Skip to main content
Log in

Evaluation of the shape deviation of non rigid parts from optical measurements

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper deals with an approach to identify geometrical deviations of flexible parts from optical measurements. Each step of the approach defines a specific issue which we try to respond to. The problem of measurement uncertainties is solved using an original filtering method, which permits to only consider a few number of points. These points are registered on a mesh of the CAD model of the constrained geometry. The shape resulting from deflection can be identified through the finite-element simulation of the part’s deformation due to its own weight and the measuring set-up. Finally, geometrical deviations are obtained by subtracting geometrical deflections to measured geometrical deviations. The method is illustrated in an experimental test case.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Breteau P Simulation d’assemblage flexible par la mesure—application au domaine de l’aéronautique PhD these, (2009), Ecole Normale Supérieure de Cachan

  2. Li Y, Gu P (2005) Inspection of free-form shaped parts. Robot Comput-Integr Manuf 21(45):421–430

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Abenhaim GN, Desrochers A, Tahan AS (2013) An investigation of the repeatability of nonrigid parts measurements: a case study of an aluminum panel. Procedia 10:105–111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Ascione R, Polini W (2010) Measurement of nonrigid freeform surfaces by coordinate measuring machine international. J Adv Manuf Technol 51:1055–1067

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Weckenmann A, Knauer M, Killmaier T (2001) Uncertainty of coordinate measurements on sheet-metal parts in the automotive industry. J Mater Process Technol 115(1):9–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Abenhaim GN, Tahan AS, Desrochers A, Maranzana R (2011) A novel approach for the inspection of flexible parts without the use of special fixtures. J Manuf Sci Eng 133:1–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Radvar-Esfahlan H, Tahan S-A. (2012) Nonrigid geometric metrology using generalized numerical inspection fixtures. Precis Eng 36(1):1–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Gentilini I, Shimada K (2011) Predicting and evaluated the post-assembly shape of thin-walled components via 3D laser digitization and FEA simulation of the assembly process. Comput-Aided Des 43:316–328

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Jaramillo A, Prieto F, Boulanger P (2013) Fast dimensional inspection of deformable parts from partial views. Comput Ind 64(9):1076–1081

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Jaramillo A, Prieto F, Boulanger P (2013) Deformable part inspection using a springmass system. Comput-Aided Des 45(89):1128–1137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Lartigue C, Thiébaut F, Bourdet P, Anwer N Dimensional metrology of flexible parts: identification of geometrical deviations from optical measurements. Ser Adv Math Appl Sci 72(200-):196–203

  12. Lartigue C, Contri A, Bourdet P (2002) Digitised point quality in relation with point exploitation. Measurement 32:193–203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Ravishankar S, Dutt HNV, Gurumoorthy B (2012) AIWINa fast and jigless inspection technique for machined parts. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 62:231–240

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Huang W, Ceglarek D (2002) Mode-based decomposition of part form error by discrete-cosine-transform with implementation to assembly and stamping system with compliant parts. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 51(1):21–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Franciosa P, Gerbino S, Patalano S (2010) Simulation of variational compliant assemblies with shape errors based on morphing mesh approach. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology:1–15

  16. Samper S, Formosa F (2007) Form defects tolerancing by natural modes analysis. J Comput Inf Sci Eng 7(1):44–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Audfray N, Mehdi-Souzani C, Lartigue C (2012) Assistance to automatic digitizing system selection for 3D part inspection. ASME 2012 11th Biennial Conference on Engineering Systems Design And Analysis, ESDA2012, Nantes (France), CDRom paper N 82319

  18. Mehdi-Souzani C, Quinsat Y, Lartigue C, Bourdet P (2016) A knowledge database of qualified digitizing systems for the selection of the best system according to the application. CIRP J Manuf Sci Technol 13:15–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Claire Lartigue.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Thiébaut, F., Lacroix, C., Andolfatto, L. et al. Evaluation of the shape deviation of non rigid parts from optical measurements. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 88, 1937–1944 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-016-8899-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-016-8899-3

Keywords

Navigation