Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

An innovative cost modelling system to support lean product and process development

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper presents a cost modelling system for lean product and process development to support proactive decision making and mistake elimination at the design stage. The foundations of the system are based upon three lean product and process development enablers, namely: Set-based concurrent engineering, knowledge-based engineering, and mistake proofing (Poka-yoke). The development commenced with an industrial field study of eleven leading European industries from the aerospace, automotive, telecommunication, medical and domestic appliance sectors. Based on the requirements of industrial collaborators, the developed system comprises six modules: value identification, manufacturing process/machines selection, material selection, geometric features specification, geometric features and manufacturability assessment, and manufacturing time and cost estimation. The work involved the development of a feature-based cost estimation method for the resistance spot welding process. The developed system was finally validated using an industrial case study. The developed system has the capability to provide estimates related to product cost and associated values concurrently, facilitate decision making, eliminate mistakes during the design stage, and incorporate ‘customer voice’ during a critical decision making stage.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Al-Ashaab A, Shehab E, Alam R, Sopelana A, Sorli M, Flores M, Taisch M, Stokic D, James-Moore M (2010) "The Conceptual LeanPPD Model", Proceedings of the 17th ISPE International Conference on Concurrent Engineering, 610 September. Warsaw University of Technology, Cracow

    Google Scholar 

  2. Aslanlar S (2006) The effect of nucleus size on mechanical properties in electrical resistance spot welding of sheets used in automotive industry. Mater Des 27(2):125–131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Benyounis K, Olabi A, Hashmi M (2008) Multi-response optimization of CO2 laser-welding process of austenitic stainless steel. Opt Laser Tech 40(1):76–87

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bouaziz Z, Younes JB, Zghal A (2006) Cost estimation system of dies manufacturing based on the complex machining features. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 28(3):262–271

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Brinke E (2002) Costing support and cost control in manufacturing. A cost estimation tool applied in the sheet metal domain. PhD Thesis, Vakgroep Ontwerpen, University of Twente

  6. Chan DSK (2003) Expert system for product manufacturability and cost evaluation. Mater Manuf Process 18(2):313–322

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Chan DSK, Lewis WP (2000) The integration of manufacturing and cost information into the engineering design process. Int J Prod Res 38(17):4413–4427

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Chayoukhi S, Bouaziz Z, Zghal A (2009) COSTWELD: a cost estimation system of welding based on the feature model. Adv Prod Eng Manag 4(4):263–274

    Google Scholar 

  9. Cicconi P, Germani M, Mandolini M (2010) How to support mechanical product cost estimation in the embodiment design phase, new world situation: new directions in concurrent engineering. Springer, London, pp 419–430

    Google Scholar 

  10. Curran R, Verhagen WJC, van der Laan TH, van Tooren M (2009) "KBE and manufacturing constraints management", Global Perspective for Competitive Enterprise, Economy and Ecology, pp 783–791

  11. Djassemi M (2008) "A computer-based economic analysis for manufacturing process selection", Proceedings of the 2008 IAJC-IJME International Conference, Nov. 2008, Nashville, Tennessee, US

  12. Er A, Dias R (2000) A rule-based expert system approach to process selection for cast components. Knowl-Based Syst 13(4):225–234

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Esawi AMK, Ashby MF (2003) Cost estimates to guide pre-selection of processes. Mater Des 24(8):605–616

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Feder DK (1993) Cost implications in the design of welded steels structures. Weld World 31(4)

  15. Feng S, Zhang Y (1999) Conceptual process planning—a definition and functional decomposition. Manuf Sci Eng, Proc 1999 Int Mech Eng Congres Expo 10(Citeseer):91–106

    Google Scholar 

  16. Jamaludin R (2008) A product-based non-conformance classification, Proceedings of the 9th Asia Pacific Industrial Engineering & Management Systems Conference (APIEMS 2008), 3rd–5th Dec, Nusa Dua, Bali, Indonesia, pp 2846–2854

  17. Kennedy M, Harmon K, Minnock E (2008) Ready, set, dominate: Implement Toyota’s set-based learning for developing products. Oakley

  18. Khan M, Al-Ashaab A, Doultsinou A, Shehab E, Ewers P, Sulowski R (2011) Set-based concurrent engineering process within the LeanPPD environment. Improv Complex Syst Today, Adv Concurr Eng. doi:10.1007/978-0-85729-799-0_51,pp.433-440

  19. Khan M, Al-Ashaab A, Shehab E, Haque B, Ewers P, Sorli M, Sopelana A (2011) Towards Lean Product and Process Development, Accepted for publication in the Lean PD special issue of International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing

  20. Klansek U, Kravanja S (2006) Cost estimation, optimization and competitiveness of different composite floor systems—part 1: self-manufacturing cost estimation of composite and steel structures. J Constr Steel Res 62(5):434–448

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Kremer R, Fabrizio T (2005) The lean primer-solutions for the job shop. MCS, Chelsea

    Google Scholar 

  22. Mascitelli R (2004) The lean design guidebook. Technology Perspectives, Northridge

    Google Scholar 

  23. Masmoudi F, Bouaziz Z, Hachicha W (2007) Computer-aided cost estimation of weld operations. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 33(3):298–307

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Mauchand M, Siadat A, Bernard A, Perry N (2008) Proposal for tool-based method of product cost estimation during conceptual design. J Eng Des 19(2):159–172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Mital A, Desai A, Subramanian A, Mital A (2008) Product development: a structured approach to consumer product development, design, and manufacture. Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  26. Morgan JM, Liker JK (2006) The Toyota product development system: integrating people, process, and technology. Productivity, New York

    Google Scholar 

  27. Niazi A, Dai JS, Balabani S, Seneviratne L (2006) Product cost estimation: technique classification and methodology review. J Manuf Sci Eng 128(2):563–575

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Ou-Yang C, Lin TS (1997) Developing an integrated framework for feature-based early manufacturing cost estimation. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 13(9):618–629

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Quintana G, Ciurana J (2011) Cost estimation support tool for vertical high speed machines based on product characteristics and productivity requirements. Int J Prod Econ 134:188–195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Ravisankar V, Balasubramanian V, Muralidharan C (2006) Selection of welding process to fabricate butt joints of high strength aluminium alloys using analytic hierarchic process. Mater Des 27(5):373–380

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Roy R (2003) Cost engineering: why, what and how? Decision Engineering Report Series. Cranfield University, UK

    Google Scholar 

  32. Schreve K (1997) Cost estimating welded assemblies produced in batches. University of Stellenbosch, South Africa

    Google Scholar 

  33. Shehab E, Abdalla H (2001) Manufacturing cost modelling for concurrent product development. Robot Comput Integr Manuf 17(4):341–353

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Shehab E, Abdalla H (2002) A design to cost system for innovative product development. Proc Inst Mech Eng, Part B: J Eng Manuf 216(7):999–1019

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Shehab E, Abdalla H (2002) An intelligent knowledge-based system for product cost modelling. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 19(1):49–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Skarka W (2007) Application of MOKA methodology in generative model creation using CATIA. Eng Appl Artif Intel 20(5):677–690

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Sobek DK, Liker JKWAC (1998) Another look at how Toyota integrates product development. Harv Bus Rev 76(4):36–49

    Google Scholar 

  38. Sobek DK, Ward AC, Liker JK (1999) Toyota’s principles of set-based concurrent engineering. Sloan Manage Rev 40(2):67–83

    Google Scholar 

  39. Stokes M (2001) Managing engineering knowledge: MOKA: methodology for knowledge based engineering applications. Professional Engineering, London

    Google Scholar 

  40. Tammineni SV, Rao AR, Scanlan JP, Reed PAS, Keane AJ (2009) A knowledge-based system for cost modelling of aircraft gas turbines. J Eng Des 20(3):289–305

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Ward AC (2007) Lean product and process development. Lean Enterprises Institute, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  42. Ward AC, Liker JK, Cristiano JJ, Sobek DK (1995) The second Toyota paradox: how delaying decisions can make better cars faster. Sloan Manage Rev 36:43–61

    Google Scholar 

  43. Xu J, Zhai T (2008) "The small-scale resistance spot welding of refractory alloy 50Mo-50Re thin sheet", JOM Journal of the Minerals. Met Mater Soc 60(7):80–83

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Ye J, Zhang B, Qi H (2009) Cost estimates to guide manufacturing of composite waved beam. Mater Des 30(3):452–458

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Essam Shehab.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wasim, A., Shehab, E., Abdalla, H. et al. An innovative cost modelling system to support lean product and process development. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 65, 165–181 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-012-4158-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-012-4158-4

Keywords

Navigation