Abstract
The effect of mechanical vibration on the roughness parameters (Ra, Rq, Rz and Rt) obtained by an electromechanical surface roughness tester in two samples, a stainless steel with Ra equal to 0.369 μm and a carbon steel with Ra of 5.342 μm, is discussed in this article. The tests were performed by introducing vibration with different values of frequency and amplitude. The measurement uncertainty associated with all roughness parameters was estimated by applying the GUM method proposed in the JCGM 101. The analysis of variance (ANOVA) technique was applied, and it was observed that the variables frequency and acceleration plus interaction between them were statistically significant with a 95% confidence level for all parameters evaluated. In the stainless steel sample, frequency produced the greatest effects on the values of roughness parameters, except for Ra value, which was more influenced by the acceleration. It was also found that the effect of the interaction between frequency and acceleration produced significant effects on the values of Rq and Rz. In the carbon steel sample, the interaction between frequency and acceleration was the main generator of changes in the average values of all parameters evaluated. For Ra, Rq, and Rz, the frequency was also a statistically significant variable.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Chand M, Mehta A, Sharma R, Ojha VN, Chaudhary KP (2011) Roughness measurement using optical profiler with self-reference laser and stylus instrument—a comparative study. Indian Journal of Pure & Applied Physics 49(May):335–339
Bhushan B (1996) Tribology and mechanics of magnetic storage devices, 2nd Editio edn. Springer-Verlag, New York
Jang DY, Choi YG, Kim HG, Hsiao HA (1996) Study of the correlation between surface roughness and cutting vibration to develop an on-line roughness measuring technique in hard turning. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 26:453–464
Leach RK (2014) The measurement of surface texture using stylus instruments. Measurement Good Practice Guide No. 37. Engineering Measurement Division National Physical Laboratory. London: HMSO/National Physical Laboratory. ISSN 1368–6550. 112p
Haitjema H (1998) Uncertainty analysis of roughness standard calibration using stylus instruments. Precis Eng 22(97):110–119. doi:10.1016/S0141-6359(97)00090-1
ISO (1996) ISO 3274:1996, Geometrical product specifications (GPS)—surface texture: profile method—nominal characteristics of contact (stylus) instruments. ISO TC 213. 13p
Abburi NR, Dixit US (2006) A knowledge-based system for the prediction of surface roughness in turning process. Robot Comput Integr Manuf 22(4):363–372. doi:10.1016/j.rcim.2005.08.002
Abouelatta OB, Mádl J (2001) Surface roughness prediction based on cutting parameters and tool vibrations in turning operations. J Mater Process Technol 118(1–3):269–277. doi:10.1016/S0924-0136(01)00959-1
Asiltürk I, Akkus H (2011) Determining the effect of cutting parameters on surface roughness in hard turning using the Taguchi method. Measurement: Journal of the International Measurement Confederation 44(9):1697–1704
Rodrigues LLR, Kantharaj AN, Kantharaj B, Freitas WRC, Murthy BRN (2012) Effect of cutting parameters on surface roughness and cutting force in turning mild steel. Res J Recent Sci 1(10):19–26
Thomas M, Beauchamp Y, Youssef AY, Masounave J (1996) Effect of tool vibrations on surface roughness during lathe dry turning process. Comput Ind Eng 31(3–4):637–644. doi:10.1016/S0360-8352(96)00235-5
Wang X, Feng CX (2002) Development of empirical models for surface roughness prediction in finish turning. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 20(5):348–356. doi:10.1007/s001700200162
Selvam MS (1975) Tool vibration and its influence on surface roughness in turning. 147–157. Wear 35:149–157. doi:10.1103/PhysRev.46.157
Lin SC, Chang MF (1998) A study on the effects of vibrations on the surface finish using a surface topography simulation model for turning. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 38:763–782. doi:10.1016/S0890-6955(97)00073-4
Risbood KA, Dixit US, Sahasrabudhe AD (2003) Prediction of surface roughness and dimensional deviation by measuring cutting forces and vibrations in turning process. J Mater Process Technol 132(1–3):203–214. doi:10.1016/S0924-0136(02)00920-2
ISO (2013) ISO 12085:1996—geometrical product specifications (GPS)—surface texture: profile method—motif parameters. ISO/TC 213. 17p
Joint Committee for Guides in Metrology (JCGM) (2008). Evaluation of measurement data: guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement, (September), Geneva, Switzerland. 120. doi:10.1373/clinchem.2003.030528.
Bhushan B (2000) Chapter 2 Surface roughness analysis and measurement techniques. Modern tribology handbook. Volume 1. ISBN 0–8493–8403-6. CRC Press, LLC. Boca Raton, Flórida, EUA
Vorburger TV, Rhee HG, Renegar TB, Song JF, Zheng A (2007) Comparison of optical and stylus methods for measurement of surface texture. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 33(1–2):110–118. doi:10.1007/s00170-007-0953-8
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Dobes, J., Leal, J.E.S., Profeta, J. et al. Effect of mechanical vibration on Ra, Rq, Rz, and Rt roughness parameters. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 92, 393–406 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-017-0137-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-017-0137-0