail. Additionally, a compression test device is designed for performing a standard component compression experiment, which is used to evaluate the tensile yield stress and the pain degree. A novel quantitative metric is proposed for predicting the pain degree (PDI) with a typical compression test. The relationship between the stress and the pain feeling is presented by the compression test of the particular sample.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kamolz LP, Lumenta DB (2013) Dermal replacements in general, burn, and plastic surgery. Springer, Vienna, pp 1–11

    Book  Google Scholar 

  2. Pilanci O, Tas B, Ceran F, Kuvat SV (2014) A novel technique used in the treatment of inflammatory linear verrucous epidermal nevus: tangential excision. Aesthet Plast Surg 38(5):1066–1067

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Vallée C, Fortuné D, Lerintiu C (2007) On the dual variable of the cauchy stress tensor in isotropic finite hyperelasticity. Comptes Rendus Mecanique 336(11):851–855

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Hckett MR (2016) Stain-energy functions. Springer, New York, pp 25–35

    Google Scholar 

  5. Kaliske M, Behnke R (2015) Material laws of rubbers. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, New York, pp 1191–1196

    Google Scholar 

  6. Gao Z, Kevin L, Desai JP (2010) Constitutive modeling of liver tissue experiment and theory. Ann Biomed Eng 38(2):505–516

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Gao Z, Desai JP (2010) Estimating zero-strain states of very soft tissue under gravity loading using digital image correlation. Med Image Anal 14:126–137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Gilchrist MD, Murphy JG, Rashid B (2012) Generalisations of the strain-energy function of linear elasticity to model biological soft tissue. International Journal of Non-linear Mechanics 47:268–272

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Hu ZW, Zhang B, Sun W (2012) Cutting characteristics of biological soft tissues. CIRP Annals-Manufacturing Technology 61:135–138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Jankowska MA, Bartkowiak-Jowsa M, Bedzinski R (2015) Experimental and constitutive modeling approaches for a study of biomechanical properties of human coronary arteries. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 50:1–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Elango N, Faudzi AAM (2015) A review article: investigations on soft materials for soft robot manipulations. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 80(5):1027–1037

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Antonio A, Ralph P (2008) Modeling of porous structures for rapid prototyping of tissue engineering scaffolds. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 39(5):501–511

    Google Scholar 

  13. Delingette H, Ayache N (2004) Soft tissue modeling for surgery simulation. Handbook of Numerical Analysis 12:453–550

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Idkaidek A, Jasiuk I (2015) Toward high-speed 3d nonlinear soft tissue deformation simulations using Abaqus software. J Robot Surg 9(4):1–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Shi HJ (2007) Finite element modeling of soft tissue deformation. Dissertations & Theses, University of Louisville

  16. Ratovoson D, Jourdan VHF (2013) A 3D finite element model for hyperthermia injury of blood-perfused skin. Computer Methods in Biomechanics & Biomedical Engineering 18(3):233–242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Askari MA, Nazari MA, Perrier P, Payan Y (2016) Evaluation of residual stresses in human face as a function of growth. International Journal of Computer, Electrical, Automation, Control and Information Engineering 10(1):142–148

    Google Scholar 

  18. Heverly M, Dupont P (2005) Trajectory optimization for dynamic needle insertion. Proceedings the 2005 I.E. International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Barcelona, pp.1646–1651

  19. Azar T, Hayward V (2008) Estimation of the fracture toughness of soft tissue from needle insertion. Proceedings Biomedical Simulation, 4th International Symposium. ISBMS 5104:166–175

    Google Scholar 

  20. Misra S, Reed KB, Schafer BW, Ramesh KT, Okarmura AM (2010) Mechanics of flexible needles robotically steered through soft tissue. The International Journal of Robotics Research 29(13):1640–1660

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Mahvash M, Pierre ED (2010) Mechanics of dynamic needles insertion into a biological material. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 57(4):934–943

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Han PD (2014) Mechanics of soft tissue cutting in needle insertion. Dissertations & Theses, Northwestern University

  23. Yasuyuki K, Sakae M, Koji A, Noritaka Y, Hirobumi U (2016) Experimental study on injecting highly viscous liquids by using a reciprocating needle dispensing system. Int J Adv Manuf Technol:1–8. doi:10.1007/s00170-016-9538-8

  24. Moore JZ, Malukhin K, Shih AJ, Ehmann KF (2011) Hollow needle tissue insertion force model. CIRP Annals-Manufacturing Technology 60(1):157–160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Gokgol C, Basdogan C, Canadinc D (2012) Estimation of fracture toughness of liver tissue: experiments and validation. Med Eng Phys 34(7):882–891

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Mccarthy CT, Hussey M, Gilchrist MD (2007) On the sharpness of straight edge blades in cutting soft solids Part I-Indentation experiments. Eng Fract Mech 74:2205–2224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Feng Y, Huo R, Fu H, Li Q, Lv R, Wang Y, Wang D (2007) Dermabrasion with steel wool in the extensive partial burns during shock stage: a case report and review. Burns 33:526–529

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Jeschke MG, Kmolz LP, Sjoberg F, Wolf SE (2012) Handbook of burns. Springer-Verlag, Wien

    Book  Google Scholar 

  29. Mahvash M, Hayward V (2001) Haptic rendering of cutting, a fracture mechanics approach. Haptics-e 2(3):1–12

    Google Scholar 

  30. Doran CF, McCormack BAO, Macey A (2004) A simplified model to determine the contribution of strain energy in the failure process of thin biological membranes during cutting. Strain 40(4):173–179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Williams JG, Patel Y (2011) Fundamentals of cutting. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 11(11):39–94

  32. Tang H, Markus JB, Moran B (2009) A constitutive of soft tissue: from nanoscale collagen to tissue continuum. Annals of Biomedical Engineering 37(6):1117–1130

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Qinghua Song.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, D., Song, Q., Liu, Z. et al. Cutting characteristics of porcine tenderloin tissue along tangential direction of surface. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 98, 17–27 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-017-0304-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-017-0304-3

Keywords

Navigation