Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

An AR-based hybrid approach for facility layout planning and evaluation for existing shop floors

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Facility layout planning (FLP) has substantial impact on the various aspects of a manufacturing system. FLP is typically performed for new shop floors. However, enterprises nowadays are often faced with the need to reconfigure the existing shop floor layouts to synchronize the shop floor operations with the constantly changing production targets. FLP tasks for existing shop floors are often small in scale, e.g., adding or removing a couple of machines, but complex to address since a wide range of criteria need to be incorporated and the presence of the existing facilities imposes critical constraints. Current FLP approaches are not efficient to handle these issues. The development of computer-aided design (CAD) technology has provided feasible solutions to bridge this gap. In this paper, an augmented reality (AR)-based hybrid approach is proposed which facilitates on-site layout planning and evaluation in real time. By integrating AR technology with the mathematical modeling technique, the proposed approach allows the users to augment the shop floor with the facilities to be laid out, model the existing facilities to obtain their geometric data, and define the criteria and constraints to formulate the problems as multi-attribute decision-making (MADM) models. Two planning methods are employed to solve the MADM models, namely, information-aided manual planning and analytic hierarchy process (AHP)–genetic algorithm (GA)-based automatic planning. During the planning process, the criteria and the constraints are assessed in real time to provide immediate evaluation and feedback to facilitate decision-making.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Aiello G, Enea M (2001) Fuzzy approach to the robust facility layout in uncertain production environments. International Journal of Production Research 39(18):4089–4101

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Back M, Childs T, Dunnigan A, Foote J, Gattepally S, Liew B, Shingu J, Vaughan J (2010) The virtual chocolate factory: building a real world mixed reality system for industrial collaboration and control. IEEE International Conference on Multimedia and Expo, Singapore, pp 1160–1165

    Google Scholar 

  3. Billinghurst M, Imamoto K, Kato H, Tachibana K (2000) Virtual object manipulation on a table-top AR environment. Proceedings of the IEEE and ACM International Symposium on Augmented Reality, Vienna, Austria, pp: 111-119

  4. Chong JWS, Ong SK, Nee AYC, Youcef-Toumi K (2008) Robot programming using augmented reality: an interactive method for planning collision-free paths. Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing 25(3):689–701

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Clough M, Buck R (1993) Plant layout ergonomics: impact of problem and solver features on layout quality. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, pp. 468-471

  6. Criminisi A, Perez P, Toyama K (2003) Object removal by exemplar-based inpainting. Proceedings of IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp.721-728

  7. Doil F, Schreiber W, Alt T, Patron C (2003) Augmented reality for manufacturing planning. Proceedings of the Workshop on Virtual Environment, pp. 71-76

  8. Fite-Georgel P (2011) Is there a reality in industrial augmented reality? Proceedings of the 10th International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality, Basel, Switzerland, pp: 201-210

  9. Gausemier J, Fruend J, Matysczok C (2002) AR-planning tool-design flexible manufacturing systems with augmented reality. 8th Eurographics Workshop on Virtual, Environment, pp: 19–25

  10. Kamalinia S, Afsharnia S, Khodayar ME, Rahimikian A, Shabafi MA (2007) A combination of MADM and genetic algorithm for optimal DG allocation in power systems. Proceedings of the Universities Power Engineering Conference, pp: 1031-1035

  11. Klein G, Murray D (2007) Parallel tracking and mapping for small AR workspaces. International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality, ISMAR

  12. Kulturel-Konak S, Smith AE, Norman BA (2007) Bi-objective facility expansion and relayout considering monuments. IIE Transactions 39(7):747–761

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Lee J, Han S, Yang J (2011) Construction of a computer-simulated mixed reality environment for virtual factory layout planning. Computers in Industry 62(1):86–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Lee JY, Rhee GW, Park H (2009) AR/RP-based tangible interactions for collaborative design evaluation of digital products. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 45(7):649–665

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Lee JY, Rhee G (2008) Context-aware 3D visualization and collaboration services for ubiquitous cars using augmented reality. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 37(5):431–442

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Mahdavi I, Shirzi B, Paydar M (2008) A flow matrix-based heuristic algorithm for cell formation and layout design in cellular manufacturing system. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 39(9):943–953

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Meller RD, Gau KY (1996) Facility layout objective functions and robust layouts. International Journal of Production Research 34(10):2727–2742

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Meng G, Heragu SS, Zijm H (2004) Reconfigurable layout problem. International Journal of Production Research 42(22):4709–4729

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Mobach MP (2012) Interactive facility management, design and planning. International Journal on Interactive Design and Manufacturing 6(4):241–250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Navab N (2004) Developing killer apps for industrial augmented reality. Computer Graphics and Applications 24(3):16–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Pan Q, Reitmayr G, Drummond TW (2009) Interactive model reconstruction with user guidance. Proceedings of the 8th IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality, Orlando, pp 209–210

    Google Scholar 

  22. Pentenrieder K, Bade C, Doil F, Meier P (2008) Augmented reality-based factory planning—an application tailored to industrial needs. Proceedings of the 6th IEEE and ACM International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality, Cambridge, pp 76–84

    Google Scholar 

  23. Poh YL, Nee AYC, Ong SK, Youcef-Toumi K (2006) Augmented reality (AR) for facilitating layout design. Singapore-MIT Alliance Symposium, pp: 17–18

  24. Rauterberg M, Bichsel M, Meier M, Fjeld M (1997) A gesture-based interaction technique for a planning tool for construction and design. IEEE International Workshop on robot and Human Communication, pp: 212-217

  25. Saaty TL (1980) The analytic hierarchy process. RWS, Pittsburgh

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  26. Sahin R, Turkbey O (2009) A simulated annealing algorithm to find approximate Pareto optimal solutions for the multi-objective facility layout problem. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 41(9):1003–1018

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Shahin A (2011) Facility layout simulation and optimization: an integration of advanced quality and decision making tools and techniques. Modern Applied Science 5(4):95–111

    Google Scholar 

  28. Siltanen P, Karhela T, Woodward C, Savioja P (2007) Augmented reality for plant lifecycle management. 13th International Conference on Concurrent Enterprising, Sophia, pp 407–414

    Google Scholar 

  29. Singh SP, Sharma RRK (2006) A review of different approaches to the facility layout problems. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 30(5):425–433

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Sun SH, Chiang HW, Lee MI (2007) Erratum: adaptive direct slicing of a commercial CAD model for use in rapid prototyping. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 34(7):689–701

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Tan P, Fang T, Xiao J, Zhao P, Quan L (2008) Single image tree modeling. ACM Transactions on Graphics 27(5):108–115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Wan S, Lu J, Zhang H (2010) The application of augmented reality technologies for factory layout. 2nd International Conference on Audio, Language and Image Processing, Shanghai, pp 873–876

    Google Scholar 

  33. Wiedenmaier S, Oehme O, Schmidt L, Luczak H (2003) Augmented reality for assembly process design and experimental evaluation. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction 16(3):497–514

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Yang L, Deuse J, Jiang P (2012) Multiple attribute decision making approach for an energy-efficient facility layout design. 45th CIRP Conference on Manufacturing System 3(1):149–154

    Google Scholar 

  35. Yang T, Hung CC (2007) Multiple attribute decision making methods for plant layout design problem. Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing 23(1):126–137

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  36. Yang T, Kuo C (2003) A hierarchical AHP/DEA methodology for the facilities layout design problem. European Journal of Operational Research 147(1):128–136

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  37. Yang T, Zhang D, Chen B, Li S (2008) Research on plant layout and production line running simulation in digital factory environment. IEEE Pacific-Asia Workshop on Computational Intelligence and Industrial Application, Wuhan, China, pp: 588–593

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. K. Ong.

Appendix The 3D positioning method

Appendix The 3D positioning method

In this method, PTAM [11] is used for real-time camera tracking and feature point registration. PTAM provides the functions that allow the users to use the chessboard to calibrate the camera so as to obtain the intrinsic camera parameters. In the tracking mode, new feature points are registered into the points map, and the world-to-camera transformation matrix is calculated and updated for every frame. By making use of this matrix, the positioning method is used to register the POIs (Section 3), which are mostly points with little visual features that can be tracked by PTAM.

As the world-to-camera transformation, matrix M is known for every frame, for a point P in the world CS and its projections p in image CS is given as follows:

$$ P={M}_{\mathrm{A}}m{p}_{\mathrm{A}}={M}_{\mathrm{B}}m{p}_{\mathrm{B}} $$
(10)

where p A and p B are the coordinates of P in the image CS from two different frames A and B, respectively. M A and M B are the world-to-camera transformation matrices for frames A and B, and m is the camera-to-image transformation matrix. To implement this method, the 3D coordinate of a point in the world CS can be calculated if its 2D coordinates in two different frames can be obtained. By using this method to position a POI, the users only need to select (via mouse click) the POI from two different frames, as shown in Fig. 15.

Fig. 15
figure 15

User-aided point positioning

This positioning process can be further simplified if the point to be positioned is on a known plane, e.g., the xy (or yz, zx) plane, where the users will only need to position the point in one frame. This has great value for modeling the objects that are placed on the floor.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jiang, S., Ong, S.K. & Nee, A.Y.C. An AR-based hybrid approach for facility layout planning and evaluation for existing shop floors. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 72, 457–473 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-014-5653-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-014-5653-6

Keywords

Navigation