Abstract
This work analyses the effect of the institutional design of public spending on technical efficiency. The model controls for technical efficiency using institutional variables for earmarked and autonomous revenues and assesses them using two stochastic frontier models. The main findings show that expenditures by Mexican municipalities, regardless of type, reduce the technical efficiency of local production. Results support the Brennan–Buchanan collusion hypothesis that decentralization generates an increase in government spending, but it does not translate to higher social welfare.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
For the sake of simplicity, municipalities, local governments, and jurisdictions are used flexibly.
The dataset analyzed during the current study is available from the corresponding author upon request.
Some municipalities did not exist in our base period 1993, so 13 new municipalities were collapsed with their origin jurisdictions. Mexico City delegations have another fiscal institutional design, so they were excluded of the analysis. Also, other municipalities were excluded due to the lack of information, all of them belong to the state of Oaxaca.
It follows a normal HDI specification, but changes weights with the public services indexes.
Statistic Moran I’s: P value 0.000 at alpha 0.05.
We split the country in four regions: border, north, center and south.
Results of the idiosyncratic error for Hadri model are different in comparison with the inefficiency error.
References
Adkins LC, Moomaw RL, Savvides A (2002) Institutions, freedom, and technical efficiency. South Econ J 69:92–108
Aguilar Gutiérrez G (2011) Eficiencia industrial en las regiones de México. EconoQuantum 7(2):93–113
Aigner D, Lovell CAK, Schmidt P (1977) Formulation and estimation of stochastic frontier production function models. J Econom 6:21–37
Álvarez Pinilla A, Arias Sampedro C, Orea Sánchez L (2003) Introducción al Análisis Empírico de la Producción. Universidad de Oviedo and Universidad de León, España
Arellanes Ramirez A (2011) Una solución a la paradoja de las aportaciones federales para los municipios (Ramo 33 Municipal). CIDE: Tesis de para obtener el grado de Maestro en Administración y Políticas Públicas
Aschauer DA (1989) Does public capital crowd out private capital? J Monet Econ 24:171–188
Bannister GJ, Stolp C (1995) Regional concentration and efficiency in Mexican manufacturing. Eur J Oper Res 80:672–690
Battese G, Coelli T (1995) A model for technical inefficiency effects in a stochastic frontier production function for panel data. Empir Econ 20:325–332
Becerril-Torres O, Álvarez-Ayuso I, del Moral-Barrera L (2010) Eficiencia técnica de las entidades federativas de México. Economía, Sociedad y Territorio 10:485–511
Belotti F, Ilardi G (2012) Consistent estimation of the “true” fixed-effects stochastic frontier model. CEIS Research Papers 231
Braun FG, Cullmann A (2011) Regional differences of production and efficiency of Mexican manufacturing: an application of nested and stochastic frontier panel models. J Dev Areas 45:291–311
Brennan G, Buchanan JM (1980) The power to tax: analytical foundation of a fiscal constitution. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Cabrero E (2001) La Experiencia Descentralizadora Reciente en México. Problemas y Dilemas. CIDE Working Papers División de Administración Pública 28
Cabrero E, Carrera A (2000) Fiscal decentralisation and institutional constraints. Paradoxes of the Mexican Case. CIDE Working Papers División de Administración Pública 85
Caudill SB, Ford JM (1993) Biases in frontier estimation due to heteroscedasticity. Econ Lett 41:17–20
Caudill SB, Ford JM, Gropper DM (1995) Frontier estimation and firm-specific inefficiency measures in the presence of heteroscedasticity. J Bus Econ Stat 13:105–111
Cejudo G, Gerhard R (2010) La Rendición de Cuentas de Transferencias Intergubernamentales. El Caso del FAIS. UNAM: Instituto de Investigaciones Jurídicas
Chávez JC, López Ornelas LF (2013) Un enfoque no paramétrico para la descomposición de la productividad del trabajo en la industria manufacturera regional. Working Papers, Banco de México 2013-08
Cobb C, Douglas P (1928) A theory of production. Am Econ Rev 18:139–172
Duran-Fernández R, Santos G (2014) Road Infrastructure spillovers on the manufacturing sector in Mexico. Res Transp Econ 46:17–29
Farrel MJ (1957) The measurement of productive efficiency. J R Stat Soc Ser A 120:253–290
Faya Viesca J (2004) El Federalismo Mexicano. Régimen Constitucional del Sistema Federal. Porrúa, México
García del Castillo R (1995) Análisis del municipio mexicano: diagnóstico y perspectivas. Partes I y II. CIDE Working Papers División de Administración Pública 32
Greene W (2005) Reconsidering heterogeneity in panel data estimators of the stochastic frontier model. J Econom 126:269–303
Guizar Jiménez J (2004) Ramo 33: Fondo de Aportaciones Federales (Aspectos Normativos, Operativos y Financieros del Gasto Federalizado). Instituto para el Desarrollo Técnico de las Haciendas Públicas
Hadri K (1999) Estimation of a doubly heteroscedastic stochastic frontier cost function. J Bus Econ Stat 17:359–363
Hernández R (2008) El centro dividido: la nueva autonomía de los gobernadores. El Colegio de México
Hernández Trillo F (2016) Poverty alleviation in federal systems: the case of México. World Dev 87:204–214
Hernández Trillo F, Jarillo Rabling B (2007) Transferencias condicionadas federales en países en desarrollo: el caso del FISM en México. Estudios Económicos 22:143–184
INEGI (2008) Censos Económicos 1994, 1999, 2004 y 2009 Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Geografía. http://www.inegi.org.mx/est/contenidos/Proyectos/ce/Default.aspx. Accessed 26 June 2017
INEGI (2009) Censos de Población y Vivienda 1990, 1995, 2000, 2005, 2010 Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Geografía. http://www.inegi.org.mx/est/contenidos/proyectos/ccpv/default.aspx. Accessed 16 June 2017
INEGI (2015) Sistema Estatal y Municipal de Bases de Datos. Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Geografía. http://sc.inegi.org.mx/cobdem/contenido.jsp?rf=false&solicitud. Accessed 1 May 2017
Krugman P, Lizas-Elizondo R (1996) Trade policy and the Third World metropolis. J Dev Econ 49:137–150
Neyapti Bilin, Bulut-Cevik ZeynepBurcu (2014) Fiscal efficiency, redistribution and welfare. Econ Model 41:375–382
Oates WE (1972) Fiscal Federalism. Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, NY
Peña Ahumada JA (2011) Manual de Transferencias Federales para Municipios. Secretaría de Gobernación, Instituto Nacional para el Federalismo y el Desarrollo Municipal
Pitt MM, Lee LF (1981) The measurement and sources of technical inefficiency in the Indonesian weaving industry. J Dev Econ 9:43–64
Reifschneider D, Stevenson R (1991) Systematic departures from the frontier: a framework for the analysis of firm inefficiency. Int Econ Rev 32:715–723
SCT (2015) Traza tu Ruta. Secretaría de Comunicaciones y Transportes. http://aplicaciones4.sct.gob.mx/sibuac_internet/ControllerUI?action=cmdEscogeRuta. Accessed 15 July 2017
Shadbegian R (1999) Fiscal federalism, collusion, and government size: evidence from the states. Public Finance Rev 27:262–281
Timmons J, Broid D (2013) The political economy of municipal transfers: evidence from Mexico. Publius J Fed 43:551–579
Wallis JJ, Oates W (1988) Does economic sclerosis set in with age? An empirical study of the Olson hypothesis. Kyklos 41:397–417
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank Antonio Álvarez Pinilla and Fausto Hernández Trillo for their valuable comments.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
Hector M. Nuñez declares that he has no conflict of interest. Alejandro U. Becerra-Ornelas declares that he has no conflict of interest.
Human and animal rights
This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Becerra-Ornelas, A.U., Nuñez, H.M. The technical efficiency of local economies in Mexico: a failure of decentralized public spending. Ann Reg Sci 62, 247–264 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00168-018-0894-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00168-018-0894-1